Still no effort to making this run on Intel CPUs huh ? Nice.
Intel CPUs get about the same speed mining per core compared to AMD CPUs if you compile them correctly |
|
|
|
Solidcoin2... Hundreds of thousands of coins mined in the first 24 hours with most of them going to bcx's botnet. Why 51% attack when the difficulty is stuck so low?  |
|
|
|
If you guys could be any more bitter we'd be making lemon juice in here. Until the algorithm is released what is the point in making judgements on things you know nothing about? Theorize what it could be sure but the implications are a bit ridiculous and designed to spread disinformation.
For the amount of time some of you spend thinking about what SC2 could be doing you could be looking at the block chain and figuring it out. But that would require actual work eh?
Here is a theory, once the SC2 algorithm is out people will start cloning it into their chains, just like other parts of SolidCoin. There is a reason for this, we are leading the way.
Or we could be disassembling your source code. Using 64-bit registers...? |
|
|
|
|
Solo mining still works fine
The network hash rate is still very high even with the SC2 launch -- the mass of CPUs fighting over SC2 blocks is coming from somewhere other than tenebrix miners
|
|
|
|
|
well, it's good to see sc2's launch is going as smoothly as sc1.
If that's the way 51% attacks are prevented, it's really half assed if not uncreative.
|
|
|
|
|
i think bcx is manipulating the block chain by progressively increasing hash rate over the network in increments, and is now mining the majority of the blocks... Maybe it has something to do with circumventing ch's magical new 51% protection algorithm.
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one day until we see another difficulty increase
|
|
|
|
|
Retarded, this is worse than solidcoin. It looks like the binaries aren't even up any more.
|
|
|
|
bump... has anyone tried these binaries? |
|
|
|
|
It looks like SC2 is pulling miners away from Tenebrix.. but not very many. We were at 4.30 gh/s yesterday, now we are at 3.60gh/s.
edit: nevermind, allchains.info is totally broken and none of the values on it make any sense. I have no idea what the real TBX hash rate is right now.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not mining when I can't see the source code, sorry.
If you look at commercial programs, non-open source code tends to be the most vulnerable in terms of security. I just don't trust this.
|
|
|
|
I wonder if someone could compile this package for Windows i5 & i7 users ?
If you want to do a port, pick up a copy of cygwin or Visual Studio and do it yourself. It shouldn't be impossible, it's only a command line program. |
|
|
|
|
There is something wrong with your build... when one of my builds was messed up I was able to mine the genesis block and was mining a new block every 10 minutes at 3kh/s. But of course, no other nodes in the network would confirm this.
|
|
|
|
|
Hash rate is crazy right now, we're hitting 4.2gh/s or the equivalent of about 350 AMD quad core processors.
Percent increase for difficulty is correspondingly going up about 10% a day, although it isn't exploded as rapidly as it was two days ago.
|
|
|
|
AMD users: Try turning up the CPU-NB (CPU NorthBridge) speed, that's your L3 cache+memory controller. It may help.
I get about a 2% gain from having my NB at 2600mhz |
|
|
|
So, on a 2600K with 8 threads I should get what !?
~3.8 kh/s per core |
|
|
|
|
You guys are thinking way harder than I am.
BTC just underwent a small crash, we should see a resurgence in about 4-12 hours given the past 4 weeks as an indicator.
|
|
|
|
Not sure what's going on there (aka "can't reproduce issue").
My only guess is it's possibly related to removing the sha256 algos, but... that was even before I started doing the compilers job for scrypt.
Not sure what to do other than general hints along the lines of "start with a clean tree, CFLAGS="-whatever" ./configure; make"
Hrrrm... I guess you could revert the sha256 removal or drop the new scrypt.c into Tenebrix-miner and see if that also causes the same issues.
There is no scrypt.c in your latest released source of 1.0.2... I'm looking at the tar.gz and it's missing it. What release? The releases are done by Lolcust, I only keep a git at https://github.com/ArtForz/cpuminerOh, I guess it's not a release then... you can get a compressed file of all the contents by clicking on "Downloads" link on the top right of your page ( https://github.com/ArtForz/cpuminer ), but for some strange reason the latest one is missing files. Might be a github bug. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
