I think this explains it pretty well.. Just a Trojan here.. I'll close the pool |
|
|
|
|
But not one was added to the OP... weird...
|
|
|
|
cool - would you please enlight me how you did this ? I can't get the daemon accept any blocks from the pool ?! Thanks Cookie I don't know what you use, but it works fine with python stratum |
|
|
|
|
Looks (almost) like a virus/trojan - the source link is empty
|
|
|
|
This coin/algo is property of Nvidia miner atm  could huge improvement be done on optimizing AMD miner i know not yep, and not even a tip for my work ^Main reason why normal amd miner is not in public. I wonder why coders for nvidia still giveaway cookies for free. well it's not that profitable, if it skyrocket to something high donation should be considered Work has been done already, even if it is not "highly profitable" you should donate. I stopped giving away anything for free for exactly those reasons. |
|
|
|
each income is 128 coins, seems like a guy mining in a private pool……
Suprnova has 1.3 GH and Zpool has 900 MH. That's pretty much all of it.. there is no private pool so ,how to explain that guy's income? like get one block every time, but xre doesn't support solo mining the pool eat coins? i'm not sure. i believe the mining pools may be susceptible to pool hopping, and it's being taken advantage of. i was mining on maxminers and noticed a huge miner would start mining when the luck was bad, then leave after finding a block to mine on zpool you would go to zpool.ca. either autoexchange to btc or put your xre address to use it as a regular pool supernova right now is reporting a constant 15% loss in the "blocks" under statistic, that is the amount that you lose from the full reward that should be your the percentage should be under 100% Actually its just luck over time .. sometimes it's good, sometimes it is not so good, just like in real life .. check the other pools (which offer those statistics)  |
|
|
|
Was pool hopping looking the best pool. A few times on suprnova I would get a block on the sgminer : Found Block for pool 0 and it gets accepted but didn't show up on pool stats in the block found. Weird.
You should have that over all pools and coins, false positives, in the coins log you then see "hash doesn't match nBits" or something similar. |
|
|
|
Hi, We've added SIB to the miners multipool: www.zpool.caCheers Looks like someone is studying my mainpage pretty well |
|
|
|
Nice seeing you here, it's great seeing a legend in our midst. If you ever plan on making an optimized miner or bin I'm sure its going to rock!!!!  If you are going to or when you get to making one please include optimizations for pitcairn cards, they are a dying breed. That's all a humble scrubble is asking for  . You can make it FLY!!!! also for a strange reason i'm getting less than the correct reward for this coin, on all pool, i can't fucking be that unlucky Maybe you are confusing x11 calculations with x11evo calc's... its much slower |
|
|
|
@ocminer the suprnova dashboard is not displaying the workers active & their hash rate from yesterday....
I know, I am on it but it will take some time. In the meanwhile you can check all that on the account -> my workers page Some body says suprnova pool is always stealling mining hashpower ,is that true? Just compare mining results from Suprnova and the other pools and you will notice earnings over time are the same. |
|
|
|
@ocminer the suprnova dashboard is not displaying the workers active & their hash rate from yesterday....
I know, I am on it but it will take some time. In the meanwhile you can check all that on the account -> my workers page |
|
|
|
...
With all due respect (you have very extended knowledge and skills) the "pool" you got set up is a workaround the decentralized nature of spreadcoin. YES - it is a "pool" mining, and NO - there is no "breach" in spreadcoin's design, which is meant to prevent/limit whatever pool mining. Let's not do semantics - you proved there is a workaround for pool-like mining. You might say: "It's not pool-like, it is pool mining" and technically you will be right, but personally signing each miner's miner is an overkill just to prove a point. Also you eliminate miner's choice of software, and while many people might be ok with that, I (and many others I'm sure) will not use this, just because I'm left with no choice. I already regret for this reply, since all "pool related" replies just have to be left without response. I encourage georgem to put a link in the OP with detailed SPR pool discussion. Just one sentence: After all - it doesn't matter |
|
|
|
Actually there are / were pools.. But they never added them to the OP and most miners (but their own farms / own miners) lost interest and stopped mining. I have all the sources for the pools and if anyone has interest I can publish that all on github, it's actually pretty easy to start a pool as the only thing which is "the problem" here is that you have to sign the block with the privkey - all you need is a signed/encrypted miner and a encrypted connection to the pool (https) and you're all good. Actually https / encrypted connections are never a bad idea for any kind of data communication, even normal mining could and maybe should be done over encrypted connections. That "decentralization" concept is funny here, i've monitored the network over a certain time while I was implementing the pool software and whilst every blocks is mined to a different address (because in solo-mining / to-your-wallet-mining your wallet generates a new address for every found block) they are broadcast / relayed by a few IP's which indirectly implies that there only 3-4 "bigger" farms mining this. Of course when you look at the block explorer you say "hey wow, every block is solved by a different miner with it's own address" - which is totally wrong |
|
|
|
supernova pool is not paying right, payment are lower than expected, fix it please
Its paying the amount of coins of the Blocks that were found in a proportional Mode to the miners. There is nothing wrong. Compare with the other pools i have 35MH there and i'm getting only 2400 coins per day, estimate say 4300, and math say also 4300, math is done with blocktime*blockreward/(nethash/myhash) Then math is wrong - try other pool and Report back, pool luck is also in normal Range. i tried, and i'm getting more, 180 per hour, which is in fact 4300 per day, how it should be, is your pool broken or what? You cannot compare one hour vs 24h. Luck is a big Factor here. Compare hour against hour or 24h vs 24h. The pool is paying out what is coming in minus 1% fee but your pool is the biggest, should get almost all block, thus bad luck should be null You can check everything yourself, Stats are fully open |
|
|
|
supernova pool is not paying right, payment are lower than expected, fix it please
Its paying the amount of coins of the Blocks that were found in a proportional Mode to the miners. There is nothing wrong. Compare with the other pools i have 35MH there and i'm getting only 2400 coins per day, estimate say 4300, and math say also 4300, math is done with blocktime*blockreward/(nethash/myhash) Then math is wrong - try other pool and Report back, pool luck is also in normal Range. i tried, and i'm getting more, 180 per hour, which is in fact 4300 per day, how it should be, is your pool broken or what? You cannot compare one hour vs 24h. Luck is a big Factor here. Compare hour against hour or 24h vs 24h. The pool is paying out what is coming in minus 1% fee |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
