It's unfair to compare BTC-BOND with TU.SILVER. BTC-BOND is personal debt - it won't go up or down, whereas TU.SILVER is not.

I won't call it a spam list of random casinos. There's plenty of newly created ones, but there are also quite a few established casinos.

No, but you'll have people literally selling coins that were made earlier. Take a look at BTCTalkAccounts and what he is doing.

"Selling Terracoin! Qualifies for a subforum so you can easily pump'n'dump!"

Certain criteria cannot be agreed. You need to understand that whatever criteria there is, it will encourage certain kinds of behavior.

Age?
 Simple, people will rush to announce as much coins as earliest they can, leading to buggy and crashing code.

Hashpower?
 Coin will be focused on early mining to push it over whatever criteria was set. Early adopter's heaven.

Oh and this is forgetting coins without mining won't ever get a board? What about pure PoS coins? What about ripple? what about proof of movement coins?

Cool. Issue more G.MPOE please (backed by real shares of course )

It's not an endorsement of a specific alt coin. It would be like if in the securities section, there was an ASICMINER subboard.

It is actually, because it's an official endorsement unless there are 400 subforums added for any coin.

In a community this size, especially a religious one with people being fanboys of their favorite cryptocoin they were early adopters of, you will piss people off if you set a criteria. The better solution would be to not set it in the first place, and again, this is bitcointalk, not cryptocurrencytalk.

people have faith in friedcat.

Developing or developed a really cool Bitcoin service or site?

Inputs.io is an up coming off blockchain payments service. We'd love to help you and make it win - win.

Contact us for more details, and give a blurb about what you've done or are doing.

Blockchain.info,

You should integrate a better Bitcoin message signing format! The current one is clunky, requires copy and pasting multiple pieces of information, and is hard to find out the start / end:


It's quite simple. the 1MDeZ... is the address, the IIW/rq is the message signature of everything between "-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----" and "-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----" after trimming whitespace or newline at the start and the end.



Oops, sorry for threadjacking, but Inputs.io does expose this through our API. Stay tuned

An announcement about an announcement. Hmm

I hope bitfountain is having alerts ringing..

You are going to have a cut off line through. Why should some arbitrary criteria decide what's "real" and what is "scam"?

Best solution would be.. bitcointalk.

If you are interested, I'm happy to do a code review for you and point out any bugs / security issues / etc for a link to CoinLenders.com

We'd have to do that through SMS, and that would be a bit of a pain to set up.

You could save this http://gauth.apps.gbraad.nl/ locally to your computer through.

ShitCoinv2 has changed more than Litecoin. Remember, Litecoin was a 5 line or so change from Tenebrix or whatever.

I consider PPCoin to be a "real" coin, so does Namecoin, whatever, but what if they're excluded?

coinchat.org - 50 mBTC (slightly over $5) per active user that stays after a month

If you run a popular faucet (at least 1000 visits / day), send me a PM! If you integrate Inputs.io into your faucet, we'll contribute 1 BTC to your faucet pool.

Benefits of Inputs.io
1. No need to run bitcoind
2. Instant payments
3. No need to bunch up transactions
4. No transaction fees

Current min TX limit is 0.1 mBTC (or 0.0001 BTC).

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Signed by Inputs.io on 25/06/13 07:50:30

This is a signed message generated by Inputs.io

-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1MDeZptpVfaNemwoSpeeph2P1UgHuQM62m
IIW/rq62ip/MtTSZbCZSdoQSkJKeWPyp6yJ1MxQFhzfmMlnSib1QUsYt8FOMYw9zzr4BnLfPM/0bIlPVDiKVE6U=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Done.

You now need to enter the CAPTCHA *or* 2FA.