Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 07:28:35 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 [154] 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 ... 762 »
3061  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 06, 2019, 04:31:11 PM
I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.

Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU  "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y  I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit

I mean what else do you need bud? There is double shadows all over the shit and everything.

Bah.

Flight transcript of Apollo 11.

https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/mission_trans/apollo11.htm

Online virtual copy of the Apollo Flight Computer.

You can program it yourself and see what it did. It was really the first personal computer. The first PC.

http://svtsim.com/moonjs/agc.html

Bah Bah black sheep have you any wool?

nice more forgery, sick movie script.

Btw why is all that stuff classified for years before it is released

When you can run the Apollo Flight computer, or download the code, or buy a replica on Ebay, it's laughable you would suggest it was fake.

We can trace the development of computers prior to, and after the AFC. Parts of the OEM items are still available for examination.

therefore, we had a flight computer capable of the operations of the Apollo program. The Apollo astronauts used a sextant and a telescope to figure orbits. The design of each exists and that they worked and will work is a fact.

Hence, we do know how to get to the Moon and get back.
3062  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 06, 2019, 05:45:29 AM
I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.

Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU  "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y  I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit

I mean what else do you need bud? There is double shadows all over the shit and everything.

Bah.

Flight transcript of Apollo 11.

https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/mission_trans/apollo11.htm

Online virtual copy of the Apollo Flight Computer.

You can program it yourself and see what it did. It was really the first personal computer. The first PC.

http://svtsim.com/moonjs/agc.html



3063  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The real Satoshi? on: June 06, 2019, 05:40:34 AM

I'm not impressed.

The level of rationality of the speculation is low.

For example.

"The email was traced to an IP in the Netherlands, where XYZ once lived."

To the writer, this is a DOT CONNECTED.

To me, it just means someone used a VPN that randomly came up Holland.
3064  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Where to go? on: June 06, 2019, 04:49:54 AM

From personal experience, before you move, i would suggest you search within yourself, and make sure that you are not trying to move away from yourself. It's impossible to run away from yourself, of course...

In my experience, a change in one's personal life can make a big difference in the way one perceives the surrounding environment and people...

Imho, another thing that makes a difference is the urbanization....

Excellant comment!

Look at the difference between Rome and the countryside, Los Angeles and Montana, London and the Irish countryside.
3065  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Youtube starts campaign of mass censorship and demonetization on: June 06, 2019, 04:43:50 AM
I am sure a lot of you have heard about this, but since the legacy media can't compete with the alternative media, they have opted to attack their ability to not only present their views, but earn a living from doing so. People are so hungry for truth and so tired of the old dried out turd that is the MSM, they literally can not compete with a guy in his garage on his web cam. This is only going to get worse, not just in the digital sphere, but in meat space.

They are crafting a Communist style system of political correctness, and anyone who doesn't comply will be unpersoned and cut off from using the banking system, from transportation, from internet platforms, and even the ability to earn a living. Prepare yourselves, because when you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make violent revolution inevitable.

And who owns Youtube?

Googlag

And since there's a lag between slow government operations and corrections and the speed at which GoogleYoutube can make changes, they are starting now on their plan to influence the 2020 elections.

They will go all out to attempt to get their candidate to win, figuring that they can't be stopped in the time frame in which the election happens.

Assuming they succeed, they'll put into effect the plan they intended for 2016.

That's what we got.
3066  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 06, 2019, 04:39:59 AM
I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.

Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened.
3067  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Youtube starts campaign of mass censorship and demonetization on: June 06, 2019, 04:37:07 AM
I am sure a lot of you have heard about this, but since the legacy media can't compete with the alternative media, they have opted to attack their ability to not only present their views, but earn a living from doing so. People are so hungry for truth and so tired of the old dried out turd that is the MSM, they literally can not compete with a guy in his garage on his web cam. This is only going to get worse, not just in the digital sphere, but in meat space.

They are crafting a Communist style system of political correctness, and anyone who doesn't comply will be unpersoned and cut off from using the banking system, from transportation, from internet platforms, and even the ability to earn a living. Prepare yourselves, because when you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make violent revolution inevitable.

And who owns Youtube?
3068  Economy / Economics / Re: TIME > FIAT / BITCOIN > GOLD on: June 06, 2019, 04:04:16 AM
.... why is gold worse than fiat/btc?

Because it's not easily divisible, and that limits trade severely.

Because fraud is easy, and it's massive.

Because it's a physical asset, and that's not so easy to move around, through airports and borders.

Because it's dangerous, robbers like to rob.
3069  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is Blockchain the solution to the whole abortion drama? on: June 06, 2019, 04:00:46 AM
Bahahaha
I love this guy’s sense of humor
Of course it’s all tongue in cheek, but where is the line drawn? I thought the abortion question was solved by the SCOTUS a long time ago?

The author definitely doesn’t like Trump and I dont know about his claim to being a Republican, but he did make me laugh. The stupidity going on right now is absolutely nuts.

Blockchain and smart contracts could definitely be used in a LOT more areas of our lives but as this satire shows, it could easily go too far.

Well, what should be regulated or decided on a federal vs state level?

Would you like states to ignore federal law on weed, and do their own thing?

Legalize it?

If so why can't states do the same thing with abortion?

Where is the consistent rule here?

3070  Other / Politics & Society / Re: US visa application now requires submission of social media information on: June 06, 2019, 03:28:15 AM
Seems like about 10 years ago that Great Britain criminalized having encrypted information and not providing the key to authorities when asked.  I have not heard much about it since, though.  Probably it was hopeless since if most people are like me, they've long ago forgotten how to decrypt stuff which I long ago encrypted and there probably are a ton of files on my various storage devices like this.

Probably the biggest reason to not bother people to much about encrypted blobs is because more people might learn the word 'steganography'  Not 'stenography' which the spell checkers usually suggest.  The word sends chills down the average totalitarian control freak's spine and turns their skin several shades lighter.

It's going to be a headache if you insist you can't remember the password for that old rar file in your laptop, so yeah, I think it's problematic.

As for steganography, I think those cat images I've seen in an article before counts. One of the last thing governments want citizens to know how to make.
Stegano...

Does that have anything to do with Sargent Stedenko?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9cIPFtmjIQ

3071  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 06, 2019, 03:20:04 AM
The "photographs" NASA provides shows they landed a tinfoil wrapped cardboard box with a facade of tar paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts on a Los Vegas movie set.....

And eclipses are ...
3072  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Republican and Democratic senators seek to block Trump Saudi arms sales on: June 06, 2019, 03:12:14 AM
i don't understand why they want to block this plan.
It seems a very nice deal, 8 billion is a huge amount of money and it will help a lot the American economics. On the other side, they establish their alliance with Saudi Arabia.

No doubt the alliance with Saudi Arabia is central to America's position in the Middle East. The problem is we know who the Saudis are using those weapons on. Israel draws flak when they retaliate when they get bombed but Saudi Arabia killing civilians in Yemen, you don't hear complaints that much.

i don't understand why they want to block this plan....

Because it's a Trump Deal.

Isn't there already several attempts in the past to block arms sale to KSA, especially after they attacked Yemen?
Okay, it's opposed because it's a Trump Deal, and there is a shred of logic for the oppositional stand.

I'm not opposed to the US being aligned with SA and Israel, by the way. Not saying these countries and their leaders are perfect by any means.
3073  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Republican and Democratic senators seek to block Trump Saudi arms sales on: June 05, 2019, 04:20:39 PM
i don't understand why they want to block this plan....

Because it's a Trump Deal.
3074  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is Blockchain the solution to the whole abortion drama? on: June 05, 2019, 04:19:18 PM
HAHAHAHA. That has to be the funniest post ever written. Now seriously though... GET YOUR HANDS OFF WOMEN'S RIGHTS REPUBLICAN MEN.

Hey, fuck off. Now righteously fear the republican men who operate the blockchain, because they are the sole decision makers concerning the blockchain record of who fucked who. And with their control of the fucking data, you are fucked.
3075  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 05, 2019, 04:17:11 PM
Now I'm a bit confused.
What is considered conspiracy theory on this case, that men landed on moon or that men didn't land on moon? Cheesy

1. Have people believe the Moon is a giant heavy ball in the sky to support the false Copernican model of the universe.

2. Manufacture evidence of men landing on the Moon.

3. Profit.

Conspiracy theory is a term coin by the CIA to label anybody who is critical or might bring light to their clandestine and often illegal or immoral activities.




Aw come on!

You know as well as I that we live on a Flat Moon, and the big mirror in the sky just reflects it and that's why we see the Moon up there.

Enough of this nonsense about living on a Flat Earth. If we did then we'd see the Earth on that big sky mirror and we don't!

And that proves it! There is No Flat Earth!
3076  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Make Bitcoin Great Again on: June 05, 2019, 02:31:29 PM
Seeing how Trump is trying to squeeze the Chinese into a deal and talking about how much they have taken away from the U.S... someone should mention to him that the U.S used to be the home of crypto, and that because of overzealous regulation and heavy taxation, Bitcoin headquarters is being moved to China. The Bitcoin Company is now worth $150 Billion and it's  all gonna go to China unless he signs an executive order making bitcoin legal tender in the U.S.

The Bitcoin network has no nation, yet. It will not be U.S. or China even though you are joking.
Bitcoin can become a nation tho and I am sure the people in that society will use bitcoin to trade not yuan or usd.

I don`t know how they will feel about china owning 81% of the hashrate in that country though.

Honesty what they should do is split up bitcoin in between all of the nations and give them equal hashing rate per population, sure china still has more, they have more people they kind of need it, but instead of 81% of the hashing power being in China it would be 31% or something.

But have some global rule in play where like you can`t have more then 2 kids as a couple unless you want to give up your BIP(welfare).

Give everyone 1 kid coin, they get taxed or have to buy more kid coins or something if they use it.

better yet give everyone equal hashing power www.bitswift.cash and the populous creates the coin. So instead of working for another mans money supply and them creating it out of thin air, everyone does and it is backed by time/duration.

I have only one question.

Who is the OmniPrescent Powerful Thing that executes these actions?
3077  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 05, 2019, 02:20:28 PM
The Moon landing hoax is a communist (atheist) conspiracy. The Moon is not a physical object, prove me wrong!

You are doing a superb job of that, I would certainly not want to interrupt.
3078  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is Blockchain the solution to the whole abortion drama? on: June 05, 2019, 02:15:58 PM
No, this is a ridiculous suggestion. The author of the article is an extremist trying to scare people into voting a certain way (for pro-abortion politicians).

It isn’t possible to enforce the authenticity of information provided and someone could claim to have a period in order to get around laws.



If you haven't noticed, there is a periodic thread started here as follows:

Is Blockchain the solution to ...(Random left wing shit)

This is followed by two or three sock puppet posts.

3079  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 05, 2019, 03:13:46 AM
.....
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.

Except of course for NOBATMAN.

3080  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Climate change: Scientists test radical ways to fix Earth's climate on: June 04, 2019, 10:04:23 PM
People always say go solar, but they do not realize how much carbon they make when they are making the solar panels, probably even more than if we just used the fossil fuels.

We should just be running on hydrogen cars also (this could keep sea level in check) although in the future if we use to much water it may fuck up out orbit.
There is enough thermal energy on our planet to sustain every city a billion times over, clean thermal energy that is being created by nature.

also, if we start burning up hydrogen from the oxygen it only takes 4% of  oxygen to burn all the hydrogen, so you are left with oxygen in the atmosphere, perhaps we can use that on mars.

We won't be changing the Earth's orbit with anything we do.

Nobody has really demonstrated fuel cells to be cost effective or practical.

I think Lzar has
If they stopped getting killed they could to, it cost effective trust me, take a car battery and electrify the water inside of a tub, light that shit it is more explosive than fossil fuels and safer because you do not create more than you burn so no bombs can be created, even safer in a car crash.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjeM2IBhtlc
I don`t know if this is troll of not, but I know you can run a lawnmower on hydrogen I did it was I was 12.

Practical, low cost automotive fuel cell power does not exist.

Storage of compressed hydrogen is a problem.

Gasoline really has a lot of advantages.
Pages: « 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 [154] 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 ... 762 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!