If anyone else sells merit, I assume a member like Vod or Lauda (or anyone else on DT) will happily red them if they find all accounts involved as negging a throwaway doesn't really do much.
Assume you are saying giving red trust to the guy SparkyU was not any injustice from my side.
|
|
|
Listen up good mdayonliner.
First of all, you are not the staff, you are not Satoshi or anyone who started this forum. You're just some guy wasting time on a power trip obsessing about some trivial new rules that joined the forum a few months ago. I've been here for years involved in crypto, you are in no place to judge me or my intentions. You really should be focusing on something more important than this with your life. I don't really have to explain myself to you, but I will anyways to induldge anyone that is listening and might think this is something important, which it's not.
Again, I didn't even want these merits to begin with. If they never existed and the forum never gave them to me that would've been just fine, I couldn't care less. Because of this whole thing they're way more trouble that they're worth with everyone bitching and moaning. "here have some free stuff but you can only use it in a certain way or you're in trouble!" What joke, you can keep it then. It was just something free that fell out of the sky like an airdrop that I got rid of, I don't want them and have none left now. Even if I didn't have a high rank I would still be here discussing crypto and I would be involved in crypto. This forum is here to discuss ideas and communicate with each other. All the ranks and merits and blah blah is a bunch of superfluous nonsense, you're getting way too caught up on that. You don't have these kinds of ranking systems on other communication platforms like telegram for example because they don't matter, the words and messages matter.
Yeah I noticed people using merits, but again I don't care so I didn't pay all that much attention. I still didn't look into the rules deeply after that because it was a waste of my time. It's some meaningless self validation junk such as likes on facebook or thumbs up on reddit, who gives a shit. I did multiple trades because that's how he wanted it done, again I didn't think about it too much. That's all the explanation that is necessary, nit picking every minute detail is some ocd level of obsession.
I stand by what I said in that PM I sent you, negging me is completely uncalled for. I don't have any more merit left and I won't be using it again if I do get some more. From what I see the system is heavily flawed and not worth participating in if it results in things like this that are wasting even more of my time.
So this is how you are trying to play with me now? The fear game You know it's an old trick. You listen up moron, Do you think me being in the forum a few months ago and you being here for years make a difference. Really!!! What have you done for this forum all these years accept crying for signature campaigns to earn those shit useless coins most of the time? I would still be here discussing crypto LOL I see there are a lot of discussions about crypto on your last 20 posts This forum is here to discuss ideas I see ideas from your last 20 posts again, lots of ideas, I am overloaded with ideas after reading all these posts. Dude, listen gentlemanship advice... You made the mistake. I did multiple trades because that's how he wanted it done, again I didn't think about it too much. Now, accept it that you got. Nothing personal here and I have nothing to prove you as well.
|
|
|
Hi All !!!! I have very big problem. I do not have only 5 merit to get Member. I create good topics. Answered the question of participants. But no one sends me a merit
Tell me how i can earn Merit without buying it?
If you buy then eventually you will be exposed here and you with the guy will sell merit both with get red trust tag. It's called Bitcoin Talk.
- So I already got the reason to tag them with red trust. Sweet Edit: Already TAGGED
|
|
|
Asking for merit receiving negative feedbackGiving merits to alt accounts receives negative feedback if discoveredWhat about on selling merits? It only says: disallowed but no clue about the penalty. Any suggestions or update? From common sense I am considering the penalty provably will be is receiving negative feedback. But I am not yet someone here to decide/assume, it will be an insult to all these people who are here from years with deep understanding of possible issues. I have a thread where I am policing merit farmers/abusers and with evidence I am leaving them red trust following the forum rules. I need to be fair on my judgement. One of them accepted that he/she sold merits. Although I left them a red trust but I think according to the rules I am wrong. Should I remove the red trust knowing the person sold the merits? Thanks
|
|
|
My response is... 1. I didn't know anything I was doing was against any rules, I thought your merits were your own and you could do whatever you wanted with them. If that isn't the case then I have to plead ignorance and I sincerely wasn't aware of it. I guess I have to look over the merit rules more in depth since everyone seems to be throwing a hissy fit. I had other concerns at the time when merits were introduced and didn't really read much up on it.
2. I was contacted asking if someone could trade for my merits. I said sure, why not. Again I didn't have much interest in them so I got rid of them as my understanding was you're going to lose them at some point anyways. Use them or lose them. I've been on other forums with similar point systems where you could trade them without issue.
People are acting like it's some malicious plot, lol. It's not that serious to me, I didn't honestly give it another thought until one of those guys sent me a message there was a thread about it. Also OP should've messaged me too if it was such an issue.
Like you mentioned The Pharmacist, there are a lot more serious things going on in the forum that people should be fighting against first.
Thank you for your response... Ok I believed your story of ignorance and unawareness on the first one. Let me highlight something that you said... 2. I was contacted asking if someone could trade for my merits. I said sure, why not. And this person clearly is BarkingHawk. The BarkingHawk has proven guilty PERIOD Merit bought on the table on January 25, 2018 and the first time one was really from your ignorance since your sent it on January 26, 2018, 05:51:53 AM. It clearly proves that it was from ignorance and unawareness. I'm ok with this because this is an innocent mistake. Question is now... Since then to before sending the 2nd time (50 merits) on March 04, 2018, 01:31:31 AM, do you really want me to believe your story? From January 26, 2018, 11:57:18 AM to before sending the 50 merits ( March 04, 2018, 01:31:31 AM ), you made 102 - 32 = 70 (!) posts and exactly 36 days, 19 hours, 39 minutes and 38 seconds gone and you are saying you did not have much interest in them and your understanding was you're going to lose them at some point so you decided to trade them? Being actively posting on the forum almost everyday you never came across with all these merit/smerit debates, conversations? Your ground is too weak to believe. Truth is you saw money on the merits so you held them and may be still holding them hoping to trade these with some money. I think I still have my ground to keep the red trust. You are welcome to bring your facts to get rid of the red trust. OP should've messaged me too if it was such an issue - Just imaging if I have to message all these users personally asking the causes then I would not be able to do others stuffs. Take it easy. Like you mentioned The Pharmacist, there are a lot more serious things going on in the forum that people should be fighting against first. - I'm sure The Pharmacist did not mean to ignore merit abusing.
|
|
|
This could actually be a veiled way of sending merits to yourself. Given a good post, few would question the use of sMerit upon it. However, this would only be to "new" account farmers rather than older ones since they would just as well post on their higher-ranked accounts and rank them up.
Perhaps it's a new wave of accounts being farmed as the max monthly merit cap is reached?
Recently I am policing on accounts with suspicious merit exchanges and I did noticed some of the high ranked accounts are actually giving suspicious amount of merits to some of their new accounts (ALT obviously). I am tagging them with my best. I do have some ideas that I believe applying will really reduce this kind of alt farming abuses. There is mentioned, multiple account and account sales are allowed. Its mean, no problem if 1person having 2 account?
According to the rule - yes
|
|
|
This could actually be a veiled way of sending merits to yourself. Given a good post, few would question the use of sMerit upon it. However, this would only be to "new" account farmers rather than older ones since they would just as well post on their higher-ranked accounts and rank them up.
Perhaps it's a new wave of accounts being farmed as the max monthly merit cap is reached?
Abusers will always try to abuse everything they come across if they can. There are numbers of new accounts those are trying to make seriousgood posts and they do not have any alts Me for example But for me, i still don't know. Can we have 2 or more account?
Read this, there are green signal.
|
|
|
Case#4Morphling and yillusionMorphling's merit summaryReceived - Time | User | Sent | 5 - Today at 05:14:49 PM | ethbringer | Null | 9+2 - Today at 05:22:36 PM | yillusion | 16 | 6 - Today at 05:26:49 PM | Antivoid | Null |
Just notice the time of the received merits. The timing is strange! In 12 Minutes the user received altogether 20 merits All these days he had nothing!!! Exchanging 16 merits with yillusion raise reall question that they may be alts to each other. Notice the post quality of all these merited post and surprisingly all these merit exchanging is happening on [ANN][XAS] Asch | Decentralized Application Platform Based on Side-chain thread!! It's the same thread that we had in case#3 Anyway I am going to red Trust Morphling and yillusion believing they intentionally exchanged merits to each others perhaps they are alts.Sending merits to Morphling nearly at the same time I believe ethbringer and Antivoid also has something to prove that they are not involved with abusing.
|
|
|
selling or buying merit is not against the rules,there will always be people who try to abuse ANY system in place the thing is,they cannot just get away with it easily if their posts are rubbish and they get 5-50 merits for an obviously spam post (or a "special" merit magnet topics as I call them) the rules also do not prohibit for a D1-D2 trust member to waste their efforts by red tagging don't know where the 28$ figure is coming from,but that is crazy Am I reading it correctly? I guys you are joking By the way click here for reference.
|
|
|
Case#3A. mrhelpful is confused? mrhelpful's merit summaryReceived | User | Sent | 2 | Sandal_Hat | Null | Null | jenia1 | 10 | Null | allinvain | 50 |
What would you say if someone send you 50 merits for this... Hi guys. Alan here from CryptoBoreas.
Regrettably we don't have that kind of power and when we get a power upgrade in the near future I have to go through our customer waiting list first. I am prioritizing smaller customers first! I am really not sure what motive does mrhelpful thinks of when he sent 50 to allinvain and 10 jenia1? The action of sending 50 merits to allinvain from mrhelpful really raise question to me.Perhaps mrhelpful will have a valid answer. Is he/she now on the top of allinvain's prioritizing customers list? B. Kousei23's possible connection with plucking23, Bruce1614, loading..., alexsandria, Ashong SalongaAnd relation between Bruce1614 and kirito1614Keep the timing of the received merits before we start. and because of that 5 merits sent from Sanugarid also counts.Kousei23's merit summaryReceived - Time | User | Sent | 27 - March 13, 2018, 09:56:59 PM | Ashong Salonga | Null | 28 - March 13, 2018, 10:00:27 PM | alexsandria | Null | 5 - March 14, 2018, 07:59:40 PM | Sanugarid | Null | 1 - March 14, 2018, 08:01:08 PM | plucking23 | 50 | 24 - March 14, 2018, 08:02:07 PM | loading... | Null | Null | Bruce1614 | 10 |
Can you see in-between Ashong Salonga and alexsandria the receiving time difference is around only 4 minutes?! If this was from same post then we would have less doubt then we have since the merits received from two entirely different posts!!! Again on 14th March the total timestamp for the first merit (5) and the last merit (24) is around 3 minutes from Sanugarid, plucking23 and loading...!!! This one might be from a same post since it has been marked as "Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored" however I wonder on 14the the 3 users with Kousei23 and on 13th the two users with Kousei23 had a round table meeting? And since then nothing at all!!! Ok, I guess Sanugarid, plucking23, loading..., Ashong Salonga and alexsandria wanted to trap Kousei23 but hey why Kousei23 sent 50 (!!!) to plucking23?Oh snap!!! Looks like Kousei23 and plucking23 are alt to each others!!! 23? plucking23's merit summaryReceived | User | Sent | 50 | Kousei23 | 1 | Obviously Kousei23 and plucking23 are alts to each others and exchanging merits with each others violates the forum rules which leads to receiving negative feedbackSending merits on the same time from Ashong Salonga, alexsandria, Sanugarid and loading... to Kousei23 seems to be a part of a plan.Let's talk about Bruce1614 received 10 from Kousei23 Bruce1614's merit summaryReceived - Time | User | Sent | 10 - March 19, 2018, 03:14:34 PM | Kousei23 | Null | 5 - March 19, 2018, 03:17:36 PM | kirito1614 | 7 | Ops!!! Again Looks like Bruce1614 and kirito1614 are alt to each others!!! 1614? 10 and 5 merits brings 7.5 sMertis. Send 7 sMerits to kirito1614 LOL. Thanks Kousei23 for helping with 10 merits Ok, Obviously Bruce1614 and kirito1614 are alts to each others and exchanging merits with each others violates the forum rules which leads to receiving negative feedback
|
|
|
I guess this person is going through a banning period. I checked the last post he made was on February 28, 2018, 03:12:05 AMHope he/she learn a lesson. I personally reported lots of his posts.
|
|
|
Karena merit adalah sebuah patokan bagi seorang anggota untuk kenaikan pangkat mereka sehingga bagi orang yang tidak sabar dalam berproses mereka akan mengambil jalan pintas . Hal ini membuat persaingan anggota menjadi tidak sehat maka dari itu menurut saya merit tidak efektif dalam menilai seorang anggota karena ketika kita membeli merit meski post kita tidak berkualitas kita tetap mendapat merit maka dari itu sebaiknya merit dihapuskan saja.
You really need to use English for this thread since it's not a local thread. By the way this is what I got from google translation
|
|
|
I would like to seek attention of Bardman, The Pharmacist and iqlimasyadiqa on how to tag someone? -since you guys are on the same page like me and have very high rank on the forum. Quote from: The Pharmacist on Today at 11:53:20 AM I tagged the first two of those idiots, who are quite obviously engaged in merit abuse.
- How do you do it? Can someone else like me can tag them as well? If I can do it by myself having the current rank I have then I can save a lot of works except waiting for someone else come to see the post and do the tagging job. People who do farming are those who are not confident in ability and they think that it is the best way, but in reality not at all !!
This makes a lot of sense and thank you TheQuin for the clue, I will try to find fishy facts if there is any. PS: I found more users with suspicious merit exchanges on Case#2 and added them on the Update/Edit sectionUpdate: Ok I see what The Pharmacist meant when he said I tagged the first two of those idiots, who are quite obviously engaged in merit abuse.
Sending neg trust with the ref seems a great way to tag abusers.
|
|
|
This constant trend to use salutations (Sir, Dear, Respected) is also a cultural difference. To you, it maybe normal to show respect to someone in a position of power over you, but as far as netiquette and western work culture is concerned, this is considered sycophancy/ ass-kissing. This is considered the hallmark of an incapable, scheming individual and not of respect. So avoid this like a plague. Instead, address people with a normal Mr./ Miss
I am from eastern culture but spend a lot of my time in western culture and this is something always annoys me. I feel embarrassed hearing people calls me sir, dear, respected etc instead I feel comfortable with mate, dude, mr; Problem is in eastern culture when we learn English, the teachers teach us salutations like sir, dear are only way to show respect. Other day I went to the doctor and I asked how should I call you. He said call me "Sir" from my reaction when he realised that it annoyed me then he said you can call me Dr. X (his name) Point is: To me you are a Doc, you might be a teacher/professor and for them you might be "Sir" but for me you are just a Dr. PS: The whole post is a brilliant work. Good job on putting everything in one place.
|
|
|
you admit to stealing content! you then insult people.. you are not getting your account back - you deserve the ban..
now move on and forget about this easy income that you do not deserve
You confessed to copy past plagiarism. Too late to change your story now. The moderators would not have banned you otherwise. So get it into that thick skull of yours that nobody here is going to help a thief. We're all really happy you got banned.
- Isn't it possible to close the thread? The user is not actually making any sense, he/she is in a loophole and not accepting the reality. Wiser to stop him by closing the thread at least for now and if he create a same thread then not to reply him/her but just to report.
|
|
|
In reality it will just reinforce older privileges, lead to farming like that, and make bitcointalk less atractive for new users.
I added some edited section... Edit: I am in support of merit system to improve the content quality of the forum. Bringing merit on the table is a really very good step by the theymos. The way the spammers were using the forum, for theymos - he had no choice but to do something to make it a better place. The issues we are seeing with merit are not actually the idea is wrong, it's actually the same spammers/scammers are trying to abuse it finding its holes. It's completely normal for a idea which is new and every idea needs improvisation after implementation. Merit needs improvisation on how the users will use it (application level). People are misusing it because it is directly related to rank. And since it's directly related to rank so I believe some of the twist (if possible) taking in consideration will stop (make a big difference) abusing it.The farming will stop once we the users will start finding (adds little help to the moderators) who they are. I'm not if these accounts will be banned or what will be their consequences but whatever (may be putting them into your ignore list or giving them red trust with the evidence of their abusive connection, the best is only admin or moderators can confirm or warn their activities with 100% confidence since they will have all logs to prove them guilty) it is, at-least people will know that these account holders are abusive and dangerous for the community. ------------------------------------------------------------- Exchange of merit doesn't really prove anything, especially if the amount of merits is small.
- Small means 1? 2? or? Accounts on original post are larger in numbers. It would anyway cease once the smerit handed out to accounts during the roll out of the merit system dries up. Over time, the cycle of merit exchanges from senders to receivers and back will come to the end because they will finally lose all of their sMerits. And after that point, if they can not contribute to the forum, they will hardly earn more merits. Therefore, they won't have more sMerits to exchange each other.
- It really is a poor hope where we can do something about it to fix the issue. Appreciate your feedback. --------------------------------------------------------------- I appreciate your efforts but there is a thread for this stuff: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.160 You can post it there with the same format or just link this thread there. However not much will happen, they are usually not tagged or anything but I will give you some merit for your effort. When I was writing the original post I really looked for some topics which is already talking about the same. Then again I though I may not find the same format that I feel comfortable. So I decided to create a new post for it. Thanks for the credit for my effort. ---------------------------------------------------------------- I tagged the first two of those idiots, who are quite obviously engaged in merit abuse.
- How do you do it? Can someone else like me can tag them as well? But let's knock 'em down one by one. Thanks for identifying these guys. Thank you and yes this is exactly what I am trying to achieve from this post.
|
|
|
I'm probably unusual in that I completely ignore trust. I don't do any trading, apart from a few domain names, and those tend to be run through an escrow service. I thought trust was about trading, and money exchanges, but it seems to be a lot more here. I'm not sure that I understand it's purpose. It seems to be used as a weapon, more than a trading rating.
I really do not understand these DT1, DT2 etc things. Can anyone enlighten me please. I saw people send trust for others if they are not trust worthy. I really interested to know actually what is the purpose of trust things and how to find these DT1, DT2 etc things. A link of the details should be fine for me. Thanks
|
|
|
I stumbled by accident over a [b]scam account that uses YouTube videos[/b] from different accounts to gain some bounty tokens Ok I totally missed this part, my bad. Great job in finding this Expert3. This is really unethical. OMG!!! Please I really want to believe that that Expert3 is not Coin Bloq.
I personally follow Coin Bloq channel and he really make sense. He is doing really hard work and great job to deliver his contents and look his channel has now 23K followers! Do you think he has time to do such nonsense things in this forum?
What I suspect is, Expert3 just tried to use one of his video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wS2RJUePR5Q) claiming his (Expert3) just to receive some bounty coins. I also doubt Coin Bloq does not have any clue yet that something like this happened with his video.
I do not know about Martins Hacks. Possibly he can be Expert3 or I may be totally wrong. I just checked Martins Hacks hacks has 16K subscribers.
It's too late today in my side. I really need to dig more on this since I still think Coin Bloq is not Expert3. I just need to be 100% sure about it.PS: If your evidences proves true then you definitely reserve credits for this post. I had to do the same thing like you, left him/her a red trust.
|
|
|
OMG!!! Please I really want to believe that that Expert3 is not Coin Bloq. I personally follow Coin Bloq channel and he really make sense. He is doing really hard work and great job to deliver his contents and look his channel has now 23K followers! Do you think he has time to do such nonsense things in this forum? What I suspect is, Expert3 just tried to use one of his video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wS2RJUePR5Q) claiming his (Expert3) just to receive some bounty coins. I also doubt Coin Bloq does not have any clue yet that something like this happened with his video. I do not know about Martins Hacks. Possibly he can be Expert3 or I may be totally wrong. I just checked Martins Hacks hacks has 16K subscribers. It's too late today in my side. I really need to dig more on this since I still think Coin Bloq is not Expert3. I just need to be 100% sure about it. PS: If your evidences proves true then you definitely reserve credits for this post.
|
|
|
|