Ah, yes... all DT2 members are pedophiles without question. Now you've really caught us: to be on DefaultTrust means that you must be a pedophile as a prerequisite.

You can't extend old accusations as proof for new ones. That doesn't make sense.

game-protect is just an idiot

They wanted to shut him up and he took the deal because that was better than getting nothing at all.

OK? Anyone can be accused of being a pedophile and plenty of people are. Doesn't mean there's substance behind those accusations.

For example...

How so?

Give it a rest you fool, your arguments are rubbish and badly-constructed.

I'm countering the rating. If you have any problems with this you can make your case but the way I see it, both users are acting a bit like children with this retaliatory feedback bullshit.

To replace it with a negative.

Quid pro quo.

Here's my opinion: in exchanges of A->B, the one that should be tagged is A, not B.

Obviously, when you have A<->B both users are tagged but this is not the case here. If you start tagging users because they have received lots of merit from one individual, that opens up doors for scammers/butthurts to spam-send merit to someone that isn't abusing the system for a false conviction. After all, like The Void, you can't reject gifts. bonus points if you get that reference

The tag on asche should be reconsidered. Precedence holds great power which is why I carefully tag merit abusers.

easy as abc + d
payment incoming

[74916d4c15339c235d6fca706588b55ce7dd39ff8ff904de2b4c08704b9cb60a]

Your argument is simplified to this:

"If hilariousandco does something, then clearly everybody else does it too, but shadier."

---

It's kind of like when you cherry-pick data and then extrapolate it to fit the entire space. Something like, "lamb is a carcinogen and thus meat in general causes cancer"

This entire argument is based on a false equivalence. I have said this time and time again.

If you do not trust me then you should send my account a negative feedback with your arguments as to why I'm untrustworthy.

I was talking about digaran's feedback, not anyone else's. If you're going to look through all DT members' redundant negative tags then you can feel free to do so because there are definitely those cases.

I'm not sure why this topic is relevant, though.

The issue was simply that your activity had not updated. Since it has now (and you are a Jr. Member) this thread should be locked.

The button is at the bottom-left of the page.

You have 28 activity. You need 30 to become a Jr. Member.

Activity updates roughly every 30 minutes (or hour, can't remember which).

Managing a campaign for something that doesn't have a thread and tons of discussion about its shadiness is not equivalent to participating in a campaign for something that does.

You were aware of all the Betsoft madness, the poker bullshit and kept trying to dismiss these issues.

As far as I'm aware, yahoo hasn't yet managed an ongoing scam.

---

Would your argument have changed if I didn't send yahoo positive trust? It's really easy to construct these conspiracy theories by overanalyzing every little action, like digaran does.

Hey, if you want to think that there's some organized bullshit happening then feel free. But I haven't messaged yahoo personally about anything apart from the Ryland case.

Alright, I'll also add a little bonus out of my own pocket for the inconvenience.

Just a reminder to all participants: if I make a mistake at all don't hesitate to notify me, either in this thread or via PM.

You mean the red trust removal service? No. I seldom add multiple negative feedbacks to a user. Do you want me to? Because since you've made the thread, your image has started degrading steadily, especially as you continue to dig the hole deeper.

So you're okay with allowing others to steal money, right?

That's what you're doing when you "invest" in these ponzi schemes. You help the scammer build up their reputation and invite bigger investors to their doom. By the time the ponzi operator pulls out they've already taken at least 1000x what you've lost.

Tagged. Thanks for the report. You can lock/archive the thread now.

Next time, posting in Reputation would be just as good. (Probably better).

Still you? suchmoon is just responding to the quote, not bringing up other shit that you've posted. They've just decided that since the thread you posted in has nothing to do with them, that they would rather redirect the conversation here.

---

Have you contacted Blazed?

You probably copied and pasted content, i.e. plagiarized.

---

Your account was nuked, it seems. Did you heavily shitpost?

Misread the dates. Your tweets are valid: I can send a payment to you right now or next week bundled in one transaction: which do you prefer?

683998ac99ba0f20772c7fc328ade9fc40332eca31b1a8528da43b0ba81c6956

Payments have been sent to qualified participants. It would be well-appreciated if you could update reports by editing previous posts: it prevents the thread from being too spammed and also helps me check reports more easily.