and we have already lost a lot of confidence we are very confused now what we have to do to get the trust of everyone
You have no idea how confused we are with this "project": I suspect Satoshi is from Singapura and she developed bitcoin earlier than we think. Of course, she allowed citizens of Singapura to test it.  |
|
|
|
|
Newbie jail?
Problem solved.
|
|
|
|
Another wannabe bitconnect. This is all you need to know about them:  Experienced trader who can make 1800% annual doesn't need other peoples money. |
|
|
|
Yet everywhere I look, almost everyone who ever declares publicly that he owns an alt account, gets red-trusted.
This is not true. Alt accounts are mostly tagged because they cheated giveaway claiming rewards more than once or cheating signature campaigns with local rule "alt accounts are not allowed to join". Other reasons to tag alt accounts - loan scammers, ICO scammers, fake service scammers, escrow scammers, ICO bump service, trust farming, farming merits between alts. Other than this, I don't see problem in having alt accounts. |
|
|
|
I did
You didn't: there are dozens wrong feedback you have given to people Pick one randomly
Pick one randomly.
It is of not any good to your account defending now, by the way I am was about to go to the club tonight but your company here seems a better one so am having fun with you two tonight.I don't have an alt army, anyone knows my accounts, it is public knowledge on the forum I am happy that we are entertaining you. I can't say the same thing for you. Since you decided not to go to club tonight, can you comment this: You have left me a negative for me buying accounts in 2016 which I counteracted by leaving you a negative. Can you change it to neutral and I will remove my negative to you Do I have to trade with half of the forum in order for you to change your feedback for me in neutral ? Why are you mentioning certain things and then avoiding answer when asked? |
|
|
|
What if a scammer returned the stolen bitcoins?
I am out of this thread.
|
|
|
|
Let me close it this way, "you are always right, everybody else is always wrong, the same hypocrisy that is going on in this forum from quite some time". My point was to show why the trust system has flaws, it was shown, let's leave it like this. You by the way are living proof of this marl  I thought you left: This is my last sentence here
there are dozens wrong feedback you have given to people Pick one randomly
Pick one randomly. |
|
|
|
However, someone might accuse you of cherry-picking. That wasn't my intention.
I just wanted to show that unfortunately you are one of the DT members who do not get back your feedback even when the other users proves you that he is not into these kind of things anymore and shows really good behaviour. Have you traded with half forum yet? As for minerjones, please do not compare yourself with him I am not sure where I compared minerjones with myself. It seems you are the one pushing this for some unknown reason. there are dozens wrong feedback you have given to people Pick one randomly
Pick one randomly. |
|
|
|
You are not understanding, minerjones ratings are much more relevant and evident and on point compared to marlboroza, they also in the majority of the times have verified references which are still active to today time compared to the other one, that is my point. Hope it is clear now.
As I sad, you are unable to read references.   Someone escrowed funds between user A and B, and someone else found out that user is not trustworthy.
I can do this whole day with you:    Do you want to talk about other feedback? Pick one randomly  |
|
|
|
I thought he is, but I have removed my feedback since he apologized and his other feedback doesn't have anything that could show he would do something malicious.
Ok, he made apology and *puf* - he is not abusing trust system any more.  Wow, 3 votes against in like 10 minutes. Seems like Lauda used some multies Right...I can literally say this for you - iluvbitcoins, shibawow, account from 2012...sorry, not correct order of accounts
Welcome to DT, btw. I am out of this thread. |
|
|
|
Bounty archived http://archive.is/5penn"User 'marlboroza' has not chosen to allow messages from newbies"
Newbies have rly hard life in this forum
Some newbies have been spamming me, unfortunately it reflects legit users too. Bounty hunters shared emails which are available in spreadsheet and someone has sent email from obviously trow off email with phishing link inside. Could this be it? |
|
|
|
Can you address this: Why are you evading ban with alt account?
Why have you sent merit to alt account?
Why are you cheating bounties?
Why spamming forum with meaningless zero value posts?
Why did you try to sell something pretending it is collateral?
And this: What is goal of this thread?
Is it:
a) DT members are mafia and criminals?
b) DT members are trying to control bitcointalk?
c) I received negative because I have tried to take loan with collateral I was trying to sell?
d) The Pharmacist, actmyname, Vod.. didn't tag all scammers on this forum?
What do you really want to accomplish with this topic? To get rid of negative trust, showing that you have changed and this was really honest mistake and at the same time you are accusing DT members of being criminals and taking bribe to "close their eyes":
|
|
|
|
While you maybe right about the trades, honestly I trust much more a rating from "minerjones" than I do from "marlboroza", just sayin. So probably I also think that a person like minerjones who has had a lot more time spent in the forum and done so many deals through this time it is much more trusted than a person who sent a message to me (that I don't do what I do for a signature campaign) meaning of the message in brackets, you find real one below and a few days later ,strangely joined Chipmixer  Also why should I trust more a person who almost had never any trade with anyone here compared to one who have had a lot of them like in the case of the 2 persons mentioned above. Yeah the trust system has many flaws into it. Just pointing them out and do not want to engage in further discussion. That while in the message ended very early Hi, just out of curiosity why did you remove FortuneJack signature ? Are they conducting shady behavior ?
I am taking vacation of signature campaigns for a while. Few days later.... Any particular reason you decided to leave the Campaign?
Username: marlboroza
Post Count: 4661
BTC Address (must be SegWit)
Oh, few days later was 2 months later. Have you been living on Mars? Time doesn't work there like it works on Earth? Few days =/= 2 months. Few days later you say? Why is this bothering you? You have solid connection to well known scammer, and yet you didn't provide single solid proof to beat this. While you maybe right about the trades, honestly I trust much more a rating from "minerjones" than I do from "marlboroza", just sayin. So probably I also think that a person like minerjones who has had a lot more time spent in the forum and done so many deals People who don't know to read reference usually make such stupid conclusions. Trust system isn't trade system, as lauda pointed. Btw, why have you changed your fake retaliation negative to false positive and then removed it? Oh, sharing PM's I see? Hi
Congrats on reaching DT membership. You have left me a negative for me buying accounts in 2016 which I counteracted by leaving you a negative. Can you change it to neutral and I will remove my negative to you. This is not for signatures campaign as you know I have many mining rigs but it is about reputation. Also I have completely quit all 3 accounts bought several months ago if you check them.
Hoping in a good judgment from your side.
What does this bold part mean? Why don't you share everything, since you obviously like to share PM's which doesn't make much sense without further investigation? How about this: Ok. Now another question and I would like it to ask it in a funny way.
Do I have to trade with half of the forum in order for you to change your feedback for me in neutral ? I can fully understand if you will keep it negative although is totally irrelevant for this time.
Have you traded with half of forum yet? How about to fuck off and stop mentioning my name from time to time in specific topics? |
|
|
|
Can ai buddy report them too?
I just did. Didn't I?  (Ok, "AI buddy" was a joke. I don't think I am allowed to share who linked UID's with nicks, but I am happy that they helped with it.) |
|
|
|
How can we see another scammer around the forum with an old bought account if the account was never sold?
How can we see that you didn't sell it?
Do you think TP is not abusing trust system? |
|
|
|
hello everyone!
Hello funcryptoguy! as you can see I am a newbie in the forum, and i use it to get the information i need for my Cryptocurrency world, and being a newbie with no merit does not limit me from having what a need.
I am glad one newbie is here for information and not to build little quote pyramids. now, my wonder is, why all this fight to get the merit?
What fight? all the accounts are bounty hunters so they need the merits to partecipate?
Not all accounts are bounty hunters. Merit should be reward for constructive post. |
|
|
|
https://prnt.sc/laul0vWhat is keeping you from tagging it? We don't want to see another scammer running around the forum with old bought account trying to scam someone.
Other than this I really don't want to comment anything.
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what's going on here though. I have few theories, looking at the same pattern(posts are without quotation to point something, links to posts are above each one): Account #1 : Bitcointalk name: EsthervAlinav4990 Twitter Profile Link = https://twitter.com/EsthervAlinav4990 --> doesn't exist Facebook Profile Link = https://www.facebook.com/EsthervAlinav4990 --> doesn't exist Telegram Username = @EsthervAlinav4990 --> exist, but long time no seen Medium Link = https://medium.com/@EsthervAlinav4990 --> doesn't exist Account #2 : Bitcointalk name: KyliebNorahb4944 Twitter Profile Link = https://twitter.com/KyliebNorahb4944 --> doesn't exist Facebook Profile Link = https://www.facebook.com/KyliebNorahb4944 -- doesn't exist Telegram Username = @KyliebNorahb4944 --> exist, also as previous user, long time no seen Medium Link = https://medium.com/@KyliebNorahb4944 --> doesn't exist Account #3 : Bitcointalk name: Promoprice Twitter Profile Link = https://twitter.com/PaigeiPresleyi5003 --> account doesn't exist Facebook Profile Link = https://www.facebook.com/PaigeiPresleyi5003 --> account doesn't exist Telegram Username = @PaigeiPresleyi5003 --> long time no seen Medium Link = https://medium.com/@PaigeiPresleyi5003 --> nowhere to be found Account #4 : Bitcointalk name: AubreybLucyb4866 Twitter Profile Link = https://twitter.com/AubreybLucyb4866 --> it doesn't exist Facebook Profile Link = https://www.facebook.com/AubreybLucyb4866 --> doesn't exist Telegram Username = @AubreybLucyb4866 --> last time seen long time ago Medium Link = https://medium.com/@AubreybLucyb4866 --> error 404, doesn't exist And so on...Could it be...ICO bumping service? Bumping bounty to keep it on top for more promotion? I mean, they all applied to bounties with social media accounts which don't exist, except telegram which is inactive anyway, with invalid eth addy's: ETH Address: 0x7eC9e5194cB47dF637CF0Ae0aad3D1ba8B0574480
ETH Address: 0x7eC9e5194cB47dF637CF0Ae0aad3D1ba8B8870
Someone is trying to cheat campaigns? I just don't see how. Latest post: Nothing is real. I am not tech person, is ddos possible this way? |
|
|
|
On top of it, marlboroza's questionable(?) red paint.
There is nothing questionable in my feedback. Both feedback is true, previous one and new one. The ponzi promoting topic was created long ago by xtraelv but why marlboroza was silent all those days and woke up far later even the hilary's tag?
I didn't wake up later, I am always here. Why marlboroza wanted to know in PM that when I withdrew the escrow application (before or after the red tag from hilary)? When I responded then why did not marlboroza asked me anything else about it for long time. He was active and we had conversations with several other stuffs in between.
What conversations OMG. You sent me message to check something and I said I can't find anything and you should report it to admin. That can't be called conversation. What other conversation you have in mind? I can't find them in my PM. Can you please point me several conversations between? edited - "I can't find anything" was about something else. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
, I noticed one of the tagged shills is spamming 200percent ponzi crap all over the forum:
