Just a few days ago, a rainbow ruling coalition was formed in the state of Sahcsen-Anhalt by all the mainstream parties, to keep the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party out of power (the AfD is having 25 out of 87 seats). At least in the former Eastern Germnay, the political situation is changing. It is AfD vs Mainstream (pro-Merkel) parties.
Look at what is happening to Trump in America. The unofficial polls suggest that Trump is loved by 60% of the people. Yet the GOP is trying to keep Trump completely out of the race... and they are doing so with some shady, underhanded, and possibly illegal tactics. This makes the whole governing processes to look like something other than what the people have been formally told, or formally think. Good people love TRUMP Smart people don't base their hope on any of these political comedians.
|
|
|
The whole debt money system of the modern world is a big money-laundering program. Money comes into existence by being borrowed into existence, not because there is anything backing it. It is all funny-money. Then, even if you could pay the loan back, where could you get the interest? You would have to take out another loan to pay the interest on the first loan. Because the system is so large, when you repay your loans with interest, you don't see the ways that foreign nations are tricked to enter the "Ponzi." If you default on your loan, you don't realize that defaulting by some of the borrowers is simply part of the way a debt-money system works. Debt money is a big money-laundering scheme that is used by the bankers and politicians to get rich at the expense of everyone else. Switch over to Bitcoin, or UPMA ( https://upma.org/).
|
|
|
Science is a religion cause people believe in it
Correct. People religious believe as truth, some aspects of modern science which are not known to be true, and which are so wildly unbelievable that they would almost have to be miracles to be true.
|
|
|
Just a few days ago, a rainbow ruling coalition was formed in the state of Sahcsen-Anhalt by all the mainstream parties, to keep the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party out of power (the AfD is having 25 out of 87 seats). At least in the former Eastern Germnay, the political situation is changing. It is AfD vs Mainstream (pro-Merkel) parties.
Look at what is happening to Trump in America. The unofficial polls suggest that Trump is loved by 60% of the people. Yet the GOP is trying to keep Trump completely out of the race... and they are doing so with some shady, underhanded, and possibly illegal tactics. This makes the whole governing processes to look like something other than what the people have been formally told, or formally think.
|
|
|
As cellphone and microwave usage increase, radiation from these devices increases as well. There are those that think that the bees are dying off en masse because of cellphone usage.
|
|
|
See? That's the neat thing. I don't believe that I lied. But if I made a mistake, or if I misunderstood, and in my mistakenness or misunderstanding really did lie, it is all forgiven because I believe in Jesus salvation.
What about if a person deliberately lies and deceives all the time, like yourself for example, do they get salvation? If so then you've just highlighted why Christianity is so very very flawed. That is a good question... Jesus said all sins are equal... Christians also believe that "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" is an unforgivable sin... which means... any sin is unforgivable? Poor BADlogic... going to hell Sins are equal from the standpoint that God requires perfection. No matter the sin, it is imperfection, a thing that God hates. Jesus also says that the servant who does wrong without knowing it, will be beaten with few blows. The one who does wrong even though he knows that he is doing wrong, will be beaten with many blows. You better start believing in Jesus salvation. After all, you are one who knows all about the Bible and salvation and what is right and what is wrong. You studied it. Since you knowingly reject, it will be far worse for you in Hell than it will be for the semi-ignorant Fluffer.
|
|
|
See? That's the neat thing. I don't believe that I lied. But if I made a mistake, or if I misunderstood, and in my mistakenness or misunderstanding really did lie, it is all forgiven because I believe in Jesus salvation. What about if a person deliberately lies and deceives all the time, like yourself for example, do they get salvation? If so then you've just highlighted why Christianity is so very very flawed. There is a difference between an intentional lie and an accidental lie. We all lie. The actual lying doesn't have anything to do with salvation. Faith in Jesus is the thing gives salvation. While it is true that intentional sinning weakens faith, it is God's judgment that determines when the faith of a person is too weak for salvation. The question isn't my salvation. My sinning is unintentional, and doesn't have anything to do with my salvation faith. The question revolves around your faith. Perhaps you are gaining some faith in Jesus salvation, even though you don't know it, through the things that I say. Maybe there will come a time when when you will embrace Jesus salvation willingly.
|
|
|
I am Hindu so I feel that Hinduism is the bet religion for me and it will vary from a person to person, muslim feels Islam is best, Christian feels Christianity is the best, but when it comes to love and friendship religion is not at all important, its just a word nothing else.
However, the best religion is the one that gives eternal life in Heaven. There is nothing better than eternal life in Heaven. The problem is determining which religion does this. I think you answer yourself the best here: It always needs to be backed up by something else before it can be known to be factual.
But, you would love eternal life in Heaven, factual or not.
|
|
|
You poor little fellow. You call that abusive? Most of it is pure, loving chiding, with the hopes of saving someone by showing him the error of his ways. Other of it is agreeing with someone where he shows his stupidity first. What's the matter? Can't take someone with a different opinion or better knowledge? They express better knowledge or a different opinion, and that hurts you, right? just because it is different, right? Don't you see that you are doing the same thing continuously? Haven't you figured out that, that is what a forum is for, at least to some extent? Now I suppose you will call this post of mine abusive. However... I can hardly believe you are that sensitive. Thanks for playing around. You asked me to pst a list of times you have called other forum members "retarded". I went to the trouble of posting it for you. What's the problem? You asked me to ask you. No, I didn't. That is a lie. How much extra time in Hell did that lie just buy you? See? That's the neat thing. I don't believe that I lied. But if I made a mistake, or if I misunderstood, and in my mistakenness or misunderstanding really did lie, it is all forgiven because I believe in Jesus salvation. You in your deceptiveness don't have Jesus salvation for your deception, do you? But don't feel too badly about it. The work that Jesus did on the cross reduces your time and pain in Hell somewhat, even if you don't believe. Jesus never wanted anybody to go to hell... not even you. So, out of the love that He has for you, He has reduced your pain even in Hell somewhat. It's still gonna be bad, because you DO have the strength to reject much or most of the salvation He offers.
|
|
|
If by "science" you mean science theories, why would anyone trust them, since they have not been proven to be factual? Of course, there is a way that you can trust science theories. You can trust that they are theories until they have been proven to be factual.
It's a shame gravity is just a theory... I suppose that means there is a chance gravity doesn't exist? See? This is where you are either mixed up, or you are not being clear intentionally. The law of gravity is not a theory. The explanation of why gravity works the way it does is the thing that is the theory. Gravity law is law. Gravity theory is theory. I suppose if you think gravity is "just a theory", that it doesn't affect you? Naw, you're wrong... Both gravity and evolution are proven to be a true, factual and predictive representation of reality... which is basically what a theory means in science... learn your words https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theoryA scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.
It is important to note that the definition of a "scientific theory" (often ambiguously contracted to "theory" for the sake of brevity, including in this page) as used in the disciplines of science is significantly different from, and in contrast to, the common vernacular usage of the word "theory". As used in everyday non-scientific speech, "theory" implies that something is an unsubstantiated and speculative guess, conjecture, or hypothesis; such a usage is the opposite of a scientific theory. Regarding evolution, something exists. It has been termed evolution. Since the thing that exists, does indeed exist, if you call it evolution, then evolution exists. Evolution theory talks about some things that are not known to exist. It also talks about the reasons why the existence termed "evolution" exists, and why some of the things in evolution theory might exist. They are two different things... evolution and evolution theory. People can write all kinds of things in Wikipedia. A lot of Wikipedia is not truth. It is a good starting point, to see what a subject is about in general. But it needs to be backed up by other info before it can be known to be factual. This is something like Quantum Physics. QP is complex probability. It always needs to be backed up by something else before it can be known to be factual. Just because a scientific theory is often made up of some science facts, does not make the theory itself to be factual. The theory takes the facts and combines and twists them into something new that is not known to be factual until it has been proven factual. For example. Big Bang Theory probably will never be known to be true. Why not? As good as it might sound, there is no way to go back 13 or 14 billion years to see if it is true. There is always the chance that something unforeseen might have been there to make all the best BB theory to be non-factual. It's the same with all science theory. Until it is proven to be factual, it is just theory, even if it has the word "science" in front of it. Blah blah, meaningless drivel Name something in evolution "that is not known to exist"... anything at all... don't make a claim you can't back up with facts and evidence If it exists, it exists. If you want to cal something that exists "evolution," great. No problem. It exists whatever you call it. Even evolution theory exists as theory. But theory means that nobody knows if it exists outside of theory. If it was known to exist outside of theory, it wouldn't be theory. To quote, well you... "It always needs to be backed up by something else before it can be known to be factual" The elusive "It." What's the matter? Afraid you won't be able to deceive people into thinking what you want them, to if you repeat the whole thing? Big Bang Theory is something completely different from Evolution, and was actually invented by a Christian (do some research) So what? Even evolution theory is completely different from evolution. The fact that theory is not known to be factual is the point, not who put the theory together. You make things up, like saying there is a difference between "evolution" and "evolution theory"... there is not... these are talking about the same thing... quit intentionally lying to people
Wrong. There is a space and 6 letters more in "evolution theory" than there is in "evolution." Scientifically speaking, evolution theory exists as theory, while evolution without the word "theory" after it would exist as fact if it existed at all. You can't have it both ways. Either you have found something that exists and have called it evolution, or you have not. Scientifically speaking, if evolution is not known to exist for a fact, call it what it is, evolution theory. Perhaps you should read through that which you call meaningless drivel before you call it such.
|
|
|
I am Hindu so I feel that Hinduism is the bet religion for me and it will vary from a person to person, muslim feels Islam is best, Christian feels Christianity is the best, but when it comes to love and friendship religion is not at all important, its just a word nothing else.
However, the best religion is the one that gives eternal life in Heaven. There is nothing better than eternal life in Heaven. The problem is determining which religion does this.
|
|
|
Basically, the point about civil law is that a government set up that way is virtually a dictator over the people of the nation. There isn't really any democracy. Government rules by giving itself best benefit by allowing the people democratic-like freedom.
Legal systems have almost nothing to do whatsoever with whether any given country is a democracy or not. In simple analysis, this is correct. However, in a democracy, if the elected governing officials don't make the legal system match what the majority wants, they lose their job. Sometimes before their term is up. So, the legal system depends on the democracy. It is definitely true that without rule of law, democracy is impossible, but that's an underlying legal principle, not a legal system. Civil law as a legal system has nothing to do whatsoever with whether or not a government "sets up" a civil code which will define whether or not the jurisdiction, executive and legislative can be considered compatible with a democracy. The American legal system is common law, making the laws unimportant, although the ignorance of the people makes the people think the laws are important. Jury nullification can change any and all laws in America any time. In a democracy - which we don't have in America - if the people vote in a guy who promises jury nullification regarding the laws, and then sets it up as he promised, the laws change faster than ever. Why? Because they don't mean anything with jury nullification around. The jury is the law. Please, before stating such nonsense as you did, rtfm, i.e. go to a library, get the books in the "law 101" section and read!
Please, before you start getting all legalistic and picky about words and phrases, look at the theme.
|
|
|
You poor little fellow. You call that abusive? Most of it is pure, loving chiding, with the hopes of saving someone by showing him the error of his ways. Artificially inventing a fictious threat then rushing over to save someone from the pretend threat is not love, it's deception. Artificially speaking through your posts like you always do is deception, not love.
|
|
|
You poor little fellow. You call that abusive? Most of it is pure, loving chiding, with the hopes of saving someone by showing him the error of his ways. Other of it is agreeing with someone where he shows his stupidity first. What's the matter? Can't take someone with a different opinion or better knowledge? They express better knowledge or a different opinion, and that hurts you, right? just because it is different, right? Don't you see that you are doing the same thing continuously? Haven't you figured out that, that is what a forum is for, at least to some extent? Now I suppose you will call this post of mine abusive. However... I can hardly believe you are that sensitive. Thanks for playing around. You asked me to pst a list of times you have called other forum members "retarded". I went to the trouble of posting it for you. What's the problem? You asked me to ask you. No problem. You are helping me to show the truth.
|
|
|
muslim is not terrorist Muslim is wimp. If Muslim was Islam, Muslim would be terrorist.
|
|
|
If by "science" you mean science theories, why would anyone trust them, since they have not been proven to be factual? Of course, there is a way that you can trust science theories. You can trust that they are theories until they have been proven to be factual.
It's a shame gravity is just a theory... I suppose that means there is a chance gravity doesn't exist? See? This is where you are either mixed up, or you are not being clear intentionally. The law of gravity is not a theory. The explanation of why gravity works the way it does is the thing that is the theory. Gravity law is law. Gravity theory is theory. I suppose if you think gravity is "just a theory", that it doesn't affect you? Naw, you're wrong... Both gravity and evolution are proven to be a true, factual and predictive representation of reality... which is basically what a theory means in science... learn your words https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theoryA scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.
It is important to note that the definition of a "scientific theory" (often ambiguously contracted to "theory" for the sake of brevity, including in this page) as used in the disciplines of science is significantly different from, and in contrast to, the common vernacular usage of the word "theory". As used in everyday non-scientific speech, "theory" implies that something is an unsubstantiated and speculative guess, conjecture, or hypothesis; such a usage is the opposite of a scientific theory. Regarding evolution, something exists. It has been termed evolution. Since the thing that exists, does indeed exist, if you call it evolution, then evolution exists. Evolution theory talks about some things that are not known to exist. It also talks about the reasons why the existence termed "evolution" exists, and why some of the things in evolution theory might exist. They are two different things... evolution and evolution theory. People can write all kinds of things in Wikipedia. A lot of Wikipedia is not truth. It is a good starting point, to see what a subject is about in general. But it needs to be backed up by other info before it can be known to be factual. This is something like Quantum Physics. QP is complex probability. It always needs to be backed up by something else before it can be known to be factual. Just because a scientific theory is often made up of some science facts, does not make the theory itself to be factual. The theory takes the facts and combines and twists them into something new that is not known to be factual until it has been proven factual. For example. Big Bang Theory probably will never be known to be true. Why not? As good as it might sound, there is no way to go back 13 or 14 billion years to see if it is true. There is always the chance that something unforeseen might have been there to make all the best BB theory to be non-factual. It's the same with all science theory. Until it is proven to be factual, it is just theory, even if it has the word "science" in front of it.
|
|
|
i think science and religion is two separate things cant be combine together, science cant make miracle but the religion can so for me science is science, religion is a religion they are two different things
Science itself is not religion. Religion itself is not science. But both join each other in the heart and mind of man.
|
|
|
Agreed science theory is mostly based on mathematical patters, how we intemperate the patterns can be very subjective.
And since math is an invention and a language of man rather than a fundamental part of the universe, its truth lies in the heart and mind of man rather than in the universe.
|
|
|
Science is better than any religion. Religions are based on lies. Moreover science is based on facts and religion is based on miracles. Right, at least at the in deepest and greatest point of science. Since science has shown that God exists, but hasn't shown the miracles of how God created everything, we need religion to even accept the miracles.
|
|
|
Science is better than any religion. Religions are based on lies. Especially the religion of science theory.
|
|
|
|