Do something concrete like reporting garbage posts and helping the moderators? Was that in the reference? If so, find it for me: You might be surprised after deleting your red tag on me, maybe you could be included on DT2 by you know who.
I'm going to tag these cheaters and ask for $50 for tag removal on the trust feedback. they should pay $50 in Bitcoin and to the forum.
Maybe it's time for me to be considered as an authority to the useless power abuse of some of the DT2 members to prevent tyranny. some DT2 members are tagging people and then would say that they are not going to remove the tags no matter what. they should use their power to benefit the forum and not their own egoes.
Maybe DT1 members should consider and compare my methods in dealing with these cases with the methods of some DT2 members.
Maybe I could be a good choice, because I don't need any power nor do I need any green trust.
Hint: it's not there. Funny how you are trying to do exactly as I have done, I have asked either for money or garbage reporting, you are also expecting people to attack scams and Ponzis. I'm not the one that tagged Slow death. IIRC, it was either cryptodevil or Vod. I later added a neutral feedback, yes, but that was more of a "soft" positive feedback. You're also making a false equivalence here but clearly, that's gone over your head. we both want the same thing: helping this forum and it's community to the best of our abilities. you have your own methods while I have mine. Okay, sure. But your methods aren't good for the forum if they let scammers come back with a simple payment: that's my problem. You are a DT member and I am a nobody, now which one worth more in your own opinion? my actions that has caused me to get tagged red or your actions which has caused you to get on DT? I have never asked users for money to remove tags and I never will. I believe this is the double standard people were talking about even before all of this starts. Don't bring in false equivalences. |
|
|
|
According to your own logic, why would you consider my action as untrustworthy You were trying to get them to pay money rather than actually do something concrete.
Also, a case that you might want to check out is that of Slow death, who was negged but has since then proved to be someone that is vigilant and on the lookout for scams. They were initially involved in ponzis, and now they attack ponzis. Funny how that works out, huh? |
|
|
|
How is this even going to help anyone? Is this some kind of a security feature or what? Am I missing something?
It must be annoying for users who suffer with this since getting unban takes ages and plus requirement for getting a singed massage and sending it to Cyrus or Theymos, who are already overbooked, it’s not working.
I guess management must revise this auto ban policy, specially in such particular cases when user changes his email and password. Is it often that a user needs to change both the password and the email? I hope not. Password changes are important, yes. But more often than not, an email change signifies a change of hands with the account ownership. (Given that this is a security feature, anyway. I believe that the account is only locked when the email is notified or when a security question reset occurs) |
|
|
|
Bro, I think your calculation is wrong. [...] (500 K) per month Then clearly you have not read what I have written. 5% profit a day, re-invested after each day means 1.05^30 = 4320% profit every month, equivalent to 4.32x. They should be able to support this since there does not appear to be a limit on the deposits. And even so, we can consider the entire space of investors as a single unit that continually reinvests their profits. You believe b), then? That the site is willing to pay 20 million dollars over the next month? I do hope that you realize the 54000000x annual figure is clearly unsustainable. |
|
|
|
Which side is that? I'd invite any forum member to look at my posts on this thread and decide. if they think that I am wrong, they should say it, but why they would think that I am wrong? I have already stated many times and explained my rationale for the trust feedback. Do you think that my reason for the negative trust is false? If you believe that the comment, "Wanted to charge people to remove red tags," is false then you can argue that. However, if you're simply going to disregard the most important part of your feedback refutation and lead everyone to conspiracies about the "DT cartel" then clearly the tag should stay. |
|
|
|
I might reconsider thinking you as a trusted forum member. you are not neutral and would stay silent when DT2 members are harassing me here. As soon as someone is not on your side, they become untrustworthy. Similar to the vein of "no true scotsman" you are trying to surround yourself with people who reinforce your beliefs and trying to reject anyone who does not.
Is it possible that HCP had not seen this thread until the cjmoles reply? Yes, but you'll reject that possibility because then it would mean that they are absolved of the responsibility of responding to your thread. The lack thereof, rather, in reality. |
|
|
|
I don't think so because I've seen hilariousetc and hilariousandco for quite some time and they are clearly different person from my perspective Did you read the feedback on hilariousetc's trust page? " My alt account used on unsecure connections/computers. Do not send any coins or do any business with this account without confirming it with my main one first." |
|
|
|
I get confused I thought hilariousandco put a red trust on my wall but after a closer look it is hilariousetc I reckon because they have the same username. It's the same person. hilariousetc is the alt of hilariousanco. |
|
|
|
If in your world, questions are solved with money, I am ready to pay a fine to the forum development fund. I will not buy or set up a new account unequivocally. How do you like this punishment for an error? No. Bitcointalk doesn't have "fines" apart from evil units for new account registration. If we allowed every banned user to pay a fee to unban themselves then we would have anarchy. Unfortunately, the only thing you can do is just leave the forum behind. Remember that a ban means that the person is banned, not the account. Don't evade. |
|
|
|
1800% per Year not Monthly
And dogeminer.cc payed And you seriously believe that they have paid out $4.6 million in 80 days? Let's not forget that 5% daily is also equivalent to 1.05^365 every year = 54211841x annually. Is multiplying someone's deposits by 54 million annually sustainable? Alright. Let's not think about long-term, then. Consider monthly: 1.05^30 = 4.32x. You're telling me you believe: a) a minimum of 1 million dollars worth of doge was deposited into this site b) the site is willing to pay over 20 million dollars worth of doge next month, and then 85 million the following |
|
|
|
Here's the deal once poeple know about the existance of bitcoin it will began to been advertise ny people to people as you can see there are many people who are againts with it, Bank of madrir are wondering if it's become legal and people use it and turns into wrong activities i read articles those earlier. Bitcoin is like punj hazzard that are real in risk because when you don't risk then how you can earn from it. Always remember that it always dacing risk from the start using bitcoin tho.
This is the only post that I think is fairly non-Gleb. The others are very much in line with typical posts you would expect, which is confusing. |
|
|
|
I suggest this kind of change instead (brevity is best): | | | Username | | | Contact | | | Past Work | | | Mode of Payment | | | Max # Participants | | | ANN thread | | | SMAS list | | | Max Escrowed | | | # campaigns managed | | | Default Trust | | | | | | | | | | | | - | | | BTC/Alts | | | Unlimited | | | | | | - | | | 0.4 BTC | | | - | | | 27:-0/+4 | | |
*changed the table headings and some of the data. |
|
|
|
I admit the guilt. I do not agree with the punishment You don't have to agree. Sorry. Do you mean that my opinion does not mean anything? Do judges ask the offender what they want to have as punishment? Rules are rules and if you make a change for one person you should make the change for every person. This has not been the case since Lone Shark (i.e. unbanning a user after plagiarism). |
|
|
|
I took that as a recommendation. Because I see "should", not "must". Do you think that forum rules serve as recommendations? "Thou shalt not kill" is also a suggestion if you take that literally. Think about the intent, here. So, are you going to delete the bumps? Old bumps should be deleted as they serve no purpose, and only clutter up topics and make it more annoying to read. |
|
|
|
|
There are gaps in the number of actual posts vs. the post count on a user's profile due to moved threads, among other things. (Can only remember that moved threads add to the disparity. theymos wrote something about this before)
|
|
|
|
I give. Exactly where does one find the mother lode of unlimited gold? Bitcoin is arbitrarily limited with the difficulty and block reward adjustments whereas gold could technically (provided the right technology and enough energy) be alchemized. Not only that but by extrapolating the amount of gold found in this solar system, you'll find that there's bound to be a shit-ton more elsewhere in the universe. |
|
|
|
what will happen if I move my post, delete my old pump and back it to that sections? You can't move a post. You can only move threads, and that's only if you're the thread-starter. |
|
|
|
No collateral, no loan. Literally one of the stickied threads: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577765.0The rule of "No Collateral, No Loan" means that in order to get a loan you must give collateral that is equal, or preferably higher to the amount you are being loaned.
If you completely ignore this sticky and make a loan request with no collateral, without having massive trust on the forum, the chances of you getting negative trusted feedback and therefore having a Trade with Extreme Caution tag is almost 100%. |
|
|
|
The move button is in the same place the lock button was: bottom-left of the page. Then you just select the Archival section. |
|
|
|
-snip- They'll pay out minor amounts until some actual money starts flowing in. Once we reach the point where the site is at a profit of >1BTC (estimated) then they'll probably cash out and run with the money. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
