The free-fall-speed question can be answered in a very easy way.

Grab a rock that will fit in you hand... not a big one... maybe only 5 pounds weight. Then drop the rock from, say, 10 feet high, and accurately time its fall to the ground through the air. Then do the same thing in 10 feet of water. Notice that the rock falls much slower through 10 feet of water than it does through 10 feet of air.

Air offers very little resistance to a falling rock. Water offers more. Attached steel beams and girders of a building offer a lot more. The near free fall speed of the Towers, and especially Bldg. 7, is not logical with the resistance offered by beams and girders to slow the speed down, except that the beam and girder strength was removed first... by demolition explosives.



EDIT: I want to thank you again, Spendy, for helping us to more clearly state in easily understandable ways, how 9/11 was an inside job. Sometimes I wonder what you really believe, and if you aren't purposely setting us up so that we can more easily prove the 9/11 inside job.

Actually, it is YOU who are looking through hate-filled eyes so much, that you can't see anything but the hate in yourself.

Generally speaking, it is not the idea of Christians to be against homosexuality. It is God's idea.

Why be against Homosexuality?

1. It serves no purpose. There is ONE reason for sexuality. That is to produce offspring. Super-great friendship can exist without homosexuality. Homosexuality is a perversion of life.

2. Since homosexuality is a non-natural perversion, the people who practice it are corrupted. Their corruption doesn't make them be any less people. Rather, it is simply a fault of their system that should be controlled, like shoplifting, or murdering, etc.

3. There is a fine line between living a life that is against the things that God commands, and, losing salvation, or not, because of it. Salvation is most important, because it is for eternity. This life is short. Move away from all kinds of sinning, especially the sin of not believing Jesus salvation, so that there will be eternal salvation. All sinning weakens faith in Jesus salvation. Living a lifestyle that is against God is a continual weakening of the faith.

4. Christians who are not considerate of the the spiritually weak condition of homosexual people, are doing wrong. Rather, Christians should attempt to show homosexuals that they are turning themselves against God by practicing homosexuality, and that the practice may even lead them to eternal damnation. This, btw, is all that I am trying to do. So, it is love of homosexuals that I am promoting, rather than hate.

5. Homosexual perversion should not become a norm. It invites the young and weak willed people to try it. We don't need such perversion among our people.

6. There will come a time that God will not put up with this kind of perversion in a nation. There will be national punishment for it, besides the punishment that each individual, corrupted person gets. Let's keep the nation strong and out from under the wrath of God. Turn away from all wickedness, not only the wicked corruption of homosexuality.

Well, I should think that the answer would be intellectually obvious. I don't hate intellectual progress, and I am not happy with the status quo.

Tearing down the knowledge that we have of God, and replacing it with science-theory-as-fact is not intellectual progress. In case you haven't noticed, this is the thing that is being, and has been for a long time, done in many schools. Rather, let's find out more about God instead of trying to bury the idea that He exists.


You would rather trade the truth that God exists for the fantasy that science theory which has not been proven factual is indeed fact? You want to take a religion that is based in truth, and replace it with one that is not known to be truth. Looks like you are simply asking for problems worse than those you have already.


At best, homosexuality is an illness. at worst, it is a damning, perverted lifestyle. It serves no practical purpose. One can have good friends of the same sex without treating them as one would treat a spouse. Homosexuality is one of the things that is destroying America.



I am ashamed it is taking America as long as it is to recognize the perversion in homosexuality, and many other things. When the people can take it no longer, they will outlaw it forcefully.

Actually, God is the only thing holding everybody alive. I simply know about it a little better than many others.

Well, what is a state?

If you go to the border between two States of the USA, often you can't tell where the border is. For example, on the border between Arizona and New Mexico, there are places where the only thing that defines the border is a fence. And sometimes it isn't a very good fence. The land looks exactly the same on both sides of the fence.

The point is, what is a state/State, since there often seems to be no difference between states? Isn't a "state" really a state of mind? In the case of the border between Arizona and New Mexico, the land has been measured through surveying methods, the measurements have been written down, and the government keeps written record of the measurements.

The reason why governments write everything down is, people would forget, and the "states" would dissolve after a while. With things written down, people can go to the written records, and remind themselves of what their "state" of mind is supposed to be.

A second point is, none of us has memorized everything written in a particular government. This means that each person really has a "state" that is different from the state of everyone else. However, even if there were a bunch of people who had memorized all the writings of the State that they live in, no two of them would have exactly the same thinking about any of it. We all live in different "states."

We are all ignorant liars. Why? We say that we live in a certain State, when what is really happening is that there are multitudes of states (as many states as there are individual people) that often have the same name. For example. Every last person who says he lives in the State of Arizona has a different state of mind about it than everyone else who says that he lives in the State of Arizona.

We all really need to think things out before we ask or answer questions like this.

Enslavement is here, not in Heaven. You are a slave to needing air to breathe, water to drink, food to eat, etc.  Yet, because of the way you are built, those enslaving properties are the things that give you freedom if you have them.

You don't have the freedom to simply jump to the moon. But isn't this a good thing? Think of how many dead people there would be if we all had the ability to jump to the moon. People would die from exposure to the hostile environment of space. So, not having the freedom to jump to the moon is more like having the freedom to live a while longer.

Once you understand what freedom really is, then you might start to consider that cause and effect controls EVERY LAST THING IN YOUR LIFE, even your thinking, and the thing that you call free will. Way down deep in your soul, God has provide you with a touch of freedom. The only thing that you do in your freedom area is to decide on how strongly you are in favor of God. God controls the rest through cause and effect, based on your faith in Him, and, since He made everything, His free will which is truly free.

When you get right down to ultimate absolutes, nobody can prove that this forum exists, or that anyone is posting in it.

In the standard world of science, I have shown over and over two of the simple ways that science proves that God exists. Nobody is required to accept standard science.


Now, Fluffer. You know that you are contradicting yourself all over the place by saying these things.



This is where your logic is wrong.

First, science proves God exists.

Second, the miraculous existence of the Bible shows that it was made by God, and is far greater than any other book.

Third, the Bible shows the way to eternal life that science can't really begin to show.

Fourth, because scientists would rather believe science theory often more than science fact, science has become a faulty religion.

Wake up, Fluffer, while you still have time.

Without knowing what happened, you can't be sure of this. For example, if you had never seen or heard of a volcano, and then you came upon one, it would take some time for you to figure out what caused the disruption and destruction. Our natural knowledge of the universe is so limited that we can't begin to understand what went on in the past.

Just as an example, we are now finding that the stars are not nuclear, but rather are electric in nature. Since we are just finding this out now, how are we ever going to really even guess what happened in the messed up universe? Google "electric universe" or "electric cosmos."

Another example. If the world had wiped itself out in WWII, and there were only a handful of people left on some outlying islands, and if they had never heard or seen the devastation produced by modern war-making, what would they imagine if they saw Great Britain and Germany at the end of WWII? They certainly would not know who were the good guys and who were the bad.

Since science shows that everything has been produced by cause and effect, and pure random has not been proven to exist anywhere naturally, we really can't even begin to guess at the way the universe really operates through all the cause and effect. After all, we only know about 6 or 8 dimensions clearly, another 6 or 8 somewhat clearly, and the existence of another, say, 14 or 16, when there could be an infinity of them. And they are part of our universe.

The point is, we might as well forget science and math and turn back to agriculture and making a better life for ourselves. Even quantum computing can't begin to figure the universe out.

This is a reasonable point. Some day science will find something that shows that Big Bang was impossible. Right now there are at least 3 solid forms of BB Theory. This shows that science doesn't know for a fact that BB was real.

Evolution from inanimate materials to life is mathematically impossible. It is so firmly impossible that we don't have any logical way to even begin to show how something like evolution could even start to be possible. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.0.

When you combine the scientific facts of cause and effect, complex universe, and universal entropy, you get a result that says that God exists. If God didn't exist, at least one of these 3 scientific facts would have to NOT exist as well. Since they all exist, God MUST exist.

All our machinery, chemistry and physics comes from what we see in nature. We build our machinery based on nature and what we find in nature. Nature still has natural machinery that is greater than anything that we can build. Since it is machinery, our example of building our machinery shows that machines need to have intelligent makers. The machinery of nature is no different. The Maker of the machinery of nature is God.

The thing that I don't understand is why intelligent scientists would want to fight against God. Since they know that He exists, why not accept the truth and build science around the fact of God? In all their scientific logic, the fundamental foundation of it, that God does not exist, is not logical.

I don't get the point but, isn't that skull one of those elongated alien skulls?

People get scared in a small amount of heat, less than enough to boil water. Fear does a lot to a person. The fact that they were alive and walking around in the heat shows that the heat was not enough to even put a dent in Tower structural integrity.

I'm not joking. The people don't know how to handle the law. That's all there is to it.

It's as simple as this. If the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or THE IRS takes you to court, you can require that the plaintiff get on the stand and show the harm or damage you did to him/her. Neither the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA nor THE IRS can take the oath or affirmation, get on the stand, and say anything. You win, plus damages if you "require" them in the right way. This is basic law in America. People used to know this, but it has been hidden from most nowadays.

Perhaps you like your job. Perhaps you are not working for the money you earn. But if you are after the money, you can earn more off the the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or THE IRS than you can make in a lifetime of jobs by doing this. Same for Canada, Britain, and Australia.

Google and Youtube search on "Karl Lentz, common law." Also, check Richard Cornforth at http://voidjudgments.com/.

Gobekli Tepe (Potbellied Hill) in Turkey has proven the hunter gatherer theory wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe

I'm guessing that this is why they don't vote. They somehow can't ever seem to vote taxes away.

Thank Goodness that in the U.S. you can fill out your Form W-4 n/a (non-assumpsit) EXEMPT, and stop paying. If you file any tax return, you would do the same in all the places where numbers are required. It works. I do it (the W-4. I don't file tax forms.). Non-assumpsit, Signature.

I don't play with chemistry. I don't have a clue what your numbers are all about. Look at the edit in my post above yours.

Well, if you mean chlorine dioxide, I use it on a regular basis... at least weekly (not weakly). Keep your lousy $200. It works wonders for me personally.



EDIT: I mix a solution of 28% sodium chlorite in water, with a solution of 50% citric acid in water. Generally I mix 10 drops of each and let the mixture sit for, say, 3 minutes. Microscopic bubbles of chlorine dioxide are formed in the mixture.

Next, I add the mixture to a cup of water, stir, and drink it down.

Since the logical nonbelievers don't have a logical rebuttal to the proof that God exists, there is nothing to respond to.

I bow to your superior chemistry knowledge.

MMS works and is a whole lot cheaper.