Can't believe I was able to sleep through it! Wooo! It's over NINE THOUSAND!!  |
|
|
|
Pretty accurate indeed.
Actually more accurate if not only banks could print notes out of thin air, but also tax players to finance herself.
Hahahaha, it's actually A THING too! Square four if I remember correctly, used to mess me up quite badly because you sometimes step on it straight after passing GO square and have to give back the money you made for going full circle lol  I wish I were taxed 10% on my income. I would actually pay money to be taxed 10%! Even if that looks like more to a wealth tax rather than income tax. In case 10% is yuge! I'd rather pay the $200. I think there's a rule like which one is higher you have to pay. So if you have 3 grand you don't have a choice but to pay 10% of that which is 300, same scam as taxes in real life In that case, I quit. |
|
|
|
Pretty accurate indeed.
Actually more accurate if not only banks could print notes out of thin air, but also tax players to finance herself.
Hahahaha, it's actually A THING too! Square four if I remember correctly, used to mess me up quite badly because you sometimes step on it straight after passing GO square and have to give back the money you made for going full circle lol I wish I were taxed 10% on my income. I would actually pay money to be taxed 10%! Even if that looks like more to a wealth tax rather than income tax. In case 10% is yuge! I'd rather pay the $200. Edit: damn. Can't believe I'm being bludgeoned with tax talk while at work.  |
|
|
|
That's my bullish input for all you moon boys anyway.
Not going to win too many friends in these parts by referring to peeps here (and assumingly HODLers and accumulators) as moon boys. But, hey, do what you feel that you must. Sorry, that BTC prices are moving against your anticipations  ...... Not really.  It's ok I'm not looking for friends, just to learn from others You're right, it did go against how I anticipated though, not going to deny that  Lucky I didn't get rekt™ shorting really. Didn't realise moon boys was offensive though, I thought anyone who believes a $100K BTC is possible in the near future was a moon boy by default. We're all moon boys? Maybe men still get offended by being called boys I dunno, I forget to keep check of these things. Maybe moon men would be more appropriate, but doesn't have the ring to it. ― Linus Torvalds Fuckin' Fins! Here's a hat   avatar-sized  edit: No offense intended toward the offensible Fins  |
|
|
|
^
Long time I’ve seen Jihan -wu..... also months that I just even hear his name .....
Proof of what’s not worth anything will go away....
I have nothing to say but I suddenly feel compelled to make a post |
|
|
|
Good afternoon WO!
Observing @ $8,656
Vegeta day?
Haha! I’m ready  Such a good feeling  |
|
|
|
I am so 'kinfused.  |
|
|
|
Does anybody ever search bitcoin on Twitter?
There are some real retards on there. Reading through most of the tweets really makes me appreciate this place & you guys.
We really are still early adopters aren’t we. Some of the stuff on there, FFS, average joe really hasn’t got a clue has he?
Gotta follow the right ones bruh  Not the average joe's I’ve been really bored today. Even bitcoin is doing nothing atm. This is just like what happened before the last halving. We should start to climb upwards slowly soon. I want to see some GAINZZZZ!  That looks like JimboToronto. |
|
|
|
It's not really a big deal but I found a small problem with the ranges we've decided on. The very first set should be 1-50 (or 0-49 which would change all other picks too) otherwise whoever chooses that has one extra dollar in their range (0-50 is a $51 range) over everyone else. On the other hand, if the price is $0 then I guess we all lose anyway...  at zero the prize is also zero Respectfully disagree. At $0 the prize is still .125 Bitcoin and even if the network is down, i believe El duderino would provide a paper wallet with those funds - probably already set aside. I also imagine there will be many WO members collecting as many BTC as possible at that price point. |
|
|
|
It's not really a big deal but I found a small problem with the ranges we've decided on. The very first set should be 1-50 (or 0-49 which would change all other picks too) otherwise whoever chooses that has one extra dollar in their range (0-50 is a $51 range) over everyone else. On the other hand, if the price is $0 then I guess we all lose anyway... Not true. Check this final list of participants: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214437.msg53569347#msg53569347Rules are that your winning range extends if there is a gap in the list before or after you. Lowest prediction is 3101-3150 so there is a gap before and this user gets the entire range 0-3150. Similarly if there is a gap between two participants, the gap splits and ads to both of them, for example: | Selected price range | Participants | Winning price range | | 5051-5100 | fabiorem | 4776-5125 | | 5151-5200 | sgbett * | 5126-5325 |
Gap from 5101 to 5151 is 50, fabiorem gets 25 added to his range and sgbett gets 25 before his range. I think this rule was fantastic idea because otherwise we could have a situation when no one wins. Thanks. I was merely pointing out the inconsistency in groupings for future events if they were to occur by the grace of el duderino. |
|
|
|
On the bad side I just found out Neil Peart is dead. There goes my hero.
One of the all-time greatest! Neil Peart inspired my younger brother to take up the drums. Lots of fond memories. Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand. Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand.-Neil Peart RIP |
|
|
|
It's not really a big deal but I found a small problem with the ranges we've decided on. The very first set should be 1-50 (or 0-49 which would change all other picks too) otherwise whoever chooses that has one extra dollar in their range (0-50 is a $51 range) over everyone else. On the other hand, if the price is $0 then I guess we all lose anyway... |
|
|
|
Be careful Dude! That stuff can kill you. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I'm coming back here with the awesome hat that xhomerx10 designed He really is a great designer The main problem: Bitcoin is declining every day, a bad signal, do you have confidence in whether it will increase in the next few days? I should have sold some when it was at 8400 and bought it now for easy profit  It's a pity not to do that bitcoin is finished get out while you can Sorry guys... guess I was in a negative mood when I made that last hat. |
|
|
|
I'm sure Roger will try to wrangle her into promoting btrash Seems we have a bit of upward momentum atm  |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I'm coming back here with the awesome hat that xhomerx10 designed He really is a great designer The main problem: Bitcoin is declining every day, a bad signal, do you have confidence in whether it will increase in the next few days? I should have sold some when it was at 8400 and bought it now for easy profit It's a pity not to do that Mmmm... cats!  avatar-sized  |
|
|
|
...
Damn the Drake look alike looks real to me. As for the blonde chick id take her over Reese Witherspoon any day.
Are you sure it's a chick? The gif only shows a bit of face obscured by a carrot. She's a drag queen who might also use the pronoun he |
|
|
|
|
I dont think any of us would still be here if we weren't at least borderline extreme. Just a bunch of Bitcoin extremist freaks.
|
|
|
|
@VB1001 ... You also CCW?
I think wadcutters are fun. Normally, you don't use them as defensive ammunition, but they will work too. Imagine getting hit by a wadcutter instead of FMJ.
Neither could even come close to being hit with your mother's shoe. That really stings. |
|
|
|
Although it is entirely possible to be fair the DHL flight was in Iraq not Iran and that was attributed to insurgents and not a state actor. My point is that it landed after being struck by a missile (SAM); not the who, where's or why's. Edit: Holy shit. Turns out Ali Abedzadeh is the chief executive of The Civil Aviation Organization of Islamic Republic of IranI wonder if he can find Iran on an unlabeled map of the world.... or his own bellybutton. Dare we trust their investigation? Edit2: By "we" I mean those who do not trust the "Supreme Leader" of Iran and anyone loyal to him. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
