Seingat ane dari dulu Luno juga melayani pengguna Indo kok gan (bisa jual beli pake IDR). Mungkin agan visit web untuk negara lain kali jadi ga ada opsi buat IDR? Ane pernah makai di tahun 2017/2018 dan setahu ane ga ada perubahan layanan sama sekali buat user Indo. Kalau volume transaksi agan kecil saran ane sih ke Pintu aja kalau mau WD, feenya bisa lebih murah dan bisa narik 24/7 (kecuali beberapa bank macam BNI/BRI).

Kalau dilihat dari sejarah kripto sih emang hal kaya gini termasuk "wajar". Dev" anonim yang muncul h-1 sebelum proyek launch bisa dengan mudah launch proyek A-B-C dst karena fomo yang luar biasa dari sesuatu yang hot. Ane pribadi sih ga pernah ngikut hal kaya gini dan rata" proyek "anon" yang ane hold pada launch lewat airdrop dan liquidity berasal dari komunitas, jadi peluang rug pull juga makin kecil. Tentu potensi tim ngedump token ke pasar masih ada, tapi di sinilah yang bakal ngebedain proyek yang emang dibuat untuk bikin platform dengan visi atau sekedar buat nyari duit.

Ane sih berharap hype pool farming bisa reda di ETH biar platform" yang butuh interaksi smart contract bisa berjalan sesuai harapan dev dan komunitasnya.

That's way too complicated and I don't think it will attract much interest from borrowers in the first place, since they don't really need to borrow from the pool because there are dozens of competitors out there. I think over-collateralization is good enough if you want to make sure lenders will get something if the borrowers default.

AFAIK Yield also plans to launch a pooled-lending mechanism, but it is basically an automatic lending-borrowing mechanism so people don't have to create individual offers. Lenders can send their funds on a pool and set their categories (let's say interest between 3-10% within 10 days), and the contract will automatically take care of finding the borrowers that suit their criteria. I think you can follow this structure and make sure the interest is good enough to attract lenders while borrowers get incentivized to use your platform.

Not really a surprise tbh. I'm pretty sure some of them already hold some crypto and then announce something like this so they can increase their profits. Sooner or later the scalability debate will need to have its conclusions or at least there are several alternatives so we can continue this trend.

Hopefully, we'll succeed at that and create a new wave of mass adoption.

From what I've heard, the new law requires an exchange to register and set up a real bank account in the country and report user details to the government. Sounds like they don't want to open a "real" bank account there tbh. Maybe because they afraid government will intervene with their operations. Well, hopefully, this will reduce shady trading activities even though user data might be collected here and there.

Kalau agan menganggap AMPL itu NCS, menurut agan kok tidak hancur juga seperti koin" yang lain? Menurut agan bedanya di mana? Ane sendiri tidak pernah berpikir AMPL didesain sebagai stablecoin, walaupun harganya cenderung stabil ke harga peg zone. Kalau komunitas Ampleforth sendiri sih lebih beranggapan mereka menjadi bagian dari elatic finance: https://thedefiant.io/elastic-finance-definition-use-cases-and-framework-by-amplesense-dao/.

Dulu seingat ane mod sapta udah pernah ngasih komen masalah thread news macam ini. Seingat ane sih kenapa ga ada kaya beginian karena ujungnya cuma jadi spam, plus rata" cuma sharing link dan 'ngopas' isi artikelnya aja. Sulit ngontrol kontennya. Kalau ga salah ada di thread diskusi saran sub Indo.

I second the opinion that discussing the risk is also a good idea for a new investor. Make sure they know that their portfolio can go -90% in a single day or more. I think lots of new users are interested in the opportunity without embracing the risk and then claim that crypto is a scam in the end when they failed to utilize the opportunities to make some profits.

Make sure he's really prepared to lose all of that money before he starts. Reduce the amount necessary since there's no use in guiding him if he can't be patient because he lost the money he can't afford to lose.

You might want to check out yield.credit, it is more or less the lending platform developed with the same idea as yours albeit running on Ethereum. One of the things you could improve by looking at that platform is to reduce fees to make loan offers etc. I'm not sure how this could work with the Bitcoin chain though, probably you can do it on a 2nd layer or something similar if you truly want to achieve full decentralization where the blockchain holds all the details and secure the deal.

Emangnya fundamental mereka sekuat apa bisa ngalahin DOT sama BNB? DOT sama BNB bisa jadi kompetitor/platform yang cukup kuat untuk bersaing dengan Ethereum ane rasa, dan ga salah kalau pada masukin ke list koin yang mereka rasa potensinya paling bagus.

Karena ini thread untuk ngeshill, ane rasa fine lah ya kalau ane juga nge"shill" proyek yang ane suka. Rata" sih dibawah 300 juta USD mc-nya karena ane nyari yang high-risk high-return dengan potensi yang ane rasa oke.

1. SHR - khusus untuk ini, ane udah investasi sejak 2018. Developmentnya udah jauh banget dan dari AMA" terakhir sih produknya makin luas, ga cuma masalah sharing economy aja, tapi melebar ke masalah ID, travel ecosystem, etc. Appnya juga bakal launch bulan April ini dan staking juga bakal launch (kecuali delay lagi). Target layannya nyampai 100 negara lebih, jadi ane rasa volume pemakaian platformnya bakal luas. Negatifnya ini proyek kadang delay dan komunikasi ke komunitasnya ga sebaik proyek lain. Kalau ga bisa punya cukup trust ke timnya ane rasa bakal susah buat hold. Price terakhir sih $0.08, udah 4x lipat dari harga ICO dan 90x lebih dari ATL (saat ane beli).
2. LTO
3. YIELD (dapet gratis) - yield.credit, kompetitornya COMP dan AAVE. Marketcapnya masih sangat kecil, integrasi dengan Fantom biar fee jauh lebih rendah dan rate yang kompetitif ane rasa bisa bawa platform ini dapet MC setidaknya 300 juta. Devnya juga deket dengan Chainlink, Ampleforth, Fantom, dan lainnya. Ane rasa peluangnya untuk berhasil jadi kompetitor AAVE dst cukup besar. Minusnya devnya anonim, atau tepatnya pseudonim karena udah cukup terkenal di kalangan DeFi enthusiast. Kalau agan dulu follow group review codenya Andre Cronje pasti udah tahu dia juga.
4. MUSE (dapet gratis juga) - DEX buat NFT. Ane rasa selama hype NFT ga mati ini proyek bakal dapet MC yang cukup banyak. Jumlah token juga lumayan dikit, sekitar 1 juta maks. Murni proyek komunitas.
5. KAI / Kardiachain

Lama ga ngecek proyek ini ternyata kemaren udah launch node untuk proyeknya UN. Harga tokennya juga udah lumayan di sekitar $0.6 USD. Ane rasa profit dari leasing masih cukup oke khususnya kalau modal agan cukup besar. Dengan makin banyaknya klien kayaknya feenya juga makin banyak. Ane pribadi sih mau beli lagi kalau ada dana nganggur.

Ada yang punya node atau ikut leasing ga di sini? Prosesnya masih sama seperti terakhir ane leasing, cukup sign transaksi aja tanpa harus ngirim token ke address tertentu.

As far as I can remember even if you don't have enough ETH to make any transaction you'll still see the pop-up. Did you try with other web browsers or is there any plug-in that blocks any pop-up etc? Did you try a hard refresh after you connect your MetaMask? I personally use several ad and script blockers but never got this problem.

Awalnya ane kira agan bakal berargumen kalau non-collateralized stablecoin itu bisa dipakai. Kalau dilihat dari praktek yang udah ada memang pada hancur lebur sih, ane rasa karena emang susah dapetin trust dari usernya sendiri dan banyak peluang protocolnya kena serangan yang bisa bikin harga atau suplai tokennya berubah dan jadi disaster.

Kalau ane lihat malah AMPL jauh lebih 'kuat' daripada ide non-collateralized stablecoin ini, padahal tujuannya bukan untuk bikin stable coin (walau harga tokennya cenderung stabil di angka $1).

Wah, emang mereka ga mau ngirim tokennya sendiri apa gimana? Kayaknya pelit banget pesertanya sendiri yang harus klaim token dan bayar gas yang mahal (kalau airdrop sih masih masuk akal). Belum lagi kalau nanti ada pihak usil yang bikin sebagian feenya masuk ke wallet yang dikontrol oleh developernya sendiri, hmm.

Dari beberapa group sih ane baca pada banyak proyek yang bakal make rollups, optimism dst untuk menyiasati fee mahal sebelum ETH2.0 terjadi. Mungkin di bulan Juli/Agustus fee udah bisa berkurang khususnya kalau dApps macam Uniswap udah update dan make optimism.

As far as I can understand from your story, you can't do it right now, unless Binance has new order types. What you can do is probably put a sell order at the price you believe Bitcoin will reach later on, and then put the stop loss at $50k. If the price drop to $50k then your order will be placed on the order book and if you're lucky all of your Bitcoin might get sold asap. If that's not your thing, then another option is to use a bot that supports such task.

I also like Andreas videos, watched them a few times in the past when I'm still new and don't really understand much. That being said, reading the book is a good experience as well since you can skip and read the parts that you're really interested in any time you want to. Not to mention most of Andreas's books are available for free (at least the previous version), so there should be no problem if you can't buy the books.

Things could get tricky if you want to learn about subjects other than Bitcoin though since there are new terms here and there. Other than Binance academy, I guess following the latest news on Twitter is a good choice if you don't want to miss anything new, such as "liquidity protocol", "liquidity farming", etc.

I think there are several reasons:
1. The fees are quite high.
2. It is difficult for new users to join and find opportunities since a lot of job owners probably have their favorites. Skill doesn't really matter if you don't find the opportunity.
3. You don't have to depend on a fiat payment processor since the payment can be transferred to your crypto wallet directly.
4. Convenience. You don't have to trade from fiat to crypto and save some money.
5. The current platform is too centralized, or simply doesn't offer a place for crypto enthusiasts to work on some things they're good at (different from person to person I guess).

You mean the whole hard drive has been reformatted multiple times? Sounds like a lost cause then. If you truly believe you had the wallet file, seeking professional help won't hurt, but you'd have to spend some money. Personally, I'd consider it gone at this point and move on from this.

IMO one of the main reasons is that younger people like to take more risks to get higher profits. Not to mention how lifestyle and part-time job culture in South Korea are quite high, so people can get money relatively quickly and spend it on anything that they wanted (at least that's what I get from the analysis on South Korean culture). In addition to that, the barrier to enter the crypto market is quite low, compared to other investment markets like real estate, stocks, etc.

If you still can't withdraw it, then I guess you have to deposit some coins and then withdraw them all using the coin/network with the lowest fee. Or wait for a few years and hope your LTC value increases.

There's no other choice, exchange won't process those small transactions since they need to make profits when you withdraw.