Bitcoin Forum
June 03, 2024, 11:14:10 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 [157] 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 ... 387 »
3121  Economy / Securities / Re: Do not buy the new PMBs called BFMINES issued by Furuknap on: June 23, 2013, 01:05:38 AM
Agreed, this is a horrible investment at the offered price. I thought it was okay at first before I realized it only starts hashing in months.
3122  Other / Off-topic / Re: Does Github charge by the line? on: June 23, 2013, 01:04:37 AM
Nah. Otherwise people will write code without linebreaks.
3123  Economy / Lending / Re: I need a 2 BTC loan on: June 23, 2013, 01:03:33 AM
Sorry to say this but this loan is -EV. It is throwing your money away.

Doesn't matter if you have good intentions, doesn't matter if you repay, it is still -EV.
3124  Economy / Gambling / Re: coinsp.in Two-Up! Soft Opening on: June 23, 2013, 01:01:52 AM
The game is pretty cool. Higher max bet pl0x when you launch.
3125  Economy / Lending / Re: Lending Website on: June 23, 2013, 12:54:36 AM
register.php and other pages:

Quote
<head>

Add
Code:
<!DOCTYPE html>
before the head.
3126  Economy / Lending / Re: Lending Website on: June 22, 2013, 11:50:06 PM
<!DOCTYPE html> and nothing above it so your inputs are not thin.
3127  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What Litecoin means for Bitcoin (and crypto in general) once it's on Mt.Gox on: June 22, 2013, 11:34:30 AM
Like gox matters.
3128  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] Virtual Mining - Hash Without Hardware! on: June 22, 2013, 11:33:43 AM
That's kinda the problem when you offer investments that are zero sum games - either you make a profit (and piss off your investors who made a loss), or you make a loss (but your investors make a profit).
3129  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] BTCINVEST - Low risk investment fund! on: June 22, 2013, 11:24:56 AM
Bid and ask walls has been placed. If you have large (buy or sell) orders, schedule it by contacting me privately. Smiley

Also, I'd appreciate it if you could leave me a trust rating if you haven't already!

Wow the ask wall is already gone at .24. Will there be more?
Yes, especially as I am not harming any existing investors trying to sell.

I hope that 0.27 BTC purchase was done by the seller instead of some clueless investor... Roll Eyes
3130  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: June 22, 2013, 11:09:03 AM
Hello everyone,
I have a few questions about ASICMINER shares history (I have not enough time to read all the pages in this thread, so I hope that somebody who remembers it will answer).

1) When ASICMINER started to offer the shares? The first post is from 2012-08-09, but there is something about "earlier investors".

2) When the price started to rise from 0.1?

3) What were the factors that moved the price up?

4) When was the initial 0.1 gained back in dividends?

5) Anything interesting/important happened with ASICMINER before March 2013?

I can see chart of BTC-TC passtrough history since March 2013 ( http://coinflow.co/chart/ASICMINER-PT ), so I'm interested in the price development before that.
Thanks for answers.

"Early investors" are simply the people who hold the shares now.

The price moved up because they successfully developed ASIC chips that mines. This pretty much happens with every mining company when they get hardware, as the risk that they would never have got hardware evaporated.

The initial 0.1 was gained back in dividends in a month or so?
3131  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Which do you prefer, a constant bitcoin address or anonymity? on: June 22, 2013, 10:24:35 AM
Not a crypto expert, but here's what I found googling:

Quote
You have a good discussion in:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=133425.0

Basically, ECDSA is compromised, hashing isn't. With a quantum computer, you could easily deduce the private key corresponding to a public key. If you only have an address, which is a hashed public key, the private key is safe. Anyway, to spend a transaction, you need to send the public key. At that point you are vulnerable, but the attack is not straightforward.
3132  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Which do you prefer, a constant bitcoin address or anonymity? on: June 22, 2013, 09:36:55 AM
This is not just about anonymity, every time you spend coins from an address the public key for the address is revealed. This is 1 less (out of 3) different encryption/hashing algorithms used.

This is also one of the reasons why Qt has different change addresses.
3133  Economy / Services / Re: Free bitcoins (up to 0.25BTC/mo): Advertise these links in your sig! on: June 22, 2013, 06:31:35 AM
Yep, paid!
3134  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: CoinChat.org | Free Bitcoins | Web Chatroom | Custom Rooms | Gambling Games on: June 22, 2013, 06:27:02 AM
Bump.
3135  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BFL Conspiracy on: June 22, 2013, 06:25:56 AM
What do you mean nobody knows ASICMINER? We know ASICMINER's network hash rate.
3136  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BTCJam collateral dividend question. on: June 22, 2013, 06:19:15 AM
I don't think so.
3137  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] Earn interest on your bitcoins! CoinLenders pays out interest on deposits. on: June 22, 2013, 05:34:45 AM
you may want to read the thread in the legal discussions before you do that.  A few of us are betting you'll lose your entire investment when the regulators seize the site.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=239905.0
Just like how BitFunder, btct.co, mpex.co, cryptostocks.com, btc-e.net, vircuex.com, bitstamp.net, cryptsy.com .. oh wait.

No bitcoin business is licensed to operate in all countries of the world. It's simply impossible for any Bitcoin business to do that due to the regulatory barriers and costs.

You will also not lose your entire investment, we have dead man's switch systems in place.

 
Question:   Please list the steps a borrower goes through to try and get a loan approval.   What recourse options so you have once a loan goes into default?    PM direct if you want to take this off the thread.
We've started lending to qualified borrowers such as Bitcoin businesses as well as fully secured loans. We don't chase after btcjam's market. We have not had a default since April.
3138  Economy / Auctions / Re: [WTS] Domain+Code www.BitHits.info on: June 22, 2013, 05:26:36 AM
OK, I admit, I actually laughed at your ending date.
3139  Economy / Auctions / Re: [WTS] Domain+Code www.BitHits.info on: June 22, 2013, 05:18:22 AM
5 BTC starting price??

You are charging for a phpBB forum separately?

Worthless domain?

Worthless script?

Tick tick tick.
3140  Economy / Lending / Re: CoinLenders Flow: Programmatic Bitcoin Liquidity Loans on: June 22, 2013, 05:13:05 AM
That's what we've been using and it works quite nicely so far. It's not for a random twitter app, it's for businesses who need short term liquidity in the range of hundreds to thousands of coins.

There's a few advantages, such as no way for disputes - I can prove that you requested X btc to X address, here is the txid, and this repayment address is empty.

Shamelessly stolen from MPEx
Pages: « 1 ... 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 [157] 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 ... 387 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!