thats not true you must compare the lifestyle of russians poor under zarism and communism, and you will realise, it was much better under communism
Yes, things were much better under Communism I'm sure. lol difference between the holodomor and the countless regular neverending starvation in precommunist societies are that the holodomor was a unique event in a war. while the neverending starvations where part of regular live, so natural no one even cares about it. seriously what kind of a nooba re you to do such a bad example? |
|
|
|
if all you said is true, then how do you explain the situation in the bitcoin price which rose and fell several times in the past. was it same push by bitcoin creators?
You maybe right of your statement but lets accept the real status that the down turn on the recent activity on the market was due to a lot of issues concerning crypto market.the FUD, Scammers, Hackers, and the never ending issue on Regulation by the financial government agency which until now is not yet resolved. Lets monitor the market for a more favorable crypto market status come 2019. i think cryptomarket will resolve itself how power has been always distributed, and thats not through anyfakes. |
|
|
|
|
people that earn crypto do sacrifices. they dont do them for free.
you have to find reasons to get them to do sacrifices.
|
|
|
|
to give a new generation of "icos" that could be filtered and regulated by this indexation.
If they are manually approved, you will be swayed by compensation. If they are automatically approved, scammers will easily find out how to cheat the system. thats true. but there is no other way of getting a proper regulation and selfmarketing. i am thinking mainly about the sector of engineering foundations for those that want to use craftsmen, equipment and materials to create value sources in their environment. i wont list any pow token in that market |
|
|
|
He's head of IT in a big company (Energy Industry), "B", and I'm in company "C". We met 3 years ago in company "A" which was also a huge energy company. In his scope there are internal financial apps, I suppose they are doing more or less doing the same thing as in company A, meaning: - Manage bills of expenses / expense accounts
- Manage and monitor corporate budgets (by departement / or projects / or directors)
- Manage workflow of validation processes for corporate investments
- Manage property portfolio of the group
He said "hey I remember you were into BTC, do you know how these technologies could help my business?" But there is a big difference between holding a couple of btc and alts and being a fintech crypto consultant! I don't know much about his needs or problem he's trying to solve, we barely talked, he just mentionned the fact "I'd like to innovate"... So can you guys think of some specific crypto technology or blockchain services designed for companies? Any hint would be welcome. tell your boss how to create an ico and then pay you his employee with his own cryptotoken then lol  i want to see your face, when your boss pays your next salary in his private token... |
|
|
|
Hey guys, I'm running a Security Token Offerings(STO) News & Research Channel to spread out awesome projects and articles about security tokens. If you need any news & articles about security tokens, come and see https://t.me/sectokensnews!😊🚀 Feedback Plz. i consider securities a huge scam, the security token offerers, basically pays the workers with these "securities" in order to obtain an income source (sustainable), while the workers kept selling their time (unsustainable). in a society where securities are being offered all those that offer securities will systematically scam all those that "work for money" resulting ultimately into a society where only idiots work for "securities" |
|
|
|
well whats capitalism then? a society where the bankers have money earning catte protecting them and privatise everything.
like a mobster state.
is that a better solution? it wasnt a success anywhere in fact it was only a success in the centre of it (west, usa, london)
regards
Just pointing out that the ideology you advocate for was created by and serves the people you claim to want to fight. Also capitalism doesn't HAVE to be those things. Even if Communism wasn't a sham to begin with, yes Capitalism is WAY better. All known social formations were not created by a previously written theory. There was no theory of slavery, feudalism, capitalism. Human society developed by itself, without prepared theories. Only the theory of Communism was invented by Marx in advance and practice showed its unsuitability. thats not true you must compare the lifestyle of russians poor under zarism and communism, and you will realise, it was much better under communism just because the united states had more ressources and was economically more successful it doesnt mean that communism failed. you have to compere the relativity. communism spreaded in china also because live in imperial dynastic china was so terrible, majority of population basically died till age 30 (starvation) same was the case in middle east. just look at somalie today its how it is. |
|
|
|
well whats capitalism then? a society where the bankers have money earning catte protecting them and privatise everything.
like a mobster state.
is that a better solution? it wasnt a success anywhere in fact it was only a success in the centre of it (west, usa, london)
regards
Just pointing out that the ideology you advocate for was created by and serves the people you claim to want to fight. Also capitalism doesn't HAVE to be those things. Even if Communism wasn't a sham to begin with, yes Capitalism is WAY better. well lets see where capitalism will lead americans now to, with their trillions of ICOs, i doubt they will find now idiots abroad to help them in the first place. capitalism in my oppinion is not even a society form, what you think is submission under a certain captalist's rule but that could be anything also a very bad rule. you can also submit yourself under a communist central bank no sane american wants to be a slave of the federal reserve and its billionaires. |
|
|
|
Been Asking Myself must all Project create its own coin or is it a thing of pride this day to say I have my own coin
come to think of it some project finds it hard to be able to get there coin to any value because thousand of projects are coming up by the day people literally get confused on which to choose.
There is project out there already doing well with one thing still lacking real use of the coin in the real world daily activities that mean -
most coins are just traded as an asset!!
I think some project can just implement its solution and using the already existing cryptos as currencies by that way helping adoption.
the hassle of creating from the scratch to me is not all necessary for some project!!
if you looking at the mode of payment for your service you can simply accept already existing coin and go into a partnership with them
create a system to see that crypto have a healthy growth cycle not just having millions of project and at the end millions of dead project
better the whole system creates like a support system to retain its value for the long run... Long Live Crypto
what you all think
well having your own money, gives you the ability to pay others to do something for you. creating your own money is cheap and riskfree. while working for money is risky. |
|
|
|
of course, because they can satisfy demand |
|
|
|
LOL. I am new to this and is really exist about being the drama Queen? I know that Roger Ver always posting some drama's on his twitter account so probably he was being entitled as the drama King though I do believe on his words and made it as some sort of references base on my observations but not all especially in the speculations are right and correct. So this Drama Queen would be exciting to know who will be crown with this title.
there cannot be a drama king, only drama queens. |
|
|
|
The US government disagrees. The IRS has stated clearly that digital currencies like Bitcoin are defined under the law as property, which entails specific tax treatment. The CFTC has asserted that digital currencies are commodities subject to their regulations and a federal court has agreed with them. FinCEN has established that digital currency users are not defined as MSB under FinCEN regulations but that digital currency exchangers are money transmitters subject to AML/KYC regulations.
As you can see, Bitcoin already falls under many existing regulations. They can't regulate the Bitcoin protocol, but they can regulate Bitcoin users and businesses.
these are "definitions" not "regulations" regulations also bring in force. etc. a population has to accept a regulation. How is this any different? A population has to accept the tax code, otherwise people risk tax audits, fines and penalties, or even prison time for tax evasion. You can't get around that by using BTC, at least according to current regulations. The same goes for engaging in fraud using virtual currencies. The CFTC has charged defendants for just that because their regulations cover Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. honestly the us population gives a damn about "regulations" its just some private individuals that release something. it means nothing, if sec regulated something, sec is weak. without the soviet union today even weaker then ever, they are just a bunch of private bankers that are seeking to enrich themselves privately. if they "regulate something" or morph into communists no one will trust and care what they do. infact i think that current cryptomarket is already regulated take the index as an example that is privatly owned by gliss, with main influence. its simply a corrupt indexmafia nothing else it is of course regulated the regulating rules are: 1. Bitcoinmaximalism -> no cryptocurrency can be listed with a bigger marketcapitalisation than bitcoin 2. Corruption -> if someone wants to list a cryptocurrency with a huge number of token and a huge price (huge marketcapitalisation) it must be rich, powerful or bribe the indexmafia -> ripple/xrp 3. Denouncing all others that are not aligned with (1) and (2) ->everything else is a "shitcoin"
this is in fact a regulation, you are regulated.
what is the SEC supposed to do about it? the SEC is forced to respect free market principles, that comes from the constitution of the north american state (liberalism) and its what the cryptomarket is standing for. and i honestly dont think you will survive with that. so if you want to be a different more nobel regulated so the world supports the market or much less likely "bitcoin" fix this. (which is not easy) |
|
|
|
|
since current market is basically just a dumpster on fire I want to Propose here in this Community
the creation of completely new index for a cryptomarket.
to give a new generation of "icos" that could be filtered and regulated by this indexation.
a chance to enter the market.
because the current market is just losing all trust and is in my oppinion gradually degrading we should try a new start.
i have currently 2 names i like to use for that index
1. liberty index
2. freedom index.
addition:
3. liberation index
but we can all talk the details.
hope for high interest.
|
|
|
|
for all outsiders that enter this,
you have to understand that the current claim that bitcoin suffers from a "bear market" is absolutely wrong.
the bitcoin founders in their unlimited greed tried to push the price as high as possible, but ultimately wasted, aquired all possible support they were able to obtain.
without potential new kapital to attract they are now in a stuck situation, as they cant attract new capital anymore to push the value of their beloved "bitcoin"
this stagnation combined with the automatic liquidity loss (miner electricity and infrastructure bill) leads to a slow drain out of capital for bitcoin.
but thats not all, they also are trapped in a death spiral, as people that use bitcoin as a currency, will pay it to someone who doesnt share their "investor confidence"
through the existing deathspiral the bitcoin "earners" then sell their bitcoin in the market again which leads to a continueing collapse in value.
the whole story about "bear market" is just wishthinking or worse deliberate satisfaction, or moral stabilisation procedures to keep intact their "community".
from a socioeconomic perspective of bitcoins situation
according to logic, you are never in a bearmarket, but in reality in a support loss spiral
regards
What have I just read? Where such conclusions? I understand that there are people who manipulate the price of assets, but they are not stupid enough to drive themselves into a corner. I know a lot of people who recently bought bitcoins for the first time. This suggests that the inflow of capital is possible and it will be. The circle of people who know and buy bitcoin is still very small, but it is growing steadily. my conclusions are good i am doing them since beginning of 2018 and they where all confirmed by reality. its you who constantly is spreading trash that isnt going to happen like (bitcoin 1 million usd) |
|
|
|
bitcoin cannot be regulated its an advertised internet token with fixed amount.
no way to regulate it.
only fiats can be regulated in their rewarding usage. The US government disagrees. The IRS has stated clearly that digital currencies like Bitcoin are defined under the law as property, which entails specific tax treatment. The CFTC has asserted that digital currencies are commodities subject to their regulations and a federal court has agreed with them. FinCEN has established that digital currency users are not defined as MSB under FinCEN regulations but that digital currency exchangers are money transmitters subject to AML/KYC regulations. As you can see, Bitcoin already falls under many existing regulations. They can't regulate the Bitcoin protocol, but they can regulate Bitcoin users and businesses. these are "definitions" not "regulations" regulations also bring in force. etc. a population has to accept a regulation. thats even less possible in the united states since, everything is private there the population are just economic subjects, its not a national socialist democracy with a public. if the SEC "regulates the cryptomarket" it means nothing because its simply a private organ of a private banking cartel. |
|
|
|
wait till russians start becoming capitalists and are trying to install a central bank in every worlds community the find, like the americans did, world will get new epicenter of earthquakes comming from russia.
americans raised russians not to be communists, russians, took that lession serious, now they can imagine what they have created.
If a central bank is so capitalist, why is it one of the 10 planks of Communism? communists is when there is a central authority that forces the population into a central bank rule to achieve communist goals capitalism is when the entire society is constantly trying to basically scam/abuse outsiders as money earning cattle, and works on their behavior appearance to achieve that. both cases can have a "central bank" or even no central bank Uh huh. Because Communism never abuses people as money earning cattle or whatever else in that rambling runoff sentence you were trying to say. What if I told you your precious Communism was originally created as a concept and fostered into reality by Capitalist bankers as a means of controlled opposition, and you unknowingly work for them? Would you integrate this information into your personal ideology or would you ignore it knowing you could not possibly cope with such cognitive dissonance? my personal idoelogy is not to support any financial system that i dont controll, no matter what they tell me, thats an update from what i did as a child "trusting experts" jes the banksters are the capitalists and they use communism as a justification to be the capitalists in a communist society. You don't get it. Communism was a sham from day 1 and was literally created by bankers to take control of countries and strip them of resources. http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdfwell whats capitalism then? a society where the bankers have money earning catte protecting them and privatise everything. like a mobster state. is that a better solution? it wasnt a success anywhere in fact it was only a success in the centre of it (west, usa, london) regards |
|
|
|
A world without borders will be best but first humans need to see themselves as brothers ans sisters and root out any trace of racial superiority and prejudice. just as our doors are always open to our family members.
i trust one day the world will be like this
there will never be a world without borders, the borders will simply change |
|
|
|
When you take the time to select right STO/ ICO development company, they ensure their launch of security token sales setup remains safe & reliable at all times for achieving crypto fundraising goal. Most of the business owners understand the value of STOs ( security token offering) and they’re finally understand the importance of developing STO launch that is more secure and reliable. But, that very important process of selecting a reliable STO development company is often ignored. If this process is ignored, it can produce disastrous results ( security breaches and lost investors hope). Don’t ignore even one step of launching STO for crypto fundraising. Avoiding mistakes that can create big problems later. When business owners take the time to select a reliable STO development company, Look at these to find the best one >> i don't think it depends on the company that creates you the token, weather your "STO or ICO" will be successful. because those companies will all produce a standardised format, and it will be equally unpopular. |
|
|
|
|
evolution is a good religion for those that fear all types of gods and divinities.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
