You know I've seen some ads around here for luxury homes that were being sold for BTC.  I was really surprised and it kinda looked like a scam site so I didn't look into it too far.  Nevertheless, if you can turn that up, you may be able to contact those folks with some of your questions.

Hi there, if I understood correctly, there's a giveaway here for pd users.  On PD, I'm

username:tsp

Thanks!!!!

If you understood anything you'd note that that "negative trust" is from a guy who's trust rating is -625.  I'm just going to let you read up on that yourself.  Anyway, I'm done with you, jackass.  Congrats on making the ignore list.

It seems like a reasonable position to me, but I wonder why 380$ (not 400$, not 375$, not 350$).  What is it about 380$ that you feel like this is the bottom/or the magick number for you?

So, I'm mainly posting here so that I can see when this gets bumped as I find the whole economy of signature campaigns intersting to keep track of.  Here's a question though: did anyone quit such that there are open spots on the campaign?  I'm not interested in joining myself, but curious about the status nonetheless.

amacar, should I assume you're talking to me?  I basically want to give you the forum equivalent of a bitch-slap right now.  I've been around this board for a long time and after something like 2 years here I have about 1100 posts so if that's what you call a spammer... ?!

secondly, I used to be an active member of this campaign back when btc was worth about 400$.  As btc price rose to 1500$, this campaign option got worse and worse because they never adjust the payment rate no matter what the price of btc.  Now that the price of btc is getting back to about 400$ or so, this campaign looks more and more attractive.

Just because you're having trouble understanding a simple, germane, elegant comment doesn't mean it's right for you to call it "spam".  If anything, posting "that must be spam because I don't understand it", is actually more spammy than simply walking away and thinking about that post that you don't understand and after understanding it, posting a relevant reply.

Good luck!

@EvilPanda, I guess I feel like we're in a long slow downward trend since the 1500$ peak.  I'm not saying it's falling fast, and I may be wrong anyway.

@faizsa1990, are you talking about me?  What does it mean about "camplaining for rats"?

Me, yes, basically, I would.  Obviously that's probably not entirely true, but I don't feel like I'm personally endorsing whatever paid message is in my sig.  Maybe I should change my quote under my name to make this more explicit: "signature space is a paid advertisment, not personally endorsed by tspacepilot".

I'm having a terrible time parsing this sentence.  Ok, that's not completely true, I can parse it, I just don't know what it means to say that "3 btc could double up CGB marketcap (cryptsy)".  Are you saying that if someone bought 3btc worth of cgb it would double the cgb marketcap?  I'm terribly new to all this kind of lingo, sorry.

As the price of btc keeps lowering, this campaign looks better and better.  Maybe if btc goes back to 100$ I'll stop complaining about rediculously low rates around here and come back for the easy, automated payments and no nonsense.

Actually, redsn0w, I think that's misinformation.  The website is a ponzi scheme.  The sig campaign is a contract between two parties with a guarantee (albeit, perhaps, only a personal one) to fulfill the terms.  As far as I know, the sig campaign is not at all a ponzi scheme, it's an advertizing campagin intended to promote a ponzi scheme.

You *do* have full rights to ask.  But TF has full rights to steal your money if you loaned it to him and to only repay what he feels people have successfully argued for.

I think that Stunna attracted a whole lot of bad apples because he consistently paid out and he consistently paid out at the highest rates.  Many other sig campaigns have come and gone in the time his lasted.  Now that he's established his reputation as the best guy to work for in terms of wearing a signature, he has every right to become choosy about who he will work with.  I'd say Stunna would be well served to cut his advertising program down to just those folks who he feels like are sending the right messages out to the forum (with his name subscribed below those message).  Obviously, he has to decide for himself, though.

I also just returned after about a week and a half and I noticed that not only had my faucet dropped, but also I had a single referral credited in achievments and now that's no longer there.   These don't seem like big deals to me but I'm just reporting them.

I deposited 0.01 and withdrew 0.014 an hour or so later.  So I can attest that deposit and withdraw went smoothly for me as of yesterday evening.

I'm thinking an old man with a good smile and his cards are showing...that would be cool.  But prolly not possible so just a pot leaf or something ok?

Cool.  Thanks for the links and the background.  That's pretty interesting.

For some reason I am naturally obtuse when it comes to thinking of clever things I could do with the forum software to extract the information I'm looking for.  I don't know why that is the case, but it seems to be true.  Anyway, good point about just checking Stunna's latest posts and also thanks for the spoiler (so that I don't have to go look right now). 

You make it sound very formalized, as if it's written up somewhere for us to read.  Is that actually the case?

Aha, thanks (but you're stealing TradeFortress's thunder. you go to the zoo to see the animals you know, not to talk to talk to the other zoo vistors ).

Wait, I thought you thought he was annoying.  He thought you were nervous.