I will not assist police who are seeking to enforce any Bitcoin ban. This is what I like about you. a true rebel. |
|
|
|
Consider this a bump. lol. I would like to be a merit source no matter if I'm tagged red or not. I still do believe in theymos and this forum. Also you should ignore my last edit of my thread on off topic section. EDIT: @theymos, every time I try to do something, they would tag me, it's like they think that they own this community. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3853171.new#new |
|
|
|
------BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-------
This is Tory-Tory from bitcointalk.org and today is 2018.05.15
------BEGIN SIGNATURE-------
17MKwMzJN9jn2CdehYBMyLKRA98JpTzcAK
INqzR8PCD7PVm0G0gW1Myq/M9a/DRFKg4PJBf4v4dgfldH7a6ha74V4AQQO8rlqRAGkJUarx/6KSBVeD2aXWvN4=
------END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE--------
Quoted and signature verified. |
|
|
|
While it is noble to fight abuse of power, I don't think offering a service of what you can't guarantee is the best way to go. Whether abuse of power or not, I don't see the need for intermediary in getting people to clear unmerited negative trust. I have seen thread where someone was called out and he received a negative trust at the same time I have seen someone who announce he got unmerited negative trust but a further look at it, earn him more reds.
How do you mediate for someone who got a red trust for trying to sell an account because he feels its not against the forum rules but we know the cancerous effect that cause for the community. Would you then say its illegal or its immoral. You end up putting yourself in a position of conflict which you won't be able to resolve objectively. You want to help the community, remove the price tag do it as service, stand by your conviction and be known for it and maybe tomorrow you will be recognised by the guy that maintain balance of trust issues.
You can't always win a case. what I can do however is to expose people for their abuse of power. I would either collude with DT1-2 members or would force them to leave accurate feedback on people. If I collude with them, people would see that DT1-2 members are tagging people wrongfully all the time and they could lose their positions. If I expose them for their inaccurate feedback, people would see that they are abusing their power and they could lose their positions. I wont do it for free though. none of you deserve it. either you pay me and see the result, or you would suck it up and live with your tags. Nobody has ever tested my service yet, you don't know if I can deliver or not, only way to find out is by trying my service. |
|
|
|
As a girl I would like to find out how much money such business brings? Is it really worth to show the body to everyone? Thanks.
Yes, you could earn money by displaying your pussy to the world. we need an admin to verify that you really have one. a.k.a pussy. #Tasty. |
|
|
|
Is there no other way for you to join crypto then selling your unwanted pics. Also what is so special that people have to pay you as it is already available freely on so many sites? Will you be delivering those pics by yourself face 2 face and you charging a premium for it  Also how can someone verify you are male/female? OP could show her pussy on camera to prove it's really a pussy. @OP we want young pussy. |
|
|
|
|
How much would you charge if I ask you to get deep throated by your boyfriend on camera?
|
|
|
|
Interesting service! I did something similar for free last month. Two weeks ago user eddie13 suggested I start "forum related representation services", which I declined. Allow me to quote only this: if you believe that you were tagged wrongfully, I will defend you Lawyers defend guilty clients, are you willing to do that? Personally, I'm very happy if someone who deserves red trust gets it, and I wouldn't want it to be removed unless he's innocent. Digaran is just a troll, he enjoys this attention. It's good stuff to read while having lunch at my desk! Digaran is getting better at trolling too, I love how he wears the avatar posted by hilariousetc with pride.
On a serious note, for practical purposes, it would be nice to limit the trolling to your own threads only. Don't you have a merit source application to bump? BTW, that avatar is my own, hilariousetc posted it from my profile. |
|
|
|
|
Talking about exposing people? tell me about it. it's better for the world to see who they really are. they all want money.
|
|
|
|
***-snip-
Lol, and now they already know what they going to do. That is dump people putting their own risk in having a red tag once they caught. Investigators need to use Chemio-Therapy (permaban these users which are found abusing different bounties).
And yes thanks to investigators cheating and abusing bounty/signature campaign is strictly prohibited which is deserving to be punished and I think a permaban is worth it because they are also a merit system abuse. Merit abuse is different than bounty abuse. if their employers are fine with them abusing their bounties, you don't get to decide. they are not going to get banned for this. |
|
|
|
Send 0.01 to this address first. 18Gykh4jE6fuyARzbC3XEzrALuKWFNHra4 if you have got a red tag from a DT1-2 member. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't delete your posts. How do we know you aren't colluding with DT members to red tag people and split the profits 50-50?
Who cares? as long as negative trust is illegit, it should be removed. I will take advantage of reasonable doubt. I want to act as a lawyer. |
|
|
|
|
I'm glad to see you are making your own coin. you are a legit company and I would like to endorse your services.
EDIT: due diligence first people.
|
|
|
|
I would like to understand this point :
1- If user scammer1 want to hire you, he needs to pay N x 0,01BTC fees.
2- if you failed to convince at least 1 of the N DT(s), scammer1 will not get his money back?
3- if he will open a scam accusation : you will refuse to refund him and you prefer to get a negative trust instead?
Well, seems legit...since you imposed rules to rape scammers...
I will act as their lawyer, I will expose the people in position of power for their abuse. in the end it is up to community to decide which one is trusted. If you want to entrust your money to DT members, you should know them first, I'm here to eradicate abusers of power. I am willing to adhere to the Rules of the forum. I would either convince DT1-2 members to remove their negative trust or would expose them for the whole community to see. |
|
|
|
|
After reading through my posts and others just realised how wrong i was few years ago, i apologise if i annoyed anyone with my stubbornness.
Hopefully will not make such mistakes.
|
|
|
|
And where the fuck is the conflict of interest?
If I understood digaran's nonsense correctly he did what all butthurts do and invent a wild, tenuous conspiracy theory to try justify himself. I added Darkstar to my trust list and Flying Hellfish applied to Chipmixer and will quite possibly (in my opinion) be the next person to get a slot. Of course, I am Staff and so is Flying Hellfish. So according to digaran that means me adding Darkstar is a bribe/conflict of interest to get Flying Hellfish a spot on the campaign. Of course! Makes perfect sense  . Holy shit is this what he was trying to say all along? I swear I had no idea what he was getting at but reading this I think your right... All I can say is wow just fucking wow. @Digaran I stand by my earlier post that this cat needs medical assistance. For the record even though it is no ones business, I have been here for 5 years and as of the time of this writing I have never once worn a paid signature. I think this might prove something to a normal person. I did apply to one and will join if I am ever accepted for a couple of reasons. As I said I am not here for the sig campaign money and I had not (and still to date technically have not) worn a paid signature. By joining any signature campaign it would not render my previous statements false in any way shape or form. Now if I do finally or eventually get into a campaign I will be looking for one that does not have a minimum post count. I do not want to be forced to post anything, I generally do read more here than I post and I like to use the forum at my own pace. I will be looking for a reputable one as well. The campaign I applied to met those criteria for me so I investigated the option. If you notice a little closer you can see that I only applied for that one so far. Could it be because I am being selective in applying, maybe I don't care or need signature campaign money? But that doesn't mean if the option for me to participate in a really good campaign existed that I won't take it. It's my decision to apply or not and if you don't like that than a big old fuck you bro is all I can say! I know this will fall on deaf ears and you will continue to make shit up about people but for anyone else with at least half a fucking brain in there head I will present my side of it. Are you an honourable man? if you are then tell me something, am I a scammer? |
|
|
|
|
We need marlboroza here. he can investigate this case further to tag these cheaters. I facking hate these cheaters.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm surprised there is no mention of prostitution, alia and cute little slaves. <insert lol here>.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
