roger ver, considering his 98% bitcoin cash collapse... but the other ones are very strong competition.
|
|
|
I hear so much about the SEC in the last few weeks. Can anyone explain what's so important about this decision. why it's good for the market, and why we get rejected?
the SEC is a pseudostatist organ of the private american banking cartel that runs it in order to fake an altruistic legitimacy, it is not statist or public as the united states is not a communist society it is simply a private lobby organization created to represent the regulatory interests of the american banking cartel. the american banking cartel is selfregulated and runs basically the united states. regards
|
|
|
The average politician probably has little or no understanding of cryptocurrencies. Some might understand the basic idea of a blockchain and its decentralized nature but the percentage of lawmakers who know the difference between a private key and a public key, the process of setting up cold storage wallets, or how multi-sig should be implemented securely is almost certainly very, very small.
So if cryptocurrency does become regulated and businesses like exchanges are forced to implement security practices such as having most of their funds in cold storage, then who will decide what regulations should be implemented and how? Surely, it won't be the politician.
Do you think they will attempt to have one of the Core devs on board or invite someone important in the cryptocurrency community like Vitalik, coblee, or Roger Ver (eek!) to write the regulations and then just take their word for it? What will they do if they decide not to participate? Heck, many (if not most) of those who are well-known and respected in the field are distrustful of governments and will probably refuse to participate since it could be seen as betraying the libertarian and anti-authoritarian ethos of the community.
Your thoughts?
bitcoin cannot be regulated its an advertised internet token with fixed amount. no way to regulate it. only fiats can be regulated in their rewarding usage. but bitcoin claims not to be a fiat. althought the cryptomarket and the bitcoin creaters run a fiat system bitcoin gold bitcoin cash bitcoin sv bitcoin god bitcoin platinum bitcoin private etc. that could theoretically be regulated, but all regulation is basically a form of tyranny against freedom.
|
|
|
by developing solid structures. that help people that would trust into crypto.
but thats nothing these "bitcoin founders" can accomplish
maximum they can do is create a token and run a "index".
|
|
|
Why STO ?![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fguerrillabuzz.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F12%2Fcity-scape-buildings-urban-scene-concept-PCUCBCT-min.jpg&t=663&c=7zcDUOKpSUzIkQ) IN simple words Security Tokens are in essence, cryptographic tokens that can pay the owner dividends, entitle them to a share of profits, pay them interest, or, they can be used to reinvest into other Security Tokens. The main difference from ICO investment it that you got actually shares in the company that you invest in In addition, There is a prerequisite to qualify a crypto token as a Security Token. As a requirement, the token must pass the Howey Test, which was set out in the case of SEC vs Howey (1946) in the United States. It is simply safer for investors, and in addition, say something about the project decided to go this way which is a lot harder and demanding. So if you guys convince, I made this STO Guide it explains every step of the way how to build it, a much it cost and how to even start. they will be very questionable....
|
|
|
What enables it is not anything else but its true value. At present, Bitcoin develops best in the industry, but as what you say, with time goes by, things might change. At that time, Bitcoin's market share will shrink, but the whole industry is more mature.
well fixing the indexation and "definition of market" is a very though work since it works against the corruption of the current market. i even expect that it will alternatively just collapse and what is currently considered "the market" will cease to be taken serious
|
|
|
wait till russians start becoming capitalists and are trying to install a central bank in every worlds community the find, like the americans did, world will get new epicenter of earthquakes comming from russia.
americans raised russians not to be communists, russians, took that lession serious, now they can imagine what they have created.
If a central bank is so capitalist, why is it one of the 10 planks of Communism? communists is when there is a central authority that forces the population into a central bank rule to achieve communist goals capitalism is when the entire society is constantly trying to basically scam/abuse outsiders as money earning cattle, and works on their behavior appearance to achieve that. both cases can have a "central bank" or even no central bank Uh huh. Because Communism never abuses people as money earning cattle or whatever else in that rambling runoff sentence you were trying to say. What if I told you your precious Communism was originally created as a concept and fostered into reality by Capitalist bankers as a means of controlled opposition, and you unknowingly work for them? Would you integrate this information into your personal ideology or would you ignore it knowing you could not possibly cope with such cognitive dissonance? my personal idoelogy is not to support any financial system that i dont controll, no matter what they tell me, thats an update from what i did as a child "trusting experts" jes the banksters are the capitalists and they use communism as a justification to be the capitalists in a communist society.
|
|
|
wait till russians start becoming capitalists and are trying to install a central bank in every worlds community the find, like the americans did, world will get new epicenter of earthquakes comming from russia.
americans raised russians not to be communists, russians, took that lession serious, now they can imagine what they have created.
If a central bank is so capitalist, why is it one of the 10 planks of Communism? communists is when there is a central authority that forces the population into a central bank rule to achieve communist goals capitalism is when the entire society is constantly trying to basically scam/abuse outsiders as money earning cattle, and works on their behavior appearance to achieve that. both cases can have a "central bank" or even no central bank
|
|
|
Alik Bakhshi It's time to stop Putler.
The military operation in the Black Sea near the Kerch Strait with the capture of three Ukrainian warships logically stems from all previous aggressive actions of Russia and fully confirms the intentions of President Putin to restore the Russian Empire within the borders of the former Soviet Union. However, from Putin’s words once said that those who want to restore the Soviet Union do not have a head ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSI7WJW8wqE) we can conclude: either he lies, as always ( 1), or he is crazy, and possibly both, which seems more likely. The world has already dealt with a crazy revanchist who started to reconsider the European borders established after the First World War, which turned out to be a new, even more monstrous Second World War, and today Hitler’s shadow in the image of Putin (2), ready for the return of the post-Soviet space, looms again the bosom of the empire, plunge the World into the Third World War, motivating this readiness with the words “why do we need such a World if Russia is not there. Indeed, post-Soviet Russia, which after the fall of the communist regime, could not become a capitalist country due to the pathological passivity of the Russian people in economic and political activities (3), and, in fact, returned to the conditions of the economic model of the royal regime, expects inevitable collapse. The country, and especially the empire, cannot function successfully in the modern world, remaining in the economic relations of the last century. The internal political and economic situation in Russia is similar to a vicious circle, namely, the Russian people cannot successfully exist in a democracy, on the other hand, without democracy and free market relations in Russia, moreover as an empire, and in fact it is , no future. History shows that empires are aggressive entities in their essence, and the Russian empire is no exception. The Russian Empire during the monarchy, and during the Soviet Union pursued an aggressive policy (4), nothing changed after the partial collapse of the empire. A similar policy continues under Putin in accordance with Russia's declared revenge-seeking interests (5). Naturally, Putin found broad support for his goals in the popular environment. The Russian people, with its imperial outlook, are happy to accept Putin’s aspirations for the return of the former colonies to the confines of the empire, as can be seen from the example of Georgia and Ukraine. It would be painful for the Russian people to observe the success of the former fraternal peoples. Once it already had to go through the example of Finland. Here I want to note a peculiarity in the mentality of the Russian people, it is the envy of the neighbor, which is distinctive not in the desire to achieve its success, but in the desire to destroy it, and this is confirmed by the empire’s jealous attitude to the peoples who left it. The Kremlin cannot allow, for example, the most ethnically closest people of Ukraine to achieve prosperity. To prevent this from happening, Putin is unleashing a war with Ukraine. I must say that the Kremlin revanchist has long and carefully prepared to return Ukraine to Russia, however, Maidan prevented his plans. I had to urgently save my puppet from the people's anger and instead of all Ukraine be content with the Donbas and the Crimea. The planned coup in Kharkov did not take place, but failed in Odessa. Putin’s military adventure in Ukraine turned out to be a worsening of relations with the West for Russia. Moscow’s reckless and defiantly impudent policy of interfering in the internal affairs of other countries and taking action, such as chemical attack in London using chemical warfare agents, which can be described as a terrorist attack, harboring guilty who shot down a Malaysian Boeing, immoral intervention in the sport, which led to the prevention of Russian athletes in international competitions, made Russia a pariah country. Non-market economy, isolation at the international level leads the Russian empire to further and possibly final disintegration. Putin’s revanchist as well as Hitler is awaited by a sad end, the desperate Russian people will crucify their idol at the gates of the Kremlin. True, the more tragic finale, which Putin can dare to avoid shame, is not ruled out - World War III. It seems that the West has finally recognized who Putin is, and I hope he will take decisive steps to put the political bully in place. The incident in the Kerch Strait was assessed by the US Congress as a further escalation of Russian military actions. It's time to stop the newfound Hitler is not too late. 1. Empire of Lies and its main liar. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/?skip=50#post-alikbahshi-223172. The ghost of Hitler wanders through Europe. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-380493. Folk fate or each cricket its hearth. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/?skip=50#post-alikbahshi-285644. Russia is the most aggressive country. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/#post-alikbahshi-325315. National interests of Russia. http://forum.souz.co.il/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=102888&sid=af47fee057ec3dae7c8a9916e48f92ba26.12.18 strange thing actually. capturing Ukranian warships? seriously? If someone captured another country military machines it would bring an awful lot of information to mass media immediately. at least if it concerns such 'hot' regions. I guess Russians do have enough other things to think about their internal policy instead.. wait till russians start becoming capitalists and are trying to install a central bank in every worlds community the find, like the americans did, world will get new epicenter of earthquakes comming from russia. americans raised russians not to be communists, russians, took that lession serious, now they can imagine what they have created.
|
|
|
Well tell us why bitcoin survived 2013 and why its so much different NOW, yea we hit 500-20k instead of 100 to 1100 once, and? longterm upward movement is still clearly there you can fud like this if we fall under 1k again
Bitcoin investors who have been some time around just wait for sign of live ( like breaking some support lines which indicates upward movement ( specially with high swings because of FOMO..), once the train started again they all hop in again.. specially if we have like once doubled and so on and bitcoin reaches the news again for example..)
Bitcoin have those huge swings because people are unsure what will happen but it doesnt matter if -/+ 80% or -/+ 5% like in stocks it just needs to happen or it would be a "superbubble" ( in my opinion )
bitcoin was not in global awareness in 2013, icos were unknown in 2013. there where no useable encription services. like ethereum back then. it will get even worse once the indexation and market definition issue gets decentralised.
|
|
|
Bitcoin price now (December 2018) is: $3,742 Jan 2011: 0.30$ Jan 2012: 4.99$ Jan 2013: 14.00$ Jan 2014: 747.00$ Jan 2015: 317.00$ Jan 2016: 432.00$ Jan 2017: 998.00$ Jan 2018: 14,166$ Jan 2019: ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) The stat says we are having steady progress. well first time there was a collapse in price. bitcoins growth story obviously ended. i think this is a support loss spiral, entire world wants to create money and find idiots doing something for it. not just nakamoto, and these forum members here. Excuse me, what makes you so sure? Are you the guy from the future LOL. What are you doing in the forum in the first place :-P jes i am a time traveler from the future bitcoin crashed in 2019 i am just to protect investors here
|
|
|
brits are now going to become the worlds example of the the "tyrany of the majority" with their 50.1% election outcomes.
I wonder how Brexit will affect the talent pool in the long run, will it damage the "British brand"? everyone that listens to politics in uk will get mad, and burned out, only those that are ignorant to politics and elections will be able to thrive be successful and stay sane. so in total it will destroy the "british brand" but out of britain there will be countless companies evolving with their unique identity.
|
|
|
who the hell is "heitler"
|
|
|
also ich bin nach gründlicher nachforschung zum urteil gelang das es ziemlich wahrschinlich ist das höhere intelligente wesen hinter dem aufbau und betrieb der welt stehen.
daher kann es sowas wie ein leben nach dem tod durchaus geben, aber ich weis nicht wie dieses leben ist und inwiefern für jeden einzelnen.
|
|
|
The federal reserve is supposed to serve the public but the reality is that it's a semi-autonomous bank and most of the regional chapters are all headed by bankers and none of the leaders are elected.
I think this is a key point in my opinion, the Federal Reserve needs to act in the best interests of helping the economy rather than private interests. well it does that, and constantly american money is flowing abroad, the neverending foreign trade deficit is visible in accounting, usd becomes weak, puting himself once said, that the americans are bloodsuckers in the world economy due to their foreign trade deficit. You operate under the delusion that The Federal Reserve serves the USA, and that it has not been sucking our blood too. i can imagine that, federal reserve being the draining vampire in the midste of the us american state, what makes it even crazier is the crazy imitation of being a kongressial system. they fake statehood. alternative would now be either scamicos and tower of babel icos (confusion) or tyranic communist state like soviet union
|
|
|
“A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both.” - Milton Friedman
well you will see americans demanding communism, once they saw how some of them are using freedom to print money to basically tread the others as money earning cattle...
|
|
|
what is your issue, russia and putin are simply running an economic agenda. you might be simply just paranoid
|
|
|
i think automatisation and increase in production and intruction of new and more cryptocurrencies into the market together with losening grip of power of the cryptoindex mafia. will lead to production increases so that the population willget a better supply with cryptocurrencies improving the obtainability of bitcoin for the populaiton this will then lead to the 1000 usd bitcoin price soon. and more people will be happy ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
i think without attracting new investors bitcoin is doomed due to default passive capital loss, comming from various issues.
1. loss in investor confidence 2. electricity bills of miners. 3. negative trade ins due to unpopularity in usage as payment method. -> slow -> ressource costs -> transaction costs
support loss spiral is not equal to "bear market"
although it doesnt matter what i say, bitcoinfounders will continue to spread the "bear market" myth if they would
100% know that it is not a bearmarket but as i suspect a support loss spiral
|
|
|
So Vitalik believes proof of stake>proof of work. So what? While I entirely disagree, it's a hugely debatable topic. As for your opinions though? That's something else. they are just trying to revive ethereum which has been having one problem after another in addition to wanting to regain their 100% control over the network as they feel threatened by miners and the way they can take the control they had from them, specially with ETH ASICs now starting to become a thing. as for OP, he is just using "buzzwords" in an attempt to create what he thinks is FUD... i dont care about ethereum i dont even use it, i like waves much more, especially because its not overrun by speculants, (its speed and security are here a plus) i dont think encription plattforms will be significant in the long run, like they are currently.
|
|
|
|