The Trump Assassination Danger Zone Begins In September If Donald Trump continues to increase his GOP lead and the Elite of the GOP are not able to find a candidate capable of supplanting him at the Republican Convention, Trump’s danger zone with regard to assassination begins in September. Trump should really find a way to avoid the Ambassador Hotel at all costs for he will suffer the fate of Robert Kennedy.
Americans May Be “Dumbed Down”, But They Are Not Dumb Enough to Vote for Hillary, Cruz and Rubio. 
|
|
|
|
This thread is utterly ridiculous. Of course rapists are trusted... by other rapists. Four of them hold him down, and the other one does her thing. |
|
|
|
The people who don't believe that we have a gun problem in this country is out of their minds. Countless numbers of people die every year over guns so don't tell me we don't have a gun problem!
Its a VIOLENCE problem. Would you also say that because of car accidents, cars should be banned? NO. Use your brain for a change and figure out ways to reduce gun deaths without becoming fascist. Exactly. I wonder why no one is demanding a car ban. Cars kill far more people every year than people murdered with guns or even by gun accidents. Clearly cars are useful, and banning them is not an option. Gun control advocates aren't arguing that gun deaths need to be stopped, they are arguing that guns serve no purpose according to their own pacifist world view in their safe little homogenized suburb. You don't get to tell other people what the value of their own life and the lives of their loved ones is worth. You are not in a position to make such choices for others, only for yourself. If you don't want a gun in your home DON'T BUY ONE. Yabut, but, but, but... Then a bad guy just might bring one in.   |
|
|
|
The spacefaring perspective was captured last July by astronaut Scott Kelly during his stay on board the International Space Station. The same Scott Kelly who didn't know how to pronounce his fellow astronaut's last name, so he asked him on live TV. Scott Kelly. A very talented and humble guy.  |
|
|
|
There are countless holes in the government´s conspiracy theory. But trying to convince those who for some reason believe the government (presumably because of its long standing record of integrity and truthfulness as perceived by the believers) is simply hopeless. It´s blind faith. Not wasting more time on it for now.
I find that people who have been in the military, especially in the wars, like Nam and the first Iraq, but even the few remaining from WWII and Korea... they simply will not accept the idea of government doing it. A rather interesting observation, since not a few of them think war and their part in it was a mistake. If the US government found it desirable to create a false flag scenario to justify invading Afganistan, lot of easier ways to do it, on foreign soil too, than what happened on 9/11. What I find amusing about the 911 conspiracy theories is the way they keep asking questions but can't answer them. "But there must be something..." "It just seems so mysterios..." "Oh, the EVIL Jewwwwwwsssss..." On and on ad nauseum. I repeat my invitation, go ahead, come up with a plausible theory that is in accordance with evidence, physics and chemistry. Because so far it has not been done. That's because most of the popular, formal media won't tell it like it is... that the official 9/11 story is a conspiracy as well. This makes the whole formal story to be much closer to a lie, simply because they won't admit the truth, that they don't have the correct story. Like you say, so far it has not been done. But especially with the official story. |
|
|
|
They just don't have what other to do.. Thay just have enormous population growth. Little story; First son will inherit house, second will get cow, and third will get gun and bomb(He has nothing else to do).  If they can kill one of their own? What do you think? In America, doctors get big money to do this. Called abortion. BS. They don't stand on top of dead children here. Abortion is something else... Okay. Some of those kids who get trodden down don't die. They simply get deformed so badly that they are killed as a manner of direct murder. |
|
|
|
Pharmacy and medicine are competing with criminals in killing ppl while law enforcement busts ppl who smoke marijuana (world count for marijuana overdoses in this century is 0). Sounds cool, it is great world we have built.
Marijuana is the ultimate enemy of the big pharma. It is a naturally occurring painkiller with zero side-effects, unlike the opiate painkillers dished out by the big pharma which are full of toxins and chemicals. Humans have used naturally occurring painkillers such as Marijuana and Peyote for thousands of years, before it was banned at the behest of the corporations. An interesting thought to think about. God is protecting the world by the things that Big Pharma is doing when they keep so-called hallucinogenic drugs illegal. How's that? These drugs cause people to contact the evil spirits of the spirit world. This is part of the reason the Great Flood of Noah's day was brought on the world... to destroy the people of the earth, who had turned against God because they believed the evil spirits through their use of hallucinogenic drugs. In some of Graham Hancock's videos, he points out that statues from the ancient, pre-Flood past depict people holding snuff trays. |
|
|
|
There are countless holes in the government´s conspiracy theory. But trying to convince those who for some reason believe the government (presumably because of its long standing record of integrity and truthfulness as perceived by the believers) is simply hopeless. It´s blind faith. Not wasting more time on it for now.
I find that people who have been in the military, especially in the wars, like Nam and the first Iraq, but even the few remaining from WWII and Korea... they simply will not accept the idea of government doing it. |
|
|
|
Thank you for the exhortation. Since science has proved that the God Who created the universe exists. I don't have to attempt to prove such at all. Continue to show your ignorance if you like. And how has science proved that god created the universe? Can you explain what existed pre-god, in that case? Feel free to prevent my "ignorance" from affecting your beliefs. God is eternal, having no beginning or end. Ants in an ant farm terrarium might ask what created people. God is infinitely farther beyond us than we are beyond ants. As far as how science has proved the existence of God, simply look through my posts in this thread and some of the related threads. Or go to my profile info and look at my posts there. |
|
|
|
Now YOU are completely mistaken. All gasoline and diesel engines, even gas turbines, are steam engines at the same time that they are gasoline or diesel engines. You are completely missing it. You better go back to school.
Water is produced in an internal combustion engine during the ignition phase, and of course, instantly turns to steam due to the heat. But the percentage is small compared to other gases produced such as nitrogen. The steam is actually unwanted because inside a cold exhaust pipe the steam condenses back into water and corrodes the steel. Which is why cars that do more short journeys, wear out their exhaust pipes quicker. To call an internal combustion engine "a steam engine" is foolish, just another one of your childish word definition twisting games. Small amount of carbon monoxide are produced as well, shall we call them carbon monoxide engines? Embarrassingly for yourself steam engines are actually external combustion engines. But I'm sure you'll find a way to lie your way around that. See? I'm not laughing. I respect that you are a fuzzy, warm person... maybe even fluffier. |
|
|
|
It is easily possible to prove something that does not exist.
I have no elephants in my house. Or I am not drinking alcohol.
Only true in the trivial cases where something is provable, but not true for all cases. Do you have invisible microscopic elephants that run from you when you attempt to investigate them? Have you drunk alcohol that tastes and smells like like water and does not get you drunk and that someone has been putting in your water pipes? This is an illustration of why the burden of proof regarding the existence of god is with those who claim a god or gods to exist. Since when are provable arguments trivial? When the definition of elephant includes "invisible microscopic elephants" and the definition of alcohol includes "alcohol that tastes and smells like like water and does not get you drunk" then you may have a point. But currently neither are true so your argument fails as a strawman. The point being that it is possible to prove a negative. This does not mean that it is possible that God does or does not exist, unless you define God as such that such a statement actually becomes provable. Given that there is no universally consistent set of properties attributable to God that does make it harder to prove anything. Anecdotal evidence does not constitute proof... you cannot prove a negative claim... You might remember what you ate for breakfast, but you could never prove it to anyone You may find it very difficult to prove a negative claim, but the thing that you can often prove is that there is a chance that the negative claim is correct. If there is a chance that God exists, then stating that He doesn't is a possible lie. Stick to the truth that you think is the truth, rather than the thing you know you don't know for sure. Atheism is setting itself up as a potential lie in the face of knowing that it is a potential lie. Thus, it is a religion, just like all the other religions that exist by faith. |
|
|
|
Gun control is fine if it's regulated and everything is controlled. It's kind of similar to drugs - if you ban them, people will still go and get them another way. An illegal way. Guns can be protective, but again, you need to regulate it and have people perform tests and psychological exams before they get the guns. Otherwise, it's not okay.
If everyone thinks like you, things are just fine. But the minute someone thinks differently than you, you are using your freedom to take their freedom away, if you implement your form of gun control. Don't have any guns if you don't like. But let those of your neighbors who want guns to have them. Your neighbors will protect you when necessary. |
|
|
|
Gun control is a most important in the entire world countries. Mostly western countries need very strong regulations. Bitcoin is also used for gun purchase. This will encourage anonymous buying. Such scenario need to change.
WTF is "the entire world countries?" You mean everywhere? Also why is is "Mostly western countries need very strong regulations."? I don't see any reasoning here just you listing your half baked opinions. " CASH is also used for gun purchase. This will encourage anonymous buying. Such scenario need to change." I changed the emboldened part for you to point out how senseless your argument is, because people don't need Bitcoin for anonymous transactions. Also, something stinks around here... do you guys also smell burning shill? And more important than gun freedom is, FREEDOM. Gun freedom in America exists to back up freedom of speech, and both of them exist to maintain FREEDOM. Jokers like n0ne need to remain in their countries of slavery. |
|
|
|
The problem is that when you look science law in the face, and see that you don't like it, you go about ignoring it and trying to make it not exist, somehow. How silly of you. Why not simply accept the truth? It's there whether you accept it or not. Accepting it will simply make life more fun, and protect from eternal death if you go to God in truth and sincerity. Dude, you've said a lot of things over the time. But you definitely have not proved God to exist. THAT is a fact. I agree with you. In fact, I'll go one step further. Presently, I am not in the mode of proving the existence of God. I have other things to do. That's part of the reason I do the simple thing. I point people to the three scientific laws that prove God exists when combined. These laws are (as I have stated many times) cause and effect (as upheld by Newton's 3rd Law), complex universe, and universal entropy. Do you need to dismantle your car engine just so that you know enough about your car to drive it? Of course not. You can still drive your car around even if you think the engine is a steam engine (which it is, btw). But if you want to get into a discussion about your car engine, and if you want to be truthful about it, you need to examine things about car engines a bit. I have examined car engines. I know that your gasoline car engine is really a steam engine, even though people don't generally call it that. It is an internal combustion engine. But more to the point, it is an internal combustion gasoline steam engine. Same with the scientific proof for the existence of God. Like the internal combustion gasoline steam engine, the fact that people don't generally say the laws that prove the existence of God, in a fashion that shows that they prove God exists, doesn't negate the fact that these laws show that God exists. In other words, an internal combustion gasoline engine is a steam engine, even though people don't say it this way very often. Also, the laws of cause and effect, complex universe, and universal entropy, when combined, prove that God exists, even though people don't say it this way very often. Have I proven that God exists? Absolutely not. And I have stated such many times. But you keep on coming back with the idea that I haven't proven God exists. Great! We are in agreement on this point. Why do you keep bringing it up? If you want to see the proof that God exists, stop looking at the things that I say, and go look at the laws and their combination. Of course, if you don't want to see the proof that God exists, don't look at the laws. You can drive your car if the only things you know about the engine are that it takes gas, and you gotta turn the key to get it started. But if you start to talk about how your car engine works when you haven't even examined the proof for how it works, you are missing it mentally in some way. So - you haven't proven the existence of your deity, What is my deity? I checked my pockets, under the bed, in the closet, etc., and I found that I can't find any deity that I own. combining whatever you want or not.
And I do know about internal combustion engines, and they have nothing to do with steam. Now YOU are completely mistaken. All gasoline and diesel engines, even gas turbines, are steam engines at the same time that they are gasoline or diesel engines. You are completely missing it. You better go back to school.
Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Thank you for the exhortation. Since science has proved that the God Who created the universe exists. I don't have to attempt to prove such at all. Continue to show your ignorance if you like. |
|
|
|
What? I quoted nothing except an excerpt from an atheism website. I'm certain none of it consists of Jesus' quotes.
But you quoted it from the standpoint that sounded like you were agreeing with it, the things in the atheism website. Those things are part of the dogma of the atheism religion. And you seem to agree with them. And you said they were quoting Jesus. Your point? As usual, you intentionally misunderstand. In the picture of Jesus, above, the words are not quotes of Jesus found in the Bible. The things in the referenced atheism site are the dogma of the atheism religion. Do you have a point? |
|
|
|
What? I quoted nothing except an excerpt from an atheism website. I'm certain none of it consists of Jesus' quotes.
But you quoted it from the standpoint that sounded like you were agreeing with it, the things in the atheism website. Those things are part of the dogma of the atheism religion. And you seem to agree with them. |
|
|
|
It's not because people are misusing the drugs. It's because the drugs are "poison", Big Pharma is poisoning all you people that insist on using their toxic poisons.
I don't know how many of these painkillers are toxic. But for sure, a lot many of them are extremely addictive, and millions of United States residents suffer from addiction to these drugs. Just see the list of most popular painkillers: Oxycodone, Buprenorphine, Hydromorphone, Dextropropoxyphene.etc. All of them causes severe withdrawal symptoms. not just painkiller , all the illegal drugs are toxic. but we are doomed to use them.. but painkillers are the worst ones as you said.. That's right. All drugs are toxic. The poison that they are is being used to kick-start the immune system into action. The drugs are designed so that, if you have this symptom, a tiny dose of that particular drug should wake the immune system up to fight the symptom involved. Trouble is, everyone is different a little bit. And genetics isn't far enough along to be able to tell which person will react to, say, 1mg, and which person will need 10mg to do the same kick-start job. Overall, these kick-starts weaken the immune system, especially if they are used on a regular basis. Yes yes. We've all seen the last episode of the X-Files. Thank you for the synopsis. You believe in the X-Files? No wonder you are all mixed up. Now you're either stupid or you're trolling. Either way you're not funny. So you DO believe in the X-Files. Wow! Well, I guess everybody has to have his god, whatever it may be. |
|
|
|
And if he wins the Presidency, the next group that will be going to the dumpster is the American people. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
