Suspect, perhaps. But it is understandable that there will be many knowledgeable people who will not understand that it was an inside job.

A good portion of the people who or are or were military personnel have been indoctrinated (brainwashed) into thinking that the U.S. can do no substantial wrong. They have to be this way because, they were and are part of the U.S, and to think that the U.S. does something substantially bad or wrong is like saying admitting that THEY are doing something substantially bad or wrong. Nobody who is a relatively honest person likes to think that he is bad or wrong.

In Spendy's case, the fact that he is a thinking person, and the fact that he won't accept the idea of an inside job, and the fact that he is so adamantly opposed vocally to the inside job idea, and the fact that he is opposed to the idea without really having anything to back up the things he says when strong evidence is dumped right into his lap so to speak, DOES make him a prime suspect candidate.

Personally, I still want to give him the benefit of the doubt. But, it is because of my nature that wants to believe the best in others that I so think. The more Spendy talks, however, the more I am coming to believe that I have been duped grandly into thinking that he has good will and good faith about this whole 9/11 thing.

Isn't it really great that we have Islam and Muslims? They are so easy to blame. Who else could we use as scapegoats so easily?

The idea of running the government like a company is not a bad idea. Doing this could get corruption out of the government, somewhat. This would be a good thing, because corruption helps to cause bloated government as a lot of people get into government just to skim.

The problem with this idea is that most people NOT in government have been trained in the view that government is something like their king. Oh sure, they wouldn't say it like this. And many don't even recognize it in most cases. But this is the way they act in life. Just look at all the jokers in this forum that talk like there was no other way.

To see the distinction between government's idea of a man/woman and the reality of man/woman, look here http://www.abodia.com/ucc/. Basically what this site shows is that the birth certificate is held by government as the man/woman until the man/woman comes and claims his/her position as man/woman. Government operates the BC as it wishes, supposedly for the benefit of the man/woman if they should happen to appear.

As Abodia shows, when you appear and take up your birth certificate as your own, you get to operate it. It can be worth $billions to you, just like it is to government. And, in the way it is set up, it allows you to get the benefit you deserve without the problems of trusts or corporations or other entities that you might use to attempt to get around government stealing your money/property.

If you don't have a link, it's politics.

God doesn't need math to hold the universe in place. Math is a virtual language man devised for his own understanding of things. It is man's understanding that is flawed, not God's.

That's because you are unwilling to accept the idea that multitudes of people, worldwide, throughout all of time from the Beginning, have understood that there is one God. Sure, they had their idols. Sure they had their "imaginary friends." But they also understood the one God Creator over all.

The Turkish president has insulted himself more than any German could think of doing.

People "flee" to America, Canada, the U.K., Australia and New Zealand more than any other country when they can, because these countries are Common Law countries. A map of the various legal systems of the world is shown here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_the_Legal_systems_of_the_world_%28en%29.png.

What is the benefit of a common law country? Wikipedia says, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law:The interesting thing about common law that Wikipedia doesn't spell out clearly is, in all the common law countries the judges are not necessarily the formal magistrates that oversee a trial. Often the judges are the 12-person jury, even though they are seldomly called this.

Court cases in common law lands can be "moved" by any defendant with knowledge and understanding, into a position where the formal judge (magistrate) has no authority except to referee the trial proceedings. The defendant can make the actual written law to rule, or he can let a jury make a decision, and, if he wishes, he can let the magistrate be the actual judge.

Germany is a civil law country. See Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_law_%28legal_system%29. Essentially, a civil law country is a country where the written law dictates what the outcome of a trial may be. Because of this, virtual any person in a civil law country is truly guilt until proven innocent.

The courts in a common law country are gradually moving towards a subtle form of civil law. This is because the people are less and less aware of the fact that the defendant can require that the plaintiff get on the stand and speak into the record his complaint or claim. In addition, if it is required by the defendant, the plaintiff must show and prove real harm or damage to himself or his property by the defendant before there can be any semblance of judgement against the defendant. This is why you are said to be innocent until proven guilty in a common law land.

In the case of the German comedian if he were in a common law land, the plaintiff would never appear and get on the stand, and if he did, there would be no real damage or harm that he could show that was clearly attributed to the defendant. But Germany, being civil law, can judge based on whatever it wants, whatever is written in the statutes.

Get yourself to a common law country. Learn how to move the court to remain in common law without the magistrate being the judge. This way you can be free until the plaintiff gets on the stand showing clear harm or damage you did to him, shown by witness and evidence as well as plaintiff speaking it into the record.

Btw, in common law, if the plaintiff loses, you the defendant can require payment in amounts that he was trying to collect from you for whatever damages he was claiming that you did.

Who will start WW3?

That's like asking who will vote Trump in.

 

The Payza money transfer system out of Canada has some kind of close relationship with Bangladesh. Perhaps Payza is owned by wealthy government people of Bangladesh who would like to see freedom of religion stressed in Bangladesh so that they can make more money for the people of Bangladesh. After all, if you are running a country, and the country has financial greatness, your wealth goes up right along with it.

If the fact is in fact a theory, then it is not known to be a fact.

I am not trying to deny you the right to have fun.

You exercise a form of legalism.   

Since you can't seem to figure out the answer from the answer, there really is no way to answer.

The reason you bother is that you don't have any real reasoning for the things that you think, and you are trying to find someone who will tell you the reason why you reject the truth.

The people of Israel asked for a good thing. They asked for the perfect laws of God so that they would obey them, to keep the Israel community safe. God gave them the perfect laws.

It wasn't a joke. If the child was rebellious, and wouldn't adhere to his parents' right training, the execution was essentially a suicide.

This was a Jewish law. It doesn't have anything to do with Christians except for understanding and training in righteousness.



Of course, since you would rather have the evil remain among us, simply by promoting it if nothing else, no wonder you are having such a difficult life within yourself.

Thank you for accepting that atheism is a religion. It is about time that somebody else acknowledges this.

Btw, I was agreeing with the atheism tragedy as a tragedy.

Speaking directly about Jesus, Isaiah says in Isaiah 63:9:
The Angel of the Lord in the O.T. is thought to be the pre-incarnate Christ by many. See http://www.ivpress.com/title/exc/1423-8c.php.

Ecclesiastes 7:6:

Atheists should stand up for their religion, just like people of other religions stand up for theirs.

People are people. Christians are simply people who have a certain knowledge and understanding. This doesn't mean that they are always good and wise. But you have to take people on a person-by-person basis, because none of us/them are the same.

Just because Jesus was an angel, doesn't mean He wasn't God as well. Consider, He was a man as well as God. Why not an angel as well?

People have always lived a variety of ages. Right now you can find people who live to more than a hundred. And you can find people who live only to 35 or 40.

Back 4500 years ago, multitudes of people lived to be 400 to 500 years ago. Nobody can refute this. The Bible is witness to it. Neanderthal man lived back then, and is simply an example of people living to 400 or 500 years old.

Youtube search on "Dr. Don Patton" and watch some of his videos to see how modern archaeological scientists misdate archaeological history.