TRUMP’S NEW GRANDSON GETS VERY PRESIDENTIAL NAME
The newborn baby boy of his daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner is named Theodore.
In which way is it anything like a news for anyone but Trump family? How could anyone be interested in something like that? [Retard asks: Why is this news? I´m not interested in it. The reason retards ask stupid questions that nobody bothers answering is that they´re retarded. You're giving out a public comment. It's everyone business. Just saying your post is both useless and spooky. |
|
|
|
you're a weak faggot if you let yourself get beat up by a female unless you're into that sort of thing and you asked her to do it
Amazing. Everytime I think you said the most stupid thing ever, you manage to rise the level! It's like you're actually trying to have the most fucked up speech possible! ^^ I have no idea why people even occupy the word faggot as everyday offensive terms. Faggot is a homophobic slur meant to describe gay people. Why in the hell does that need to be considered an insult?? Because faggot is an offensive term. It doesn't describe only a homosexual oriented person, it also describes a cliché behaviour of over sexualized homo person. It doesn't just mean that the designed person is homosexual (which is, in itself, not an insult, just a false statement here) but it also means that you act like the average cliché of homosexual. For a man it's mainly extremely feminine attitude and weakness. Technically faggot means a bail of sticks. It was a derogatory term long before it was used to describe homosexuals. "The most likely explanation for the homosexual epithet goes like this: Faggot originally meant a bundle of sticks, which is a burden to be carried. In the late 16th century, faggot became an epithet for a woman, especially a shrewish one. The sense probably comes from the idea of a faggot being a burden or baggage (not unlike the modern ball and chain)." http://www.wordorigins.org/index.php/more/285/Thanks for the etymology lesson! Well no doubt the word "faggot" is in itself totally offensive then. |
|
|
|
Ahah!!! NASA is lying again: http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/Look, like we could really believe sea level rised this much xD It's obviously a plain lie! I still have no cue about why they're lying like this, but I'm sure it's all a lie, after all the level of my lake didn't change at all! It even decreased if you ask me  |
|
|
|
TRUMP’S NEW GRANDSON GETS VERY PRESIDENTIAL NAME
The newborn baby boy of his daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner is named Theodore.
In which way is it anything like a news for anyone but Trump family? How could anyone be interested in something like that? |
|
|
|
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.
The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded. Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets. Is bernie a puppet of is he free? Don't know. I'm not the one talking about candidates as being puppets. It seems especially dumb considering the fact that USA is a country where "lobbyist" is actually a job... Considering any politician as "free" is probably as dumb as considering a shark vegan. You've just demonstrated why TRUMP, who's not a politician, is so popular.  Not a politician? Whaou, funny, last time I checked he has all the characterisitics of a politician! The greed of course, but also the lies, the use of misinformation, the extreme demagogy of his speeches, the will to do anything if that brings votes and refusing everything that doesn't bring votes, the use of useless debates like immigration in order to make people believe you're actually doing something... In fact Trump is clearly a politician. There is 0 difference between him and the others. None of you brought anything that could start proving Bernie is a puppet (that would be cool to start by saying who "controls" him is he's a puppet...) and how Trump is a totally free mind... |
|
|
|
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.
The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded. Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets. Is bernie a puppet of is he free? Don't know. I'm not the one talking about candidates as being puppets. It seems especially dumb considering the fact that USA is a country where "lobbyist" is actually a job... Considering any politician as "free" is probably as dumb as considering a shark vegan. You've just demonstrated why TRUMP, who's not a politician, is so popular. Interesting. Yes of course, Bernie is a puppet.We can thank Trump for demonstrating this simple truth. You still didn't bring any piece of beginning of a little something you could call an evidence, or simply maybe just a little link, proving that Bernie is a puppet (we still don't know of who) and Trump is free. You just brag it like it's an obvious and simple truth. Yelling it doesn't make it true. |
|
|
|
No. Allmost all hospitals are allowing you to die quickly and without pain. It's the first time I heard of a patient being killed like this without asking it. Of course hospitals are easying your death if you're going to die anyway and you're in pain and you ask them to end your suffering. Though it's not legal in 99% of countries thanks to our shitty religious past and influence... |
|
|
|
Does anyone have problem when trying to access primedice from tor browser?
When i have to insert captcha in cloudfare page i have always the error : Multiple correct solution required-please solve more
But i am pretty sure that i have typed the right solution
Hmm... It's not an error in itself. Does it work when you re enter the captcha correctly after a few times? Because captcha started using other recognition paths. They don't really care about the picture you click or the captcha you enter. They start analysing your mouse movement, your browsing data and so on. Which means using Tor makes you one of a few, which means captcha gets trouble identifying you as a "normal" user! No, when i re-enter the captcha after a few times it continue to give me others captcha, only once i verified correctly the captcha but after that i haven't reached the home page for the login, in fact the site stuck whit the loading page.... Ah ok, nothing to do with my beautiful theory then ^^' Guess you should use another browser in order to contact the admins! Though I'm not sure they take the time to fix an issue concerning only tor users. Cause I don't think you're that numerous |
|
|
|
Yeah I dont see any faucet to play and try free. Will you think to add?
There is no any faucet, and maybe never will. I don't want to see russian milking machine bots on this site. If you want to try - you have 100 zero bets when game starts first time. That's enough to understand the game IMO.That's enough to understand the game indeed. But totally useless at attracting new players. I just ended your demo and I don't want to depose on this site, only because it doesn't mean anything to simply click on bubbles without betting. You can't attract new players with empty bet, that's not even betting! You gotta add a faucet to this game man. A small one, you don't have to give out more than a few hundreds satoshi you know. Oh and give the possibility to create an account. The cookie part is good for testing, but I'm not going to depose anything more than 2$ on a website if I can't get them back if my cookies are deleted or corrupted!  |
|
|
|
i really like your game to be honest and i have already tries all the times possible for free
i think i will surely try it out later in my free time for real bitcoins, also i have to wait for the transactions from exchange
I keep seeing people mention that you can try for free, but every bubble I click gives me a deposit address. It seems like a neat concept/game, but I'd like to try before I buy. Try to remove cookies and don't touch a bet selector. Initialy, if you just start game, it gives 100 attempts with zero bet. Which is rather useless in my opinion. Demo in this kind of website is here only to give you a grip of strategies you can create. If you make free bet, it means you earn nothing. If you earn nothing you can't and after 10 bets saying "ok I won a bit, gonna deposit this game is fun". You only click on empty bubbles... Not exactly the definition of fun... |
|
|
|
Does anyone have problem when trying to access primedice from tor browser?
When i have to insert captcha in cloudfare page i have always the error : Multiple correct solution required-please solve more
But i am pretty sure that i have typed the right solution
Hmm... It's not an error in itself. Does it work when you re enter the captcha correctly after a few times? Because captcha started using other recognition paths. They don't really care about the picture you click or the captcha you enter. They start analysing your mouse movement, your browsing data and so on. Which means using Tor makes you one of a few, which means captcha gets trouble identifying you as a "normal" user! |
|
|
|
Dude... You're seriously thinking that "unethical behaviour" is an argument against an online casino using bitcoin? --' I mean... Of course their point is not to bring peace and happiness on Earth! They're here to make money!!! I took a look at the thread you point and... Don't you have anything better to do with your life? ^^ The "ethical issues" you're raising are rather unsubstantial claims... What you argue is that they're not "fair enough" for you. Well they're a betting website! They're not going to guide you through everything and they're going to take as much as they can on the path of course!!!! What's important is that their service is excellent, that the amount of games/players is amazing, that their support is always ready for help and that they always have new features every month. That's why they're a successful website and why I'm more than willing to advertise them. Your argument is a nonsense because we're talking about the betting industry here. They're not good guys, they're professionals selling a service. The only thing that could make me stop using/advertising betcoin is if they stole their users. Which would mean if they refuse you to withdraw your funds. That would be something worth claimng everywhere. But the little things you're complaining about? Comon... Grow up a bit kid... |
|
|
|
you're a weak faggot if you let yourself get beat up by a female unless you're into that sort of thing and you asked her to do it
Amazing. Everytime I think you said the most stupid thing ever, you manage to rise the level! It's like you're actually trying to have the most fucked up speech possible! ^^ I have no idea why people even occupy the word faggot as everyday offensive terms. Faggot is a homophobic slur meant to describe gay people. Why in the hell does that need to be considered an insult?? Because faggot is an offensive term. It doesn't describe only a homosexual oriented person, it also describes a cliché behaviour of over sexualized homo person. It doesn't just mean that the designed person is homosexual (which is, in itself, not an insult, just a false statement here) but it also means that you act like the average cliché of homosexual. For a man it's mainly extremely feminine attitude and weakness. |
|
|
|
To be filed for future reference... ---------------------------- This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said Twitchy by Greg Pollowitz 3:19 pm We’re not sure this is the best route for Hillary Clinton to take while trying to attack Donald Trump, especially with FBI agents reportedly getting set to interview her staff’s actions regarding her homebrew email server. But, alas, self-awareness never was her thing: Hillary Clinton says Donald Trump is responsible for his staff's actions: https://t.co/troowMAacq— Capital Journal (@WSJPolitics) March 30, 2016 She really doesn’t see where this is going, does she? @WSJPolitics So that means Hillary is completely responsible for her illegal e-mail server? — LetItBurnUSA (@LetItBurnUSA) March 30, 2016 Exactly. Let’s save this tweet just in case we need to remind her of what she said in the very near future: Clip and save this for when she throws staff under the bus for her server https://t.co/jQr6s0LCxo— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) March 30, 2016 I wonder if Hillary really thought through this statement carefully… https://t.co/yXF9txNr8I— Michael Q Sullivan (@MQSullivan) March 30, 2016 @WSJPolitics Good Then she will take responsibility for Mills, Sullivan, Abedin and her own crimes endangering nat'l sec #ClintonEmail — Kim Seefeld (@KAS_SB) March 30, 2016 @WSJPolitics this is a saver. #tcot — Bill Baar (@BillBaar) March 30, 2016 @WSJPolitics oh I can't wait till this comes back to haunt her!! — Rebellious Mom (@jenladkins) March 30, 2016 And what about Bill’s behavior? @WSJPolitics Any mention of responsibility for Bill's actions? — Momo be tweet'n (@mcg0958) March 30, 2016 @WSJPolitics and who is responsible for her husband's actions or her email action or her Benghazi actions or her ….. — John Woods (@redeyebrody) March 30, 2016 Based on her record, this is the more likely response: Politicians shouldn't blame staff for failings. They should blame a YouTube video, then try to walk it back later. https://t.co/jVvDPls4Ff— Logan Dobson (@LoganDobson) March 30, 2016 You just now that’s coming. *** The post This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said appeared first on twitchy.com. This should be posted on the clinton thread. I feel like I don't feed it as often. Poor lonely harpy cactus. There is a Clinton thread? There are actualy real people voting for Clinton? Not sure about bitcointalk people voting for clinton though. I could understand bernie, and of course TRUMP. But clinton? I made clinton, TRUMP, bernie threads, all popular. Just search wilikon and the associate names Lol, do you understand that posting bullshit on threads isn't the same as "making them populars"? xD |
|
|
|
A wall can`t stop immigrants.
It`s just a waste of money and resources.
Certainly it can. It's wrong what you say. But we all know it's not the ONLY tool in the shed. Yeah sure. Because actually ready to risk there life in the sea, giving out everything they have for a better life, are of course going to be stopped by a fucking ridiculous wall... Huh? Any of them that want can try the sea route. That has nothing to do with the wall. The wall would stop the desert routes where a lot of the illegal immigrants DIE. Oh, so your solution is "let's build a wall on a part of the borders"? And what will you do when they'll all go through the sea route?  There has been no discussion of sea routes by any presidential candidate. Do you even know the geography? The tides, the currents? Mexico is not Cuba... Doesn't matter man... What I mean is that, you wanna build a wall? Very well. But they'll just start making a detour by sea that all! Where on Earth did you see that a fucking wall will be enough! If it was the case why did the Mexican immigration didn't stop, or at least decrease after the construction of the fortified border between Mexico and USA???  The WALL is still a good deal and will stop a lot of people So please just explain to me why the current fortified border doesn't stop mexicans? |
|
|
|
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.
The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded. Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets. Is bernie a puppet of is he free? Don't know. I'm not the one talking about candidates as being puppets. It seems especially dumb considering the fact that USA is a country where "lobbyist" is actually a job... Considering any politician as "free" is probably as dumb as considering a shark vegan. |
|
|
|
This was taken right after the second tower fell. You can see thousands of tons of pulverized material being propelled at speed. Imagine the amount of energy needed to first pulverize this stuff and then eject it all over lower Manhattan. The energy sink of this event doesn´t add up at all. Building 7 is standing there at the left.  Really? If you sincerely believe that the energy sink does not add up, could you please show your calculations?
I have a hunch that plenty of energy is available in a skyskraper falling to pulverize large amounts of concrete into dust.Agreed here. There is no way that this amount of dust was produced by anything but the buildings collapsing. I have no opinions on the 9/11 in itself but it's sure that there is far enough energy in a building collapse to rise as much dust as you want... |
|
|
|
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.
The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded. Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets. |
|
|
|
A wall can`t stop immigrants.
It`s just a waste of money and resources.
Certainly it can. It's wrong what you say. But we all know it's not the ONLY tool in the shed. Yeah sure. Because actually ready to risk there life in the sea, giving out everything they have for a better life, are of course going to be stopped by a fucking ridiculous wall... Huh? Any of them that want can try the sea route. That has nothing to do with the wall. The wall would stop the desert routes where a lot of the illegal immigrants DIE. Oh, so your solution is "let's build a wall on a part of the borders"? And what will you do when they'll all go through the sea route? There has been no discussion of sea routes by any presidential candidate. Do you even know the geography? The tides, the currents? Mexico is not Cuba... Doesn't matter man... What I mean is that, you wanna build a wall? Very well. But they'll just start making a detour by sea that all! Where on Earth did you see that a fucking wall will be enough! If it was the case why did the Mexican immigration didn't stop, or at least decrease after the construction of the fortified border between Mexico and USA??? |
|
|
|
Yeah French citizen. It's how you call anyone with French nationality... Why the quotes?
because it is obviously a north african or some variety of islamic, not a frenchman. Of course. I forgot only "pureblood" can be called civilized by you... I mean it's not like our country made a small revolution 2 centuries ago in order to make disappear the importance of blood in political life... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
