It seems 1btcxe.com is useless too. You can register there without giving out any details but you can't deposit without having an account at cryptocapital.co. And they demand a hefty amount of personal details.  So you are asking for two things: - Bitcoin Exchange (1btcxe) that does accept SEPA from bank accounts that you don't own - An exchange/service that doesn't ask any information about you Cryptocapital.co offer just the first one. |
|
|
|
That's too bad they ask for verification and don't offer prepaid cards.
They offer cards directly connected with your account, and they send the first one for free. |
|
|
|
Servizi che permettono l'acquisto di Bitcoin con carte di credito/debitoQuindi ad esempio con una carta Postepay, o Superflash ecc ... Spesso è anche richiesto che abbiano abilitato il sistema 3D Secure (di mastercard e visa) Per molti di questi spesso sono richieste la verifica della propria identità e residenza. - https://www.coinbase.com (Max: 500 euro al giorno/ 25 euro alla prima iscrizione / Fee: 3.99%) Supporta carte Visa, Mastercard e Maestro che supportino (e abbiano attivo) 3D Secure La verifica di un nuovo account viene fatta subito.- https://uphold.com (Fee: 3.99%) - https://www.bitpanda.com (Fee: 2.75% circa pare) Anche Neteller e Skrill - https://www.bitstamp.net (Fee: 8% ... dovrebbe scendere dopo i primi test) - http://www.bitbay.net (Fee: 5% sull'ammontare depositato - min. 10 EUR / 10 USD) - https://cubits.com (Fee: 6.50% - Prezzo apparentemente alto) Anche Skrill - https://chip-chap.comDovrebbe essere già attivo e funzionante, senza richiesta di registrazione. I Bitcoin vengono rilasciati dopo 24/48 ore, per verificare che non sia stata usata una carta rubata/clonata - https://www.coinify.com (3.9% fee sul prezzo proposto da loro) - https://cex.io (Fee: 3.5% + 0.20) - https://www.247exchange.com (Fee: 4% + 0.56 + 3%) - https://www.virwox.com (Max: 300 euro al giorno / Fee 3.5% + 0.39 + 2.90% + 2.90%) - https://www.coincorner.com (Fee: 5%) Manca ancora il supporto per l'Italia, ma è probabile che machi davvero poco https://twitter.com/CoinCorner/status/638116816171216896- https://indacoin.com (Fee 4% , min $2) - https://www.coinmama.com (prezzo abbastanza alto) - https://bittylicious.com (prezzo abbastanza alto) - https://coinsbank.com (Fee: 2.95% + 4.95 eur) - https://www.circle.com (All'inizio limite 100 euro al giorno / Fee: 2.9/3%) non più Servizi che permettono l'acquisto e/o vendita di Bitcoin con Paypal ( precedente discussione) Il prezzo di compravendita via Paypal, dati i rischi per lo più per i venditori, sono spesso ben più alti rispetto alla media di mercato. La lista è in ordine casuale. Confrontate prezzi, commissioni e funzionalità. Bitpandahttps://www.bitpanda.comVendita Bitcoin, ricezione euro su conto Paypal Bitboat - Non più https://www.bitboat.net
Solo acquisto.E-coin / Wirexhttps://www.e-coin.io / https://wirexapp.comDiscussioni: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1407170.0 / https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1413317.0Avviene tramite la ricarica di una loro carta, da ordinare, virtuale o meno. Il passaggio di ricarica richiede 1/2 giorni. Virwoxhttps://www.virwox.comVendita e acquisto in euro. Richiede diversi passaggi. Cryptonithttps://cryptonit.netExchange recente. Richiede verifica identità. Unichange.mehttps://unichange.me/order/bitcoin_paypal_usdSolo vendita Bitcoin. Ricezione solo USD. Commissioni considerevoli. Localbitcoinshttps://localbitcoins.com/buy-bitcoins-online/paypal/https://localbitcoins.com/sell-bitcoins-online/paypal/Sito di offerte da altri utenti. Paxfulhttps://paxful.com/buy-bitcoin/paypalhttps://paxful.com/sell-bitcoin/paypalSito di offerte da altri utenti. Guida utile contro gli scam su Paxful: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1658629.0Walletglobehttp://www.walletglobe.comSito di offerte da altri utenti. Servizi che permettono l'acquisto attraverso Mybank (in genere, istantaneo) Per sapere se la vostra banca lo supporta, guarda fra questi documenti: https://www.mybank.eu/it/mybank/banche-e-psp-aderenti/Oppure inserisci il nome della tua banca in questa ricerca: https://www.mybank.eu/it/privati/consumer-bank-selector/Litebithttps://www.litebit.euAnycoindirecthttps://anycoindirect.euHappycoinshttps://happycoins.comSe ne conoscete altri, abbastanza facili da usare, segnalate pure.
|
|
|
|
Please explain why we should let miners increase the limit to meet increasing demand, but not lower the limit with falling demand?
Because there is no economic reason, it has only disadvantages. It is like asking for "more features! more features!", even the bads. I've already wrote, if there is demand, a business can't make a long plan in the future if there is the fear that an unpredictable time, the miners will force a smaller block, making fees enormously, slow confirmations, breaking plans and investments. It's full of competitors to Bitcoin that are waiting every seconds to take away users/market from it. Even the uncertainty that the miners will vote for a bigger blocks is bad, but not so bad as the possibility of decreasing it. |
|
|
|
Your view appears to be that miners are not forced to make blocks bigger and therefore miners can make small blocks if they want anyway, so why have BIP100? This is probably the consensus view in the community at the moment. It could be correct, however I think it is likely to be wrong.
They like it more for two reasons  - The BIP101 is limited to 8GB.
Miners don't like all this fork drama, and they want to avoid it again as long as possible.- Miners want a BIT100 without the 32 MB limit.So what they really want is something more huge then the BIP101, and something the Core team will NOT like it even more. If you go around looking at their replies and even the last one from BitFury, you will find this  I'm kinda ok on all about this, I just don't like at all the possibility to decrease the block size. |
|
|
|
In beta stanno testando la possibilità di usare delle carte virtuali, e stanno anche cercando di accordarsi con una banca per rilasciare carte fisiche  |
|
|
|
Si aggiunge anche Paypal, con https://www.paypal.meQuesto servizio serve per rendere più facile il passaggio di soldi fra utenti. Il vantaggio che ha Paypal, rispetto ad altri servizi, è che ha la possibilità di avere il ritiro da conto corrente passivo. Su Paypal è possibile registrare il proprio conto corrente, e dare poi, se si vuole, l'autorizzazione a Paypal a ritirare soldi da tale conto. Sia l'operazione di ritiro, che di deposito, sono gratuite. Questo rende quindi facile il passaggio di soldi fra amici/parenti. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKuUyFs7X-s |
|
|
|
One simple reason is that without this option miners may be too relucant to increase the limit, as the decision could not be reversed. This is a good reason to not give them any possibility to vote. Anyone of them can chose, individually, if they want to make blocks bigger or smaller. Another potential reason is a cyclical fall in demand for using bitcoin.
This isn't a good reason, miners can always lower the size of their block, none is forced to make them bigger, neither with the BIP101. Just to remember everyone, that the limit for the block was put on the protocol only to avoid DoS attack, blocks bigger than the network (nodes) can spread between them self. Satoshi was probably worried because at the time a fund or a government was able to make a big pool full of GPU, without spending so much and making big blocks (32 MB) to DoS the network. |
|
|
|
|
I still can't see any reason to give miners the vote to lower the size.
BIP100 can be "considerable" only if the vote to lower the size isn't present.
|
|
|
|
Sito: https://morph.isCodice: http://162.252.242.77:8000/morphis.gitOPEN SOURCEWritten in Python and 100% open source, MORPHiS is intended to be free to open collaboration, transparency, and rapid prototyping. Lets work together to get this project off the ground! MODULARThe network is optimized for performance and low latency to allow for applications to be built on top of it using MORPHiS as its database. It also uses TCP to be 100% compatible with TOR so that it is as anonymous as TOR for those who connect their node through TOR to the MORPHiS network. SECUREMORPHiS is a custom (enhanced with inventions) Kademlia DHT over a custom (enhanced with optimizations for performance in security) SSH protocol. MORPHiS is written in Python, a free and open language that is memory safe with high performance asynchronous I/O, and is not controlled by US/NSA corporations. DISTRIBUTEDBecause the nodes are distributed on each of our computers, the MORPHiS network is completely decentralized. It is reliable, transparent, scalable, and is high performance without any centralized power having control. WEB OF TRUSTThrough a trust based system of reputation, this feature will enable reputation based searches (deprecating GOOGLE/BING/ETC, DNS, and so on), forums (bye bye disqus, etc!), and eventually deprecating democracy and stone age government (democracy via stone age paper ballots VS real time direct voting). BITCOIN INCENTIVEThis layer will allow for Bitcoin Micro-transactions and an inherent automatic Bitcoin Mixing Layer (anonymize bitcoin and add infinite micro-transaction ability).
|
|
|
|
Ottimo lavoro |
|
|
|
You can reverse the argument with BIP101.
"BIP101 cut the competition between miners, so if there are some miners that are not able to spread blocks with higher size and faster, they will be obliged to, because a cartel between miners, without risking so much, just push bigger blocks" No it's different, no miner is obliged to use bigger blocks, neither BIP100 or BIP101. The miner can always chose to make smaller blocks than the actual version of the protocol can support. It is NOT true the opposite. The BIP100 can cut the possibility of some good miners to spread bigger blocks if the network can support them, because a minirity/cartel has chosen to. Isn't it also the case with BIP100 ? if there is demand, miners will try to cover it thus increasing the size. This is an assumption. Even with BIP101 you can't be certain that miner will not adopt a small limit instead of a bigger one, so it change nothing. This is true, but still there will be the space that someone can try to cover, with BIP100 it is NOT, the BIP100 can cut this possibility, because it opens an easy way to make cartels of miners. The only valable argument I think of for BIP101 is about short term peak demand that BIP100 can't adapt for quickly. But this is an exceptional case.
BIP100 can increse the block size in 12 months to 32MB, by doubling it every 3 months, still it can cut the size, and this is the real problem. |
|
|
|
|
They really need to add a table of the order book instead of the graph.
|
|
|
|
|
v0.12.0:
- Support for all the OKPay-supported currencies, one at a time.
- Bug fixing
* Force file encoding to UTF-8 to avoid issues when system is configured
with a different default encoding
|
|
|
|
1MB blocks may be trivial, but 1GB blocks wouldn't be, and 1TB blocks would be out of the question today even the largest miner.
So there is not problem to take away any kind of limit None is going to use 1TB blocks (and not even 1GB now) |
|
|
|
|
It could be even more interesting to have an always updated website with the stats about the current costs of some/many configurations, so the user can choose which one he prefers.
|
|
|
|
For those of you complaining to people linking to my slides/blog posts about brainwallets - I'm currently testing support for brainwallet.io in brainflayer. My limited benchmarking gives an estimate of about 75k passphrases guessed per dollar on Amazon EC2 spot instances.
It would be interesting to change these settings to see which are enough to get near 1 passphrase per 1 dollar (or even lower) N=218, r=8, p=1, dkLen=32 |
|
|
|
|
Is there somewhere a list of people that have used the "right to be forgotten" ?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
