You should think about what you're posting before you do it.

---

Who the fuck is Don hilary?

Wrong. Not inevitable. And trying to make the forum a job means compromising with the quality of your posts. You will definitely be unable to consistently make (25?) high-quality posts every week unless you sink a huge amount of time into it, scouring for threads. Even then, it's not necessarily possible to create that many posts. Because of this, the forum's quality deteriorates. And that's no good.

---

This is advertising, not a partnership.

You should never expect to be rewarded for your efforts. Merit is (or at least should be) given to deserving posts but that doesn't mean that all deserving posts are given merit. Begging/asking for merit is not the way to go and neither is making the forum a job.

That's exactly why the merit system was implemented in the first place: to curb spam from people who treat the forum like an easy job via posting crappy replies.

I have posted 642 replies since the merit system was implemented. I have received 189 merit since then. 50 of those are from a single post and may be disregarded. That's a 21.65% post:merit ratio.

I don't complain about not having enough merit.

Your odds also don't change even if you buy multiple tickets. And even if they are in the same side, each ticket will add the same 12.5% (1/8) chance of winning.

The more you know

You might say this is true but at the same time you can't base results on subjective teachings 'year-round'. Standardized tests are just that: standardized. Objective and unwavering.

Assuming we're talking about an academic setting, admittance based on standardized tests seems far fairer than admittance based on grades from different schools with different teaching methods and grading styles.

Sure, some can't handle testing environments well. But that doesn't mean you should subject all potential students (who may be objectively better than others) to some other method that may allow undeserving ones to get by (i.e. schools that artificially increase/inflate marks).

That is not relevant.

Funny how you try to deflect your lies by resorting to absurd ad-hominem attacks.

Great: a signature affects the text of what one says. Clearly, because one has a signature anything they post must be absolutely disregarded because there is no way that it is true. Every single post from a user that has a signature must be a shitpost therefore we can ignore all their posts. QED.

You admit it yourself:

---

Are you trying to be funny, trying to level us, or are you just incorrigibly contradictory?

Blazed added me because I was acting heavily against shitposters. This (along with TP's assistance) led to the acceleration of the merit system's progress. Nothing more.

You think I am using DT to bully others.

I already stated why I tagged you after the thread was made. I don't know why you continue to ask the same questions, make the same arguments and then simply dismiss my responses as if they never happened.

You're trying to make up shit now. Your reason for my 'abuse' has changed many times throughout the other threads thus I can only come to that conclusion.

And I have said that you were wrong but obviously this I-said they-said dialogue doesn't really work when you have a firm belief.

How come you're so sure of this?

Yes, yes. I only care about shitposting on signature campaigns which is exactly why I took a hiatus from signature campaigns when I could not keep up with the minimum post requirement.

What?

99% of the time it is by users who are retaliating against me for the tag.

This whole contrived rhetoric is because of your overinflated ego, thinking that you're special and being targeted for abuse.

You don't see me in Bitcoin Discussion, Economics or any other shit boards very often, do you?

lol

This is news to me.

Well, of course. It's been proved and confirmed by all negative-trust users on the forum!

I don't think being attracted to a person on a forum (whose gender is unknown, by the way) is exactly my forté.

d it up!

I'm not exactly sure what your point is. The "Invites & Accounts" board?

---

I'm sure you would also be amused at the "Investor-based games" board, home of ponzi schemes.

Why is this relevant to your situation? Are you trying to instill the fallacy of relative privation?

I do know about this issue and it fixes itself after some time. I have no idea what causes it but if you alter the range (age) it should be fine. I oscillate between 1 and 2 days of age, typically.

A single result will appear for each thread. The reason is since the search targets only threads, rather than posts. You will have to delve into each of the threads to find all the quotes. Hence, if you are in only ten threads with heavy discussion you will only find out when your name is mentioned next (but not any previous times).

Bump.

They are untrustworthy by my standards? Show me how.

This cartel shit has got to stop. This is just a redundant blanket statement you keep throwing around as rhetoric.

I have never sent a PM to marlboroza. Or, if I have, then it was for something so insignificant I have forgotten about it.

Exclude Blazed on your trust list then.

What happened to aTriz? What happened to Ryland? I would actually like to point out that I was the one that caught the account (which used to be a treasurer, IIRC).

There have been a few times that I have thought marlboroza was too extreme. This was pre-DT, mind you. I don't necessarily trust all of their opinions but a significant portion of them seem to coincide with mine.

By you and other butthurt users, with the same zero-substance arguments out of spite.



I have already addressed this. If theymos wanted me off DT, theymos could implement a rule that allowed all of his exclusions to count as 999 exclusions. The reason I am still on DT is because he wants a fair system. theymos is not a king.

Read above.

Great. I'll just phone up all the police in every country, warning them about a "digaran" online.

I have already addressed this same argument. It doesn't matter where the money goes. How many times are you going to repeat the same old shit?

Projecting.

This is where we disagree. If you carry intent to do something, then you should be punished, even if you did not carry through with it. If you were conspiring to commit terrorist acts and were ready to carry through with the plan but were caught beforehand, you can't plead innocence by stating that you haven't actually done it yet. Who waits until after something has been done to prevent people from doing it?

Ah, yes. I should punish marlboroza for changing feedback!

Well which is it? Am I weak or am I abusive?

False.

False.

Damn, your superior deduction skills have finally caught me now. No wonder you offered mediation services for people with negative trust! There's no way that you're completely wrong.

Show me these users and the valuable tags that they have (directed toward neutral/positive-trust users). If they have tagged shady individuals that are still roaming around then you should highlight them. However, some people approach trust very differently (e.g. TBZ) and that can cause hesitation with including others into DT.

I'm glad you think that I have so much power but extortion is not my thing.



I have no personal issues with people before I tag them. It's only really afterward that they get all butthurt and riled up about it, creating threads about me and my abuse.

Good, because my feedback is going to stay there unless some outside force removes it. I wouldn't send out trust feedback unless I was willing to stick by it. There have only been about 3 instances in which the situation had changed after the fact. To which I went ahead and rectified the tag.

Saw the thread. What relevance does this have?

Every since I have become a DT member, these people have ganged up on me. I have already explained the motivation behind my tags. However, your dislike of me is preventing you from seeing the truth.

Do it. No negatives.* All positives.

Going to address this first. There is absolutely no reason for me (at that time) to get involved in any drama and collusion. It does not benefit me at all and would not benefit people who are trying to collude together. After all, I was included into DT in 2018. Not the beginning of 2017.

What does sharing PGP keys having to do with collusion? Additionally, that information is already public on the profile and we don't have to follow one another to chat. I also don't have parity with followers:following. I would also like to note that of the 8 users that I am following on that Keybase account, only one of them has "traded trust" with me. Furthermore, DarkStar_ was actually not part of DT when they sent that feedback to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

---

As for your whole yahoo spiel... when you manage a campaign for a product that looks legitimate but then it turns out to be a scam/shady, is that your fault? e.g. Betcoin

Adding fodder for butthurt users to latch on is always fun since they think they will have some topics more to talk about.

Wow. Because I follow users on Keybase, I am obviously colluding with them. Well shit, time to follow Warren Buffet!

Whooosh.

You lot always assume that there are always these conspiracies and underground dealings with DT members but the worst thing I've seen (subjective) is getting killyou to buy a flamingo and sandwiches.

What exit-scam projects have I given positive trust to? Show me and I will replace the feedback with a negative.