You'll get an email from VirWox once they've processed your request with a transaction ID, did you get that email?
I wouldn't be worried yet, they just need some time.
|
|
|
Nee, ich meinte nicht die Bitcoin-Menge, sondern die Menge der "Inputs". Wenn Du ein Gesamt-Guthaben von 2033BTC in der Wallet hast und dieses Guthaben aus 2033 Transaktionen von jeweils 1BTC besteht, müssen für die Transaktion 2033 "Inputs" in eine Transaktion gepackt werden. Dadurch wird die Transaktion sehr groß und die Wahrscheinlichkeit, daß sie überhaupt in einen Block aufgenommen wird, sehr gering. Noch schlimmer wirds, wenn Du nicht 1BTC-Portionen erhalten hast, sondern noch kleinere Häppchen.
Verschieb die Coins nach und nach, oder bündele erstmal die vielen kleinen Transaktionen.
Verloren sind die Coins sicherlich nicht.
|
|
|
So let me get this right, you're arguing that Bitcoin will become so popular that nobody will use it?
That's a good one. Bitcoin is doomed to fail once it goes mainstream.
|
|
|
Größe der Transaktion, bzw Menge der Inputs? Gebühren bezahlt?
|
|
|
I suppose this system is not a good idea for mining. ~ 1.5Mhash/Sec per ~ $150 GH, not MH The Jalapeno is 4.5GH/s for $150, isn't it? Or, well, at least it's what "they" claim it will be.
|
|
|
the minimum transaction fee is 0.000 btc thats currently 0,0 cents per transaction...
Fixed that for ya, but...shhhhh... this is what they don't want you to know
![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Da Du in der aktuellen Wallet (scheinbar) auch nur 7 Adressen hast, ist davon auszugehen, das sämtliche bisher genutzten Adressen in beiden Wallets aus dem ersten "keypool" stammen (also dem Pool von ~100Adressen, die beim allerersten Start generiert wurden) und somit beide Wallets alle nötigen Adressen besitzen.
Starte die neue Wallet mal mit der -rescan Option (dazu einfach die Verknüpfung editieren und ans Ziel ein " -rescan" (ohne Häkchen) anhängen), das könnte den Fehler schon beheben.
|
|
|
nur eine Adresse hat bzw. anzeigt
Da ist der Haken. Deine Wallet hat gleich beim ersten Start schon >100 Adressen (in der Standard-Konfiguration, man kann auch mehr, oder weniger einstellen), nur siehst Du sie nicht.
|
|
|
Why's the minimum $0.10? That's way overpriced imo.
|
|
|
Nun, ob der Käufer nicht doch was verloren haben wird - das wird sich noch herausstellen!
Nunja, wenn er den Coin "hortet" und auf steigende Kurse spekuliert, tut er eben genau das, spekulieren. Das er dabei ein Risiko eingeht, etwas zu verlieren, liegt in der Natur der Sache, hat aber nichts damit zutun, daß ich 10EUR Gewinn gemacht habe.
|
|
|
Hast du auch irgendwelche Infos oder suchst du nur etwas um deinen Frust abzureagieren?
Hast Du denn irgendwelche Infos, oder nur haltlose Behauptungen? Wie kann denn zB (fast) nur gekauft werden, wenn (fast) niemand verkauft? Da kann doch irgendwas nicht stimmen. Und wieso verliert ein anderer, wenn irgendwer .. 10 Euro verdient? Auch das ergibt nicht viel Sinn. Wenn Du mir 1BTC für 20EUR verkaufst, und ich diesen später für 30EUR wieder verkaufe, hast Du nichts verloren, ich hab nichts verloren und der Käufer hat auch nichts verloren.
|
|
|
it seems like everyone is hoarding... I always thought prices could only change (up or down doesn't really matter) while trades are happening, now you come and say everyone is hoarding. Where does all the trade-volume come from, if noone's selling?
|
|
|
The "miner" has only 1 KB ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ! That's not miner, it's just a link. Cool, a link. Oh, wait, why do we see just a link (to a batch-file I guess), or..what does it tell us? What's the russian Ubuntu for, if the only thing shown is a command-line window on a Windows machine? Why not show us the Ubuntu desktop? Anyway, I want one, where do I send my money?
|
|
|
I will get back to the forum first thing in the morning, and post further information.
Just wondering which morning that will be, maybe X-mas morning 2023?
|
|
|
Probably a wallet-stealer.
|
|
|
As I said, you still haven't understood, you don't sign nxnxnxnxnxn..., you only sign n and that's it.
However, create your own good crypto $ and do whatever you like with it, good luck.
|
|
|
Satoshi knew pretty well what he was doing, mining was never meant to be for the masses forever. You want to be able to become a miner? Guess what, you ARE able to become a miner, like everyone else. Running on the average or very slightly above average computer doesn't change your profitability, people that can afford more of those computers, or just faster CPUs would still gain more than you, in the same way they gain more from a couple of 60GH/s or TH/s ASICs when you yourself can only afford a 4.5GH/s Jalapeno. The only difference would be security-wise, your CPU-coin would be vulnerable for BotNet attacks ( ..litecoin .. addresses much this problem..), while the ASIC-coin is not. Ok let me put it this way....once I have received a bit-coin from a valid owner, who has been confirmed by x prior transactions, where x is a significant safety margin to stop any realistic hack attempt, you do not need to go further back. You are just introducing pointless security No need to go further back? Pointless security? Seems you haven't understood, when you received a bitcoin from a valid owner it is recorded exactly once and gets stored in a single block, there's no more work needed or done for your receiving transaction, it's stored once and forever. I don't see how you gonna change that.
|
|
|
For the satoshi to be the base unit of BitCoin the value would have to skyrocket...well over 1BTC = $1000 USD
The Satoshi already is the base unit of Bitcoin, the value doesn't change that. It was the base unit when 1BTC was less than a cent, is the current base unit and will probably still be the base unit when 1BTC hits $1000 or more.
|
|
|
1. with only a couple of hours a day, a PPS pool would make sense 2. without knowing the hashrate there's no way to tell 3. no need to know anything about coding, not much to learn, join a pool (and pretty much every pool has some instructions how to mine), grab a miner and start it
|
|
|
...but I think it is worth thinking about because this could turn out to be a lot of money later on down the road.
It could turn out to be a lot of money of course, but it's a lot of money that is not yours, so what is it worth to you to think about money that is not yours? Shouldn't you think more about your own money, instead of someone elses money?
|
|
|
|