Cei de la Shitcoins Club au curs foarte ok pentru cryptomonede și momentan nu au KYC. Cel puțin dintre toate pe care le-am folosit până acum prin România, de fiecare dată când ajung într-o zonă în care găsesc și un ATM Shitcoins, cumpăr. Au avut probleme pe la început cu bancnotele - se blocau în aparat, sau aparatul nu mergea deloc. În rest, no comment. Au design foarte fain și, cred eu, unic.

Just because most mining power comes from China doesn't mean their government can take over Bitcoin through a 51% attack. I've never studied who owns the most Bitcoin power in China but I highly doubt (and I think it's pretty logic) that it's their government. Otherwise, Bitcoin would be right now placed under a serious threat of centralization and power.

Considering Danny's calculus, how will the governments gain any benefit from attacking Bitcoin? A successful attack would only determine devs to focus on Bitcoin's security against these attacks, hence making Bitcoin even stronger. A failure would be a big embarrassment for the governments and would make Bitcoin even stronger than the scenario of a success.

Why would a government spend so much money just to try an attack..

If I don't have any money but have the urge to gamble, I'll borrow money from someone and I'll satisfy my gambling needs with it.

I just don't get what's up with these measures - if someone's borrowing methods are limited, the last resort will be asking someone for money. And that's even worse than going on a credit card balance spree, socially speaking.

The first and most important thing they should take care of is helping people fix their addition. If you are so addicted you can't gamble more than you can afford to, that's very bad and becomes a mental issue. Before taking care about the customer's money, take care about their mental health.

Well, by "hiring" I understood something completely different.

Would you pay someone to break the BitcoinTalk rules just to see who they are? $20 a merit? I would not. One day or another they will get exposed, just like this guy OP is accusing. Lies are short, right?

And sometimes people will do anything possible just to get up to that minimum rank needed for a sig campaign.

I always keep a little bit of Merit for those who deserve it, I'm never running out of them.

TEAM360 surely saw your message and most likely this thread too. They probably prefer to now go through PMs with potentially interested people rather than answering our questions. He/she knows what they're doing isn't right.

XinXan is also active (last active a day ago), but no response to this thread. Taking into account that he gives away Merit, he must know about the existence of this thread too.

Here's 2 more from me! Too bad you need activity, not merit, to advance to Legendary.. I really hope you're going to rank up soon enough - you really deserve it.

If someone's stupid enough to pay $20 for 1 merit which could be earned by simply posting a helpful thread/reply on the forum, they deserve their loss so let them be. They'll take down with them the members who've sent them merit too as they'd all become suddenly suspicious, so it's a win situation for us.

From what I've seen, those users who can't rank up due to lack of quality posting will give up in the end. Merit is such a good measure to stop them but I wish it wasn't a requirement for the top members like you and LoyceV Mobile to rank up.

Can't see the relation between the 2016 auction and the 2017 bull run.

I don't think someone would pay at an auction even $500/BTC under spot to only sell it after. It's Bitcoin, it's volatile. A drastic price change could happen at any given time.

Someone will probably be buying these Bitcoins to hold on to them. It makes no sense to buy it and then just dump the market.. just my opinion though.

I'm sure almost nobody's heard of this auction. I'm up to date with most crypto news and I've never seen "auction" in the headline of an article.

I've been a sh*tposter before and although I changed, I don't feel the need of creating a thread to talk about users which inspired me. There's no need to talk about inspiration of earning higher ranks imo.

Sure, there are members you can learn a lot of stuff from like LoyceV, but creating threads just for this purpose really gives them a merit-beggar look.

Every time I visit the Beginners & Help board there's a new thread like this. The first few ones earned a ton of merit and I feel like, even if OP didn't intend to post it for that, he subconsciously wonders "what if..".

Come on, I don't think I've ever seen a top member of the forum come up with these kind of threads.. Just continue doing what you're doing, if you ranked up through earned merit then you deserve it.

Well, looks like I was misinformed about the Ripple technology part. I always thought XRP was being used by banks, NOT just the tech. Ripple having their coin named "Ripple" makes me always confuse the two. I guess the name was not randomly chosen anyway

Besides all the centralization, the 20XRP minimum funds needed to keep an account active is a joke. That's $50 wasted away at the current price if you want to hold 10 different addresses. It was $50 per address when the price was at all time highs.

And yet, whenever I heard about XRP from someone in real life, I always heard the idea that XRP would be the one used by banks, not the tech. This confusion probably drives prices and investors in the wrong places and makes them believe XRP is the future.

Anyways.. as soon as the coins aren't 100% mine and someone has control over them, it's a no for me from the start. I did not come into the crypto world to chain myself to another fiat-style "cryptocurrency".

Depends if you're going for the long or for the short term. For long term tradings, people usually make profits when the bull market switches to bearish and vice-versa. If you know your targets and you're a good analyst, you might make more money through long term trades than through short term ones.

But both involve risk, so there's no guaranteed win.

Going for day trading, though, is more riskier imo than being a long term trader. You lower the chances of mistyping a digit due to being in the hurry of opening an order book (which could lead to disastrous losses) and you avoid being affected of the panic/hype.

Bull or bear market - both can be played very well if one knows what they're doing. Because bull markets are led by hype while bear markets are led by fear, you can try to find out how the human brain works when hype/fear is triggered and profit off these waves of different moods.

I'm no expert but I've lost way more money through short term trades than through long term ones. Going for long terms also makes you avoid these moments of panic and/or hype.

I know banknotes are usually full of germs and microbes, but do you really think they contribute that much to the spreading of the virus? By using Bitcoin they'd still pay for physical stuff, so whatever you do you still end up with something physically existing in your hands in exchange for physical/digital money.


It's not the most fatal virus. At least not yet. We've seen pandemics worse than corona and this one is so hyped..


Packages sent to Romania have been suspended a day ago due to the virus. I'm talking about the Romanian Post, not sure what about the other logistic companies.

Their economy is already very badly affected.. and will most likely take a pretty long route to recover from what happened. Injecting more money is a way they tried to help with the situation in Wuhan and all the other quarantined areas. It affects their economy on both the short and long terms.

Reminds me of 2013 Minecraft BTC servers. Good initiative especially considering the huge number of players worldwide. Wondering if and for how long will it last. It sounds and looks way more fun than the servers which paid BTC in 2013 for destroying blocks. If the game style is completely open-source, I guess more servers are going to adopt it. Let it become a Minecraft trend and Bitcoin would hit the headlines again.


I doubt pk'ing would be allowed. If so, all players would execute the command and basically all die instantly but 1 lucky player. The article doesn't mention anything about the way this "battle-royale" style was planned, but I guess as soon as a player gets close to the loot, the player's coordinates are revealed.

Sometimes looking for ways to maximize profit just isn't the best thing to do. If I was a casino owner and there was a way I could stop someone from basically losing more than they can afford to, I would do it even if it draws the profit lower with it.

However, I'm not sure how these limits would help greedy people. If one wants to go over their limit, they will even with the best limiting function that could exist. If one limits their total profit or loss and thinks of going over them, they will increase them. If someone wants to go for another gambling session after deleting their account, they'll just make another one.

Greed cannot be encountered this easy. I've pushed myself over the limits and know what it means to do whatever it takes in order to get where you want.

Mai degrabă pui deoparte 1-5 lei pe zi pe care îi investești în Bitcoin și ai să ieși mai bine decât cu orice faucet ai lucra. E o pierdere de timp, părerea mea. Am avut foarte multe tranzacții de 0.0001BTC (10k satoshi) pe vremea când Bitcoin-ul era undeva la $200. Când am vrut să-i mut (într-o perioadă în care BTC-ul era congestionat), am aflat ce e aia să plătești taxă pentru mineri pe tranzacții ”dust”. M-a durut puțin.

Pe lângă asta, până când și Faucet-urile au început să adauge KYC. Așadar, s-ar putea într-o zi să ai micuța surpriză că nenea de la Faucet vrea să afle cine ești cu adevărat.. sau nu-ți mai primești banii.  

In your case, asking for the chance of a new start is equal to being unbanned. And that's a "no" for someone who's done plagiarism and ban evasion. Also, why do you believe YOSHIE was wrong?

Paying to get more privileges (as in being allowed to skip bans) would be very unfair to all the other members of the forum. Your first account, which you say was hacked, has 40 posts - I don't think you lost much if anything with that account.

Eventually, wait until the staff replies because they're the ones in charge. Although I think they've had enough of these kind of threads already..

I'm actually surprised to see nobody mentioned Delta before BitMaxz. I think it's the app which boomed the most during the 2017-2018 period.

I'm using a combination of Delta and Excel. Delta for mobile and quick-checking my short term portfolios, Excel for managing my funds, trading and having an evidence of all my portfolios.

I used Blockfolio until Delta launched. I love Delta's UI but sometimes they show wrong prices. IIRC though, I think Blockfolio had this price issue too back when I used it. Delta also has some algorithm that calculates whether your transactions have been good investments (or trades) or not, but I've never used it correctly to know how accurate it is. It also has a live book order function which might come in help for those seeking to do trading.

I'll have to contradict you about point no. 2. XRP has a huge lot of demand from banks all around the world, so you can't really call it useless or demand-less. It definitely had some success hence the reason it's in the top 3 cryptocurrencies.

I certainly am against its centralized nature and against the way its supply is distributed manually. Although the funds are locked, as we've seen very recently, a lot of XRP can be injected into the market. This works exactly like fiat, so banks are happy to work with a coin that tries to immitate fiat's inflation.

Their interest is to work with a coin that is more stable than Bitcoin, so from their point of view that is understandable as much as I hate the banking system.

Considering XRP's workaround with banks all around the world, its demand could trigger a price explosion.. that is unless they're going to continue injecting so many coins in the market. The max supply of XRP is 100B, so a $14 XRP with max supply of 100B equals a $14T market cap for it. IMO it's possible under the existing circumstances. $14T for global usage isn't a lot.

User: 20kevin20
Position to Apply: Sr. Member
Posts Start: 1918
Address: 39k74QRU6yd2HSe46DNQjJk7yaquzbk6cC

Will update everything if accepted.

Been accepted by Bitvest - will continue with them.

User: 20kevin20
Position to Apply: Sr. Member
Posts Start: 1917
Address: 39k74QRU6yd2HSe46DNQjJk7yaquzbk6cC

Will update everything if accepted.