Unless the last *bump* was less then 24 hours ago then that would not be the case. His first post should not be considered a bump because it was a reply to someone else. Unless he made an update/bump less then 24 hours ago separate from the posts in question then it would not violate the bump rule.
But he could post the announcement and the reply to that user in one post (maybe wait a couple of minutes before posting that thing). A reply is considered a bump , because it 'brings' the thread above all the others. |
|
|
|
The first one is a reply to a post. I came in later and made a change to the contest. It is an announcement very relevant to the topic and there is nothing wrong in making another post to get it noticed. Since its in the marketplace section it would technically violate the no < 24 hour bumps (updates etc. included) rule. Exactly, we can say "it is not against the forum rules write two posts in a row - attached in seconds" and my two posts were merged (but it is not a problem, until I will not receive an exhaustive reply I will keep opened this thread). As shorena said it is not allowed to bump your thread in less than 24 hours, and you left run 13 minutes between those two posts. |
|
|
|
|
At the moment I am not spending my bitcoin (due the low price) but sometimes I buy steam games here in the forum from a 'seller', and some electronic stuff. I will spend more bitcoin once the price will be a little high than more (as I think a lot of you will do or am I wrong?).
|
|
|
|
This is my second address 1GkGt3218AM8FU7ZGDCeZS4LWZR8xeZcjf (just for security) and this is the signed message (from both the addresses): -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This address is owned by redsn0w, bitcointalk profile :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=211419
Signed on: 14/04/2015, Tuesday
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1GkGt3218AM8FU7ZGDCeZS4LWZR8xeZcjf
H3mboiUD4DIOc48OV7fT+rN/hUj8rI8Pq6Q7HvF511uHYiAf/MjIM0TDlEBDMlnB/DHOQAPVyglcRAaUQOXlkDw=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hey, I'm redsn0w and this is my second bitcoin address:
1GkGt3218AM8FU7ZGDCeZS4LWZR8xeZcjf
Signed on: 14/04/2015, Tuesday
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1redsY74u97ECVVKx7Gz9QWJWECUuzsrj
G73V0YvpzbHylzZcy881nCf4RVe6O9PSmXBkzbtReK2aI818RLx6pgeuzT+J+eNBBMGaOPG7Cui0kjJnVL+Jr2U=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Can someone (please) quote this post? Thanks. |
|
|
|
Tempo per seguirlo sempre meno e, soprattutto, la questione legale.  avete fatto le verifiche legali di cui parlavate? No Anon, secondo noi, senza bisogno di un legale, in Italia non si può fare questo genere di siti (anche se in bitcoin) Secondo me non è vero, se apri/gestisci un casino e paghi le vincite in *sassi... non credo sia illegale? *(ma anche tutta la parte di depositi, giocate , etc.. è in sassi) |
|
|
|
For the question of bitcoin banks, I think it will never exist a bitcoin bank.... because bitcoin was created also for 'go away' from those banks. Why someone should keep his bitcoin on a hypothetical 'bank'? We own ours wallet/client to keep and store bitcoins and (in my honest opinion) we don't need bitcoin banks.
Why? because within the system, you can save on transaction fees. They might also offer some sort of a bonus, or claim they can store your keys with more safety than you can. Because (again) I want to move real bitcoin on the blockchain and not off chain. For the question about the private keys, no one more than me can store and protect my private keys. Why should I trust another person to save my funds if I can save it/them myself? May sound outrageous to some of the extreme techies here, or those who cannot trust anyone. But I'm sure for a fair number of people, this would be totally true.
 It is normal, a lot of person here hate the banks and it is not necessary a bitcoin bank (look at the exchange system). Also, I'm not looking for a store of value. I'm wondering how bitcoin will survive in various scenarios, and how the altscene will develop in the future.
I think bitcoin will survive until a few person will support it, but I think one day will 'born' a new concept better than Bitcoin itself. |
|
|
|
Feel free to make me an offer for mine. Would prefer something long-term however because I don't want to have to be changing it monthly.
The same thing. @marcotheminer, if you want please make an offer through PM. Thanks for the opportunity. I also said the same thing.. By the way @redsn0w Congt on becoming a hero member Thanks! However @marcotheminer what is your rate for a monthly enrollment (why not, also 3-5 months)? |
|
|
|
Finally I am become an Hero member here in the forum  . I'm going to change the signature in few seconds. |
|
|
|
Feel free to make me an offer for mine. Would prefer something long-term however because I don't want to have to be changing it monthly.
The same thing. @marcotheminer, if you want please make an offer through PM. Thanks for the opportunity. |
|
|
|
Can I ask you where do you live?
South-east Asia. Maybe as Sithara 007 said, in the metro city there isn't that problem. The problem is the countryside city, etc.
It is a problem everywhere. Even in the metro cities, they are charging $25 per month for a 512 Kbps connection. And the quality is very bad. India is the place where you get bad quality stuff for ultra-expensive prices. 25 bucks for 512 Kbps  , I hope you are kidding me . This is really insane, why that high price for almost nothing? |
|
|
|
Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month). I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign I think that rate is not decent, up to 0.016 btc/ month to rent your avatar space? As I said previously, an avatar is more noticeable than a signature, I think 0.10 btc/per month is a good and right rate. |
|
|
|
What's with the "electronic use only"?
See: MasterCard® Unembossed
MasterCard has developed a new payment solution for consumer segments who have been traditionally underserved – MasterCard Unembossed. These days, customers are looking for greater utility, security, convenience in a payment card. The result is an accelerating number if new programs designed to meet specific cardholder needs, respond to particular market dynamics, or take advantage of new technologies.
What is MasterCard Unembossed?
In most respects it is similar to the MasterCard cards that you already accept: it might take the form of a credit, debit, or MasterCard Prepaid card, and will have the same familiar MasterCard brand mark. There is, however, one major difference – the card will look “flat”. All account information – cardholder name, primary account number (PAN), validity date, and security character – is printed rather than embossed. MasterCard Unembossed has been designed to manage risk by working only in your electronic terminal.
How Does it Work?
You should not process any MasterCard Unembossed transactions if you do not have an electronic terminal, or if it is out of use. If you accept a MasterCard Unembossed transaction and you do not have an electronic terminal, or it is out of use; you may carry additional liability. MasterCard Unembossed cards include an “ELECTRONIC USE ONLY” legend on the card front to inform consumers that merchants will be processing their transactions using their electronic terminals.
How to Accept MasterCard Unembossed?
If you are a merchant with an electronic terminal, you are ready to start accepting MasterCard Unembossed. If you do not have an electronic terminal, you may want to contact your acquirer to learn how you can get one. MasterCard Unembossed has been developed specifically for markets like yours and we anticipate an increasing number of consumers wanting to use it.
MasterCard Unembossed does not require a separate decalization effort, new equipment, or any system changes; and it is covered by your existing merchant agreement.
Yes, it doesn't mean you can use it only 'online' (if this was what were you thinking). |
|
|
|
hi would you take a year+ old local bitcoin account as collateral ? it is used almost daily and has great feedback so it wouldn't be something someonoen would lose over .02 bitcoins? Id give you access first so you can take a look at it to verify it all
Hi, no sorry I don't accept localbitcoins account as collateral, if you can provide another type of collateral I am sure that I can help you. Thanks for your post. |
|
|
|
I have received the physical card a couple of days ago, why?
Just wondering, I'd like to see what it looks like if possible? Yes of course, why not:  |
|
|
|
I made some calculations and I found I can save a good amount for one 0.1 BTC ATM withdrawal at current price. I calculated this by including loading fee($0.99), BitPay(2.5%), non-USD withdrawal fee($2.99). It still is pretty impressive when compared to BIT-X Debit Card as they have ATM withdrawal fee(3% + 0.02 BTC) and conversion fee(1% + 2.5%). Going to order one! Are you saying that the advanced card is better than the bit-x card? I am still waiting the first one, and I wanted to order the bit-x but if there is not difference I will not order it. This card is different to the Bit-X card which is a debit card not a prepaid card. Fees are basically the same, there is a percent of so more with Bit-X since it is a full debit card. Has anyone received their physical card yet?
I have received the physical card a couple of days ago, why? |
|
|
|
Its more than 3 hours and negative trust still not removed. Have PMed Quickseller to remove the trust but Tomatocage has blocked PMs from me. Can someone send him a PM regarding this?
Maybe he noticed this thread but he doesn't want to remove the negative trust, it's not a problem. Try to wait a couple of months ( or if you don't want to wait, buy another account to participate to a signature campaign). What the hell? Why should I wait? Why shouldn't he remove the negative trust? tm2013 himself has asked them to remove negative trust then why the fuck shall they not remove? I don't have coins to buy a new account bro. I have farmed this account till this spot and don't want it to be spoiled without any reason now. They are acting silly. What's the point of removing negative trust after months? Will it give them something if they don't remove it now? It will only harm me as I won't get paid for signature campaign. I request both of them from bottom of my heart to please remove my negative trust  Then wait a reply of them (if they want) here in the thread, an advice: don't send them a lot of PMs  wait a couple of days or weeks and make again your complaint (because the trust system is not moderated). |
|
|
|
|
@futureofbitcoin,
if you want to store value (like 10k dollars) or something I can suggest you to chose the 'gold', because BTC compared with gold it's very, very volatile. bitcoin as money (at the moment) for a lot of us is considered a thing for make money (pure speculation) but when one day this speculation will terminate we can start to think to another concept of bitcoin and usage.
(This was just my personal opinion).
|
|
|
|
I think we will see something before/after the next halving (25 --> 12.5 bitcoin). Maybe from 200 dollars the price will jump to 300 bucks, but as you said the real interesting thing may happen after ~2032 (when the block reward will be less than 1 bitcoin).
The things we should keep in mind that when time goes by, the adoption rate of bitcoin will increase, and the number of transaction per day will increase as well. So does the transaction fees. If the number of transaction can reach to the theoretical maximum of 10tx/s, then every block can collect 9 BTC (we assume every transaction includes the minimum fee 0.0001 BTC) to reward the miners. And the supply of it is diminishing, more merchants and individual are requiring it and the price will definitely shoot up. Until the bitcoin ecosystem reaches to the balance. ....... read the thread title? The question is what will happen if people choose NOT TO transact, and give miners rewards... Or even if people transact, but within a system say xapo or coinbase or something, such that the transactions don't actually happen on the blockchain, but within xapo/coinbase or some future bitcoin bank, and miners will not get rewards. Then in this case we will not "move" bitcoin, but something like that "the promises" as in the FIAT value. The limit of 7tx/s is due the block size, and I think one day it can be "adjusted" to 5 Mb per block. We should move real bitcoin on the chain, not 'off the chain'. For the question of bitcoin banks, I think it will never exist a bitcoin bank.... because bitcoin was created also for 'go away' from those banks. Why someone should keep his bitcoin on a hypothetical 'bank'? We own ours wallet/client to keep and store bitcoins and (in my honest opinion) we don't need bitcoin banks. |
|
|
|
Well, It looks like a "Windows Phone 10" style, and seems there are still lots of thing to do, we're far away from seeing that comes. Yes, one of those things is the the design. As theymos said: but it 'appear's' that we need to install bitcointalk.org's forum software on OUR machines before we can login to bitcointalk.org, is this correct?
These are instructions to install the server software that will in the future run on bitcointalk.org. Forum users will not be required to install anything with the new software. Note that the software is not yet feature-complete (in particular, the Web design is far from done), and the public repository doesn't contain everything already done. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
