Try Instawallet.org then, you will not pay fees anymore. You have to send 0,01 BTC or more though.
Try it if you don't believe me.
How long using bitvisitor do you think it will take till you've collected greater than 0.01 BTC then? Day, Week, Month? Might as well just buy them and save a ton of time. |
|
|
|
From all your posts it seems to me like your saying there is no way to get a decent amount of bitcoins easy without paying for them. Or mining witch i cannot do. There has to be a way.
In life if you want anything of value then you have to work for it. Why would Bitcoins be any different? Bitcoins currently are hot. Everyone wants them (in the Bitcoin world anyway.) Why would others give you a decent amount for free? It seems to me you feel that the world owes you something. Trust me. It doesn't. |
|
|
|
|
The question is "Is Bitcoin ready for the world?"
At the moment, the answer is no.
|
|
|
|
Just before you start shaking, sweating and getting all over excited about it, remember the amounts you receive are tiny and you will be unable to actually send them anywhere. Well you can, but the transaction fee will be higher than the actual amount your sending. Try it if you don't believe me. |
|
|
|
The identity of Satoshi is no secret (a simply Google search and some reading will reveal the persons who are Satoshi - it has already been uncovered by a journalist) - and it is not just a single person.
Really? My Google searches just point to lots of theories and suspects. I can't find any 'Satoshi is XYZ' anywhere as you claim. |
|
|
|
|
Maybe Satoshi is gradually selling his/her coins even as we speak. Gradually drip feeding them into the market.
|
|
|
|
|
I have always set my GPU fan speed by flashing it's bios with an modified version. Never been keen on software solutions.
|
|
|
|
Ok, let's blame AMDand nVidia! Evil you! You really should support Linux better!
Great to have done this, I guess that changes now everything...
 Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't these two quotes listed below contradict each other? I am also a Linux user and I never got my head down, knuckled down and tried to find a way around the problem - I simply installed a Windows VM or native machine and ran the program in it's intended OS.
Anyways, there IS already the possibility to compile and run this software under Windows and as soon as I manage to compile it, I'll maybe even share the binary (for a hefty fee perhaps to cover my time).
|
|
|
|
To deal with crappy retarded GPU drivers and UI in Linux?  No thanks, sir... The manufacturers make the drivers, blame them. Linux is more than capable of running most hardware. Who wants to dance and jump about to Bill Gates tune? Playing the game by his rules, his way, at his (expensive) price. No thanks, sir... Unfortunately for me, that's not a practical thing to do. I could dual-boot to experiment with it, but eventually I'd have to go back to my crappy OS. Thus my question.
You could install a virtualization software package, like Virtual Box and install Linux inside that. That's assuming your hardware can take the extra load of course. How come (and this isn't directed at anyone in particular) when a Linux user needs a program that only runs on Windows, he/she gets their head down, knuckles down and finds way around the problem. But on the other hand when a Windows user needs a program that only runs on Linux, there's a huge uproar, and expects everyone else to adjust to them? It's as if they assume Windows is the default system and everyone must whistle their tune. |
|
|
|
|
I can't help but feel this thread was born due to some deep underlying jealousy of SD's success issues rather than the claimed bandwidth wastage reason.
|
|
|
|
Don't let my inability to pay you back hinder your trust in others. I will repay you with a invaluable prize of immortality and peace, ASAP, after the concert which you'll be first row or backstage at.
Again, sorry squall.
If I was squall, I would feel your taking the piss. |
|
|
|
Blockparser does not run on Windows and other legacy technologies from the 20th Century
LOL  I couldn't agree more. |
|
|
|
Scammer's back. Everyone lock-down your coin wallets! |
|
|
|
If a client is running on port 80, will it be able to connect to rest of the network?
Ports 0 - 1023 are special ports that would require your Bitcoin client to be running at elevated root privilege. (Bad idea.) Bitcoin won't bind to port 80 as a normal user. |
|
|
|
If I block port 8333, will it still work?
Depends. Are you blocking the incoming or outgoing packets? |
|
|
|
|
I don't understand why you are connecting to 127.0.0.1 (localhost). If you wish to connect to another bitcoin node on your LAN you need to use it's IP address, such as 192.168.1.2 for example.
|
|
|
|
|
You've missed out Hashking on that list.
|
|
|
|
Patience, mlawrence.
Had the 540i, had to let her go. Best car I could've asked for, I mean, it had a heated steering wheel. If you live in between Raleigh and Winston Salem, good chance you saw me.
The R6 was amazing, shit spat flames. Was weaving past traffic at 120 and hit 164 mph on my third day riding. Laid her three times in all, the last time I was taking a 35 mph turn at 70. Just didn't lean into it enough and tapped the break, making me hit the grass at 60 sumthin. Bike was totaled, I hadn't a bruise on me.
Thank you parents, for the bad ass car and Daniel, for selling his car for the bike.
Nobody take the bait. Ignore it everyone. |
|
|
|
|
Option 1 for me. If you pick option 2 you are effectively paying 100BTC for the gamble. And the odds are against you.
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing more to pay off previous debts is a vicious circle of doom.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
