Recommended fee by the blockchain wallet? As in which wallet?

Recommended fees these few days have been pretty much 180 - 200 sats per byte, not 120 like your wallet used, thousands of transactions are stuck at the 100-150 sats per byte level.

None of the transactions are found outside of blockchain.info, I tried helping you with the viabtc accelerator but all 3 were not found

Were you trying to double spend bitcoins?

The initial transaction where you received https://blockchain.info/tx/883e646c1b988c3eae6872fc3dc947a158bef15a7126a7a71554b88a53a704e4 has not even been confirmed, you are trying to spend money which you do not have.

Cool story newbie. Dave have on countless occasions spent his hard earned time to recover much bigger wallets than you probably have and gotten much less than he deserves.

Who do you think you are to open a scam accusation against him?

If what you mention is indeed true, kindly open an scamaccusation thread in the relevant sub forum with your evidence. Cheers!

Your wallet funds are listed in mBTC not BTC ==

The only transaction found was of you sending everything to the two addresses you gave.

Your transaction has been confirmed. Do a rescan and it should be fine

https://blockchain.info/tx/15226a1711e7da819549e1b8cdcaf06dab1336a120fa836060d14e8759dcc7c4

Total Input   0.10153 BTC
Total Output   0.10116162 BTC
Value at time of transaction 109.11 USD
Fees   0.00036838 BTC
Fee per byte   163 sat/B
Estimated BTC Transacted   0.00008858 BTC

Nice try there?

Where is the 0.5btc in fees you mentioned? Default electrum fees is 0.5mBTC or 0.0005mBTC, you only paid 0.00036838 btc in fees. If you really paid that much in fees your transactions would pretty much already be confirmed

If you see a negative sign in unconfirmed balance, that is the amount you have send out which isnt confirmed yet.

Do you have the transaction ids? Addresses sent to? If your transaction has been confirmed by at least 1 node, you can pretty much say good bye to the huge fees you accidentally send. And no the default fees is not .5, you are either trying to scam us or you think we are retards

Tell us your wallet program, addresses involved, transaction ids.

First you mention that


Now you are claiming that "partner" who is definitely "not you" posted the first thread without your permission?

Show us proof of correspondence that partner "advised you about drawing banners" and how "you showed him your article" when there are no threads made in the first place.

Welp lets give this my first try

Accounts connected: Crytobank.uk, partner
Proof: Threads: First (deleted already : http://archive.is/RtDfD) and Second (if deleted http://archive.is/swHQq) , they literally have almost the same message body.
Addresses: NIL
Miscellaneous: If they are not the same person, someone else must be behind this, either way both are connected. I know im bad at this connecting thing

If you already have 110usd in usd, why not find a way to pay him that using paypal? If you are going to convert that 110usd to btc first, you will end up with around 105 usd after some fees, depending on market conditions your new btc would be worth anywhere between 95-105 usd by the time u and him decide on an amount.

The buyer will always pay a premium, not the seller, in this case you would be paying the premium twice, once to exchange to btc and second to get that commodity you wanted.

What you are doing isnt exactly trading but well, I hope you have a better understanding

I liked how both of you are still conveniently replying to only the first half of my original post while ignoring my second half.

Kindly explain the consensus on block size to be mined and try to explain how the miner operator with the most miners and hashrate literally decides what block sizes to have without caring for anyone else as he already has the majority?

I liked how both you and franky conveniently replied to only the first half of my post while ignoring my second half.

You do not need two specific people with specific sounding roles to make sure that everything is operating the way it should be. Even if the two people are needed, they do not need fancy sounding roles.

You can call them the site admin and integrity judge for all purposes, why insist on calling them the president and the secretary? If you give them such roles, their legal repercussions should anything happen otherwise to their roles should be equivalent, they should be able to be held accountable in case things go wrong , if not, how different are they from any other two part of bu's development?

I for one have no idea why BU would want a public facing president and secretary role if bitcoin is and should have been decentralized forever. Not sure about the technical details but if an increase in block limit is made by consensus, wouldn't the mining pool operator with the biggest miners and hashrate be able to decide the block size to be mined with his majority consensus alone?

Have started the first few chapters, most of the information has been factual and correct thus far, will try to finish the book for a full review. Seems that you are using gitbook as the ui, how was your experience using gitbooks? Were you using the opensource or other plans?

Us industry old timers believe that one does not simply fake ones achievements, especially using 99 at the end of fake numbers, it makes you even more fake and unbelievable.

Seems like you need to find actual good domain industry sites and not those stupid ones you listed. ROFL. Have fun newbie

How much did you spent, cloud mining sites are mostly scams. Genesis mining is legit but with the rates and diff, you would probably never get back what you paid in hashrate, return on investment is more than a year unless you throw in tens of thousands of dollars to speed up the hashrate. Better off getting bitcoins through other methods.

Not sounds like a scam, it is a scam

Whois has a russian name and address. Website lists another usa address instead Site uses templates from other sources.

Transaction list are generated from blockchain, not their transactions.

Amount of funds they have is fake too.

PSA : SCAM SITE, DO NOT USE

Cool, lets discuss how deep you are in this domain flipping business? How well known are you? How much and how many worthless domains like this have you successfully sold anywhere?

Even a one day old newbie into this would have changed the default site into some premade related site.

Saying "you have to be in this business to understand" is literally the same as saying "I am a retard and a newbie, I am just trying my luck because I have no brains so I use this to make it seem like others are wrong".

In other news, no point spamming the forums with your multiple threads for the same thing.

If you do not have any logical reasoning to defend yourself, don't reply with anything.

It would probably last 1 month or even lesser than that. Do note that many black forums are selling hacked spotify premium accounts using carrier partners whereby you are essentially using another person legit account which would be detected in days to months before getting cancelled.

if it is too good to be true, it is too good to be true.

More so that seller is a newbie.

Potential risk rating is @ 99.999999% that it will last less than a month

So you bought two domains from 1and1 at $0.99 each for a year at 0.00099BTC and you want to resell it with a few months left at 0.06BTC?

For both of your sites, there are no traffic organic or non organic.

One does not simply buy a domain for cheap, do nothing and expect to turn a profit.

Your two domains do not have any existing websites related to bitcoins or anything similar to the domain names. No seo rankings on any search engine. No userbase, no monthly earnings.

You might as well just auction it off at 0.0001 BTC, even then no one will come in.

In the time you spend since you bought your domains, you could have even made a bogus site to draw bonus traffic, heck it has literally nothing.

If you are really old school as you mentioned, you would have known that many of us who got in during and before bitcoin took off earned heck lots of profits from altcoins. Back when bitcoin first broke one thousand before the drastic fall to sub 400s, many were still profiting from flipping altcoins and converting them to btc. Then again, it is never a bad idea to just hold on to any existing btcs, we have beaten detractors for years and always will in the long run.

Looking forward to it falling to sub 700s again, I just hope btu would not be it's own ticker, screw the hard fork