La question de qui est Satoshi Nakamoto est simple et la réponse évidente. Satoshi Nakamoto est Durian Satoshi Nakamoto. Quelle probabilité qu'un type ayant le meme nom soit copain avec Hal Finley (ils habitaient a deux blocs a Temple City CA) et Satoshi a lui envoyé 2000 BTC quand il est tombé malade et a eut besoin d'argent. Satoshi profil est ici: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3En 2008, personne je pensait que le Bitcoin allait exploser. Alors il n'y avait pas besoin de cacher son nom. Tout le monde, utilisait son nom reel. Donc Satoshi est cette personne  Mais il dit que c'est pas lui, qu'il connais pas la crypto blablalba... "on apprends pas aux vieux singes a faire les grimaces". Il ment évidement. Il ne veut pas être associé avec Bitcoin et quand on voit ce qui arrive a tous ceux qui mettent des battons dans les roues au système US, on comprends. J'ai passé beaucoup de temps a lire Satoshi. Lire son code aussi. Ceux qui disent que c'est impossible de faire Bitcoin par une seule personne, doivent charger la version 1 de Bitcoin. C’était un simple programme avec 3 fonctions. Miner, envoyer et recevoir. C'est complètement concevable par 1 seule personne. Maintenant pourquoi Satoshi a disparut? Il a disparut le 12 Décembre 2010 de Bitcoin talk (le 13 il a fait un update sur la mailing list de Bitcoin puis c'est finit). L'avant dernier message est intéressant. C’était dans un thread qui parlait d'un article de PC World qui liait Wikileak avec Bitcoin. "It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context. WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet's nest, and the swarm is headed towards us." Post 2 Ici: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPostsOu ici: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/threads/259/En Français: "Il aurait été intéressant d’attirer cette attention dans un autre contexte. Wikileaks a donné un coup de pied dans le nid de frelons et l'essaim se dirige vers nous." Donc voila Satoshi est partit parce qu'il a compris qu'il allait attirer l'attention et potentiellement mettre sa vie ou celle de ces filles/famille en danger. Il y a long a dire sur Satoshi, ces motifs etc... mais ceci confirme cela: Voici une interview que j'ai posté il y a un mois dans Bitcoin talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4suKcm82Qno ici https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5159653.0Que fait Satoshi Sakamoto a la Bitcoin conference 2019 (le 27 Juin 2019) a San Francisco. Interviewer par des Japonais? Dans cette Interview, il dit a mots couverts qu'il était un développeur indépendant lié au secret par le gouvernement, comme Snowden. Qu'il travaillait sur des projet lié a l'armé et les communications. Dans l'interview il dit qu'il faisait le customer support sur les missile guidé?!?! Voila, Satoshi n'avait pas le droit contractuellement d'utiliser ces compétences pour faire Bitcoin, alors en 2010 quand Bitcoin a commencé a faire parler de lui dans la presse et précisément lorsque Wikileak on annoncé qu'ils acceptaient Bitcoin, il c'est planqué et il a eut raison. Pour mieux comprendre qui est Satoshi, et pourquoi il agit comme cela il faut lire ce que sa famille dit de lui, notamment son frère. En gros il dit que son frère est un égoïste, un "ass*hole" qui ne dira jamais la vérité meme sous la torture. Il aime être seul, et faire chier les gens et il se fout du reste de la famille. Les genies ont souvent un caractère insupportable, et Satoshi ne fait pas exception. Donc le mystère n'en est pas un, mais ceux qui savent protègent le secret par respect pour le genie du gars et sa volonté de vivre une vie sans les medias. |
|
|
|
Il y a pas HitBTC? Je trouves pas.
Je le vois en position 125. Sinon y'a un filtre en haut à droite  Tiens je me rends qu'au passage, le mec a mis ses refs partout où il pouvait. Bon c'est de bonne guerre HitBTC: 0 BTC, place 125. Hum hum. Sinon plein de commentaires super intéressant. Ce site est vraiment bien dans le style, bonne référence. Le type a passé du temps pour recueillir toutes ces infos. |
|
|
|
Je viens de decouvrir ce site que je trouve plutot pas mal : https://exchangewar.info/Je mets ca ici mais ca a peut-etre plus sa place dans la partie "debutants", je ne sais pas. Il y a pas HitBTC? Je trouves pas. |
|
|
|
But few argue the hashrate might significantly reduced to the point where government or "elite" organization could launch 51% attack at acceptable cost/loss.
With pessimistic views where bitcoin price & average transaction/second remain stagnant, it might possible.
that is not enough for starting an argument about changing the block rewards and result in change of bitcoin supply. if it ain't broke, don't fix it. if some day in the future, we started facing this problem and the risk of 51% attack and loss of network security was becoming serious, we can then start this discussion. but now the information we have suggests that the price is more than enough to cover the cost and a lot more, so the incentive will remain. not to mention that in this pessimistic scenario if the usage and price has dropped significantly that it can no longer cover the costs, then the incentive to attack bitcoin isn't there anymore either. just like there is no incentive to attack altcoins with small hashrate whereas you can easily do it, even the big ones like BCH can easily be 51% attacked (just like they did reverse blocks by 51% attacking it in May this year). I think that you guys are very optimistic... we are heading to an iceberg. The profitability about Bitcoin mining is at stake. The only way that 'nothing happen' is that Bitcoin double its value to compensate. This is not going to happen this time because, there is a red line where the investors will not go, and rather will spend their money on another crypto. It is not a coincidence that Libra will be launched officially at this precise time. The banks behind XRP, LIBRA or EOS are just waiting that BTC hit the iceberg to take the lead and that will be the end of Bitcoin as the leading crypto. Think about it. What if the value of BTC do not double? Then the mining will not be profitable, all the mining gears will lost profitability, all the miners will switch to another currency. This will trigger a domino effect and in March 2020 all who have Bitcoins will cry because money will flow out of Bitcoin to something else. Now you may say that if many stop mining Bitcoin, then the difficulty will readjust. All of this is like an Earthquake in the Crypto... Bitcoin will see its dominance fading and the banks will take the lead. Fixing Bitcoin at this point will be too late. |
|
|
|
Evidement, les blanchisseurs n'ont pas attendu l'arrivée de la crypto pour blanchir. Ceci dit, si tu achetes pour 100 Millions d'EUR en d'ETH, tu les changes en BTC et tu re-liquéfie cela en Eur, tu as blanchis plus blanc que blanc... Pareil que le Forex quoi. |
|
|
|
Hi i mined some BTC in 2013/2014 and forgot about it until today. I just did it with my PC and a programm and graphiccard + usb miner.
Today I thought about it after I forgot it completly.
I´ve nothing. No Wallet adress, no idea where to find.
Tried to login here but it says that my account was banned after a password leak of bitcointalk happened in 2015.
I´ve the same PC and harddisk so I looked for that Miningprogramm. Perhaps all is saved in there.
All I found was the programm "Bitcoincore" but I think I need to find another programm.
I dont know what I´m looking for and my Harddisk ist full of stupid old Files and Folders.
Do you have a hint what and where I should look for?
Thanks so far
1- BACKUP your wallet.dat, the old one. This is the most important thing 2- Install the latest Bitcoin Core from here: https://bitcoin.org/en/download3- search your NEW wallet.dat. On windows it should be in c:/users/yourname/.bitcoincore/wallets/ 4- REPLACE the new wallet.dat with the old one (and not the opposite). Keep the old wallet.dat on an USB or any safe place where you will not delete it by error. 5- run bitcoint-qt.exe Now you have to wait until the blockchain synchonize until the last transaction you got. Bitcoin while loading the blockchain identifies your transactions and reconstruct your wallet. Once the Wallet finished to sync you will be able to spend the coins you had! Good luck! |
|
|
|
If you coin is a token (eg a ERC20), you can get it listed for free or on very cheap price on a decentralized exchange.
For popular DEX like Etherdelta, you can manually add the token and start trading without the involvement from the exchange site.
There are similar services for tokens from other platforms too.
We have blockchains, not tokens  |
|
|
|
J'ai réalisé une version de maintenance pour MAC / PC et Unix https://kryptofranc.com/downloads.php#windows64bitsJournal de versionWindows: v0.18.0.0-23ad1d99d-dirty.Jul 25 2019 Unix: v0.18.0.0-524c7a4c6-dirty.Jul 25 2019 MAC: v0.18.0.0-23ad1d99d-dirty.Jul 25 2019 Correction du bug visuel Unix, maintenant les boutons ont la même couleur sur toutes les versions
Version de maintenance. Mis à jour les points de contrôle. Windows: Version: v0.18.0.0-23ad1d99d-dirty.juin 30 2019 Unix: Version: v0.18.0.0-2c0aca0dd-dirty.juin 30 2019 MAC: v0.18.0.0-23ad1d99d-dirty.Jul 1 2019 Correction d'un bug dans pow.cpp qui entraînait la difficulté entre 0 et 1
Toutes les icônes ont été améliorées, cela est particulièrement visible dans la version PC / MAC monochrome, elles ont maintenant une couleur
Mise à niveau de sécurité avec les points de contrôle Blockchain mis à jour jusqu'au bloc 12 000.
Meilleure cohérence visuelle entre les interfaces MAC / PC / Unix. Windows: Version: v0.18.0.0-a474e2549-dirty.juin 21 2019 Unix: Version: v0.18.0.0-524c7a4c6-dirty.juin 21 2019 MAC: v0.18.0.0-a474e2549-dirty.juin 21 2019 Correction de la vérification de version codée en RTF-8 et devant être codée en ANSI dans init.cpp
Ajout de plusieurs points de contrôle pour correspondre à la hauteur de bloc actuelle, pour consolider la blockchain.
Correction des cadres pour la version Windows dans overviewpage.ui
Amélioration de la palette générale des fenêtres avec des boutons légèrement colorés et des fenêtres à fond blanc
Suppression de l'heure dans la version, ne conserve que le jour / mois / année
Changement du nom du client "Satoshi" avec Nikkoid
Bug, correction de la macro __APPLE__ pour vérifier la bonne version. |
|
|
|
I have done a maintenance release for MAC/PC and Unix https://kryptofranc.com/downloads.php#windows64bitsVersion LogWindows: v0.18.0.0-23ad1d99d-dirty.Jul 25 2019 Unix: v0.18.0.0-524c7a4c6-dirty.Jul 25 2019 MAC: v0.18.0.0-23ad1d99d-dirty.Jul 25 2019 - Unix visual bug fixed, now the buttons have the same color on all the versions
- Maintenance release. Updated the checkpoints.
Windows: Version: v0.18.0.0-23ad1d99d-dirty.Jun 30 2019 Unix: Version: v0.18.0.0-2c0aca0dd-dirty.Jun 30 2019 MAC: v0.18.0.0-23ad1d99d-dirty.Jul 1 2019 - Fixed a bug in pow.cpp that was driving the difficulty between 0 to 1
- All icons have been improved, this is specially visible in the PC/MAC version that were monochome, now they have some color.
- Security upgrade with the Blockchain checkpoints updated until block 12,000.
- Enhanced consistency visual between MAC/PC/Unix interface.
Windows: Version: v0.18.0.0-a474e2549-dirty.Jun 21 2019 Unix: Version: v0.18.0.0-524c7a4c6-dirty.Jun 21 2019 MAC: v0.18.0.0-a474e2549-dirty.Jun 21 2019 - Fixed the version checking that was coded in RTF-8 and needed to be coded in ANSI in init.cpp
- Added more checkpoints to match the current block height, to consolidate the blockchain.
- Fixed the frames for the windows version in overviewpage.ui
- Improved the general windows palette with slightly colored buttons and white background windows
- Removed the time in the version, only kept the day/month/year
- Changed "Satoshi" Client name with Nikkoid
- Bug, fixed the Macro __APPLE__ to check the right version.
|
|
|
|
I think almost all exchanges will charge for each token listing process. why don't you try forkdelta or maybe binance.
Even if there are chances that we could be listed on a big exchange, because they like the project for example, or because they want this kind of projet for policies reason, I would not go at this stage. Everyone can make a mistake, and you don't want to f*ck up with Binance because you don't have the experience! So I am more looking into some friendly exchange where you can settle with your investors and get some experiences doing try and tests... and if you do a mistake you will not be burned alive like Bytecoin did with Binance. |
|
|
|
I would also suggest against listing a coin on extremely low-volume exchanges or potentially shady exchanges such as YoBit. In my experience, a lot of lower-volume exchanges have problems and those problems might not be fixed quickly for those trying to trade your coin, and same goes for potentially shady exchanges. If you have any questions about an exchange, try to look up if the exchange you want to list your coin on has a Bitcointalk thread and read a few pages of that if applicable. If you can't find that, look at reviews elsewhere.
There are 2 controversial exchanges here that I am interested in, but I do not understand why they have such a bad reputation in these forums... - HitBTC: I am trading with them for +3 years. I have seen tokens getting to the moon, then dumping and dying being only listed there, they also have a good community in both Europe, US and Asia: check the busy chat. They have some technical glitches sometime, but see how many coins they are listing, they obviously have more technical issues than the exchanges that are listing 10 coins. - Yobit: while a lot of people talking very badly about this exchange, the traffic on this exchange is huge, similar to HitBTC (Alexa) and they also have a lot of twitter followers. That means that there are investors there. So what is the problem with the shady side? 99% of Tokens are washing money shames, including tops 10 coins. Shady is all the crypto and the securities, and all the banking system... If they are stealing coins like some people say, then why so much traffic and followers? They got some issues with dumping in 2018, but we are in 2019 and they seems to have fixed the problem? |
|
|
|
If it is not shit exchange, it does not matter. More exchange is not considered negative by anyone, on the contrary with more choice it will be easy to find the appropriate one. On the other hand, listing in one of the top 10(except hitbit) keeps you alive.
"except hitbit" do you mean except HitBtc? |
|
|
|
We have been in contact with exchanges that are asking several BTC to get listed. Some other are asking just a small fee. What are your experiences and advices about quality exchanges that would list you either for free or a small fee? What exchanges you would consider as far as listing a new coin at first? Update: I have found that thread that precisely answer to all my questions Check it out! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5079048.0 |
|
|
|
Just a small stupid question but, since SEGWIT is enabling a variable size of blocks and so far it never happen that the Bitcoin transaction had to scale up over 2500 bytes, why people are still talking about the size of the blocks? Isn't SEGWIT the solution of this problem? "As of 2017, the average transaction make-up would lead to blocks with 4M weight units being about 2.3MB in size if all transactions were segwit transactions." https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weight_units |
|
|
|
|
Once again, the infamous question, why the exchanges are not modifying the wallets so that they cannot make for example a transfert of money > 1 without having someone verifying that the transaction is made by a valid member, identified and not from a hacker that got access to the hot wallet by hacking the server?
Exchanges have the resources for paying programmers.
Hot Wallet in the exchanges should have an extra layer of security to avoid these big loss of money.
|
|
|
|
|
Buying back does not fix the problem at the root.
The problem is that many people are not helping coins by mining and dumping for example.
Coins should be careful to who they are vesting their money. If you let too many miners, if you go into the auto select pools, if you give millions in bounties, it might help to get some popularity at the very beginning, but all these people are not real supporter of the coin.
If you have to buy back your own coin, that means that you failed to attract people who cares about your projet.
As an investor, stay away from these coin, they are not healthy, they are just short term projects that goal is to make short term money. Your investment is at risk when playing with these coins.
|
|
|
|
|
Iran, Venezuela, and China, Russian, India... we are heading to national cryptocurrencies.
Then they will outlaw all the crypto that are not national.
|
|
|
|
Not going to wade into this mess, because there seems to be just so many voices piping up and down about the state of crypto in India. This news, if true, does realise that it's banning private crypto and yet deciding to install one itself, right?
And if true, this SHOULD mean that Bitcoin and maybe a handful of others, would escape the ban. Interesting to see how they'll define private... because at the moment. But all the quotes seem to deem all crypto as private.
It sounds like a consequence Libra from Facebook. They do not care the small cryptos, but Facebook and Whatsap is HUGE in India. They see it as if US is meddling in their finance. |
|
|
|
https://www.rt.com/business/464811-india-crypto-currency-ban/ A total ban on private cryptocurrencies has been approved by a government panel in India which also recommended a 10-year prison sentence for anyone dealing with unregulated digital assets.After nearly two years of work, the inter-ministerial committee (IMC), chaired by the economic affairs secretary, has submitted its final report to the government, together with draft legislation seeking to ban crypto trading in the country. It also recommended setting up a 'Digital Rupee' that would be issued by the Reserve Bank as legal tender. The Committee has recommended a law banning the cryptocurrencies in India and criminalizing carrying on of any activities connected with cryptocurrencies in India. Highlighting their “serious concern” over the growing popularity of alternative digital payment systems that completely lack government oversight, the IMC stressed that privately generated cryptocurrencies “lack all the attributes of a currency,” carry no “intrinsic value” and therefore can be detrimental to India’s economy. To stamp out crypto mining and trading, the panel in their draft 'Banning of Cryptocurrency & Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill' suggested imposing a jail term of up to 10 years and/or a penalty of up to $7.25 million against any person who “directly or indirectly mines, generates, holds, sells, deals in, transfers, disposes of or issues cryptocurrency.” "These cryptocurrencies cannot serve the purpose of a currency. The private cryptocurrencies are inconsistent with the essential functions of money/currency, hence private cryptocurrencies cannot replace fiat currencies." The need to produce clear guidance on cryptocurrencies became acute last April when the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a notice banning financial institutions from participating in virtual currency transactions. In July 2018, the Supreme Court of India endorsed the ban, pending further review. Before the government decides on the fate of cryptocurrencies in India, the IMC report and the draft legislation will be reviewed by all relevant departments and regulatory authorities. Subhash Chandra Garg @SecretaryDEA “Committee is very receptive and supportive of distributed ledger technologies and recommends its widespread use in delivering financial services,” Subhash Chandra Garg, Economic Affairs Secretary said in a tweet. “It also opens up door for a possible official digital rupee. Private crypto currencies are of no real value. Rightly banned.”
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
