Can this post be made sticky on the front page of bitcointalk, because it is as true as if written by an omniscient oracle from Greek epic poetry.

The MO of the shadow fud team is to pick one single technical flaw with a plan and harp on it endlessly. As if the entirety of the coin depended on it.

Anyone could do the same to shadow. The zkSnarks they propose have fatal flaws, but you can't mention it in their thread without being deleted.

If you want to get them out, make a moderated thread and use the same bot the SDC devs use: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=850210

There are no more giveaways for the signatures. He spent 9% of the money supply already. Look at the OP.

And mining is over.

Who is "him"? The devs are working. I get to know devs of coins that I get involved in. I can't guarantee they won't flake later, but they are on the job right now.

Just honor your agreement. I didn't see any contingencies in your agreement that said anything about the dev reporting in or answering your questions. It was pretty clear, you get 285,000 GIZ and you put the sig in your profile for 1 week.

Also, when he finally launched, it worked fine. Why are you worried about history when it never had any effect on you?

I vote for an update that writes these guys out.

Or we can all go hammer their trust ratings if they don't return the money.

You should also give each one a different address to return the money to.

He probably dropped off because you guys were silent for a couple of days. It's early in the coin's life so you have to check in 2-3 times per day.

Also, PoS is not nearly 10%. It's looking to be 0.01%. Somehow the math is off by a factor of 1000.


[edit]

Actually, it looks like you have a floating point overflow somewhere. This happened to seed coin. Smaller stakes are getting the correct interest. Very big stakes are not.

The staking diff started very high (the same as the diff limit for PoW). Staking diff should drop until the number of PoS blocks start to equal the number of PoW blocks over a given amount of time. You didn't stake because it was hard. Once someone found a PoS block, the staking diff started dropping.

The devs mis-spoke. It becomes pure PoS at block 9001. PoS started on day 1, actually (min age is 8 hours). I checked out the code and it looks good and is behaving fine.

I hope no one took you up on your offer because it is seriously flawed for the buyer. I'd buy them from you at that price without hesitation, but the Bergstake isn't transferable. That means I'd have to trust you to never use the Bergstake, and I don't rely on trust. I'd buy all 13k for 1 BTC, with an agreement that you would never use Bergstake, and my hoping but not betting that you would honor the agreement.

PM me if you are interested in that deal.

[edit]

Actually, nevermind. You'd still have the private key to the wallet. If you could get the BRO team to somehow transfer ownership to my private key, I'll buy them from you at 6500 BRO/BTC.

Yeah, it's "something". You said "nothing to show". You do know the difference between "something" and "nothing", right?

Don't try to bend reality to fit your agenda.

"Nothing to show"? Quit being a stupid troll. Plenty of people have tested their gaming platform. Stick to reality. You want us to think you are helping to "clean up crypto" but your noise just enables the scammers by distracting from the real issues. You must be one of the scammers. That's my only conclusion.

It's great to be skeptical, but you are trolling here.

Jay Berg is contracted for BRO coin, not a core developer. He said this several weeks ago.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=808648.msg9894488#msg9894488

Let's stick to legitimate concerns here, we'll make more progress. Don't try to "clean up" crypto by spreading unnecessary FUD. If you stick with the real issues you'll make more progress towards legitimacy than you will by just being a low grade troll.

[edit]

But this page is a bit misleading, so qawsx get's a 1/2 FUD rating.

http://fundraiser.breakoutgaming.com/the-team/

Still, we accept that David Hanlon (for example) has other employment outside of Breakout, so we should expect the programmers to also have outside employment.

This is quite an outburst. It's obvious that a lot of ICO buyers are starting to lose confidence.

I don't necessarily share their opinions, but these concerns need to be addressed.

If Breakout is indeed looking for funding outside of the crypto-sphere, it will be a good idea to fix the easy things that would undoubtedly help with other avenues of fundraising:

1. Provide a timeline of development or release. Be inclusive and let it come from the OP. Give date ranges and explain contingencies.
2. Fix (up) the web site. Put the preview images in. Make updates. Get it current.
3. Start using the twitter account to show evidence of a pulse to the greater population.
4. Get the press releases flowing again.
5. Move to phase 2 of the ICO without further delay. The benefit of waiting for a more complete product is going to be increasingly undercut by a lack of confidence from the crypto-community. If you look at factom, there are still plenty of individuals who want to get in on the ground floor of a promising crypto project. But if you have several dozen accounts on this thread accusing Breakout of being a scam, you are going to see significantly less money from the ICO. You already need non-ICO funding, so you might as well get ICO funds while you can use them.

I know that your first round ICO represents only a small fraction of your total needed funds. But the crypto-community is an important bellwether for any crypto-currency project such as Breakout gaming. Don't ignore this community because it seems like an insignificant source of funds. Rather, it can be a significant source of visibility and help with your larger fundraising efforts through positive exposure.

Receipt? You should be holding the private key in the form of an encrypted json file. The name would be something like

breakout-wallet-BITCOINADDRESS.json

Where BITCOINADDRESS is a bitcoin address. E.g. (19Qrqd5kZqABCDm9Zrh2bEDb7GPecFZZZY, <= that's not a valid address)

That json file should be plain text and have the keys "btcaddr", "email", "encseed".

If you don't have that file then you should find it.

Thanks 7 post noob. You are a worthless copy of your parents with no substantial changes.

So you are a shit-person by your own uninformed, brain-dead logic.

With 7 posts, you likely know nothing that you talk about. Go back to reading the comments section of USA Today articles for your "knowledge".

Meanwhile, it takes 6 weeks to sync bitcoin and transactions only take an hour and a half to confirm.

And you deserve whatever bad things have happened to you. Life hasn't been perfect for you has it, asshole? Unemployed? Angry? Girlfriendless? Ugly? Fat? There's a reason for your misfortunes. It's because you are a shitty person.

And XMR is a clone of Bytecoin with literally NOTHING new.

If you are going to call out shitcoins, you should get out of yours first.

I think it would be a bad idea to release a token, and I invested a lot of BTC in the first round. I'm in no hurry to ROI. If you release a token, it will pump and dump. Your 2nd phase ICO will reflect the dump price. Think seriously about that.

Also consider that the capital you wished to raise in the second part of the ICO will be bled significantly into the pockets of the whales who executed the pump and dump.

In the end, releasing a token early will suck capital from the project and dilute our investment.

He's selling the shitty links in his sig. Hoping to get a few clicks.

His trolling is basically spam (a highly underrated protein source by the way).