If you follow these buy and sell signals, or if you follow these turning points, you definitely lose your shirt. Tried that.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Gumbi AND Alex11 Can't you get it?

Nobody wants you here. Once all your arguments get refuted, you switch to one of the dozens of other ambiguous statements and signals. All garbage. We are not interested. Go away.


Traxo made a very valid argument which goes as follows in principle:

A majority of over-prices Gold Report buyers and over-priced seminar attendees as reported by Traxo, followed Armstrong's calls. And lost a fortune in the process.

Now years later, Gumbi tells us they were all wrong, they should have known better.

Fantastic PR in my opinion




Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Can't you get it? Nobody wants you here. Once all your arguments get refuted, you switch to one of the dozens of other ambiguous statements and signals. All garbage. We are not interested. Go away, Gumbi.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

 


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Hi Traxo,

Thanks for the detailed research. I have just quickly read it, and I will definitely read it again.

I was very interested in the same topic because I bought the reports as well and was very disappointed to put it mildly. What you are describing confirms fairly much my view that contrary to Armstrong's claims, the system that he has been using cannot predict market turns. Quite the opposite. He buys the highs and sells the lows. There have been exceptions of course, but that is not good enough.

I have researched the end of 2015 low scenario where he kept posting bearish comments while the market turned to the upside. I must admit that I was influenced by his view and lost money. What pissed me off the most however is that he later claimed that he actually predicted that turn, lying and misrepresenting the performance of his analysis and services. This is the fraud I am talking about. It is not the failure to predict the price movement.

In this case, it is fairly obvious because he cannot actually claim (as he usually does) that there were some signals that we SHOULD have traded, because we depended on him to provide us with the signals as part of the service (the Gold Report) which was somehow discontinued before the next report was due.

If you haven't seen my analysis, it is at Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

MTL4,

I could not agree with you more. The user is not even getting an expert system that executes the rules that exist around Socrates to pick what to trade under what condition. Interestingly, Martin Armstrong claims that Socrates goes way beyond the quality of an expert system, talking about such systems as if they were a fraud:

Artificial Intelligence & Neural Nets - Sorting out Truth from Fraud

Give that some consideration.

The truth however is, that Socrates has been designed to be ambiguous and never give a definite answer for one purpose: To put the burden on the users, and be an engine to sell additional services such as seminars and training that would then provide the secret sauce for success.

To build a system that has a reasonable chance of trading success on the current core is impossible. I can say that because I am a programming expert who has coincidentally studied Socrates for years. To give you a rough idea: The system is one-dimensional in a sense that for every market it looks at, it looks only at this market, not any other market, no correlation with anything. More specifically, it looks only at past history in a single time frame, one at the time without any artificial intelligence whatsoever.

Proof: You have to combine the information of forecast arrays in all time frames yourself. The computer is unaware of its own surroundings. Such is "AI" in Socrates. That why I call it a contraption, not a computer system.


If, on the other hand, the system would hypothetically do what you request it to to, and be successful in doing this, then it would not be available as a service. Because it would generate more profit for a single operator than what can be generated by selling it as a service.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

@DanB1 you are absolutely right. The System and by that I mean Socrates and the many rules around it, is designed to be ambiguous or vague as you say. So that it can always be interpreted in hindsight to be right because it hasn't actually predicted anything definitive that can't be revoked later. That is because it puts out multiple conflicting signals such as reversal, energy, forecast array (and the different rows in it to pick from) plus all of the above in multiple time frames. See Socrates Technical Analysis Prediction Magic for a more detailed description.

That it why we say it is a hindsight system that cannot be used for trading.

It is a computer-based scam engine by design that is used to extract money from subscribers, and it has obviously worked to that end for years, except that it only creates losses for the users not gains.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Now Gumbi feels victorious because I used the term "period" for his term "time unit" in his small Socrates universe of randomness which gets him all confused.

That doesn't change the fact that between min and max there is a factor of 6 between minimum 0.5 (not 1) and 3 units of time after I adjust to that, because of premature trade termination. Guessing between 0.5 and 3 to get it right is a lot of ambiguity.

So far nothing has changed. We need to have hindsight knowledge to end the trade somewhere in this range.

Because otherwise, we are potentially missing out on huge profit opportunities when the price races across the next few reversals - which we cannot trade because the we are at 0.5 time unit length and have to wait for the end of the month because that is the only time when election can occur. We have to wait because according to the rule we exited the trade because it was only good until the price reached the next reversal.

Meanwhile, Gumbi will perhaps say that we have daily, weekly and so on to trade, which on other occasions he will advise not to trade - only monthly.

So Socrates will keep us busy making all these human guesses while we are losing a lot of money with Socrates.

What Gumbi cannot see is that we understand everything in his little Socrates random universe.

He knows that I can provide as many failing reversals as I want because I have the data to do it. It took him months, yes, months later he came back, to pick this one so he can feel right.

But he is wrong. He is always wrong. I don't even feel like providing any other examples to challenge him at this time. Why?

Because while he and his followers are wrestling with all his toys of the Socrates universe, and while they blame themselves and others for not guessing right in hindsight, they waste all this time on this Socrates random universe which has nothing to do with the actual markets. They are not making money and they are losing the ability to trade because they are dealing with some kind of pseudo science which is totally worthless, created by these crackpots.

They miss all the opportunities that unfold outside the Socrates random universe. They are doing this while the OTHERS make the money. The others are lucky enough that they might not even have heard about Martin Armstrong, which is perhaps the best case scenario. And they are making money without paying any type of subscription to anybody. And I still laugh my head off.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

If what you say is actually true and I don't dispute it then the meaning of a period is lost. The wider you cast the interpretation of the rules, the less meaningful and more ambiguous they become. I do understand these rules but by accepting these rules, one acknowledges that the confidence with which a trade can be executed approaches the value of zero because the computer generated signals lose all meaning, leaving everything to human interpretation, with an ever increasing number of parameters to consider such as energy and whatever you call it.

It is quite telling that as you previously stated, one needs months or years to understand the system. That should not be necessary for an advanced system because one would expect that the computer can execute these rules which it cannot do obviously. If it did so, then you guys would no longer be able to shift the blame to the users. It is that simple. If it did execute the rules as your hindsight wisdom prescribes, then it would become obvious that the system loses money and that is the last thing that you guys want. It is that simple.

That "system" is simply not viable because it is based on 30 years old ideas and technology.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Well, at least you admit that the reversal was in fact elected, which you first did not but I forced you to do because the numbers are the numbers. Don't ever tell me again that I don't know how the reversal system works, right? You are simply no match for me.

Now we are getting to the next point. You are arguing that the elected reversal, which is not a daily reversal, and which is not a weekly reversal but it is a monthly reversal, we should exit it prematurely after half the period's duration. There is nothing in the Socrates system that indicates such a premature exit. The price could have equally gone lower and therefore we would have missed a major move. This would perhaps happen in 50% of all other cases. I have seen it many times. I have exited such trades, based on reversals and matching turning points and the price just kept moving in the same direction for two more periods or more. This is completely random, and I am 100% sure you know this.

What this actually means is that this judgement is completely in hindsight, because the system does NOT report any signal that would prematurely end the trade. Therefore the system cannot be verified and is therefore useless. If what you say was actually relevant statistically, then your stupid Global Artificial Intelligence Computer would easily just provide that OBVIOUS information, in a way as obvious as you describe it. Why not? But no, that computer cannot do that, and we are left with the burden of deciding exit between a fraction of the period's duration up to three. That renders the meaning of a period useless.

Your behavior clearly demonstrates that you guys are all part of this scam, that system that allows you mafia guys to misrepresent the performance of it by shifting the burden to the user while still arrogantly claiming that your Socrates contraption uses some kind of artificial intelligence.

Here we have the proof. While I actually never executed a wheat trade based on Socrates, I am now getting blamed for not executing your hindsight wisdom, as any other user would be blamed, as I am sure they have been, while your Global Artificial Intelligence Computer is made look as good as if it was perfect. That is the fraud I am talking about.

You guys are truly disgusting, not worth to be respected by any honest human being.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Well, after this report dump, everybody can now check out how they would interpret the principle of reversal election and decide whether they trust the reports or not. On the 29th:

while the Bearish Reversal lies at 4455. Follow the numbers. I am sick of Gumbi's bullshit.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

SOCRATES Detailed Analysis
THE IMMEDIATE ANALYTICAL STANCE AS OF THE CLOSE OF Tue. Apr. 30, 2019: Wheat CBT Futures closed below our indicating ranges on the Daily level and it also settled beneath our broder set of 10 indicators indicating weakness at this moment. The market closing today at 4286 is immediately trading down about 14% for the year from last year's closing of 5032. Thus far, we have been trading down for the past day, following the high established during the last trading session. The Wheat CBT Futures made a new low penetrating the previous session's low and then closed below that level plunging significantly by 4.61%. A break of today's low of 4260 during the next trading session will warn of a potential serious decline ahead. This market has declined for 1 trading day. However, we have not elected any bearish Reversals to date.

The Uptrend Line from the last low created at 4554 tied to the secondary low made on04/29 remains as resistance standing at 4320. Only getting above this level on a sustained closing basis will signal a rally to the upside

Presently, the market remains quite bearish below all our system support indicators with resistance starting at 4344. The broader cyclical system indicators are also in a bearish position while the long-term trend and cyclical strength are bearish. This market has technically broken through the bottom of our projected envelope of support at 4318 warning this decline has been rather reasonable down 10% from the high made 03/26. We have elected all four Bearish Reversals from that high showing weakness. We have four Daily Bullish Reversals above the market at 4435, 4475, 4625, and 4717.



From a cyclical perspective, the broader view which provides a map to the future is most interesting. To date, we have continue to trade within last year's range of 5930 to 5930. . This suggests that a closing below the previous year's low should imply a continued decline into 2020 remains possible. A closing above 5032 would imply a possible correction with a retest of the downside becomes possible into 2021.

This market on the daily level has been making retesting key support beneath the last low of 4260 established back Tue. 30th. The Channel Technical Support rests at 4239 for the next session. A closing below that will signal a break to the downside once again. Currently, we are trading below all our Indicating Ranges, which suggests that projected support below the market resides at 4054. The Downtrend Line resistance stands above the market at 4433. Looking at our Reversal System, our next Weekly Bullish Reversal to watch stands at 4737 while the Weekly Bearish Reversal lies at 4385. This provides a 7.43% trading range. Turning to the broader Monthly level, the current Bullish Reversal stands at 5550 while the Bearish Reversal lies at 4211. This, of course, gives us a broader trading range of a 24%. Immediately, we closed the last session trading at the 4286, which is below this level on a daily closing basis at this moment. We need to close above this on a weekly basis to signal a rally is unfolding. Right now, the market is trading some 9.52% beneath that level.

A possible change in trend appears due come May in Wheat CBT Futures so be focused. The last cyclical event was a high established back during December 2018. Normally, this implies that the next turning point should be a low. However, the market has been neutral for right now, so caution is advisable. Watch the short-term trading levels for a hint of the next directional move into that target time frame. Last month produced a low at 4260 but closed on the weak side and we need to penetrate that level on a monthly closing basis to suggest perhaps a further decline.

The Daily level of this market is currently in a full bearish immediate tone with resistance at 4474. Thus far, we are still within a reactionary phase down one daily session.

On the weekly level, the last important low was established the week of March 11th at 4270, which was down 5 weeks from the high made back during the week of February 4th. We have seen the market decline further this week dropping to 4260 and we still remain beneath resistance standing at 4344. The market has remain a bit weak as of the immediate close of this session.

At this moment, this market is in a downward trend on all our indicators looking at the weekly level. We can see this market has been down for the past week. The previous high made during the week of March 25th on the Weekly level at 4780 remains significant technically and only exceeding that level on a closing basis would suggest a reversal in the immediate trend. The previous low of 4270 made during the week of March 11th on the Weekly level, has now been broken in the recent decline here during 4/22 and the market is trading beneath it thereby inferring weakness. However, we still remain above key support 4342 on a closing basis.

Some caution is necessary since the last high 5384 was important given we did obtain two sell signals from that event established during December 2018. That high was still lower than the previous high established at 5930 back during August 2018. Critical support still underlies this market at 4103 and a break of that level on a monthly closing basis would warn of a further decline ahead becomes possible. Nevertheless, at this time, the market is still weak. Taking a broader view, this market is in a downward trend on all our indicators looking at the monthly level. We can see this market has been down for the past month. The previous high made during December 2018 on the Monthly level at 5384 remains significant technically and only exceeding that level on a closing basis would suggest a reversal in the immediate trend. The previous low of 4104 made during December 2017 on the Monthly level has held and only a break of 4270 on a closing basis would warn of a technical near-term change in trend. However, we still remain below key support and key resistance now stands at 4952 above the market.

SOCRATES Detailed Analysis
ANALYSIS AS OF THE CLOSE Mon. Apr. 29, 2019: Wheat CBT Futures closed below our indicating ranges on the Daily level. The market closing today at 4352 is immediately trading down about 13% for the year from last year's closing of 5032. Thus far, we have been trading down for the past 11 days, while we have made a low at 4336 following the high established Fri. Apr. 12, 2019, this price action warns of at least a pause in trend if not a retest of key support. Only a close above 4466 would imply a retest of the previous high. The immediate trading pattern in this market has exceeded the previous session's high intraday reaching 4466 and closed below that same low creating an outside reversal to the downside which was a very dramatic swing of 2.91%. Volatility notwithstanding, the market finished on the weak side and it remains below all our internal momentum cyclical support models as well. We have elected 4 Bearish Reversals from the cyclical high established on 04/29. Electing all four Bearish Reversals tends to confirm we have a near-term correction unfolding.

Currently, the market remains quite bearish below all our system support indicators with resistance starting at 4360. The broader cyclical system indicators are also in a bearish position while the long-term trend and cyclical strength are bearish. This market is also trading mostly below the bank of eight moving average indicators suggesting it remains in a mixed posture for now. The market is trading within our envelope albeit skewed to the bearish side. This market has not closed above the previous cyclical high of 4780. Obviously, it is pushing against this resistance level.



Turning to the broader cyclical outlook, the map of the future is certainly interesting. To date, we have continue to trade within last year's range of 5930 to 5930. . This suggests that a closing below the previous year's low should imply a continued decline into 2020 remains possible. A closing above 5032 would imply a possible correction with a retest of the downside becomes possible into 2021.

Timing Models are always critical and there is a chance of a rally moving into the week of April 29th, which is reinforced by also a Directional Change Target with the opposite trend thereafter into the week of May 6th (NOTE: this can be intraday or on a closing basis).

The strongest target in the Weekly array is the week of May 27th for a turning point ahead, at least on a closing basis. It does appear we have a choppy period starting the week of April 22nd until the week of May 27th with each target producing the opposite direction for that 6-week period. Thereafter, we see the next target coming into play as the week of June 10th until the week of July 1st with again each target producing the opposite direction for that 4-week period. However, the important target during that period will be the week of July 1st. We have elected 3 Bearish Reversals from the last high thus far to date. This is especially true since we are below all our indicating ranges confirming weakness. Making a new low in the next session will imply a broader decline if the market penetrates 4235 and closes below that number.

There are 2 Weekly Directional Change targets starting from the week of April 29th to the week of May 6th warning of a potential choppy swing period for these few Weeks.

This market on the weekly level has been consolidating and moving higher since the low established the week of March 11th. However, we did elect 3 Bearish Reversals from the high formed on the week of March 25th which provided the decline into the week of April 22nd. Then we did manage to elect 3 Bullish Reversal which gestured the rally after the low of the week of April 22nd. Making use of our Reversal System, our next Weekly Bullish Reversal to watch stands at 4737 while the Weekly Bearish Reversal lies at 4385. This provides a 7.43% trading range. Turning to the broader Monthly level, the current Bullish Reversal stands at 5550 while the Bearish Reversal lies at 4455. This, of course, gives us a broader trading range of a 19%. Immediately, we closed the last session trading at the 4352, which is below this level on a daily closing basis at this moment. We need to close above this on a weekly basis to signal a rally is unfolding. Right now, the market is trading some 8.12% beneath that level.

A possible change in trend appears due come June in Wheat CBT Futures so be focused. The last cyclical event was a high established back during December 2018. Normally, this implies that the next turning point should be a low. However, the market has been neutral for right now, so caution is advisable. Watch the short-term trading levels for a hint of the next directional move into that target time frame. Last month produced a low at 4270 but closed on the positive side and so far, we are trading neutral within last month's trading range of 4780 to 4270. We need to breakout of this range to confirm the direction. Therefore, a close above will be bullish and a close below will warn of a possible decline.

The Daily level of this market is currently in a full bearish immediate tone with resistance at 4482. To date, this decline has been down for eleven daily sessions.

On the weekly level, the last important low was established the week of March 11th at 4270, which was down 5 weeks from the high made back during the week of February 4th. We have seen the market decline further this week dropping to 4336 and we are back above resistance which is beginnjing to now form initial support at 4344. The market has remain a bit weak as of the immediate close of this session.

At this moment, this market is in a downward trend on all our indicators looking at the weekly level. We can see this market has been down for the past week. The previous high made during the week of March 25th on the Weekly level at 4780 remains significant technically and only exceeding that level on a closing basis would suggest a reversal in the immediate trend. The previous low of 4270 made during the week of March 11th on the Weekly level has held and only a break of 4422 on a closing basis would warn of a technical near-term change in trend. However, we still remain above key support 4342 on a closing basis.

Some caution is necessary since the last high 5384 was important given we did obtain two sell signals from that event established during December 2018. That high was still lower than the previous high established at 5930 back during August 2018. Critical support still underlies this market at 4103 and a break of that level on a monthly closing basis would warn of a further decline ahead becomes possible. Nevertheless, at this time, the market is still weak. Taking a broader view, this market is in a downward trend on all our indicators looking at the monthly level. We can see this market has been down for the past month. The previous high made during December 2018 on the Monthly level at 5384 remains significant technically and only exceeding that level on a closing basis would suggest a reversal in the immediate trend. The previous low of 4104 made during December 2017 on the Monthly level. However, we still remain below key support and key resistance now stands at 4952 above the market.

Original Post


Monthly bearish 4455 elected at close of 4286 on 2019-04-30


You are evasive. we are talking about THIS 4455 reversal, and it was elected.

I am not going to waste my time with the charts and any other reversals. I go by the relevant numbers only.

The pro version risk tables:

2019-04-29
Wheat CBT Futures Risk Table

 ----------------- UPSIDE RISK ----- DOWNSIDE RISK ---
MONTHLY.......     5550 | 27.52% | 4455 | -2.36% |



2019-04-30
Wheat CBT Futures Risk Table

 ----------------- UPSIDE RISK ----- DOWNSIDE RISK ---
MONTHLY.......     5550 | 29.49% | 4211 | 1.749% |


So you see that the next reversal on 2019-04-29 was 4455, which then got replaced on 2019-04-30 by 4211 as expected because of the election. That is all we need to know.

Whatever was penetrated but not elected previously does not matter - not elected.
What really matters here that there is only ONE indication in ANY of the reports about what was elected is this (in case of bearish):

The next number that is still above the price of end of period price, listed as reversal one day before end of period. This is 4455. There is no other way to see this. And it is the same number as in the standard reports which should be consistent because you don't want to sell garbage to those who use the standard reports, do you? You want all numbers to be consistent, don't you?

I repeat: 4455 was the first electable number, and it was elected. That is not rocket science. Anything else is a distraction. How on earth otherwise would ANY user find out what the next electable reversal is?

If you disagree with this, then this is proof that YOU don't know how the reversal system is DEFINED.

Absolutely.

How it works, well, that seems to change by the day apparently with all the bugs and excuses that seem to be popping up everywhere. I am sick of your bullshit.









Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Original Post


Monthly bearish 4455 elected at close of 4286 on 2019-04-30


You are evasive. we are talking about THIS 4455 reversal, and it was elected.

I am not going to waste my time with the charts and any other reversals. I go by the relevant numbers only.

The pro version risk tables:

2019-04-29
Wheat CBT Futures Risk Table

 ----------------- UPSIDE RISK ----- DOWNSIDE RISK ---
MONTHLY.......     5550 | 27.52% | 4455 | -2.36% |



2019-04-30
Wheat CBT Futures Risk Table

 ----------------- UPSIDE RISK ----- DOWNSIDE RISK ---
MONTHLY.......     5550 | 29.49% | 4211 | 1.749% |


So you see that the next reversal on 2019-04-29 was 4455, which then got replaced on 2019-04-30 by 4211 as expected because of the election. That is all we need to know.

And you want to tell me I don't know the system?




Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Original Post


Monthly bearish 4455 elected at close of 4286 on 2019-04-30



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

I take note of the fact that you expand the selection of possible ambiguities that dictate that the system is in hindsight always right, but it is on the other hand so incredibly stupid that it does not even know its own rules, which should clearly prevent the generation of such erroneous signals, if the rules could be applied in a consistent manner, which is not possible with ambiguous rules.

The erroneous signal was the generation of a monthly bearish reversal which according to your rule should have been ignored. This is the wheat futures case that you use to prove me wrong. The reversal was elected. We are still talking about the Wheat futures trade, aren't we? If you say it was not elected then you are lying because we have the numbers.

Show us the link to the manual where it says that the election of a reversal should be ignored based on a conflicting forecast array signal.

Everybody can follow this simple logic above and now you are trapped. I am saying such a rule does not exist. You say it does.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

I take note of the fact that you expand the selection of possible ambiguities that dictate that the system is in hindsight always right, but it is on the other hand so incredibly stupid that it does not even know its own rules, which should clearly prevent the generation of such erroneous signals, if the rules could be applied in a consistent manner, which is not possible with ambiguous rules.

The erroneous signal was the generation of a monthly bearish reversal which according to your rule should have been ignored.

Show us the link to the manual where it says that the election of a reversal should be ignored based on a conflicting forecast array signal.

Everybody can follow this simple logic above and now you are trapped. Again.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Sorry, wrong again. where did I say I know nothing about Socrates? Nowhere. I know everything about it. Everybody reading this forum knows it because I have proven with facts that it is a scam. You could never convincingly prove me wrong on these facts. What you are writing now is just made up. Please refer to my facts, the cases, the numbers. However trying to understand it is meaningless once you know it is a scam. Game over. Your logic stinks.

So now you are saying because of the 98% conviction rate, white collar criminals like Martin Armstrong should get an out of jail free card?

Again, your logic stinks.

We, the people who pay taxes for this justice system don't want white collar criminals to get an out of jail free card.

In contrast, unfortunately, your stupid logic and strategy is a major part of the entire Armstrong scam. Because Armstrong has an axe to grind with the justice system which is why some believe he financed the Forecaster movie.

AFAIC I am trusting the justice system enough that I walk half an hour out of my place to do shopping and back any time of the day without any fear of criminals. I could not do that if you were right with your stupid assertions. We need a justice system, obviously. The fact that it doesn't work as expected in some cases cannot be used to draw conclusions as you do. So here we go again, you get what you deserve. As long as you keep peddling this crap even in face of all the evidence against it.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

I have never seen so much bullshit in one sentence. Where did I say that I trust the justice system? You are talking incoherent crap. Idiotic. You are saying because of some injustice has been applied to whatever other case you cherry-pick, cases where the accused have not confessed or not even been tried, that this means that injustice has been also applied to a convicted criminal who confessed to the the crime. Makes sense? Idiotic.

I find it deeply offensive to mention Julian Assange who is a real genius in contrast to Martin Armstrong who is a charlatan and crackpot. You don't even know how to follow a simple thought let alone a complex one.

Again, how can we compare a head of state whom I have at least some respect for (in this case) with a crackpot like Martin Armstrong? You would not even now how to clean Trump's desk.


I do not comment on Socrates anymore - it has been proven to be a scam. As confirmed by an overwhelming majority of posters in this forum. Period.

Why even try to understand the misleading methods of a scam? Are you crazy?

I do not respond with technical details to these low-life provocations any more. I have done that before. Game over. Everything has been said. Everything has been documented in full detail. Nobody listens to Armstrong and crew any more. You are the moron of the month, the joke of the month! Disqualified. I laugh my head off! The more you post, the more ridiculous it gets. Got the message?


Just one last thought: To see a member of the Armstrong team post this type of message should make it clear to absolutely everyone what type of outfit we are talking about. Everybody who considers spending money on any of Armstrong's products would be well advised to read Gumbi's posts. Good marketing indeed. I love it.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.