Thank you for the piece you've shared, they are all helpful and I am certain that those gamblers who can read your short article will be blessed in disguise. I wonder why people are gambling in desperation in the first place, gambling should be an extra activity and should not even be done solely for the money to be made through it. And even if the person will not solely gamble for fun but for the money, they should be wise about it and moderate things to avoid issues for themselves. I do not know the gain of the gambler who had wasted his money on gambling but still went ahead to borrow more money to gamble, is that not insane?

No one needs to tell such a gambler that he is losing it already, and perhaps he is already addicted to gambling. How it should be reversed should be the burning desire of the person and not the other way around. Gambling can only be enjoyed if we are responsible in doing it, but the moment we start irresponsible gambling, then we become unuseful to ourselves and everyone around us. Is that a good remark? This alone should have talked senses to many gamblers gambling anyhow.

We are all looking forward to Bitcoin reaching that high and historical level ($100,000) but let me tell you, if anyone tells you that it will "certainly" reach that level, that person is deceiving you. No one knows what the market would do and Bitcoin has not hit that level before to warrant us being empathetic about it, so any price calling can never be professional, the market doesn't work like that. It is all about our wish and hope now, and we pray that it hits that level so that we can make more money.

However, my concern is the fact that Bitcoin is not showing so much seriousness in this regard and what I see now as more concerning is the fact that lack of liquidity could be an issue. I've raised this issue many times but people think I was being overbearing about it, but well, let's see how things go. My reason for the concern is the fact that liquidity is not just coming from thin air, it comes from the pocket of some people. If there are no new adopters of Bitcoin who can inject their capital, it then becomes an issue. And in contrast to how people expect it, they believe that some whales will push it toward the $100,000 automatically, but nothing is magical here.

Wait a minute, which whale doesn't like money and wouldn't have bought Bitcoin at a low price? Haven't those guys thought that these investors are not new to investment environment and market psychology? Didn't they know that they know the beauty of buying low and the danger of buying at a high price? This is what many will not consider despite being a concern because the love of Bitcoin has blinded them.

Mainnet? Which Mainnet again

Regardless, Solana is a very good coin but it could be disastrous if we are too trusting of any coins, anything can happen in the crypto market which could be adverse irrespective of how good the project is. This is why whenever you buy a coin, you should know you are taking a risk and the risk becomes higher when you do not strike it when it is still very low. Solana is high in price now and it is more than half of its ATH already, and you can't compare yourself buying it now($170) with someone who had struck it when it was still at about $15. The difference is clear and so is the risk.

Still, this will still not stop the coin from appreciating more, but note that you are risking more in case it slips to the bearish trend earlier than expected and you can't earn so much from it anymore in this bullish season. I am one of the few people who believe that Solala could still hit $1,000 this bullish season, if this happens, that's your luck.

Nevertheless, this is merely a wish and an instinct, it is never truly professionally speculated since the asset has never reached that level before.

Lol...this is concerning really as the market force has been naturally dropping the pay rate. The forum tried to establish itself ever since m!xers have left but I think the reality is bitting hard now, not more $250 or more offers. Though there are still good campaign offers, except that it is not more than $100, excluding the bonus, and with the bonus, people may still earn $160, but with some tough tasks.

It is not business as usual, but time changes and things might be reviewed upwards by the same market force that dropped it. That said, it also depends on the way you view it as the earning from the forum is a passive income, and regardless of the country you are in the world if you are earning $400, it can do some extra things for you compared to if you never earned it.

This is also with less work to do, especially if your campaign asks you to post a maximum of 20-25 per week (an average of 3 posts per day). However, this is huge money in some countries, and with that little effort put into it a day, it is a very reasonable extra income on average.

Now, how do we get an honest review? That is the issue, my friend, we hardly see or read the truth these days as everyone is now for the money and not the integrity and sanity of the readers and the world at large. This is why I will always advise everyone to ensure they are deriving their information from the right channels, this is the only way they can at least get some above-average information/review that will be true. One can do that with private websites, but please, such site owners must be trusted so well with the best possible antecedents and not the kind of random reviewers and influencers in which you can be sure that almost all that they are reviewing cannot be true.

This is because they are simply for the money mainly and not for the truth. Money is causing a whole lot these days and technology is also abating them, which is sad. There are no regulations again to make matters worse because if there are viable regulations and sanctions that could be meted, website owners and influencers will think twice before telling lies just because they want to lure people, or should I say next victims to some companies.

Nonetheless, if the reviews are many and are random, I mean the ones in which the websites/platform owners give people the benefit of stating their individual and independent experience about companies, then an iota of truth about the company can still be derived, particularly if one can read them insightfully.

You seem to be contradicting yourself here since if there is a house edge that is not 100% according to what you have explained in relation to what I have read with you guys' discussion, then how come the odds again be 100% against the gambler? No. The fact that a gambler played and lost does not mean that the house edge is 100%, it only means that even if the house edge is just 10%, it indicates that the gambler wasn't able to enjoy the grace covered by the remaining 90%. Needless to say, this house edge of a thing is not obvious to anyone and even if a certain casino states their edge, is it really true?

The fact that the difficulties in casinos can be adjusted based on what is coded in the algorithm makes the house edge of a thing that is difficult to ascertain or trust. However, this house edge of thing is applicable only to the casino aspect of gambling and not to the sportsbook, and all that matters in casino betting is to try your best and leave the rest as you can't beat the house in the long run. Nevertheless, it is better to focus on the fun part of this kind of betting even as you are neutral about the money, that's if you think about it at all.

Well, without confusing myself further, let me say that I do not understand what you meant by the difficulty in an escalation of issues with the casino because whether it is physical or online, there are measures already in place to address issues as an establishment, and if it is not solved by immediate resolution, there will always be a way to escalate things in ranks. This is even better tailored toward the right channels with the physical casino, unlike the online casinos that you probably will never see. Although this is not a yardstick to judge customer satisfaction, but still, it still goes a long way to include it as an appraisal.

Besides, yes, you have a point on the concluding part, it is better for the casino to play by the book and build the best reputation and trust for itself. If not, it will bounce back on its head. The locality that harbours you isn't an idiot, so if the allegations against the casino are getting too much and it is such that is not adding positively to the community, I think it will not be long for people to rebel against it. Playing by the book in the fairest possible way is the best way out here.

No, that is for the KYC casinos only, it is certainly not correct if you are generalizing things here. It is never the right of ALL casinos to request for KYC completion but rather the right of casinos that do not advertise no-KYC. We should often differentiate things to avoid misconceptions for some people. No-KYC casinos do not have the right whatsoever to ask you to complete any KYC, after all, you might have joined the casinos due to that mantra. So why are they requesting and forcing you to complete KYC? And of course, when you register with them, being a no-KYC casino means that they can't have anything to hold you in their terms and conditions, so they do not have any right over you because the terms and conditions will ever be silent about the KYC but will rather embolden you to go on with them without fear.

However, if they later change their mind and want you to provide the KYC, then their terms and conditions must have changed by then which by law requires them to convey it to you and you must also agree to it before you can provide them with the KYC to relinquish your right, and that is subjected to the fact of whether or not you still want to gamble with them. I know many would be forced to complete the KYC by the casino in this case since they may not have any choice, but legally, they do not have any right to force you against what you signed up for. The worst they can do is to tell you to withdraw your money and leave their casino. It is only the KYC casinos and those who clearly wrote it in their terms and conditions that you have to do the KYC that have the right in every sense.

I don't see anything incorrect in what @Sunderland said because that is what I have witnessed. The fact that you've not witnessed it doesn't make it incorrect. In my experience, some companies believe that the most genuine ID you can provide is your international passport and I share in their view with a high degree of agreement. This is because it is easy for anyone to doctor their ID cards, be it national ID cards, Driver's Licence, voter's card/right and so on. If people actually doctored it and are not able to know through their own internal tools, the best way to know is to contact the issuing authorities for verification. This will surely be difficult to do all over the countries of the world and will cost them more money. But for the international passport, it can be easily verified even by their country's government whether it's genuine or not.

For this, there are times that you might submit the regular ID but the company would reject it and ask for the international passport. And there are times that you might have been using the regular IDs submitted for verification for many years but suddenly, the company might request for your international passport to do additional verification. This has happened to people I know before, but it's no big deal since they have it all ready.

That is okay bro and I respect your opinion here. So be it that it is the fun you only seek in gambling or that you at least view it towards, but still, are you telling me that if you see a means that could be earning for you, you will avoid it? I do not get it. Fine, gambling is a very risky avenue, this might have prompted what you said, but giving it a try can never be a bad idea in my opinion. No matter what I read online that can earn for me, I will try to give it at least my minutes to try to get the gest because if I'm not interested I can at least tell others that might. It is until that thing is later deemed not meaningful or constructive that will make it piss me off.

That is by the way though, since we all know that gambling is risky, that fact alone is what I know that is encouraging you and not the fact that money can't be made from it. And really, gambling has all it takes to help anyone who knows what to do with it. If one can ensure that they learn a gambling strategy, and have planned even as they aree budget and managerial inclined towards it, then they are solving the issue bit by bit. They will now have to apply wisdom in the area of good psychology and get so disciplined and determined for better gambling engagements.

I just bookmarked your page as it seems that you have something reasonable to offer, I love predictive engagements as a trader and invest.

At first, I thought it was one of the regular styles we normally see in the forum but this seems to be unique after reading a few you have to say and I will give it time to study it more and the safety of my money as well if I have the time to go through it thoroughly this week. Even as I wish you well in this project, it is good advice if you advertise the project here on Bitcointalk.

Through this style you use, fine, some people will notice, but the volume will be so little. With the signature aligned, it will soon go viral and I know that if it is encouraging in practice just as it is in reading it, people will troop to it.

Good luck!

What I can say in this regard is that anyone who comes across a thing like this should first contact Stake.com itself and not just assume that it is not possible to avoid missing out on good offers that are also true. There are different packages and promotions going on in companies all the time that may not even be general, so we should not conclude outrightly. It's possible that there are specific codes that will be imputed or direct links that will hint Stake that you are from this company/influencer/partners and for this purpose and package at the same time. If contacted, I am sure they will be able to advise you rightly.

However, be very careful with the links you click online, many might not be for any good. Some might take you to a replicated site or even cause phishing attacks on you, so be advised. And unless you trust a website, going directly to Stake.com is the best approach to go about registration and earning some offers.

This is beyond luck if the context here is to be adhered to. It is never about gambling alone but the risk/belief in investing in what the casinos have to offer as extra as well, which is their token. If it were to be the betting itself, then I could say luck is a very vital function here, but if it is about the investment in casino tokens, then I believe that expertise is to be rated higher while luck is given a minute reference. Gaming tokens are flooding the crypto space now, and just like memes, many of them are seriously performing well. Many of them are even performing so well in their presales and airdrop phase/programs. Just like Notcoin, it did well when it comes to the release of airdrops recently.

For this and for the reason that positive inclination is surrounding the gaming environment, a good speculator must have been reasonably hinted that casino tokens will have that opportunity to appreciate in this bull run if the entire crypto industry does not fail. This is a kind of graceful benefit in which the performance of the casinos themselves will add to how their token will perform. You can see that this is more practical than the luck you emphasized.

Not at all, I only replied to your post based on the content. I differentiated between Bitcoiners (those who earn through Bitcoin) and Bitcointalkers (those who participate in Bitcointalk and eventually earn from it). It's clear, you never mentioned Bitcoin earnings in your post but the forum earnings.

Yes of course! I deal with cryptocurrency and I am so proud of it. There are still cryptocurrency establishments and businesses in the country, what has the government done to them? Let them anger people more than this so that people will start protesting and suing them. What is happening in the country is the case of a confused government giving polices and instructions that are conflicting, those guys are just dullards chasing shadows.

You know what, the Nigerian government and even the CBN have never banned or even restricted cryptocurrency activities directly (you can earn, hold, trade, stake etc. your crypto), but they are forcing banks (which will never sincerely comply since they have their loopholes) not to have anything doing with digital assets (be it USD, crypto and whatever is virtually exchanged for the NGN). They are desperately doing this to try to stabilise the Naira, but forgetting that that was never the cause of the woe of the national currency but poor policies, bad economic management and lack of FX inflow.

Since I do not steal, heck yeah, I will tell it even to the face of President Tinubu that I earn through crypto if he wants to know. We'll meet in court if they harass me. The government are only giving instructions to scare people, no law whatsoever is backing them if that is what you want to know.

You are correct about this, if it is a selective government clamping down on cryptocurrency, it will never be efficient and even the citizens and residents will be in that same country doing cryptocurrency...lol This is so possible with VPN and other ninja tools and they will never be able to suspect them not to mention of tracing them to face the law. Even in China, many people are doing cryptocurrency despite the tough stance of the government about it. This is to the point that early this year, China's central bank warned that hundreds of billions of USDT were transacted within a year, even as recently, an illegal underground banking operation transacting in the USDT was raided (https://www.theblock.co/post/294777/china-busts-1-9-billion-underground-banking-operation-using-usdt). Can you imagine? This means that a selective country clamping down on cryptocurrency cannot work but coordinated clamping down on it. This was what birthed my reply to the OP, even as he never mentioned a selective government but generalised them.

Oh, yes, prioritizing online gambling over offline gambling will not make you meet many physical people not to mention of knowing what is going on in their gambling life. Even if you did not meet them in person, if such gambling outlets are close to you, you will see some neighbours gambling, and from there you might be able to see for yourself and hear a few about their gambling lifestyle either from them or from people. From there as well, you might get to know what people are facing about gambling, especially those who are not using their common sense to do the right thing and be responsible in gambling.

Oh, I see, the wife was forced to leave him due to his irresponsible gambling life? That is so possible, especially if the guy did not show concern for his family, particularly in the financial aspect of it. And yes, people may be tough to help when they are facing gambling issues, it is not until they are also willing to be helped that it will be easy for them. Can you see this guy, he learned his lesson the hard way, I don't just know why people will be wasting their lives away just to gamble. Why not moderate it?

This is very good advice and it is similar to what I just issued out in my last post to advise people against investing in crypto projects because they too much trust it and believe it is merely overvalued and that it will later buy more to shock everyone. This could cause issues in the long run and the coins/tokens that were so undervalued in your view might remain like that until the next bearish phase comes into play. So what is the gain of the investors when they eventually lose hugely?

There are coins/tokens now that I will not even go near anymore, the risk is high and I mostly judge them by what they've been doing since the last quarter of 2022. Since that time, the crypto market has had at least 4 different bull runs, and after each bull run, there were corrections as well. So if those cryptos were encouraging, they would have performed well by now or have a performance that would at least hint what would have at least given the investor hope.

But they are just sluggish, it will even be worse if someone buys at a higher level after struggling to get there. It will be easy for it to fall hugely during the bearish season.

I think you are getting it all wrong from the beginning as regards the term used. Judging by what you narrated, you are referring to Bitcointaker and not Bitcoiner. Bitcoiners are those who are engaging in Bitcoin, and even if you are engaging in Bitcoin but still silent about it in this context, but instead refer to the forum itself as your source of income, then you are a Bitcointaker in my opinion.

Regardless, let anyone think whatever they want to think about you, so far you are earning through legitimate means, continue to do you and let your conscience do the rest. I expect anyone earning here (even if that's their only source of income) to be proud of it as they are Markerters. The last time I checked, marketing job is a very good job no matter how little you earn from it.

Anyone who is not satisfied with it should find you a better job or keep shut. Case closed!

Oh my God!!! Where did you dive to this time? Well, those car racers or other people/athletes engaging in physical activities need the exercise since what they are planning to achieve is physical and they must attain some kind of shape, speed, and flexibility in most cases. But trading is never like that, it is such that need more of your psychology and prowess (all mental), so you can see the difference. And once you can move your hands to place the order and do other few things which are the easiest physical things to do here, then you are good to do.

Fine, on the deeper thought, the exercise could be useful in a way since our brain function and daily liveliness, smartness, alertness, activeness etc. could be linked together today. But it is still not necessary in trading as all that you need is inside of you just make sure you have a bright day, and good psychology for trading and you will be just fine without any exercise.

You are very wrong that Bitcoin has survived the attack from the government, if the government attacked Bitcoin, it would have been a different story today. I can assure you that if the world government attacks Bitcoin today, it will not survive and even all the decentralised mechanisms around it and sites/platforms related to it will all be pulled down. This is because there will be a total clampdown on it (Bitcoin) and all the businesses around it including exchange.

You can imagine how huge the panic selling of Bitcoin would be by then, and it will get to the level that you will not be able to sell your Bitcoins again because no one will be willing to buy it from you. It is not until this time that you can say "the government has attacked Bitcoin." Restricting, banning and finding ways to regular Bitcoin transactions for the sanity of the world is not an attack, only that you guys are not appreciative of what the government is doing, particularly for not clamping down on Bitcoin.