So the Protagoras and Euathlus court case is worthless because in a decentralised world if Protagoras
asked Euathlus to build him a home and after Protagoras paying him and 1 year later the home fell down
no courts to tell Euathlus to pay Protagoras back ..

Your making smart contracts to help the government  FACT..
Smart contracts saves time for the law to investigate the contract..
NO LAW  what is the point in a CONTRACT ?..

You will make a set of coded rules that the user has to stick by BUT how many stick to the rules?.
Hack steal lie    exchanges rob you SO even if you think you made a safe way for the law to be less involved YOU STILL NEED THE LAW < The law is government and they take TAXES..

Nomic: A Self-Modifying Game
Based on Reflexivity in Law

June, 1982

IN his excellent book A Profile of Mathematical Logic, the philosopher Howard
DeLong tells the following classic story of ancient Greece. "Protagoras had contracted to
teach Euathlus rhetoric so that he could become a lawyer. Euathlus initially paid only half
of the large fee, and they agreed that the second installment should be paid after Euathlus
had won his first case in court. Euathlus, however, delayed going into practice for quite
some time. Protagoras, worrying about his reputation as well as wanting the money,
decided to sue. In court Protagoras argued:

Euathlus maintains he should not pay me but this is absurd. For suppose he wins
this case. Since this is his maiden appearance in court he then ought to pay me
because he won his first case. On the other hand, suppose he loses his case. Then he
ought to pay me by the judgment of the court. Since he must either win or lose the
case he must pay me.

Euathlus had been a good student and was able to answer Protagoras' argument with a
similar one of his own:

Protagoras maintains that I should pay him but it is this which is absurd. For
suppose he wins this case. Since I will not have won my first case I do not need to
pay him according to our agreement. On the other hand, suppose he loses the case.
Then I do not have to pay him by judgment of the court. Since he must either win
or lose I do not have to pay him."

Then DeLong adds, "It is clear that to straighten out such puzzles one has to inquire
into general procedures of argument." Actually, to many people, it is not at all clear that
general procedures of argument will need scrutiny-quite the contrary. To many people,
paradoxes such as this one appear to be mere pimples or blemishes on the face of the law,
which can be removed by simple cosmetic surgery

BAD LOGIC ^^^^^^^^ ..

To be in a decentralised world you wouldn't of even got to court REMEMBER you said you want no government in your lives the "BLOCKCHAIN" will sort it out ..


Protagoras had contracted to teach Euathlus rhetoric so that he could become a lawyer..
No need for lawyers decentralised REMEMBER ..No law to enforces it will the blockchain do it ? ..


My decision is Euathlus won the case .. FACT .. Why you ask?

Because they agreed that if he went into law and won his first case that Euathlus would pay the other half NOW Protagoras was being a GREEDY SHIT by dragging Euathlus into court SO this case is
irrelevant to the first case  because you Protagoras decided to make the other case to benefit yourself
and by doing so you hurt the other person rather than him hurting you..

If he would of had a separate court case AND being a PRACTISING LAWYER then yes i would of awarded
the case to you Protagoras but you brought him here to trick the courts and by doing so you
Protagoras will be fined 5 thousand duckets  ..GREEDY MAN ..wasting courts time ..

Your lucky Protagoras your not hanging on a cross like that jesus dude ..
Now get out my court you BUM..


But imagine decentralised ? NO GOOD JUDGE   like popcorn1 ..

NOW i make that 95 points to me in the game of NOMIC so roll the dice who is next?
Jeez your all only on 5 points ..First to 100 THE RULES REMEMBER ..NOMIC ..

First to 100 and POPCORN1 is on 95 points the rest on 5 points ..

YOU KNOW I WAS A FAIR JUDGE   and right ..

How come Junker and Tusk are at the BUMS meeting ?.
They are both unelected bums and brought islamic terror to our shores in many more numbers to keep us busy while they spend our monies NOT their monies but OURS ..

So how come MR PUTIN not allowed ?..
You have Junker the scumbag bum and Tusk the bum lick lapdog who never got elected into leading Europe
to do anything SO how come those types can go to a FREELOADERS CLUB FOR BUMS  when you had
MR PUTIN another FREELOADING BUM ..Mr Putin should of been made welcome after all is is one of your types A FREELOADING BUM< A thief who as robbed the Russian peoples of many billions ..

BUT at least Putin talks more sense than Justin trudeau<< That guy is a complete WANK  ..
He will destroy Canada ..

Anyone can bring in 1 million islamic nutter and 100 thousand do good 
BUT what about the rest?  YES they cause terror NOTHING BETTER TO DO  ..
BUT lets all celebrate the 100 thousand good ones doing well forget the other 900 thousand who will not be doing well so i imagine 20 thousand want to kill your asses ..
Well you promised them a better life but they never got one only the 100 thousand did so next thing you know TERROR boredom TERROR ..I got no money I am bored with life i will take a few out with me..

Well it was you infidels who said i could have a better life ..

Muslim rape slavery comes to Canada - Mad Mimi
https://madmimi.com/s/38da27
Click here to watch: Muslim rape slavery comes to Canada. A 33-year-old Muslim migrant to Canada, Walid Mustafa Chalhoub, has been convicted of 24 .


Justin Trudeau and many other nations have basically opened up a free night club with no security and with no restriction on the amount of people that can walk in the night club< MAJOR TROUBLE <<FACT..

OH and Justin Trudeau owns the BAR ..he cares for the monies ONLY..
Not the people having safe fun      but just the monies ..

GREEDY BUMS ..Ask them all to show their BANK ACCOUNTS and ask them to provide information how they come to have that much..WILL THEY SHOW THEM?..SCUMBAG BUMS..

And Justin Trudeau..
Justin Trudeau and Senator Patrick Brazeau face off in 2012 boxing ...
Video for justin trudeau boxing match▶ 0:45
https://www.theguardian.com/.../justin-trudeau-and-senator-patrick-b...
28 Jul 2017
The 2012 charity boxing match marked a pivotal moment in Trudeau’s political career, but his account of the .

PATHETIC  ..  GET OUT YOU BUMS ..You talk shit..

#WeAreBaking  👨‍🍳
‏
 @TezosCommunity
 1h1 hour ago
More
#FF Tezos around the world:
@TezosSAfrica
@TezosBoston
@TezosJapan
@Tezos_Korea
@TezosChina
@TezosAlabama
@TezosShenzhen
@TezoSpanish
@TezosSH
@Tezos_Beijing

Who did we miss?   < TEZZIES BANGKOK

@kate_sills
Follow Follow @kate_sills
More
Douglas Hofstadter on Nomic, the self-amending game and inspiration for Tezos:

Nomic is a game in which changing the rules is a move. In that respect it differs from almost every other game. The primary activity of Nomic is proposing changes in the rules, debating the wisdom of changing them in that way, voting on the changes, deciding what can and cannot be done afterwards, and doing it. Even this core of the game, of course, can be changed.

— Peter Suber, The Paradox of Self-Amendment..

I suppose kate sills i am playing Nomic with you ? .

NOMIC is a game in which changing the rules is a move. In that respect it differs from almost every other game<  BULLSHIT   it doesn't it's the same as every other game FACT..

To play a game you have rules even before you play you know the rules FACT or how do you play it?
With no rules to a game how do i score a goal?  Because the rules tell me to kick the ball in the net..

So the game defeats the object because you already stuck to the first rules
HOW TO PLAY THE GAME  < RULES..

Now those rules cannot be changed because how do you play the game?..
Yes a good game for DEBATING < A really good game come to think about it BUT never the less to start the game you stuck to a set of rules set in STONE ..

Like every game has rules set in stone so we can play ..
And this is what i mean by setting rules in stone for leaders so they cannot change the game WHY?
because my life is not a GAME ..

But keep posting kate sills i really enjoy your twitter post ..Don't worry i am not a stalker ..
And i don't do twitter or facebook just here  ..

Don't like fame only fortune ..

Blockchains can't solve all the world problems ..

How does a blockchain stop your wife from shagging the next door neighbour?..
So lets not pretend blockchain will solve all the problems this earth throws at us ..

Liars/Scammers can make blockchains < NO THEY CANNOT ..

That's what they scam you by       saying they can when they clearly can't..
Blockchain with batman wings on it  And yes many fall for it

decision based on info from a radio broadcast - being in a blockchain does not give the information any more credibility. WRONG..

i mustn't say anymore   to many looking for ideas to scam people with..

All depends on the information  ..

Imagine politicians couldn't get away with fraud    or get massive wages then those who do get massive wages plus do fraud those politicians would say if i can't get away with it your not FACT..

But the bribes dinner bribes second incomes whiles being a politician blinds them because of greed..

Pure DEMOCRACY ?

1 average joe can rob a home  a politician can rob all our homes in 1 swoop ..
So who is this pure DEMOCRACY FOR ..

1 average joe can kill 100 with a bomb give a take a few..
1 politician can kill MILLIONS with 1 say..

Tony blair bush   i could go on and on..
So what is your pure democracy and who is it for THE PEOPLES? ..
As you see leaders do the damage in many ways ..

Do you know high political wages can destroy DEMOCRACY ..why you ask ..
They see the monies so become blinded by the fact ..
More interested in their own good life to really care for the peoples ..

Less monies then they would see the problems everyone else faces ..FACT..
High cost of train travel    homes the lot they would look at the world different ..

We have people before they become elected     into to be an MP vow they would never put there kids in
private school soon as they become elected they put their children in private schools ..

Fair democracy is setting laws so these rats can't get away with the RAT THINGS THEY DO..
They destroy millions of lives in one say so..

So now do you believe in pure democracy ?..

‏@kate_sills
 4h4 hours ago
More
A very interesting point: people who believe in pure democracy are the "unwitting heirs to a crude version of absolute monarchy" because they place everyone else's futures on shaky ground..

What is pure DEMOCRACY do you know?. Is your idea the same as mine?..

Law and Democracy are 2 different things ..
The law is set in stone by the peoples and you do it..
Democracy you want something set in stone doesn't mean you get it  might get out voted..

So what is PURE DEMOCRACY  to you it might mean something totally different to me ..

I wouldn't call democracy pure NEVER EVER ..
I would say a FAIR DEMOCRACY ..Why do i say this ?..

We vote and the winners get their way of life  "SUPPOSE TO ANYWAYS" cough BREXIT ..
But there will be losers so how pure is that    To be called PURE DEMOCRACY?..

We can only make it FAIR .. What is a fair DEMOCRACY ?
It's not for the people it's for the leaders we elect ..

So to say my democracy will create a MONARCHY type system is BULLSHIT    COMPLETE  BS..

My fair democracy is so the leaders we elect cannot steal  it's those types that destroy us for the greed
and lack of leadership they see the money first not the peoples ..

Born with Margret Thatcher   took me milk plus my giro if i reached 16 now had to wait till 18 if i went on the dole..

i done politics as my subject at 12 years old thought we just talked and shouted at each other
HOW WRONG WAS I    write write write read read read   not much shouting at all ..

Come in handy know though  i see the RATS AT PLAY..

Imagine no law in BITCOIN  meaning the law didn't care what happens   it's decentralised and no law will get involved then what do you think will happen if everyone knew no law in BITCOIN?..

Common Bitcoin scams and how to avoid them - Lovemoney
https://www.lovemoney.com/news/.../common-bitcoin-scams-and-how-to-avoid-them
11 Dec 2017 - Scams involving Bitcoin are rising almost as fast as the value of the cryptocurrency itself. The value of a single unit of Bitcoin was just under ...

Bitcoin price: Fraudsters using surge in cryptocurrency to trick people ...
https://www.independent.co.uk › LIFE › Tech › News
29 Jan 2018 - Bitcoin and other investments are being used to lure people into scams, the UK's ... surge in cryptocurrency to trick people into scams, financial regulator warns ..... The rise of bitcoin's price and the interest in buying it has also led to an ... On 3 January, binary options became a regulated investment product, ...

If people knew no CENTRALISED BODY as in the LAW  then how much more would go on?..
So can blockchians have no Central body?  ANSWER NO i say..

Blockchains are good for coding commands so that these commands get done   because us humans are not very good at taking commands we are always trying to break them ..

Imagine a safe with a digital lock  why is it locked ?  because us humans are not good at taking commands
like stay out my money safe   so we proceed to lock them ..

And that's why Blockchain is born   so commands can be met as best as they can ..

But decision making no because it cannot see the future outcomes it can only TRY to see the future and the future we all see is not to get ROBBED ..That's why it's CRYPTIC ..

No one stole be no point in blockchain at all ..
Central is way way faster and cheaper to run FACT..BUT because of greedy thieves like politicians stealing taxes just 1 of many i could go on but because of the fact of theft we have blockchain..

Dilution of monies is a form of theft ..They stole your taxes spent them borrowed more then it got diluted ..
Because they borrow off the future at a higher cost in interest so goods go up and you end up working for less monies ..

And here we are today making blockchains because we don't trust anyone FACT ..
It's to save humanity from getting robbed and costing the law less meaning less taxes going on law
meaning more monies for homes and schools and what not..
 
But we will always need a central body to enforce things ALWAYS ..
No law enforcement then your blockchains smart contacts are useless to everyday life ..

Not very good ..Why you ask?..

Sometimes many times us humans think we made the right choice but never ..
I payed you     1 year later i am not happy      my house fell down and you built it ..

So how does a blockchain make a right decision ?..
Can a blcokchain correct the future with no law enforcement?..

Imagine a smart contract    if the time wait is to long on an escrow because of no trust then waiting to long
is not good    other means faster than blockchain to receive your monies goods or work in a faster manner..

Now imagine a smart contract with no central body to enforce it on a blockchain if both parties fail what happens then the blockchain LOCKS them both out for breaking the contract..
So they both loose?..

What happens if everything is ok at the start i pay you out but later after i payed you because i agreed
to pay you and you are happy   what happens if my home falls down 1 year later who do i see?..

Well no law because everyone saying a decentralised world and a decentralised world has no police to enforce anything so the smart contract on the blockchain has to enforce it how i will never know ..

Send heavies to collect?..Then i blow your head off as soon as you knock on my door NO LAW
Remember it's a decentralised world    MAD MAX WORLD ..

MEPs grill Juncker on tax scandals - EUobserver
https://euobserver.com/justice/138069
31 May 2017 - European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker appeared before an ... Juncker had spent decades as the Grand Duchy's prime minister and ... Juncker denies role in tax scams · MEPs say Panama Papers probe more ..

Jean-Claude Juncker drawn back into wiretapping scandal - Telegraph
https://www.telegraph.co.uk › News
13 Dec 2017 - Jean-Claude Juncker must take urgent steps to explain his role in the illegal Luxembourg wiretap scandal, a former senior intelligence officer .

CDU donations scandal - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDU_donations_scandal
The CDU donations scandal was a political scandal resulting from the illegal forms of party ... As a consequence, two of the leading CDU figures of the 1980s and 1990s, Helmut Kohl and Wolfgang Schäuble, lost their political ... payment from the government of Saudi Arabia following the delivery of German-made tanks (a ..

And you want to be in the EU and believe everything those bums tell you ..
Nothing but lying bums greedy pee wee hermans ..

They been done for FRAUD and you people still believe and still have them in power THOSE fraudsters ..
And they want you to have a better life or themselves ?..

Well they already done FRAUD  and they are still in power to do this and you lot love them ..

Corruption costs EU 'up to €990 billion a year' – POLITICO
https://www.politico.eu/.../corruption-costs-eu-990-billion-year-rand-study-fraud-fun...
22 Mar 2016 - The EU has a corruption problem that could cost it up to €990 billion a year, according to a study commissioned by the European Parliament ...
Missing: 900

A written contract provides more certainty to the involved parties, and thus holds much more weight than its verbal counterpart. From a legal perspective, spoken words are flimsy, and by putting an agreement in writing, you’re minimising the risk of being double-crossed or violating the terms yourself. It’s the best way to dodge misinterpretations and misunderstandings; and even if both parties have honest intentions, details of an agreement can easily get forgotten if they have not been jotted down.

In the case of a dispute, verbal contracts (even handshake agreements) could potentially be seen as valid and binding in the court. However, when it comes to your legal standing and peace of mind, it’s a very thin thread to hang by, and you should do it at your own risk..

A contract is a promise or set of promises that are legally enforceable and, if violated, allow the injured party access to legal remedies. Contract law recognises and governs the rights and duties arising from agreements.[1] In the Anglo-American common law, formation of a contract generally requires an offer, acceptance, consideration, and a mutual intent to be bound. Each party must have capacity to enter the contract. Although most oral contracts are binding, some types of contracts may require formalities, such as being in writing or by deed.

In the civil law tradition, contract law is a branch of the law of obligations.

law of obligations no law then i am not obligated because who will make me ?..
You paid me out 1 year ago in a smart contract BYE BYE ..

Imagine you done a deal with a smart contract and this happens   what if no CENTRALISED BODY like
the law   what will we do ?..

Now many people bought a VW Golf ..Then later on this happens ..

Volkswagen emissions scandal - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal
The Volkswagen emissions scandal began in September 2015, when the United States ... A 2010 Volkswagen Golf TDI with defeat device displaying "Clean Diesel" at the Detroit Auto Show. Date, 2008–2015 .... which VW had agreed to. Winterkorn was charged with fraud and conspiracy in the USA on 3 May 2018.

So if no CENTRALISED BODY like the law    what will happen ..?
Please do explain   because all i see if no law enforcement is MAD MAX ..

You are helping the law with time cuts   with a smart contract your not going against the law but helping it
save monies in lawyer cost cleaners all sorts of cost involved with law that smart contracts can help with
BUT still those contracts smart or not need the LAW to enforce them OR no point in a contract..

So can you really have a decentralised world ANSWER NO ..Total mad max if everything was decentralised.

Now instead of thinking of ways to cut the law out THINK of ways to HELP the LAW ..
Lawyers judges cost the public monies   If we can save the public purse by less time work for judges and layers and crime then that's the best way to think..

The more time we give to complaining the more it cost ..
Oh judge he said this and that   Smart contact saves time but if it doesn't then the law steps in..
But you still needed a CENTRAL BODY as a just in case something goes wrong ..

Decentralised world ?   

Bitcoin fraud triples as criminals target cryptocurrency boom - Telegraph
https://www.telegraph.co.uk › Technology Intelligence
26 Jan 2018 - The rising price of Bitcoin has been met with a surge in cryptocurrency crime as reports of Bitcoin-related fraud tripled in 2017

I will show you SMART CONTRACTS below..

Donald Trump Business Bankruptcies - List and Reasons - ThoughtCo
https://www.thoughtco.com › Humanities › Issues › U.S. Government
19 Jan 2018 - Find out which of Donald Trump's companies went bankrupt. ... Chapter 11 restructuring reduced the company's debt by about $600 million and

NEVER PAID A PENNY BACK<<Smart contracts ..
But guess what average joe is paying it back ..

See how good trump is    and the funny thing no one on the opposite side mentions it because they have
all done the make companies up then declare them bankrupt for many millions   and all on the average joe
heads ..

You can code a set of rules but rules are made to be broken  ..


You signed a CONTRACT  at Mt. Gox saying you wouldn't do FRAUD but they done it to you.. 
So much for "CONTRACTS".. And on a computer not a paper contract..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mt._Gox
Mt. Gox was a bitcoin exchange based in Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. Launched in July 2010, .... Gox filed for bankruptcy protection in the US, to halt U.S. legal action temporarily by traders who alleged the bitcoin exchange operation was a fraud..

Why do we need contracts?..

If no law then " CONTRACTS" are worthless < FACT  you can put all the spin on any contract smart or not
if no law then no point in a contract..

Do you know a contract even on paper is to help the law <FACT your helping the law by describing what both parties wanted to do and then you both signed it so when in a court of law the judge can read what you both agreed upon  FACT..

Now you can put rules in code so both parties hopefully agree but still at the end of the day you need the law for a contact smart or not< FACT..

Ok lets give you some problems like this ..

I build you a home i put it in the smart contract to build you a home  I build you your home everything is fine you pay me for your lovely home at a cost of 1 million  1 year later things start to fall apart
who do i see to get my monies back ?< THE LAW  because if no law your contract is WORTHLESS..

Another problem ..A signed CONTRACT   even if it was a SMART CONTRACT how will it of solved the problem without the LAW ?? ..

The story of the fake bomb detectors - BBC News - BBC.com
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29459896
3 Oct 2014 - The sentencing of a British couple for making fake bomb detectors marks the ... The fake "detectors" - sold with spurious but scientific-sounding claims ... After the FBI declared it a fraud in 1996, a British man ..
REMEMBER the person got paid out because everything was all good ONLY TILL LATER ON .

I was happy he was happy   only till later on was i not happy but the smart contract payed him out
so who do i see now ..THE LAW<<FACT..

CONTRACT  smart or not   NEEDS THE LAW ..

You can set rules in code that people have to abide by BUT still if it's a "CONTRACT" you need the law to enforce it..

Things can happen WAY WAY LATER even though you both thought at the time everything was all good..
Now you NEED THE LAW ..

Yes smart contracts HELP THE LAW  ..Save monies on time     money is time..
Lawyers per hour cost a few pennies..

BUT still CONTRACTS need the law to enforce them FACT..

Mintpal Scam Artist Ryan Kennedy Charged With Fraud and Money ...
https://themerkle.com › News › Crypto
5 Jul 2017 - Most cryptocurrency enthusiasts remember the Mintpal exchange. ... Kennedy's stolen Bitcoins were worth over 1 million GBP, and propped up ..

THEN SYSCOIN    WENT TO A CENTRAL BODY     THE LAW    and cried like little girls ..
So much for decentralised    YES WHEN THE DEVS SAY SO ..

If no law your contract is WORTHLESS   it's not a contract   because who enforces it if 1 or both don't agree..

I don't agree i want the police   if no law then who do i get?..
All CONTRACTS is to help the LAW  < Fact for judges to judge your signed agreement save time..

TIME IS MONEY..

Money is for slaves 100%   FACT..I will prove my point..

Money is one solution to this problem. I can sell the loaf of bread, and later exchange the money for an apple or another item. With money, we can reduce the number of ‘wants’ from two to one — I don’t have to need the items that you have to trade; I can still get an apple later. The temporal requirement has been lifted.

Money is one solution to this problem= slaves ..

A prostitute will do what for money?  and how much for..
Now if you could just give them the money without them doing anything what do you think they would do?.
The prostitute would rather just take the money without doing anything SO it proves she was a slave for monies ..

Now with a universal income she would of never been selling her self or him self ..
Less likely anyways ..
Money is a form of slavery  the more 1 person has the more slaves they can have..
So with a UNIVERSAL INCOME  no more slaves everyone as a starting point to live..

If you say it will make people lazy WRONG..
So why didn't elon musk just sit on all his cash  ?  He never he carried on and made tesla so to say humans just sit down if they get money is not true ..

So all those with money don't want to carry on making money is just not true..
The only reason why welfare sit and do nothing because they take it away if you find a job that pays
just the same as what you get for nothing SO why work ?

For satisfaction of working for nothing I don't think so ..
so with a universal income no one can take it ..away even if you become rich you still get it till you die