There were 179 assets at GLBSE, part of them inactive.
So we have to wait not more than ~40 days in worst case.

Seen elsewhere:

Aren't you guys trying to derail the BTCFPGA's thread with all this stuff about BFL?

"Indians the ones who invented zero"?
From ancient India, not from North America.

Hey, dishwara, there is a monstrous difference between the one who successfully prepared sophisticated concept, mechanism and protocol of Bitcoin, and the one who has difficulties even with payouts to users (doing it slowly and with mistakes), not to mention of the assets data.

Keep the "stupid" for yourself.  Several thousands BTC have already been returned to community, so one has to be stupid to call it a rip off.

There is also "2000 mW" model, advertized as "burning matches". The "1000 mW" hasn't got such such description, so I think their actual power is not more than 200 mW and 100 mW accordingly.

Inaba, there are 18 mini-rigs at the picture, not 240 singles. Correct the link.

There is a new move at the address for returns of double-paids:
http://blockchain.info/address/1BgPRMk4uaJrohM1T9Cn4Hd9pHaEL6FH5j

Look here:

But wait...
Judging from http://blockchain.info/address/1BgPRMk4uaJrohM1T9Cn4Hd9pHaEL6FH5j, Nefario just (a 2 confirmations ago) have started some moves with BTC from this address.
Is he going to make the final payouts now?

The small forum is simply quite new, and was kind of forked from here several days ago.
Simply use "SEARCH" button at the beginning of the page and search for BTCFPGA or cablepair. Than read a bit.

There are more than three companies preparing ASIC miners, but the others seem to be late.

At the last page you can find a useful link to http://forum.btcfpga.com.

Ignore MysteryMiner. I mean use "Ignore" button.
It's not worth listening to someone who makes bold claims while he can't even find pictures which were widely republished at bitcointalk.org or at Bitcoin Magazine.

I have the magazine. The general article "Fluttering Expectations" is on pages 66 to 69. Than there are two pages of something like Q&A. I found nothing about die size nor exact process size (apart of "the company already plans on reducing the size of their next generation offerings to 45nm or even dipping into the sub 40nm domain").
The new thing is something important for P2Pool - the machine will "send back shares as they are found".

I'm going to examine other pages.

Near all of the reported payments was done in these chains. I looked at the chains, found a pattern and finally I presented my best guess.
I used phrases like "I'm sure" or "I'm convinced", to show I present my opinion about a very probable event.
To proof otherwise we would have to sum all unreturned BTC (what people are waiting for) and see how big is the total in comparison to ~9000 BTC.

Not all, but most of them. The last 1000 BTC didn't go to proper people, so they have got nothing and are still waiting.

Just a few (I found just the two of Psychotic Boy's payments). Most of the rest are from 3762 BTC chain.
For me, the timing of the chains confirms the returning of the money but it also shows another thing: it is not done fully automatic (like me or many others would do), but rather by a group of commands - many small scripts written by hand. As such it is quite slow and prone to errors.  It worries me. It is not a good sign for successful passing of the assets info to the issuers.

Augusto, you have much greater experience with Bitcoin - do you see here any different pattern?

Does the insurance company reimburse the lost income of ASIC buyers? Just saying...

There is no any anonymization, apart of the Bitcoin mechanism itself.
The chain is an effect of using a series of commands to perform the payments - one transaction per a payment, instead of one transaction for a group of the payments.

When you have a transaction identifier of a payment (like at the beginning of this thread) or a blockchain address (like above) of the payment or double payment,
you can quite easily trace at blockchain.info the chain back (where came the money from) or forth (where went the rest to).
Looking at the chain starting from the 1000 BTC you will see there is a row of smaller transactions, where the main quota is getting smaller and smaller, and each transaction forks a smaller amount into different address. When you look at these addresses, you will see that near all of them has received this smaller amount twice: the first time on 16th Oct (from one of the big chains, starting from 5000 or 3762 BTC) and the second time on 18th Oct (from the chain starting from 1000 BTC).
Many of the transactions were confirmed by people here, so I'm convinced I'd guessed it right.

Only 17% is REPORTED in this thread, but I'm sure the whole 90% was returned.

There were 8762 BTC returned in two chains: 5000 BTC and 3762 BTC.
The last 1000 BTC of the latter was mistakenly distributed as double payments.


The last example has proven to be of money returned to DeaDTerra:

As you see, Nefario supposedly returned near all BTC of users, but the last 1000 BTC which went to improper people.
So part of the people (~1/9) still got nothing, but they should get their money soon, when most of the 1000 BTC is paid back and Nefario send it again, with proper addresses this time.

People are still paying back the double payments.

It's a pity. There are a few people (in another threads), which obviously should have been on your ignore list.
You wouldn't waste time feeding the trolls.