Haha very true. I might just stick your pool in there somewhere
|
|
|
I really like the idea of the new reward method, looks interesting, but I already have 3 pools I send hashes to. I wish I could mine on all the interesting pools!
|
|
|
Major connection issues right now, looking at pool stats, everyone is having the same problems.
|
|
|
subSTRATA: I've seen the dev saying before that it takes about a week of uptime for the "u" value to be accurate.
I see you've only been running that instance for 2 min, that'll happen.
|
|
|
Sorry, it's 2.10.0 this has been seen on two different machines running this version on win7 64bit. Edit: pinned again!
|
|
|
Why is this not pinned anymore?
Edit: I am seeing a frustrating problem. I wonder if it is the software or the pool. I am using a new pool connected by the stratum protocol, and occasionally it will be declared as "not responding" by bfgminer. It then falls back on a backup pool, which is good. What I don't understand is why it doesn't attempt to reconnect to the higher priority stratum pool. The software appears not to re-attempt connection once it has been declared dead. The only way to force it to reconnect is to restart the software. This is frustrating when using a MMQ because it resets the clock speeds, thereby affecting overall hash rate.
|
|
|
There is a lot of animosity and accusations being thrown around. I see no proof that this is the actual BTCOxygen pool operator "harassing" people on irc, I only see someone using that nickname. As others have said in this thread, there are two options BTCOxygen is working against his own best interests to circumvent irc bans and bother people to no discernible advantage and, more likely someone is posing as the pool operator to immaturely sabotage his character.
|
|
|
How do you know this isn't other people looking to besmirch his name by doing that? Where's the proof, since it's not just one IP.
|
|
|
Oh yeah I know. It's tough to ignore though.
I think anyone who doesn't have a backup isn't serious about mining. Haha
|
|
|
doublec, What's the word on i0coin balances being paid out?
|
|
|
Fair enough. I'll stick around, see how it goes. I'll be adding another 1.6gh sometime this week.
|
|
|
The low fee definitely drew me to this pool, but with the controversy surrounding it is making me wary... I'm sure I'm not alone.
|
|
|
I agree with juhakall. You should really make it clear to people that this is a proxy pool, and explain what that is, in addition to being a little more transparent as to who you're sending our hashes to.
|
|
|
I'm trying this for a little while, pointing 1.6gh your way. On your website you advertise "Instant Payout" which isn't true. I'd take that down, if I were you.
|
|
|
Anyone else notice the Estimation shown on the dashboard page isn't showing the right estimation? I don't think the code has been changed to reflect the reward halving. Also, the PPS rate on the main page definitely appears wrong.
|
|
|
Since there's been less than 140 blocks produced in the last 24h, I would say that the hashrate is going down.
|
|
|
Yep, my workers are connected.
|
|
|
Communication problems all day, causing switching between this pool and my backups. Miner can't connect to the pool, then is able to connect about 10 seconds later, repeating a few times, then goes dead, my miner switches to backup, bitparking comes back and my miner switches back, and about 5 min later the cycle starts again. This all negatively affects the output of my hardware, has cut my hashing rate in half. I've disabled this pool for the time being, until it gets better.
|
|
|
Depends on your definition of reasonable, also depends on which exchange you base your value on. I think my offer was a good starting point.
|
|
|
You said you were taking offers.
|
|
|
|