Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 04:28:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
321  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [4000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 3.5%,DGM 1.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining on: April 28, 2013, 07:31:16 PM
Personally I think DMG is a dead end... not good for miners but ok for the pool.

Why don't you simply use eligius' payout schema so the pool can never go broke? It's at least fair and easy to understand. My primary issue with most payment schemes are that they punish users when they have punish miners who have downtime --- more than they reward miners who don't have downtime. Which is why I only mine on pure pps or prop pools. Although I would make an exception for elegius... except I want to be able to register a username and have more stats than having to search for a payment address.

If you were to use that with the existing "lock in payment addresses" for each worker/user that would be a winner.


322  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Best 7950 card right now?? on: April 27, 2013, 03:13:21 PM
So I happened to pickup a couple of the gigabyte cards - imo the custom cooling in junky. The cards vent heat in all directions and in addition to that the back side of these boards become quite hot. No chance of running these on board without it overheating whatever's behind it.

IMO the ref. design with the canister is much better since it vents out the back of the case.
HIS-iceQ or Sapphire Vapor-X are the best options imo.

323  Economy / Economics / Re: $55 - really? Really? Really? on: April 27, 2013, 02:10:29 PM
I'm fascinated by this math but it doesn't seem logical to me. I don't think the break-even prices you give are constant. Now I haven't thought about this a lot so there's a strong likelihood I'm wrong. Please show me where.

Manfred says currently he mines 6.3 BTC/month at a cost of $150/month or $23.80/BTC
Adrian-x says the same (I'm guessing) calculation gives him $17.76/BTC

It seems to me however that at current BTC prices similar rigs must be profitable for everyone else as well. This encourages more people to mine raising the difficulty.

As the difficulty goes up, your constant hash rate rigs generate LESS coins at the same energy costs. RAISING what you see as your break-even rates. So say the hash rate doubles and difficulty doubles. Now aren't your break-even rates $47.40/BTC and $35.52/BTC respectively?

Do you simply recalculate your particular rigs minimum break-even every time the difficulty changes?
Can you do this calculation in advance? Or are you simply doing it retrospectively.

personally, I recalculate it periodically.

I choose to evaluate my operation as a whole. Total cost to run relative to earnings at btc/usd rate. I include a repayment plan for any hardware i've purchased. Often this amounts to vastly reduced earnings in a given time period, since I'm inclined to think of the $700 profit as 'paying off' the last 2 graphics cards I bought and only making 100 bucks that week.
324  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Butterfly Labs Jalapeno Unboxing on: April 22, 2013, 01:17:08 AM
Am I the only one who wants to see the new single case?

Me too.

Personally, I'm just hoping that the single actually start shipping around the time the jallys do... because it's starting to feel like ordering larger units was a mistake.
325  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 18, 2013, 08:36:02 PM
Yes Stratum is pooched for me also - attempting to submit a share disconnects from the pool.
326  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [Try Now >>>] BTCOxygen.com - PPS | 2% fee | Stratum | Auto-Payout on: April 18, 2013, 07:37:25 PM
Hi,

The DDOS has ended.

Pool is back up again.

If anyone has troubles please let me know.


Regards
BitcoinOxygen

Thanks for all your hard work... Decided to give it one more try. Pools back up for me & login is nearly instant.

Keep this up and you'll be getting even more of my gh/s rigs as they come on line this week.

327  Economy / Economics / Re: = Grand Unified Solution to Lost Coins, Hoarding, Deflation, Speculation = on: April 18, 2013, 07:01:44 PM
The end result of deflation is always a destruction of an increase of prodution capacity and capitol to the point ware where  goods become so scarce plentiful that they stop falling in price and the deflation burns itself out diversification occurs.  The greater the deflation the more physical capitol is wasted or lost diversification of production occurs.

FTFY & L2MacroEconomics.

328  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Investor Funded PPS Pool - Concept. on: April 17, 2013, 08:22:37 AM
 It's an interesting idea... but frankly... why bother.

Why not just use something along the lines of Eligius payout schema so the pool can never go broke. . .

329  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [Try Now >>>] BTCOxygen.com - PPS | 2% fee | Stratum | Auto-Payout on: April 17, 2013, 02:51:14 AM
And pools dead for me again.

It was good for almost a week before this.

And I still can't login.

Guess I'm done.

330  Economy / Economics / Re: $55 - really? Really? Really? on: April 17, 2013, 02:33:34 AM
For the millionth time in these forums. The price of BTC has absolutely nothing to do with the price of mining. The difficulty will adjust towards making mining a break-even venture. The difficulty rate lags the price due to the time it takes to bring miners on and offline. The price is solely determined by supply and demand.

poppycock.

Just keep repeating it to yourself over and over until you believe it.

Miners are the primary suppliers of bitcoins for sale at sane prices. The vast majority of miners sell some large percentage of mined coins to cover electric and hardware costs. Whatever's left they speculate with...

The degree of speculation of any subset of miners is up for debate, it can be as simple as holding until the price reaches some point or as complicated as day trading.

~

Speculators probably actually control more bitcoin that miners... but they generally aren't placing market orders like most miners are.

What he meant was that the prices can go way lower than the production cost, in which case miners might simply stop mining.
It is not like the prices on the market are hardcoded just because it is the cost of production, that's a fallacy.
The $50 a bitcoin is a pretty tough resistance, but if it breaks through it, mining might not be an economical venture for many.

Some might choose stopping the mining altogether until the price recovers, and some others might think that it is just temporary and simply keep generating bitcoins at a short term loss believing that the prices will rise again in the future and recoup their losses then.

Agreed. I don't know very many serious miners (10s or 100s of gh/s of mining hardware) who'd operate at a loss for very long...

That being said, I'm still adding GPUs to my fill slots on my rigs. the 7950s I'm buying are still profitable at anything over 12.50 But I'm not actually selling any btc currently. I pretty much sold all my reserves when it hit 240, so the hardware I'm adding and the electric costs are covered until the end the end of the year. Now I'll just forget about the market and take another look in december. My biggest decision is how much of the left over fiat from my profit taking pre-correction should be used to purchase btc at these lower prices.

331  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: I think BFL deserves a bit more benefit of the doubt on: April 17, 2013, 02:19:29 AM
1) So the update said pretty much what I was expecting.  The software is almost done, we have changed the power profile and had to change the board design to accommodate which is almost done, we are shipping out the dev units, and doing all the little 100's of details that make for a properly engineered and tested product.    No surprise here.  In fact, encouraging as it gives insight into exactly where everything stands. 

I think we are 2 months or less at this point.   

Notice that this is not surprising exactly because they have been saying these kind of things since october.

Also, please read the latest BFL propaganda again.
They want to stress that the chips are absolutely fine, except that they use up more power than was designed. But that's still ok, according to BFL.
But it's not. If the ICs use up a lot more power than designed for than there is something bad with the chips as well.
You have to look for those details because if there is one thing that i've learned about the way BFL operates then its that this little "the chips are fine" will turn into "We'll have to redo most of the ICs" in a couple of weeks.
The problems with the board were also fixable 'with a little tuning' and they would have delivered their product a couple of weeks ago.
Now the story has progressed over a couple of communications from 'Just some minor power problems with the board, will be done in a few days' to 'we need new boards and have no real shipping date at the moment'.

I guess that's just the difference in perception between us. Having been involved in a myriad of products from the initial design all they way to finished product... I can tell you from personal experience that having chips come out drawing more power or generating more heat than expected isn't the end of the production cycle. Sure it can change the game. But you don't just junk the entire design and do something else.

Once upon a time intel was developing Silverthorne - it was designed to an x86 processor for cellphones. They were trying to compete with motorola and mitsubishi. The tech worked, but needed more power and generated way more heat than expected. This tech didn't just dry up and go away... The changed the sales model, rebranded it under centrino as "Atom" and pushed it for handheld devices like tables and netbooks. This lead directly to the explosion of tablets as a consumer product. I don't believe there's a single cell phone that has an atom in it... but there are micro computers (in use as terminals and budget pcs) and hundreds types of tablets and 'netbooks' (micro laptops) that use them.

BFL is on the right track - redesign the board to supply the power needed while keeping temps stable, change the sales specs and ship the coffee warmer to consume the old tech board that would have been singles. Personally I think the very best move they could make would be devolping something where the top of it was a massive heatsink. and making it modular, to be plugged into the rack assembly they would sell. I'm thinking 4u rack that takes 3 mini-single modules. maybe just 4 chips per device.

I think the biggest hurdle for them is giving up the tiny size they had from FPGA days, get over it, go a bit bigger so you can cool the thing effectively... etc. Give me a metal packaged chip (or 4) that on a board that has AM3 holes for mounting a cpu heatsink and fan on top of it... that would make me very happy. Design the entire thing with a stacked heatsink that has a pair of 120mm fans on each side... design them so they could be assembled into a wall via interlocks on the sides, top and bottom of the case... one side air intake and other side of the wall being the exhaust... have the thing blow through.
332  Economy / Economics / Re: $55 - really? Really? Really? on: April 17, 2013, 01:56:19 AM
For the millionth time in these forums. The price of BTC has absolutely nothing to do with the price of mining. The difficulty will adjust towards making mining a break-even venture. The difficulty rate lags the price due to the time it takes to bring miners on and offline. The price is solely determined by supply and demand.

poppycock.

Just keep repeating it to yourself over and over until you believe it.

Miners are the primary suppliers of bitcoins for sale at sane prices. The vast majority of miners sell some large percentage of mined coins to cover electric and hardware costs. Whatever's left they speculate with...

The degree of speculation of any subset of miners is up for debate, it can be as simple as holding until the price reaches some point or as complicated as day trading.

~

Speculators probably actually control more bitcoin that miners... but they generally aren't placing market orders like most miners are.

333  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: I think BFL deserves a bit more benefit of the doubt on: April 16, 2013, 07:07:19 AM
Lets be a little fair here, Avalon shipped 300 units in 3 months, second batch starting shipping today (im correct?), lets say, if the total numbers of Avalons is 900 by end of May and we consider 1/4 of what BFL claims on production rate, BFL will mach the number of Avalon units in a week and half if they start shipping in June....


Avalon shipped 300 units in 3 months, you cant order because they are always sold out, they are expensive, what are you guys expecting the people to do? Even if you order a 4th batch Avalon, you probably dont going to get it in a long time too.


Thats why people order BFL units and pray.

As for who win and who losse, like in any bussiness, there are winners and lossers, who preorder a Avalon 1st batch won, who preordered BFL lose, thats the end of story, you just cant start complaining because you taked your chances with BFL and lose, its getting tiredsome of hearing people compaining of BFL, nobody forced you to preorder BFL, ask a refund and do something else, if not its because you know you dont have other choice.

And there is not always refund choices when a bussiness goes wrong people.

Well that and based on the accounts of the manufacturing equipment they've got... they should be able to produce hundreds of units a day once they have a production model nailed down.

I believe the game has changed however... specifically - with the old power/hash numbers I figured that the jalapeno was going to be the dog of the line... and now it looks like that might the best seller, and people make end up purchasing hundreds of them rather than dealing with the larger models. That could be really good for bfl and extremely annoying for farm owners. But probably good for bitcoin in general.

334  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Difficulty after BFL on: April 14, 2013, 04:41:44 PM
After BFL Batch 1 & 2, and Avalon Batch 3, and ASICMiner we'll probably be in the mid 40million range - maybe by June?  Then the oddities like Helveticoin might come in or some other unknowns.  Either way GPUminers will be in Altcoins.  From then on it will be an all out ASIC arms race.  60-100 million by July?  You buy more ASIC if you think BTC will go to 1000USD never knowing what the cap on hashrate will be.  Electric rates will start to matter by this time next year and the Gen2 or even Gen3 units will start coming out.

Or BTC has another issue and something like LTC or PPC takes over - unlikely but you never know.

My numbers say... 150 mil... but if a new player jumps into the ring it could be double that.
335  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: I think BFL deserves a bit more benefit of the doubt on: April 14, 2013, 04:39:57 PM
Hrm interesting.  I had only just first heard about them about 4 or 5 months ago.   I lurked on the forums and what not for a few months and did my research.  Avalon's offer is way more expensive and seems to be less well designed.  ASICMiner, I really don't know much about them.  I know you can buy mining shares on their system, and I spend an hour or two trying to figure out how it works but I really couldn't.  The BFL solution looks the cleanest, and most high end.  If they were selling on being first to market thats news to me.  I had not seen anything that promised that anywhere.  Maybe I'm just late in the game.

Then you don't understand the full scope of how deep their lies go. In mid Oct 2012, they were saying "Honest abe, we're shipping in October. We're world leaders in microprocessor design!" Now it's mid Apr 2013 and nothing has changed. Oct shipping was a lie. Nov shipping was a lie. Dec shipping was a lie. Jan shipping was a lie. Feb shipping was a lie. Mar shipping was a lie. Apr shipping is their latest lie.

OP, I think you've got it pretty much right on... the company is legit, but completely inexperienced in actually delivering this type of product.

When I ordered my fpgas from BFL I was told it would be 2 months to have them delivered... they arrived 3 weeks early. When I placed my pre-orders for upgrades... I was told "expect a shipping date before march 2013"

From my perspective, I can call them anytime I want and have someone speak to me. I could if I wanted to request and get a refund... and from my perspective they're 14 days behind on shipping. Sure I was excited when they mentioned a ship day in october... but my plans were all done based on what the sales rep told me at the time of the order. So yes, I'm slightly annoyed that avalon shipped first, but I'm honestly expecting BFL to start delivering product any day now.

Even if the company is struggling on the tech side of things, the fact that they've adjusted numbers on hash rate, price and power consumption indicates to me that they're in the process of solving these issues. Expect a product soon. Anyone who says that "BFL Lied" is basing that off a misguided sense of entitlement rather than facts. Things happen when bringing a product to market, I sure some things could have been explained in a more timely manner... but so far they've had good enough reasons for the delays. Switching the packaging for example is a multi month delay at least, usually around 6 months in my experience.

I believe they'll get it sorted and a product shipped soon.


336  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [Try Now >>>] BTCOxygen.com - PPS | 2% fee | Stratum | Auto-Payout on: April 12, 2013, 07:51:37 AM
Well the miner disconnect issue does seem to be fixed... Too bad I can't seem to view the account page to see how things are going...
337  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ASIC Owners (or anyone with lots of FPGA): Cashing out BTC on: April 11, 2013, 10:01:16 PM
So here's the thing - you're going to have to use verified accounts at some point, and it's going to cost you some tax at some point.

Personally I'm verified at mtgox and cavirtex.

Whenever I get into the 8000 a month range just use the other. Depending on your immigration status, various laws affect you.

I do not, for example have to report income earned in another country while I'm a US resident. So I use the cavirtex first and wire into a royal bank account. Anything that goes into my US accounts I have to pay income tax on.

A couple ideas that help -

cultivate local buyers, some locals coming to you with cash to buy btc so they can go buy whatever it is on silkroad. Legally you'd still have to pay taxes on cash sales... but hey what you evade is your own business.

Buy some other store of value for btc - gold and/or silver come to mind, sure you'll get completely hosed on the markup but it's pretty much anon.


Eventually, if you can sustain your income level, you're going to have to incorporate yourself as a business - deduct hardware, maintenance, electricity & network services, pay yourself a wage you can handle paying income tax on... and let the business own all the hardware. You can 'cost of doing business' almost anything in this scenario including your own healthcare, insurance etc... and it's easy enough to grow it as your income increases... simply add some additional employees - who's job it is to have additional exchange accounts... etc. This amounts to going completely legit - and how much profit taking you can do is entirely dependent on you paying the associated tax costs and wages and whatnot (according to your local law).

The massive plus here, is that you'll have complete control over how much your business actually makes - and you always have the option of simply accumulating bitcoin that you don't cash out.



338  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: 2 Avalons on a private pool on: April 11, 2013, 07:58:28 PM
No, you should use a public pool. You should find a block every 2/3 days.

So if i should find a block every 3 days and a block gives 25BTC that should give me about 8BTC per day.  Is that feasible on a public pool too?
Yes, also mining on a public pool has the advantage of being regularly compensated.
If you go solo anyway - you will make the network stronger Wink

I think the real breaking point for solo mining is somewhere above 1% of the total network. If you're getting close to that probably best to go solo.

In real terms, if you could scrape up a terahash you ought to find between 2 and 3 blocks per day. Which should be plenty for anyone.

339  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: We ,btc avalon buyers, could losing the game. on: April 11, 2013, 07:52:18 PM
Pure failed logic.

ftfy.

It doesn't matter what unit of denomination you keep your books in. The real judge of value is "what can I buy with it" -

at the time you bought your avalon with btc... you could have instead bought 1000 USD or 242 gallon of petrol. This is a valuation of what you spent to purchase the goods. It is incidental that what you chose to buy has the function of generating bitcoins for you. This is called income.

The key is use the same method of valuation for your income as you have for your expenditure.

So what if bitcoins increase in value and have a higher price on your exchange... as long as you can spend some of those bitcoins and buy you 1000 usd or 242 gallons of petrol... as long as you do spend the income.... you've made 100% ROI on your investment.

You're confusing speculation and capital gains with income and expenditure.
340  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official CedarTec Topic - New ASIC [Scam?] on: April 11, 2013, 07:38:41 PM
What would happen if you don't reach 1000 pre-orders? Do you have to reach a minimum quantity of pre-orders to begin mass production?

The same that will eventually happen if they do... they'll vanish with whatever profit they were able to scam.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!