Thank you Redacted , Time is of essence on this GB as you are very well aware so keeping close eye on Hashrate
|
|
|
Try removing the top cover , I have read it helps with cooling & hash rate , Hashrate on both worker 1 & 2 has been averaging below ~ 270 Gh/s.
|
|
|
I assume that BTCT will push all remaining balances to the public BTC address associated with the accounts. And since that's the address that Deprived has on file for shareholders, it doesn't make a big difference if he pays dividends on BTCT just before the shutdown or if he does it to the BTC addresses (other than that a BTCT dividend is orders of magnitude less work).
You forgot transfer fees for sending dividends.
|
|
|
There are lot of unanswered questions about future of LRM , what will happen to liquidity of the stock in future when we are off bitfunder , also hashrate per bond doesn't match the bond price now & by the time mh/s per bond goes up difficulty would have offset the increase in MH/s , LRM is lagging behind in race against difficulty .... hope we have more answers from LRM.
|
|
|
More importantly how much hashing power are the bonds currently worth and when will they hit the magic 100/MHs as promised in the IPO?
My current calculation is 5250000 mh /55207 bonds = 95 mh/bond so we are still short 5 mhs!
Lab_Rat, Any news on the next delivery?
Good question , We need to keep-up with difficulty , getting more Mh/s or Gh/s per share when difficulty has become 3x of current difficulty will mean we will still earn near about same dividends as we are today with current Mh/s per share.
|
|
|
How many shares are left , also BTC price is up , will the share price be corrected accordingly ?
|
|
|
Why anyone would want to continue supporting these Belligerent Fools at Life is beyond me.
Just let them go bankrupt already if they don't get arrested and sued first.
If you care about Bitcoin, you should care enough not to support these corrupt clowns.
Life is too short to reward their behavior.
What are you talking about? If someone placed an order last year or months ago and wants to change to "Mining by the GH" then what is the problem? Is changing an order (without giving any more money) really supporting them? Especially if this helps them to profit a little more than otherwise, or again, like me - avoid Customs taxes - which is getting to be worth more than the miner. The pain must run deep... Learn from past , do the maths , will any one ever make any ROI from "Mining by the GH" , there already many group buy on this thread already mining @ current difficulty level , which are cheaper than "Mining by the GH" but ROI on those group buys is still difficult , STOP Advertising for Black Fucking Hole , Parasites of Bitcoin world.
|
|
|
How about all the share holders are to sign a message from their designated BTC address in a particular format to conform ownership , this will also verify , payout address is valid as well.
|
|
|
Chinese got carried away on BTC cool-aid ,................... NOT !
|
|
|
150: Not so tired anymore, feeling fresh and recreated. Thank you, bitcoin.
I am already tired of 150 man !
|
|
|
So any estimates on dividends we can expect per share Redacted
|
|
|
STOP posting about stupid BFL ponzi schemes on this forum
|
|
|
If i understand, this week dividends were the last scooped div' .
The next dividends will be the "493MH/s" per bonds or i'm wrong ?
Lab_rat did not mention any thing about delivery of Bitfury gear which would be spread in 2 batches & also 2 weeks of mining on new gear as per THE PROPOSITION
|
|
|
I know this is temporary. But this fee, taken out of bond holder dividends, appears to be wrong no matter how you slice it. For two seemingly obvious reasons:
1) 25% of all mining is taken out for exactly for this kind of expense. Labrat fee's and operational costs and whatever is left is suppose to be for re-investment. How could this not be a LabRat fee or operational cost? So, if it ends up that there is a little less for re-investment, that's just the way the 25% cut got allotted out this time. 2) Even if #1 could be explained away, which seems very unlikely, being paid more on (undisclosed) LabRat fee's an extra $700 to essentially do data entry for about two hundred bond holders seems very expensive. I imagine it could be done in three hours; and that would come out to about $230/hour doing essentially data entry.
All that said. I do think you wanted to be fair, or at the least wanted to do what is best for LRM. But this seems to be an oversight that directly conflicts with any such positive intention. So, if I'm missing something obvious or key, then sorry, but let us know.
+1. Dividend is the sole reason for getting into LRM , any -ve news on dividends hurts , particularly for early adopters who bought @ 0.15 ~ 0.16 per bond
|
|
|
I hold 67 shares & dividend I have received is : 0.06198876 BTC , which doesn't add-up to BTC0.00129834 x 67 - 0.0025BTC fees -0.025 BTC.... grnbrg. Sorted
|
|
|
I hold 67 shares & dividend I have received is : 0.06198876 BTC , which doesn't add-up to BTC0.00129834 x 67 - 0.0025 BTC fees
|
|
|
Almost forgot , is Lab_rat mining going to run KNC gear
|
|
|
Lab_Rat do you have ETA on delivery of bitfury gear for October
No date guaranteed as of this time. I'm unsure as to how much and when, but I'll be speaking to Dave in person within the next couple days. Ok , reason I asked is some here managing group buy of October delivery Bitfury gear have already started to get their miners .. hope we get ours soon.
|
|
|
Lab_Rat do you have ETA on delivery of bitfury gear for October
|
|
|
Redacted , what have you found about down Jupiter , what is the reason for failure , would you know ?
I heard a rumor on the R6 thread that it was the PSU being overloaded. If that is the case & magic smoke is still inside the box , redacted has other PSU he can use so it should be a easy fix , hoping for best.
|
|
|
|