It is surprising how brainwashed these Germans are. During the recent state elections, the only anti-immigrant party (AfD) received a huge surge in support (scoring 24.5% in Sachsen-Anhalt, 15.0% in Baden-Württemberg, and 12.6% in Rheinland-Pfalz), but still the pro-immigrant ones (SPD, CDU, Greens.etc) received enough support to form state governments in all the three states. Low IQ people deserve extermination. No sympathies.

In a lot of places if you call the police for a woman assaulting you as a man, you go to jail. You could be drenched in blood and swollen with a knife sticking out of you some times and it makes no difference.

Current RESEARCH?

this is a construction project and it's not that complicated.

Seven hundred miles, assuming 15B is $3750 PER FOOT....

turkey is the #1 sponsor of terrorism and deserves everything it gets

Except ginger people - they have no souls 

you fire warning shots into the air then shoot at the invaders if the warnings go unheeded, doing harm to a wrongdoer before he can do harm to you is called defending yourself. this is what the israelis do and their wall is 99% effective at keeping illegal african muslim infiltrators out of the country. same for bulgaria and its border with turkey.

Emory's student newspaper, The Wheel, said Wagner outlined four steps that administrators plan to take in order to address the issues raised by the protesters who said they were in pain in a campus-wide email.

Wagner added that the Freedom of Expression Committee is meeting to address whether the person or people responsible for the chalking were in compliance with Emory’s policy.
 
He said that they would debate technical issues, such as whether or not the chalkings were done on an appropriate surface.
 
However, he believes that the broader concern motivating the protests had to do more with the ideas the chalkings stood for than how they were done.
 
The Wheel also reported that the students this week chanted, 'You are not listening! Come speak to us, we are in pain!' shortly before Wagner agreed to meet with them.

Poor babies. Social media responded...

'The crybaby students forfeited any expectation of an open discussion with their demands that any talk or chalk of Trump should be banished from their fantasyland.'
 
 'I have no idea how you kids will survive once you get out into the real world. People have different opinions than you. You need to grow up, and fast.'
 
One person also wrote: 'Within a year I am ashamed of both my undergraduate college (Yale) and my graduate university (Emory Law, '77).
 
'I am a liberal supporter of Clinton and Sanders (the former by a shade) and I want to shout at the thin-skinned crybabies on these campuses who are so obsessed with 'safe spaces' and so dismissive of free speech values: "GROW THE F*** UP !"
As we summed up recently, no matter where you go in life, someone will be there to offend you. Maybe it’s a joke you overheard on vacation, a spat at the office, or a difference of opinion with someone in line at the grocery store. Inevitably, someone will offend you and your values. If you cannot handle that without losing control of your emotions and reverting back to your “safe space” away from the harmful words of others, then you’re best to just stay put at home.

I wonder what they´ll come up with to stop the guy. A lone gunman seems unlikely, he must have extremely tight security and besides nobody at all would believe the lone nut story. Which would mean a conspiracy, so that´s out of the question. Some third candidate that would take votes off Trump? But that would put Hillary in. Maybe that´s what they really want. She´s the big darling of Wall Street, the war industry, garbage media, psychopaths, retards and useful idiots on the internet.

I was just pointing out some common facts that any University educated person in the US already understands. I have no opinion on the subject....

And, as far as the social programs that the rich put in place: they put them there for they're own protection!  Do you think that police are hired to protect the poor?  Or, welfare programs are in place because the poor get paid well?  Or, prisons are built to house investment bankers?  Police are hired to stop the poor from slapping the shit out of the rich and taking back their money!  Welfare programs are in place to appease the unemployed so as to maintain a larger labor pool!  And, prisons are built to house those who disagree with the system!

Don't agree with the tax system?....don't use the highways, don't bitch when your water is polluted, don't call the cops when a hood rat threatens to take your stuff, and don't complain when you're city is bombed!

I'm not directing any of this at you specifically....I'm just trying to illustrate a situation that I think we're over simplifying.  Believe me, I have no opinion....I have more than I will ever need thanks to the free market.  I just think it's important to point out facts rather than chase delusions.  The world is constantly at war!  There is a huge global wealth disparity.  And, there is a controlling population of over privileged people who are too distant from global reality, too caught up in there baser daily activities, and too arrogant to listen to facts.

There are no easy questions, no perfect solutions, and no reasonable expectations that people will begin to be fair with one another within the context of our current global economy.

Why was bitcoin conceived? Was it conceived to concentrate wealth or redistribute wealth? How does it fit into our current global economy?  Things are getting BIG!  We need to  start thinking on a macro-scale rather than confine our thinking to our micro-realities! You want to turn a profit off of bitcoin? Embrace its global potential!

People can't sell things for less than they cost, or they quickly end up with nothing.
If they don't make money, they can't keep working.


....


You think rich people get their money from poor people.

If that doesn't sound like a joke to you, then you have serious problems.

First, you might want to consider the fact that corporations as they currently exist are actually a product created by Government regulations.

But let's examine what a business is. A business typically produces goods or service. Those products must necessarily be in line with market demand or they would not make money and go bankrupt. People voluntarily exchange the products of their own labor (money) for the products that the business is selling. In a free market this a voluntary exchange of value for mutual benefit.

Here's the funny thing. In free markets the price is determined by supply and demand. In Communism this "price" must be arbitrarily determined by the central authority. Socialism must attempt to set prices by mimicking the pricing of private business. In any socialist country, without some private business, they wouldn't have a clue how to determine prices for government services. Socialism and Communism lack the pricing mechanism of free markets and that is why it eventually results in huge shortages or excesses. Read about what is happening in Venezuela right now. Venezuela is a heavily socialist country.

In a free market a business will grow only if they are providing good value to their customers. Yes, they can cheat their way to profits for a while perhaps, but if people feel they are getting screwed then anybody can use that as an opportunity to enter the market as a competing business. Competition is the natural limit to excessive greed and corruption. Think about your logic here. Without government interference please tell us again how a business would "rule the world".

If a business is doing such an exceptional job that nobody can compete with them, then honestly why is that so bad?  

Let me point out something else completely ridiculous in your thinking. You seem to be terrified of free market monopolies, yet have you considered what the government actually is? A government is by definition a monopoly! They are using legal authority to tax you and provide you services of which you have absolutely no choice.

Try not paying your school taxes because you chose to send your child to private school. Try hiring a private security company to protect your property because the city police are completely useless and would rather hand out speeding tickets. In both cases you'll probably get thrown in jail.

Let's say I came to your house when you weren't home and cut your grass without your permission. Then later I sent you bill demanding payment. You didn't pay, so I came to your house and threatened you with a gun. Would that be moral thing for me to do? Of course not, yet that is exactly what government services are.

You need to understand the difference between voluntary and involuntary interactions. Socialism is a system that must implemented and enforced through law (aka force). Free markets are not a system. They are simply what happens when people interact voluntarily for mutual benefit.

Well if you think my logic is reasonable than how would you answer that question?

I don't know for sure, but I'd suspect it's precisely for the reason that they are becoming increasingly Socialist.

You could probably say that an increasing wealth disparity is the same thing as a decreasing or shrinking middle class, correct? Just like you could say that a lessening of wealth disparity would indicate a growing middle class. It's always been seen as a great success of the USA and similar western societies that they've had a large middle class where anyone could earn a decent living at a job.

To me it seems to make sense that in an environment with the most economic freedom you'd have a lesser wealth disparity. 100 or 200 years ago there was next to nothing for regulation, income tax did not exist, people understood that nobody had the right to steal their productive output. Liberty was just common sense! Fast forward and we've seen increasing regulations, increasing taxes, welfare state, war on drugs, and an overall decrease in individual freedom. It costs a TON of money to police the world, incarcerate people, wage perpetual wars, and promise everybody free shit under the illusion of "rights". The problem is it's extremely wasteful and so resources that should be in the hands of the poor and middle class are being taken to administer this monstrosity called the US government. Huge wealth disparity is the price we pay for bureaucracy!

There is a difference between productive work and unproductive work. Production and wealth come from growing food, building things, and saving! Whereas what government (socialism) does is pays people to dig ditches all day and then somebody else to fill them back in every night.