Wow , is it possible til now to send a transaction with zero fees ! why would miners waste their time and power to confirm such a transaction ? and the funny part is It takes only 3 hours to get confirmed which a transaction with fees can take that time I thought that the days of free transactions have ended and it was in the first years only It has a high priority. By default miners still have 50KByte reserved for transactions without fee, ordered by priority. The large input has 20,743 confirmations with ~1.7BTC value so 1.7*20743/144 =~244 bitcoin days. According to blocktrail[1] the TX in total had a priority of 9,668,496,460. Top 20 in terms of priority of the ~9k TX waiting for a confirmation on my node: 2,341,582,826.15384626
2,678,532,626.43181849
2,711,615,384.61538458
3,583,972,950.30769253
3,838,105,476.83333349
3,887,977,272.72727251
4,339,554,642.87179470
4,555,239,070.75471687
5,127,570,661.25000000
5,890,474,793.37179470
6,702,525,091.12820530
7,597,765,363.12849140
11,361,882,744.00000000
24,793,105,508.09659958
25,484,776,241.69230652
41,091,759,995.17335510
52,068,086,846.15384674
54,065,099,355.51281738
320,256,652,601.80767822
476,436,860,679.24530029
So the TX in question would have been on spot 9. [1] https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/bb02b06bb38799ab02560b52cd7eec7973e046b58c2682336b5d986fdfcf24d6 |
|
|
|
You can try to open the TX in a browser. If that fails the network has probably forgotten about the TX. In that case you can reset the blockchain, this should return the coins to the wallet. If they are back you can recreate the TX. |
|
|
|
Hi,
So a few days ago while blockchain was kinda f***ing up, i sent a 0.137 payment from my cellphone bitcoin wallet app to my coinbase wallet. As with 2 other payments that day, that have still to be confirmed according to the wallet.
Now I just checked the tx that my cellphone wallet app provides with them, and the transaction can no longer be found on the blockchain.
Where the hell are my bitcoins? the only proof i still have of them is on my cellphone wallet...
Thanks
The network probably forgot about the transaction(s). Can you resend them from the phone wallet? If not you might have to reset the wallet, which do you use? |
|
|
|
|
What if the insurance is a scam? How much are you willing to pay for it? The bitcoins have to come from somewhere. If everyone is just blindly "investing" in ponzis, because "herp derp I has insurance" it wouldnt work or be very expensive.
|
|
|
|
trying to send a transaction with one 2500 satoshi output (P2PKH), one P2PKH input and one op_return output with 2500 satoshi fee. Won't send in sendrawtransaction RPC on bitcoin-qt 11.2.
Get "dust" error. I thought the minimum output was much lower than 2500 satoshi.
Is this a bug or or something else? What am I missing?
using bitcoinjs-lib to build transaction.
Current default dust limit is 2730 satoshi. It used to be 546, but that was changed due to the spam attacks. |
|
|
|
I think it was like a passphrase to generate privkey .
Thats a brainwallet. |
|
|
|
again i am not talking about scams, i am talking about selling cracked, hacked and carded stuff.
Yup, you're not. You're talking about banning someone based on the assumption that he/she broke the service's(unrelated to bitcointalk) TOS. Bannable offense that is , my young padawan /sarcasm mexxer you got something wrong, i never asked or assumed to ban people  The tough question though - which I might have overlooked in my enthusiasm earlier - is where is the border? 80% discount is probably carded, how about 50%, 20%, 12.499999%? You asked hilarious if they think an 80% discount is legit, but ignored their question about where the cut off point is between obviously carded and quicksale. The board will most likely stay as it is, if its obviously illegal (fake IDs) it will be removed, if its borderline (99.79% discount) it will stay. |
|
|
|
Noice infographic, did you get it from the main site?
Yep, its theirs not mine. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I get a warning for a transaction I received sometime.I pay attention to see is this happens in all recived transactions or only for some of them.
It will be only for some, the reason for the message is most likely the malleability[1] that was crudely fixed recently. Older clients will create transactions in a way that is now considered non standard. [1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_Malleability |
|
|
|
Hi Guys,
I'm not sure what's happened but I received 0.33372462 at this address: 1LZNqjVoBZfVVamwQZXf4LUAZe3Cknpgyf
Then after 3 confirmations and a few hours I sent it to another address:
1HqGFCEK4oi8Dd5rjmQwe7vMNFbTcvd4eJ (TX ID: eacccb00cb1bf4c8e07444b7a9a652348ac801568b47807d7c8c98359a2a694b)
But the transaction apparently never happened.
I closed the client and re-opened and my bitcoins have not returned and the transaction disappeared for my MultiBit 0.5.16
The last transaction in the wallet which shows me receiving the bitcoins has the status "This transaction is not standard and should not be trusted. Seen by 1 peer. Appeared in best chain at height 393,956."
What can I do?
And I get the same warning:"This transaction is not standard and should not be trusted".But when the transaction has confirmed all is fine.I use MultiBit Classic 0.5.19. Do you get the warning for a transaction you created or for a transaction that you received? MB Classic should not create non standard TX. |
|
|
|
I am fed up my btc address is 15JURdV1yTBHiSeUoTCKpxPtGynvShbTWh I invest 10 usd in 19 january but still not received my payment  Here is the present status of my invest screenshot please help me http://prntscr.com/9u6ephIts confirmed, its not a bitcoin problem. Contact the service's support. |
|
|
|
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
should do it. I ran both commands but unfortunately I'm still at the old version, when I start bitcoin core it still says I'm on 10.2 What does cat /etc/apt/sources.list
show? |
|
|
|
Hello @ all,
I am new to bitcoins and this forum, i do have some question :
Can i sell Virtual Goods? Or is that not allowed?
As long as its not stolen (aka "cracked" or "hacked"), carded or otherwise obtain illegally, yes. I plan to sell stuff that cost from 1$ to 100$ there is 1 important question can i ask to use escrow even for 1$?
Im pretty sure you can find someone willing to escrow 1 USD worth of BTC. |
|
|
|
I was just wondering if, we would have been given the total freedom to trade and use bitcoins just like the way we are doing today if, some trader(s) on this forum where Satoshi Nakamoto? I'm just saying this out of curiosity because i've noticed the way most trader(s) do throw -gative trust rating!  Freedom includes the negative rating I gave you, why should it be only your freedom to steal and sell that stolen property and not mine to warn others about your actions? |
|
|
|
i was thinking what if a guy hold the majority of the node(that does not share the same network, but they are placed all around the world) and thus he can control the majority of the votes, and basically kill the consensus
is this even possible assuming that this guy exist?maybe i'm missing something, but it appear to be very doable if you have the money...i know it's not so different than having the majority of the farms, but instead of doing a 51% to the network, you control it with all your nodes
Thats the sybil attack franky1 was talking about. -> http://www.coindesk.com/chainalysis-ceo-denies-launching-sybil-attack-on-bitcoin-network/-> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weaknesses#Sybil_attack |
|
|
|
253 is possible to attack, maybe not for you, but its possible. Anyway, see my edit, it was not this exact script that was used, but just something like this.
Up to what strength is an attack still possible nowadays (say assuming lots of money) ? Is it something like 2^64? I tried to google that but could find no clear answer. Hard to say, it mainly depends on the attacker. 2 53 is based on someone with two strong gaming GPUs. This someone could be an old bitcoin miner with a high number of now obsolete mining GPUs. If you consider the GPU nodes of one of the top500 machines[1] (e.g. your state or near university trying to get your coins) the GPUs they use (e.g. Titan[2] has 3072[3] Tesla K20s[4] with 2496 cuda cores ea.) should be able to do ~45Mkeys/s[5] each or ~138Gkey/s. If those estimates are correct, they would go through 64 bit in ~4.3 years. That is certainly not feasible to get 3,500 BTC, but it shows who important a strong RNG is with todays technology. None of these estimates assume any weaknesses in the algorithms used, but rather a bad RNG as basis for the keys. [1] http://www.top500.org/[2] https://www.olcf.ornl.gov/titan/[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cray_XK7[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_Tesla#Specifications_and_configurations[5] basis for the estimate are the 1664 cuda cores of my GTX 970 that do ~30Mkey/s with highly optimized software like vanitygen. |
|
|
|
I was just thinking about setting up a node in order to "vote" for bitcoin unlimited, my favourite solution in the blocksize debate. As I can see here seems like very few people are running a full node, I can't understand why. I read instructions on https://bitcoin.org/en/full-node , but I can't understand some things: - I have roughly 6 mbit/s for download and 0.8 for upload, will it suffice? Will my connection still be usable for surfing etc? It will take a while until you have cought up, but it should be enough to hold 8 connections to the network. You might have to turn the node off if you do other things that need a high bandwith (e.g. video steaming). - how much hours/day have my node to be running to be considered an active node?
Depends on who you ask. Some say if you dont accept at least 100 connections from the outside (slightly exaggerated) you are not even running a full node or only "leech" the network. I think its nonsense. Every node helps, even if you only run it for a few hours a day. -can I run more than one node?
Yes, but they would share the already little bandwith you have so it makes no sense to do so. Why less than 500 people are running a node different from core?
Other implementations are unpopular among node operators. |
|
|
|
Don't you think you should check with theymos first before taking things into your own hands and going renegade?
This is why you need to join us on IRC. I have previously only really trashed threads if they explicitly state that they're hacked or cracked etc but it's not going to do any good if there's no consistency and only you or a couple of staff are trashing threads by newbies whilst everyone else's are left alone.
I have only removed those that seemed like they were illegal (e.g. "they're hacked accounts"; "don't change password"). Besides, it is pretty obvious if someone is selling yearly subscriptions for a few dollars. If it was legal, they'd be rich by now. I reported all theads bumped (or posted in or created) today in that fashion. As always, act on the reports or label them invalid so I know Im wasting my time with them. Even with my report numbers a few bad reports should drop me a percent. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
