I think ICO investors are decreasing day by day. Many well rated ICO projects can't make even the soft cap! I think this fall of ICO is happening because of the lack of investors! And many Investors stopped investing because of the bear market. What do you think about this?
ICO investor has already been decreased. As you said, most of the ICO failed to reach the soft cap. But I can't say its because of lack of investor rather its because of scam ICO. People are afraid of investing in ICO for that reason. So, you can't say it's because of lacking of investors. |
|
|
|
|
Although the whole market is red, I'm very much afraid of holding ETH now. In my opinion, ETH was fluctuated to its ATH when people were more interested investing in ICO. Nowadays ICO is almost dead. That is why it has less demand. I don't think it will get another ATH soon.
What's your thoughts on it? Should I hold now?
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, it's really a big one. Congrats mate.
In my case, I got once 0.90 ETH which is the highest in my life. Although I did not participated in a lots of bounty.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a clear pumping from a/group of person. You can see the maximum supply is lower. Anyone with a little money xan easily pump such a coin.
|
|
|
|
|
You might have lose your coin if someone aims to do so via a new wallet. Through that wallet, someone can easily hace access to your wallet. So, it's better to check their source code and find out some opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Bounty is the best way to earn altcoin regularly and have a passive income. You can also earn through Airdrop but most of the airdrops are shit now a days.
|
|
|
|
I think the bearish moment for ETH has been ended. If you see the current situation, it's good and stable now. ETH price is turning around $280 and any moment from now it can be increased. Again, if you see the last 14 days usage of ETH, the last two days were quite high before the average. It means total usage is also gonna be increased which will force ETH to have some upward trend. |
|
|
|
|
Investing in ICO is definitely worthy as long as it is a legit one. But, nowadays, most of the ICOs are a scam. So, if you want to put your money on ICO, you have to research a lot. For your info, don't trust the ICO review service. Most of those are paid review. That's why I recommend you to do your own analysis before going to invest.
|
|
|
|
Prrrrft is just salty he got banned from the slack for concern trolling. This is literally all he has ever done in the expanse slack. Atleast a few times a week he would do this. Ask anyone from the EXP chat.
Check it. I specifically remember when Chris was talking about doing a charity event for Borderless Charity to give back to the homeless center, or maybe it was a woman's center. Anyhow, Prfft went on for about 3 hours saying that what we were doing was wrong. Who the hell bashes on a charity??? Now you're just making stuff up, post a screenshot. For the record i always thought the charity was a nice thing and if i did anything to attack it i apologize. Why are you even trying to discredit me anyway. I haven't said anything that isn't either true or my honest opinion and now i'm being accused of 'concern trolling' and attacking a charity? That's low man, really low. If anything is toxic in the community it's this right here. I'm not making stuff up. Maybe you forgot the scenario, but the definition of being toxic is exactly why you were banned. We get suggestions and open ideas all the time. They are very much welcome. As i said, show me exactly how this happened. I'm not a person to bash a charity and again if i said anything to undermine the charity i apologize. Whatever way my comments came across i can assure you i didn't mean to badmouth the charity. You think you're open to ideas but in reality you're not, i saw it on the slack all the time. Someone says something and team member will say 'great feedback, we're going to do that!'. And then nothing happens with it. Then if people start to ask further questions you get more and more annoyed. Or in that case, maybe you are open to ideas, but you don't process them, and then get annoyed when people are still asking for it. Another thing that often happens is someone asks you a question, you give a partial answer which doesn't really answer the question, they keep asking and the team gets annoyed. As a result the conversation gets more bitter with each response. The person asking the question doesn't feel understood and the team members feel attacked (somehow). Now i'm the kind of person who will not let something like that go and i'll keep bringing it up until something actually happens or until i get an actual answer, and that's how i frustrated you. I never meant to do or say anything bad or particularly critical but the team's constant avoiding reaction steered the conversation that way. I'm part of many communities and nowhere do i have a problem like this, most are very friendly and positive. There's something wrong with the way you handle certain community members - if you handle it well a situation like this can at all times be avoided. You can say it's my responsibility to keep the peace but it really isn't, its yours because it's mainly in your interest. I mean, it isn't just me. I've seen team members be horrible to other members on the slack too. It's always the people who ask sensitive questions though. You have to find a way to deal with that. As a dev team you can't allow yourself to feel attacked that easily. Maybe you should take a look at how other dev teams deal with community feedback/questions/concerns. Obey chat rules, and all will go well. Otherwise, ya get banned. Thanks for the apology, but that still has a long way to come from all the other toxicity. It's not about asking sensitive question. The problem was that we would answer your question several times, but you would keep going on like we would ignore you. Maybe it wasn't the answer you wanted to hear or was looking for, but the fact remains we answered it accordingly. A lot of communities face similar problems, from shilling of other token projects to fud. No crypto project is the perfect utopia when it comes to the overall community. Even bitcoin has its problems. An example is that I was banned from the ETH discord for posting information in thread where moderators specifically instructed me to do so. One guy, who wasn't even supposed to have admin access, banned me because he didn't agree with the news of the article. This was just news, no shill or fud. I'm not trying to patch things up with you or get back into the slack, i could make a new account but i have no interest in following the project any further. I apologized for that specific instance because if anything of the sort happened i take responsibility for it, and i'm not going to let my account get slandered like that. I've said it before and i'll say it again, if i kept asking it's because you didn't answer my question sufficiently. The team has a long-standing pattern of answering questions without actually saying anything, or just trying to discredit whatever the source was. I've seen it happen to other people as well, for example the guy who was asking about the Tokenlab price bonuses for larger investments. He didn't mean anything bad, just wanted your point of view and the conversation turned incredibly toxic. In like 3 sentences the conversation turned to slandering Vitalik Buterin, because he said something like ICO's with bonuses don't understand how it works, instead of answering the question. What in the actual hell. It wasn't the guy asking the question who made that toxic, it was the team's reaction. It's such a cop-out answer to say "there can be no utopia". It's a way of saying everything you do is as possible and whatever bad stuff happens is not your fault, it's again very fitting for the attitude of the team. There's always something to improve. first of all, we answer all the questions. this isnt some shady scam project. sure, EXP faced a lot of heat after ETH messed up their DAO and many considered EXP would soon follow, but it did not. The DAO is finished and moving towards beta testing next year. Next, VB made comments on his twitter account about ICOs being wrong about offering tiered bonuses. You asked why, and we provided an answer. This answer, word-for-word, because we decided to. That was the answer. However, because you did not agree with that answer, you, and only you, kept going on and on about why should not be doing that. My comments about anything VB says should not be credible since this is a guy that supports CP. There were many back and forth situations going like this each every time we did an update, posted a video, distributed the newsletters. It's situations like this, no I should say, exactly like this, is how you were trying to turn the community against us. A few others in that conversation understood what was happened, but as soon as the question was answered, that was the end of it. Only you kept pressuring us, kinda like you are now. Take it however you will. I've been in crypto since 2013. Have seen everything from straight up legit projects to 100% scams. There is no perfect community. Why? Because different folks have different strokes. I like something you may now, and visa versa. So let me ask you, what are your motives now? Doesn't seem like much has changed. I didn't ask anything regarding the tiered ICO, and i didn't participate in the conversation at all. I just read it the other day and reminded it. Show me a screenshot of me saying even a single word on that topic, it doesn't exist. Probably a lot of other things you think i did also didn't happen. I've been in crypto since early 2014 and i've also seen everything, and this project disappointed me. As for my motives, i explained them already. I came here to vent my frustration because it was the only place left to do so, and because you responded with personal attacks (and still are), i keep coming back do defend myself. I was already done with this 3 posts ago so do us both a favor and stop saying i did stuff i didn't do so we can end this. |
|
|
|
Prrrrft is just salty he got banned from the slack for concern trolling. This is literally all he has ever done in the expanse slack. Atleast a few times a week he would do this. Ask anyone from the EXP chat.
Check it. I specifically remember when Chris was talking about doing a charity event for Borderless Charity to give back to the homeless center, or maybe it was a woman's center. Anyhow, Prfft went on for about 3 hours saying that what we were doing was wrong. Who the hell bashes on a charity??? Now you're just making stuff up, post a screenshot. For the record i always thought the charity was a nice thing and if i did anything to attack it i apologize. Why are you even trying to discredit me anyway. I haven't said anything that isn't either true or my honest opinion and now i'm being accused of 'concern trolling' and attacking a charity? That's low man, really low. If anything is toxic in the community it's this right here. I'm not making stuff up. Maybe you forgot the scenario, but the definition of being toxic is exactly why you were banned. We get suggestions and open ideas all the time. They are very much welcome. As i said, show me exactly how this happened. I'm not a person to bash a charity and again if i said anything to undermine the charity i apologize. Whatever way my comments came across i can assure you i didn't mean to badmouth the charity. You think you're open to ideas but in reality you're not, i saw it on the slack all the time. Someone says something and team member will say 'great feedback, we're going to do that!'. And then nothing happens with it. Then if people start to ask further questions you get more and more annoyed. Or in that case, maybe you are open to ideas, but you don't process them, and then get annoyed when people are still asking for it. Another thing that often happens is someone asks you a question, you give a partial answer which doesn't really answer the question, they keep asking and the team gets annoyed. As a result the conversation gets more bitter with each response. The person asking the question doesn't feel understood and the team members feel attacked (somehow). Now i'm the kind of person who will not let something like that go and i'll keep bringing it up until something actually happens or until i get an actual answer, and that's how i frustrated you. I never meant to do or say anything bad or particularly critical but the team's constant avoiding reaction steered the conversation that way. I'm part of many communities and nowhere do i have a problem like this, most are very friendly and positive. There's something wrong with the way you handle certain community members - if you handle it well a situation like this can at all times be avoided. You can say it's my responsibility to keep the peace but it really isn't, its yours because it's mainly in your interest. I mean, it isn't just me. I've seen team members be horrible to other members on the slack too. It's always the people who ask sensitive questions though. You have to find a way to deal with that. As a dev team you can't allow yourself to feel attacked that easily. Maybe you should take a look at how other dev teams deal with community feedback/questions/concerns. Obey chat rules, and all will go well. Otherwise, ya get banned. Thanks for the apology, but that still has a long way to come from all the other toxicity. It's not about asking sensitive question. The problem was that we would answer your question several times, but you would keep going on like we would ignore you. Maybe it wasn't the answer you wanted to hear or was looking for, but the fact remains we answered it accordingly. A lot of communities face similar problems, from shilling of other token projects to fud. No crypto project is the perfect utopia when it comes to the overall community. Even bitcoin has its problems. An example is that I was banned from the ETH discord for posting information in thread where moderators specifically instructed me to do so. One guy, who wasn't even supposed to have admin access, banned me because he didn't agree with the news of the article. This was just news, no shill or fud. I'm not trying to patch things up with you or get back into the slack, i could make a new account but i have no interest in following the project any further. I apologized for that specific instance because if anything of the sort happened i take responsibility for it, and i'm not going to let my account get slandered like that. I've said it before and i'll say it again, if i kept asking it's because you didn't answer my question sufficiently. The team has a long-standing pattern of answering questions without actually saying anything, or just trying to discredit whatever the source was. I've seen it happen to other people as well, for example the guy who was asking about the Tokenlab price bonuses for larger investments. He didn't mean anything bad, just wanted your point of view and the conversation turned incredibly toxic. In like 3 sentences the conversation turned to slandering Vitalik Buterin, because he said something like ICO's with bonuses don't understand how it works, instead of answering the question. What in the actual hell. It wasn't the guy asking the question who made that toxic, it was the team's reaction. It's such a cop-out answer to say "there can be no utopia". It's a way of saying everything you do is as possible and whatever bad stuff happens is not your fault, it's again very fitting for the attitude of the team. There's always something to improve. |
|
|
|
Prrrrft is just salty he got banned from the slack for concern trolling. This is literally all he has ever done in the expanse slack. Atleast a few times a week he would do this. Ask anyone from the EXP chat.
Check it. I specifically remember when Chris was talking about doing a charity event for Borderless Charity to give back to the homeless center, or maybe it was a woman's center. Anyhow, Prfft went on for about 3 hours saying that what we were doing was wrong. Who the hell bashes on a charity??? Now you're just making stuff up, post a screenshot. For the record i always thought the charity was a nice thing and if i did anything to attack it i apologize. Why are you even trying to discredit me anyway. I haven't said anything that isn't either true or my honest opinion and now i'm being accused of 'concern trolling' and attacking a charity? That's low man, really low. If anything is toxic in the community it's this right here. I'm not making stuff up. Maybe you forgot the scenario, but the definition of being toxic is exactly why you were banned. We get suggestions and open ideas all the time. They are very much welcome. As i said, show me exactly how this happened. I'm not a person to bash a charity and again if i said anything to undermine the charity i apologize. Whatever way my comments came across i can assure you i didn't mean to badmouth the charity. You think you're open to ideas but in reality you're not, i saw it on the slack all the time. Someone says something and team member will say 'great feedback, we're going to do that!'. And then nothing happens with it. Then if people start to ask further questions you get more and more annoyed. Or in that case, maybe you are open to ideas, but you don't process them, and then get annoyed when people are still asking for it. Another thing that often happens is someone asks you a question, you give a partial answer which doesn't really answer the question, they keep asking and the team gets annoyed. As a result the conversation gets more bitter with each response. The person asking the question doesn't feel understood and the team members feel attacked (somehow). Now i'm the kind of person who will not let something like that go and i'll keep bringing it up until something actually happens or until i get an actual answer, and that's how i frustrated you. I never meant to do or say anything bad or particularly critical but the team's constant avoiding reaction steered the conversation that way. I'm part of many communities and nowhere do i have a problem like this, most are very friendly and positive. There's something wrong with the way you handle certain community members - if you handle it well a situation like this can at all times be avoided. You can say it's my responsibility to keep the peace but it really isn't, its yours because it's mainly in your interest. I mean, it isn't just me. I've seen team members be horrible to other members on the slack too. It's always the people who ask sensitive questions though. You have to find a way to deal with that. As a dev team you can't allow yourself to feel attacked that easily. Maybe you should take a look at how other dev teams deal with community feedback/questions/concerns. |
|
|
|
Prrrrft is just salty he got banned from the slack for concern trolling. This is literally all he has ever done in the expanse slack. Atleast a few times a week he would do this. Ask anyone from the EXP chat.
Check it. I specifically remember when Chris was talking about doing a charity event for Borderless Charity to give back to the homeless center, or maybe it was a woman's center. Anyhow, Prfft went on for about 3 hours saying that what we were doing was wrong. Who the hell bashes on a charity??? Now you're just making stuff up, post a screenshot. For the record i always thought the charity was a nice thing and if i did anything to attack it i apologize. Why are you even trying to discredit me anyway. I haven't said anything that isn't either true or my honest opinion and now i'm being accused of 'concern trolling' and attacking a charity? That's low man, really low. If anything is toxic in the community it's this right here. |
|
|
|
Are there any improvements made in last couple of months? Or is there any link i could read about it/them?
Not really, the team is all over the place. Tokenlab, website redesign, DAO, EXP.Pay, EXP.Life, VoteLock, whitepaper, marketing, EXR.... Honestly i'm losing track of all the things they are attempting. NONE of these things are finished. Note that most of these products were announced in the beginning of this year, and NOTHING has been delivered, except EXR. Most of them haven't even started yet! I've tried talking to them about it but they get frustrated and don't want to listen, and eventually kicked me out of the slack. A good project has a clear roadmap and clear goals. The Expanse team tries to do everything at the same time and as a result everything is half-assed. They were supposed to launch a roadmap in June. After half a year not even a draft has been released. How do you even operate without a roadmap???There is just a complete lack of direction - there is no capable CEO is able to oversee the big picture and prioritize the steps needed to get to the goal. I used to like this project but it turned out to be the biggest disappointment of all my investments, nothing substantially happened after giving them a year to accomplish something, and i know nothing's going to change because they make the same mistakes again and again. Some things have happened and there are some ICO's lined up, so things are slowly progressing, but man it could have been so much more, and so much better. The product i expected when i invested initially was and is still great, but i have little confidence it will ever get there. At some point someone will get a similar idea and execute it better, and Expanse will be lost. Like NXT was lost to NEM. Honestly they are not scammers, they mean well but they are just completely incapable of managing a project. Let alone something of this magnitude. Then why am i writing this? Well this message has 2 purposes: 1) To point investors in the right direction - which things to look at when they have invested. 2) To hope that the team gets their shit together: Understand what you're doing, why you are doing it, and prioritize. Figure out, in detail, what the hell you want to build and how it will work. Then make a step by step plan with SMART goals to get there.Now in response to this message they are going to say: He is a shill, paid by Ubiq or whatever. But they will not look at their process and try to figure out what they're doing wrong. They dropped 200 spots on CMC and still think it's because "BTC is doing so well", or "People are paid to make us look bad". I'm not a shill, i'm not paid by anyone - my account is almost 4 year old. I'm just terribly, terribly disappointed. I recalling banning you from Slack just because you were always toxic. Every single time we posted news, made a small accomplishment, or updated the community on, you were extremely critical. Even on tasks that were "completed", the criticism did not stop. So yeah, I would definitely call you FUD because a logical investor does not remain a critic when something is completed. I sure as hell wasn't toxic, i even vouched for and defended the project a lot in Q2, until i got just extremely frustrated by the team's behavior towards criticism and lack of direction. I even offered to help you out, several times, because i was seeing what was going wrong, but the team rejected my help. Of course i get more and more critical when every even slightly sensitive question is met by avoidance and personal attacks. Of course i'm not going to hype tiny accomplishments because i'm a long term investor - i don't care if you accomplish something which is not relevant for the big picture. If anything, it makes me more frustrated because the team treats it as some massive accomplishment (so many times overhyped), while i already know in a month it'll be forgotten and we're still at square 1. You expect your investors to jump on your bandwagon and if anybody does otherwise the team feels attacked and feels like these people are toxic. Guess what? That's a shitty attitude for a team. Investors have real concerns and when they voice them there are only 2 options: -The concern is unjustified so you can explain it away -The concern IS justified and you should process the feedback. And if it turns out you are unsuccessful in explaining the concern away, you probably missed something because you either didn't understand the concern correctly or your answer is not sufficient. I can't believe i have to explain stuff like this, it's elementary. Take your reaction to my post as a text book example of what's wrong with the Expanse team. Instead of addressing my points one by one and showing you actually do have a plan and know what you're doing, you AGAIN respond by calling my reaction FUD. I'm a disappointed investor and this forum is the only way to vent my frustration, which is something completely different because you sure as hell fucked up to get me to this point. N.B.: when i say you fucked up i mean that the team has a complete inability to handle criticism, a bad attitude where they treat people with genuine concerns as toxic, and very poor self-reflections skills. Only the worst of attitudes will get my this worked up. For the record, i was holding up to 100k EXP for the better part of this year and lost about 30BTC, and i'm not even talking about missed profits. That's my bad, because i invested in a bad team, lesson learned. But maybe that helps to get it through your head why i feel a need to vent here. You treated one of your biggest investors like shit. |
|
|
|
The result of unreasonable work of developer
Since 2014 years only 2 stock exchanges, so stupid
In addition, the chile on the road map was expected on Q3-Q4 2017,
now mid-December - where is the result? Nooo
again miss deadlines
irresponsibility and illiteracy, 1 developer
That google translator failing my fren still, what he means makes sense I hesitated, but decided to quit. Didn't like the way the dev started to write some useless article on medium to beg bittrex to keep him, instead of looking for at least one new exchange. Five days isn't much, he has to lead a project, not taking himself for a journalist. Thanks, I made some $ out of that coin. He is looking at new exchanges, obviously.The article is just a good response to the situation. If it turns out from a legal perspective Bittrex has no reason to delist SAFEX, they might cancel the decision or relist the coin. Moreover, it invokes investor confidence. In other words: Daniel is handling the situation. He's proven to be reliable in the past so i'm sure he'll come op with new places to trade. The community is strong so listing fees another big exchange can be acquired by donation if needed. It's ridiculous to think this situation will have any long-term impact on the project. Development will continue and it'll be listed on another big exchange sooner or later. |
|
|
|
Pffrt,
I agree with you on every point.
2 months ago I did some research on Expanse progress and many planned deliverables have been delayed for 2-3-4 months.
The roadmap and information about infrastructure dApps were moved to less transparent locations. It is unclear whether identity and social networking dApps will be ever released by Expanse.
TokenLab platform already misses the deadline for Nov-Dec, no ICOs are on sight and hopefully that will not change.
I also asked sensitive questions and the reaction was the same - going on personal attacks rather than answering the technical details I was interested in.
Wow i'm so glad i'm not the only one, thanks! |
|
|
|
Are there any improvements made in last couple of months? Or is there any link i could read about it/them?
Not really, the team is all over the place. Tokenlab, website redesign, DAO, EXP.Pay, EXP.Life, VoteLock, whitepaper, marketing, EXR.... Honestly i'm losing track of all the things they are attempting. NONE of these things are finished. Note that most of these products were announced in the beginning of this year, and NOTHING has been delivered, except EXR. Most of them haven't even started yet! I've tried talking to them about it but they get frustrated and don't want to listen, and eventually kicked me out of the slack. A good project has a clear roadmap and clear goals. The Expanse team tries to do everything at the same time and as a result everything is half-assed. They were supposed to launch a roadmap in June. After half a year not even a draft has been released. How do you even operate without a roadmap???There is just a complete lack of direction - there is no capable CEO is able to oversee the big picture and prioritize the steps needed to get to the goal. I used to like this project but it turned out to be the biggest disappointment of all my investments, nothing substantially happened after giving them a year to accomplish something, and i know nothing's going to change because they make the same mistakes again and again. Some things have happened and there are some ICO's lined up, so things are slowly progressing, but man it could have been so much more, and so much better. The product i expected when i invested initially was and is still great, but i have little confidence it will ever get there. At some point someone will get a similar idea and execute it better, and Expanse will be lost. Like NXT was lost to NEM. Honestly they are not scammers, they mean well but they are just completely incapable of managing a project. Let alone something of this magnitude. Then why am i writing this? Well this message has 2 purposes: 1) To point investors in the right direction - which things to look at when they have invested. 2) To hope that the team gets their shit together: Understand what you're doing, why you are doing it, and prioritize. Figure out, in detail, what the hell you want to build and how it will work. Then make a step by step plan with SMART goals to get there.Now in response to this message they are going to say: He is a shill, paid by Ubiq or whatever. But they will not look at their process and try to figure out what they're doing wrong. They dropped 200 spots on CMC and still think it's because "BTC is doing so well", or "People are paid to make us look bad". I'm not a shill, i'm not paid by anyone - my account is almost 4 year old. I'm just terribly, terribly disappointed. |
|
|
|
this coin did an ico almost 2 years ago...and all it has delivered is a wallet, new website, and a dividend calculator.
this dan guy makes alot of promises, i've read all the threads, and yet there is always a consistent delay or excuse.
and this coin is trading at 40 million market cap? wtf?
alpha coming, beta coming, chille coin coming....
this is a one man show with a secretary....why doesn't he hire more programmers or make a team?
what a joke.
Someone please comment this. Is it true? This coin indeed had an ICO in 2015. Originally SAFEX was to be built on the Maidsafe platform, but because that platform had too many technical difficulties it wasn't going to happen. In 2016, after too much delays with Maidsafe, in a community vote it was decided to build a new blockchain from scratch. Since then work has progressed nicely and everything Daniel delivered has been top-notch. Yes there have been delays, but he always delivered in the end, and put quality over speed which is the correct prioritization in this business. It seems Daniel and the team learned from their mistakes during the wallet release (promising too much too fast) and i doubt they will make the same mistake again. fud or not, these are just the facts. dan may be a talented guy who could pull it off, but there is a reason why he's pretty much a one man team and nobody else is working on it...funding? business skills? if you call progress nicely a wallet, website and calculator, then sure. of course everybody here who holds coins will shill...i'm just presenting this as i see it, from someone who doesn't and wont' hold any coins. Indeed development hasn't gone extremely fast, but more has happened than that - the groundwork has been done for the project so now development has truly started. He's also not a one-man team anymore. The team has been expanding the last months with economists and developers. Furthermore, Daniel has some crazy skills from his background working in finance, so he's more than qualified to lead this project. They also have quite the dev fund because Daniel invested wisely over the years, they could go on for years if they needed to. I've been following this project since the start and i see that over the last 6 months: - The community has grown fantastically. Lots of new and engaged people and initiatives - The team has expanded, and delivery has been speeding up. - The team is becoming more and more proffessional. However you look at it the project has merit. The question is if they are going to deliver, and i clearly think so. Not based on wishful thinking, but because i see a healthy development of the project. |
|
|
|
this coin did an ico almost 2 years ago...and all it has delivered is a wallet, new website, and a dividend calculator.
this dan guy makes alot of promises, i've read all the threads, and yet there is always a consistent delay or excuse.
and this coin is trading at 40 million market cap? wtf?
alpha coming, beta coming, chille coin coming....
this is a one man show with a secretary....why doesn't he hire more programmers or make a team?
what a joke.
Someone please comment this. Is it true? This coin indeed had an ICO in 2015. Originally SAFEX was to be built on the Maidsafe platform, but because that platform had too many technical difficulties it wasn't going to happen. In 2016, after too much delays with Maidsafe, in a community vote it was decided to build a new blockchain from scratch. Since then work has progressed nicely and everything Daniel delivered has been top-notch. Yes there have been delays, but he always delivered in the end, and put quality over speed which is the correct prioritization in this business. It seems Daniel and the team learned from their mistakes during the wallet release (promising too much too fast) and i doubt they will make the same mistake again. |
|
|
|
i am trying to put order on btc/usd market for 4290 price, but it said me
XBTUSD price can only be specified up to 2 decimals.
what that means??
i thought decimals means numbers after ","
why it doas not let me put order on 4290? but let put order on 4300???
I had the same thing, just reload the page and it'll work again. |
|
|
|
Update: Refreshing the withdrawal page a lot works. After ~10 refreshes it put me through to the withdrawal page and submitted a withdrawal successfully
Coins or Fiat? Fiat (EUR) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
