Rumor, Mercedes next year will be back in his color.

They will be the Silver Arrows again.

Source (in Italian) https://www.formulapassion.it/motorsport/formula-1/f1-team/mercedes-tornera-freccia-argento-nel-2022-599197.html

I think they've all been doing this. I remember in 2020 Mercedes stopping development halfway through the season to work on the future car for what were then the new 2021 regulations, before it all got put back a year.
TBH I would be very surprised to see Ferrari leading the pack. Even if they somehow manage to build a car that's as good as a Merc or a Red Bull, Max and Lewis would still be someway down the road, as Ferrari don't have the drivers to challenge.

This will be a hard month for teams that have a lot of african players. Liverpool is probobly in biggest trouble and to me they will probobly drop a few points,Chelsea is also playing really bad lately and i dont see them at second place it will be really hard,i think Man City will make their advantage a lot bigger

No they are not spending more than they are earning, but most of them are just surviving doing one of the most dangerous combat sport on earth.
I watched some interviews and fighters spoke how much they pay for fight camps, and it's lot more money than you think.
Higher ranked fighters does earn much more if they are unbeatable like Khabib or if they trashtalk like McGregor did in his prime.

Boxers don't have middleman and they don't work for anyone so they are getting complete payment, not just percentage from deal.
They can have any sponsors they choose, and they don't have to pay many coaches for all different sports.
Dana White is saying that MMA fighters earn more but that was expected to hear from him, but UFC is top league so fighters in other organization earn much less.

Floyd Mayweather earned more than $560 million
vs
Conor McGregor earned around  $15 million

Came across this article today, it's in Greek, but I'll summarize quickly. You could also use Google Translate through Chrome.

Basically, the following article is mentioning two of most dominant predictions about Bitcoin, it's collapse or skyrocket, surpassing $200.000. A few examples of experienced analysts and  economists are mentioned below. Firstly, Tom Lee, of Fundstrat Global Advisors, believes that the price of bitcoin will quadruple by 2022, reaching $200.000. Another crypto market analyst, Nicholas Merten, agrees.

The main principle the article is following is that throughout the past few years, Bitcoin didn't crash below its lowest point. For instance, in 2016, its lowest point was $365, while in 2017, it was $780. And this pattern follows for the rest of the years. With the same logic, Bitcoin won't fall below $27.734, the lowest point of 2021.

On the other hand, the famous economist and professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University, Steve Hanke, claims that while the price of bitcoin is close to $ 50,000, its value is zero. The head of the largest bank in the world agrees with him. According to JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon, bitcoin has no value.

In conclusion, we're seeing two sides of the same coin. On the first instance, we're seeing market analysts, praising Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, while on the contrary, well-known economists, who are also related with large bank/financial institutions, are against Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general. I'm not sure if it's a coincidence or not...

What's your take on this matter?

Source:
https://www.liberal.gr/market/bitcoin-tha-ektoxeutei-sta-200-000-dolaria-i-tha-gkremistei/423177

Borussia Dortmund according to Bild is rumored to give a possibility to Haaland to sign a new contract with them.

They are talking about an offer of 12m/y with a deadline set to the end of February.

The plan I think is that the new cars generate a lot more downforce from ground-effect, through carefully shaped channels on the base. This means that when they get close behind another car, they still keep most of the downforce, whereas a current car relying on barge boards etc loses a lot when right behind another car.

So in theory, yes, cars should be able to follow more closely without losing downforce... which should lead to better, closer racing, and more overtaking.

But yes, you'd still expect to see Mercedes first, followed by Red Bull. I think a lot of the Mercedes problems this year were due to how the changes affected high-rake and low-rake cars differently, which caught them out... so 2021 gave other teams a chance. Next year they could well be ahead again.

Actually I didn't expect liverpol to lose and Chelsea to draw.

I don't think it was mendy's fault. Headers are hard to deal with because you just don't know where it's going unlike a shot. If anything, those two Chelsea defenders beside Welbeck that did very little to stop Welbeck from making that header. Aside from the goal, Chelsea's attacking efforts were futile at best and Brighton looked like the better team in the last 10 - 20 minutes of the match.

Only problem with Chelsea or Liverpool dropping points is that City doesn't follow in that fashion.

Fighters spend a lot of money on training camps so that 10K is not enough to cover everything, and most of the money sponsors are giving is going directly to UFC and I think fighters are getting small share.
No fighters is allowed to sign any separate deal with any sponsor and that tells you everything you need to know.
Nobody wants to reveal exact earnings but we know that many complained about paychecks and UFC is not allowing them to create some union

I agree with this. There is no scenario where Ferrari could be better than Mercedes or Red Bull during this era, eventually there will be engine changes as well and with these new car setups I am pretty sure that cars will be closer to each other so mistakes from any mercedes or red bull driver may end up causing ferrari drivers to get some more points. However, even with more points, I am pretty sure it will be at max 5th for drivers and third for constructors with these engine differences.

Ferraris only opponent at this moment is Mclaren, and that's going to be the case this year as well. I may see Vettel and Aston Martin to be a bit more decent, that's expected but I doubt Williams could ever be better, they are just not good enough to be any decent, not in the 3-5 range at least, maybe they will be better than what they have been so far, but not too much position change.

Luna is pumping up these days. Some people claim that Luna will be the next Solana. But some people claim that Luna doesn’t worth to invest because it’s overpriced. So, it will crash soon.
I have a question to ask. Does Luna worth to invest?

Are Ferrari suggesting that they don't expect to start with a strong car in 2022?

This article begins with the F1 CEO talking about how he expects at the start of the season, some cars will be a lot better than others, due to how they've each interpreted the new rules. I think anyone would agree that this would be as expected, similar to what we saw at the start of the current era, when no-one could touch Mercedes. But then it goes on to a quote from Binotto at Ferrari, who I think sounds quite negative and effectively says that Ferrari's biggest strength is that they can catch up with whoever starts the season ahead.

Well, not for nothing but we caught a Golden Cross today guys.

ADDED:

You TA guys wanna explain to me what this mean on low volume?

All I can find is something that says there is a buying attempt without available assets to fill.

Here’s something that could repeat.  If price history could be used as an indicator...



Both initial resitances happened after around a 30% sell down.  First bounce usually is just that, a dead cat bounce before going back down to accumulation mode.  So yeah..  It could be another couple of weeks before we see BTC starts trending up agai.  But that’s if we don’t see it break down below 40k.