Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 12:16:04 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 [162] 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 ... 296 »
3221  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [AUCTION] Rare extra-large Bitcoin Block from BTCC Mint, w/ 26+ BTC, NO RESERVE! on: July 06, 2016, 06:45:47 AM
- 3 stars
I think I missed it.  I can't find what the 2 star / 3 star means.
It's a marking on the coins/blocks



I'm not quite sure, but if I had to guess, there's gonna be another one for each halving
(1 star for 50BTC blocks, even though imaginary, 2 stars for 25BTC blocks, the current ones, 3 stars for 12.5BTC blocks, next week and after that 4 stars for 6.25BTC blocks in 4 years)
3222  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: DeathProxyX defaulted on a loan on: July 06, 2016, 06:34:00 AM
For starters, nobody should lend to someone with a history of defaulting loans. No, the lender doesn't need to stipulate anything around the price of BTC. If the borrower takes the payment in bitcoin and agrees to make the repayment in bitcoin, that's the end of it. How did this 50 (or 100??) Euro's come about? Bank transfer? Mailed him a note?
Neteller, according to OP.

The lender should have had a stipulation that if the price of btc were to rise to a certain amount that the loan needs to be repaid or the collateral will simply be kept by the lender to cover the loan, and then used that 50 eur to purchase sufficient btc. Or when the loan became overdue, the lender should have used the collateral to cover as much of the loan as it could as of when the loan was originally due, especially if the borrower was no longer responding to PMs
As I understand OP, the "collateral" was handed over to the lender at the moment the loan was supposed to be repaid/the borrower was already late with repaying the loan.

It's a late loan and he have 50 euro as collateral (that cover not less than 80% of loan value). Then he send me first, a lot of time, amount bigger than 0.08 BTC and never had an issue, as he could confirm. So stop accusing.
I'm not the one accusing, OP is. Then again, this thread is titled "defaulted on a loan" and not "is late repaying a loan". Anyhow, not going to argue over words here, it makes no difference to the situation.
But if we're at it, what's about your past loan defaults, say this one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1340291.msg13670896#msg13670896)?
Are you also just very very late on them? It's been half a year, that's just a "late repayment", not a "default", right?
3223  Other / Meta / Re: Is it possible for mods to state reasons for deleting posts? on: July 06, 2016, 06:05:38 AM
You could always quote them for us and let everyone take a look.
Maybe we can find out what's the matter without mods having to add it to each and every deletion they make.



There isn't any reason other than off topic replies or spam deleted by mods.
Actually, there's more. Basically everything that could in any way violate one of the forum rules.
Unless you want to break all these rules down to either a) spam or b) off-topic replies.
Then there's repiles to posts that get deleted,...
3224  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [RAFFLE] BitPiece Prototype coin (only 3 exist) - 0 tickets available on: July 06, 2016, 06:00:38 AM
And to confirm, the winner is chosen from which character from the block hash? First? Last?
Make it first and I can guarantee coin@coin comming out as the winner.
It's usually the last, and as it isn't specified here, I'd expect it to go the common way, hence last.
3225  Economy / Services / Re: Free bitcoins for your signature on: July 06, 2016, 04:58:12 AM
I saw the OP sent some bitcoin to Lutpin. would be nice if Luptin vouch for it if he think it is legit and not an hacking attempts.
OP delivered what they promised to me. It was however just for 0.00045BTC, so no kind of big vouch out of me. But they delivered.

and the 10 cents may cause you lose your 6700$. lolz... becareful folks...
Never saw someone losing their bitcoins over signing a message from the address they were held in. Would be a new one to me.
Anyhow, the address I signed from is empty now, good luck stealing anything from me (in any possible way).

I don't understand what is the need of signing a message with our bitcoin address for getting this giveaway.
It proves you're the owner of the bitcoins held in that address during the snapshot.

I strongly feel the newbie is just a scammer and have attention to hack or steal money with some trick or ways. this looks so shady for me.
OP just wants a cut from the free lumen they can claim via stellar.org using the signed message. Kinda the same like with the distribution of clam back in the days.

and the give away don't even worth to sign a message.
Depends how many btc you're holding in your addresses and how long you need signing a message from them.
3226  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: If I install and use Electrum, then will I be able to export my bitcoins? on: July 06, 2016, 04:35:21 AM
will I be able to do that without the help of an Electrum server?
Yes.

For example will I be able to export my private key to a web wallet for using my bitcoins there? Or any other possible way?
Exactly that way.



You'd use Wallet -> Private Keys -> Export (then decrypt your wallet, if you've encrypted it)
You'll get a list of all private keys currently included in your loaded wallet file and the according addresses.
You then can export those either by hand or as csv/json file.
3227  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [AUCTION] Rare extra-large Bitcoin Block from BTCC Mint, w/ 26+ BTC, NO RESERVE! on: July 06, 2016, 02:11:15 AM
(I can't say it's the largest block ever mined, but certainly, it's very rare to see a block with over 26 BTC in size.)
Sorry, but you're not even close.
https://blockchain.info/block-index/1107294/
https://blockchain.info/block-index/1081405/
3228  Other / Archival / Re: . on: July 06, 2016, 01:22:34 AM
I this an auction by the way? (I could have started with that question).
Yes, but you have to pay an mandatory entry fee, regardless whether you win or not.
It's not much though, just your soul.

3229  Other / Archival / Re: Need a Lender for 0.05 BTC with 20% interest repayable in 10 days on: July 06, 2016, 12:23:33 AM
Lutpin would you be willing to hold this account as collateral?
Yes.
3230  Other / Archival / Re: . on: July 06, 2016, 12:22:32 AM
is this the right place for the free sandwiches?
Yes, but no line cutting, please.

I'll jump on the mitchell group buy but im afraid i might get all brass if i do.
I think Mitchell Brass luck is over, after all, I only got a single brass from my last Mitchell unboxing (and got flipped off twice Lips sealed ).
3231  Other / Archival / Re: Need a Lender for 0.05 BTC with 20% interest repayable in 10 days on: July 06, 2016, 12:14:54 AM
I would be willing to fund .048 of this loan with your account as collateral with .0057 repay in 10 days. Any interest?
In case you don't want to lose money, retract/edit that offer. Else, I'm sure OP will pick up on it.
Alright as Lutpin reccomends, offer changed!
I was more talking about the extra 0 you had into your repayment amount...The loan would result in a lose for you.
3232  Other / Archival / Re: Need a Lender for 0.05 BTC with 20% interest repayable in 10 days on: July 06, 2016, 12:11:40 AM
I'm willing to put my account as a collateral, though I'm i a signature campaign right now.
I would be willing to fund .048 of this loan with your account as collateral with .0057 repay in 10 days. Any interest?
In case you don't want to lose money, retract/edit that offer. Else, I'm sure OP will pick up on it. Wink
3233  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Bitmine.ML Satoshimines (Moneypot) (PROMO) on: July 06, 2016, 12:07:26 AM
This app is owned and operated by BitCasino.
A user which I would not trust honoring any promotion/contest based on their prior activity.
If you value either, your time or bitcoin, I'd advice you to pass on this thread, aswell as any other threads made by OP.



Isn't this an exact copy of sweepabit? Which is already on moneypot?
What's the difference between these two sites? (Other than the house edge, which is higher on your side)
Nothing. OP is known to rip-off other sites and start fake-promos for their copies.
3234  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: Zahlung kommt nicht an on: July 05, 2016, 11:00:06 PM
Sicher dass Bitcoin Core so eine Überweisung immer wieder automatisch anstößt?
Ja, solange er läuft, tut er das.

Ich meine, er läuft jetzt schon ein paar Tage und es tut sich immer noch nichts.
Das liegt aber nicht daran, dass core die tx nicht pusht, sondern daran, dass kein Miner sie in einen Block aufnimmt.
Durchs pushen bleibt die tx im Mempool verschiedener Nodes, mehr macht das allerdings auch nicht.

Kann es passieren, dass solche Transaktionen für immer vergessen gehen?
"Vergessen"? Nein.
Kann aber gut sein, dass die tx aufgrund der niedrigen fees von keinem Miner aufgegriffen wird und so ewig im Mempool herum irrt.

Wie wäre das mit einem anderen Client? Würde der das auch immer wieder anstoßen?
Kommt auf den Client an, bringt aber nichts.



Du kannst immernoch Core die Anweisung geben, die Transaktion fallen zu lassen (Konsole -> abandontransaction), einige Zeit warten, und das ganze erneut mit passenden Gebühren senden.
Oder eben garnicht und die private Keys von Core zu Electrum übertragen.

Oder du wartest noch ein paar Tage um es dann aufzugeben und eines der beiden obigen Dinge zu tun.
3235  Other / Meta / Re: What's your "Report to Moderator" % rate at? on: July 05, 2016, 10:51:42 PM
By the way it will be a long way for Lutpin or anyone else to overtake you!
Is that a challenge? Grin



@thermos:
It would be nice getting a regular (e.g. monthly) dump of the top 50 (or even 100) reporters.
Might also be an incentive for some of the less-active reporters to step up their game.
3236  Other / Archival / Re: . on: July 05, 2016, 10:42:33 PM
I will include about 10 or so in the box that is leaving to him shortly.
I'll take one of those, he's still holding onto some stuff for me anyway.



Miner knows by labelling this 'nothing to see' we'd all be inquisitive haha
I came here early and actually already saw something Tongue
3237  Other / Archival / Re: . on: July 05, 2016, 10:38:01 PM
I know saw nothing.
Also, if Mitchell wants to do an EU group buy,... Smiley
3238  Other / Meta / Re: Ume is evading his ban -- Was banned for begging on: July 05, 2016, 10:18:00 PM
Bumping this up, waiting on a response/comment from both, lolxxxx and any moderator regarding this issue.
3239  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: Brauche dringend Hilfe / bitmixer.io on: July 05, 2016, 10:02:53 PM
Vielen Dank Leute! Bin ja auch selten dämlich... die Bitcoins wurden jetzt gemixt und sind wieder auf meinem Bitcoin.de Konto.
Sind die jetzt gemixt / anonymisiert oder muss ich die jetzt nochmal mixen, weil die wieder bei Bitcoin aufgetaucht sind.
Du mixt ja grundsätzlich, damit keiner weiß, dass die BTC von Adresse X kommen/mit Adresse X in Verbindung stehen,
wenn du diese jetzt also zurück an Adresse X geschickt hast, hast du den ganzen Prozess nichtig gemacht.

Weiß zwar nicht, wieso du deine BTCtc durch nen Mixer jagst, aber prinzipiell solltest du das jetzt nochmal machen,
wenn dir die Sache wichtig genug ist.
3240  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: Brauche dringend Hilfe / bitmixer.io on: July 05, 2016, 09:53:42 PM
Die Adresse poste ich Natürlich nicht
Damit könnten wir allerdings am schnellsten helfen.

Komme gerade nicht ganz mit. Werden die jetzt gemixt und auf mein bitcoin.de Konto geschickt oder wird der an sich selbst geschickt?
Das Prinzip beim mixing ist ja folgendes:
Du schickst Coins an den Mixer & bekommst "frische" Coins (sprich welche, die nicht durch taint analyse mit deinen ursprünglichen zu verbinden sind) minus den Gebühren zurück.
Das gleiche wird hier jetzt auch passieren. Adresse X schickt Coins an bitmixer.io, wofür bitmixer.io coins aus ihrem mixing Pool an Adresse Y (die, die du eingegeben hast) schickt.
Ob X und Y nun dieselben sind, macht für den Mixingvorgang erstmal so keinen Unterschied.

Hätte bei forward Adress ja die Adresse von meinem Wallet eingeben sollen oder ?Und nicht die Adresse die ich von bitcoin.de bekommen habe ?
Korrekt, die "forward address" ist diejenige, an die bitmixer.io die "neuen" Coins schicken/weiterleiten (oder zu Englisch: forwarding) soll.
Pages: « 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 [162] 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 ... 296 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!