The current legislation in EU permit to buy such items from various countries and easily make a working
Kalashnikov.
Check Slovakian and German AK.
This item is legal in EU and banned in USA:

Using nukes against a combined force of China and Russia? That will be suicidal. USA + France + United Kingdom + Israel + Pakistan is in the possession of close to 6,000 nuclear warheads. The most powerful nuclear weapon ever built (Tsar Bomba) was capable of incinerating everything within 100 km of its radius. That gives a maximum effective surface area of 30,000 sq.km per weapon.

Now the question is how many of these nukes the NATO will be able to use in a relatively short time (say 4 to 6 hours). Even if they manage to use all the 6,000 weapons, only around 1% or 2% are likely to land in Russia / China, as the air-defenses are very advanced. That means that around 10% of the surface area of Russia / China will be devoid of life. That might kill at the most 50% of their soldiers. But the remaining 50% will use nukes on the NATO nations, completely exterminating the life there.

Yes, the idea of Muslims capturing Rome/Vatican City is farfetched. It's as likely as Muslims capturing Constantinople (Second Rome).

Wait.

The ISIS will probably use demographic Jihad to conquer Western Europe, by creating immigrant influx from the Middle East. By 2050, at least a few of the Western European nations will be Muslim majority. Already a few of them are 10% to 20% Muslim.

That said, Italy is less than 5% Muslim right now. And the rate of increase of the Muslim population is quite low, when compared to that in the other countries such as France and Germany. Still... we can't predict the future.

The discussion is harsh in the same way that if somebody came on these forums and exclaimed "Why Nazism is the Key!", I would denounce it and laugh them out of the room.

It's disgusting. And trying to claim that we're really just confusing Socialism with Communism shows the OP and many others on this thread have no idea regarding the moral philosophy behind their theories.

Yes I'm in favor of FREE markets. FREE meaning that there is not a government body that can be hijacked and used to grant and maintain monopolies. All of the things which lead to monopolies in a capitalist system are entirely due to government.

If you'll read any of the material I linked to, you would start to understand what ALL government is. I don't care if you want to call it Socialism, Communism, Fascism, etc. Those are bullshit ideals that all stem from the same fundamental belief. The belief that the use of coercion is morally acceptable. Socialism is a forced redistribution of wealth through various methods such as taxation, tariffs, and subsidies. It violates private property (your right to the products of your labor) in the same way that all government does.

Now please go ahead and explain how one company (without using government) would rule the world.

You are the one who apparently doesn't know what socialism is.  I never said it was communism, but communism is an extreme version of socialism.  You don't understand what a free market is or what capitalism has done for you.  Where was the automobile invented?  Where was the computer invented?  Where was the telephone invented?  On and on it goes, these are the result of free enterprise not government controlled entities.  I do not want to be forced to "pay my fair share", because that is what socialism is about.  It takes away all incentive to become successful.  I have to pay for everyone's education, healthcare, etc?  I should be obligated to take care of me and my children.  If I feel the desire to help others then I can, but should not be forced to do it.  There is a reason that America has been the most inventive and most powerful nation on earth for a years and years, because we aren't a socialist country.  Socialism removes true free enterprise, it will never ever thrive under it.  How many multi billion dollar companies are headquartered in socialist countries?  A few, but most are not.  Because what happens when the government sees a company thriving and they then deem it necessary to control because that would be for the greater good?  I have lived in socialist countries (mexico and spain) and live in the US.  Socialism is not the answer, nor will it ever be.  How many self employed people are there in socialist countries?  According to your statement above, socialist countries are just full of self employed people, which just isn't true.  When you take away the people's free will to take care of others then that is the devil's tool.  America has become more and more socialist and I hate it, it will ruin this great country.

Why are the 2 incredibly different? 
Communism is just an extreme form of socialism.
This site gives a good comparison of the two.

http://www.diffen.com/difference/Communism_vs_Socialism

I deleted what i Said i made a mistake i got Socialism confused with capitalism, i won't comment on Socialism !!!! . I did google it http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/100214/what-difference-between-communism-and-socialism.asp

I was off topic after i saw my mistake so shot me.

Shouldn't this be posted in Politics & Society !!!

cya

billboards nationwide if not global, THE TRUTH IT IS ILLEGAL TO USE A LEGAL NAME..... many ways of looking at it, but a name in law is nothing more than that by which something is commonly known, im commonly known as tricky pleased to meet you, now when im forced / coerced into interacting with so called authority figures they always want the name on birth certificate which is your legal name, but if you do not hold a BAR card then you are not qualified to use the legal name.... basically the birth certificate creates a trust in law, of which the guberment hold the trust as their property notice all birth certificates state not to be used as identification, and crown copyright, if you are silly enough to claim to be a legal name, you are claiming to be state owned property which obliges you to respect all legislations of that state, and as you are in breach of copyright you are automatically guilty of a crime (breach of copyright) obvs they cant tell you that as you would just tell all your mates something like what im explaining here, so they stitch you up with some other dumb charge (notice they always charge you a fee of sorts) using a contract known as a bill of exchange, never ever claim to be a legal name, that way they have no authority over you and can not extort revenue from you

school was there to indoctrinate, 1 of the biggest indoctrinations was you are the legal name, daily register etc etc :/

Have you noticed that the mempool tends to bloat up massively whenever the price moves $10-$15?

Spam? Dust? Or people desperately trying to move coins to make a trade?

After a total loss of BTC0.35261055 I decided to quit playing. This is not the game what I expected it should be good luck with your game and goodbye.

Sorry for the loss. Just please always remember to not gamble more than you can afford to lose. Whilst our house edge is low & all bets are fair and can be proven so, you are betting at a negative expected value. You will tend to lose money in the long run.

None the less, on a brighter note, good job to the 3 people which managed to get over 100 BTC profit this week. Primedice may be down a little over 600 coins over the last 7 days but need not worry - We love seeing winners!

I agree this is against human nature.

I believe so that he trying to express his opinion when it comes to this matter. He is just being realistic, this is his belief and anyone can actually express his own thoughts wherein we ,do also exercise our freedom. Not all people may agree to it. But then he forgot that not all people are having the same beliefs which make this an issue..