AHAHAHAH xD
Ok I just laughed far too much! Well it's a bit sad to see that an actual human can think so little but it was funny in its own way xD
I'll still try to explain you why your reasoning is false. But please take back your brain from TV, seems you let it there.
So you're saying you don't understand the ideas you're promoting.
If people get goods and services for free, someone else has to work for free. Slavery.
Nah, just that somebody else is paying for it, that's called tax.
If the government enforces "equal chances", then it must punish people who have "better chances" in order to make them equal.
Nah, you don't have to lower the chances of some, you can also increase the chances of the others.
If the government takes more money from "successful" people, then the government punishes success.
Whaou, ok in this way you're right if you consider that taking more money from those who have more is the same as "punishing peopl" then yes it is.
Aren't you aware that the government can impose fines and charge people money for breaking the law?
Under your system, here are some examples of crimes that could result in a $1,000,000 fine:
- Fraud
Cause it's not punishable? You feel like Fraud shouldn't be punished?
- Trafficking illegal drugs
That's the mere principle of "illegal" you know, what would you like to be done on illegal things? Rewarding?
- Being successful
Nope, being successful leads to an increase of taxation, not a fine.
- Helping the economy
Nope, if you invest the money in the economy then your not taxed, it would be stupid to do so.
- Working harder than other people
Nope again I don't even see how you could fine someone for that
- Inventing a new medicine that saves people's lives
No, in no way, I mean what the heck?
- Inventing a new technology that improves the quality of life for millions of people
But what the fuck are you saying exactly please? Who would be punished for that? Give me one example in the entire socialist countries history!
- Providing something more valuable to other people than what anyone else is providing
Ok I'm a bit tired of repeating myself so same answer as above.
Since these are the activities you want to punish,
these are the activities you are discouraging.
Here are the activities you will encourage by paying people to do them:
- Staying home all day
Well if you do this you'll earn barely enough to survive. But yes it's possible if you do nothing more than eating and sleeping all day. Experience shows that less than 0.1% of the population is even using this universal base income and most of them actively look for a job and find one after some time.
- Getting drunk or high every day
What? What's the link?
- Never getting a job
Hmm... You get paid only if you spent some time working and the time you get paid is proportional to the time you worked. The goal is to let you some time to find another job but if you do nothing you won't get paid for years doing nothing.
- Not producing anything for society
Same as above
- Never doing anything useful for another human being
Dude it's tiring seriously, same as above.
- Not providing for your own children
Didn't understand this one
- Getting pregnant at the age of 15
Actually it's the contrary, free education leads to less teenage pregnancy sorry.
- Keeping children away from their own father
I don't see why, seems you have a strange vision of what socialism even mean.
Why do you want to reward bad decisions while punishing responsibility?
Not the point, the idea is that in a socialist state you're never alone, the state is always here to back you up if you're in need. In fact it's much easier to create things and take risks and responsability knowing that even if you fail the state will take care of your children!
It made sense during the Cold War when these policies were promoted by our enemies as subversive weapons to destroy Western Civilization, but why are you still promoting them?
