Pretty sure it was said already but nobody reacted to this it seems.
I know the only winner of a WW3 and it would be Europe. Europe is protected by France nuclear weapons, able to nuke any country in the world. And Europe isn't an interesting target because there is absolutely no natural ressources of interest here. It means it's fucking dangerous and you wouldn't earn anything important. So nobody will attack Europe =)
That's an interesting idea that you bring us here  ! But what if France and the other europeans countries were not on the same side ? Also, let's remember that the evil Americans bombed Japan while they had no interest to do it. This was a pure terrorism, like they're the best at. Well the side with France inside would win :p Difference is that by bombing Japan USA ended the war without any possible counter attack. No country could do that because France own 7 nuclear submarines, each of it being able to launch around 80 H-bombs anywhere in the world. Even if the USA would bomb France, they would be totally nuked in return. So why doing it? What about several France ? I'm sure that within the 15 newt years there will be a civil war that will split the country in several sides. I see a kind of coup d'État defying State's authority and finally win because of more power and no fear to do war. Then can either have a far-right government, created by the same people as bedhind the coup d'État taking over France or keep splitting it. Japan wanted to end war, but not at no condition like the USA wanted, so they killed 200 000+ innocent civilians to don't have to agree with the Japanese. This is what is called terrorism, or killing civilians in order to exerce political pressure, like the General de Gaulle did during the WW2, or like they did for the 11/9. This time, this was even worst, because this was against their own people. But nothing stop the American devils... De Gaulle did this? I'm interested please tell me more. Well if France is divided it'll be all a question of which part gets the army. But there is 0chance something like this happens. People are too lazy. French live an easy life without even knowing their luck. And they get raped by capital and banks without saying anything. No, the people will be too glad to be manipulated again and spit on terrorism (which is an insignificant threat) and migrants (which are no threat at all). People are too dumb. They won't fight for what is right. |
|
|
|
God isn't invisible. He reveal himself to the meritous men. If you follow a decent life, without sins, you'll accept to the Heaven you'll see Him. So we should all be invisible but to decent humans? What did you try to mean ? I am sorry, but after tried more and more, I'm unable to understand what it does mean  ... He meant that if humans are like God then we're all invisible to humans not living good and decent lifes, just as how God is ^^ |
|
|
|
Bah gun control debate only concerns USA. Europe understood well that gun controls means less deaths and more security. When USA will become a civilized country they'll understand it too  Less deaths of/more security for those committing democide in Europe (the minority of the people, who are in the armed forces, vs the majority of the people, who aren't), absolutely. When USA becomes a "civilized country" like those in Europe, American mass graves will be a tourist attraction for Europeans. Give an example of a dictatorship that came into existence despite all civilians being legally armed (who wanted to be, and weren't infringed). Oh wait, dictators and their loyalists are invincible, and shrug off any amount of incoming fire from their innocent victims, nevermind.  Well say whatever you want but most of the time a dictatorship gets more than 50% of the population as a support at least at the begining. And please give an example. Cause WWII was exactly that: population fully armed. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin/USD 3-Day chart. Warming up main engines.  I'm a bit afraid by your chart... I shouldn't have oppened a short no?  ahahah! Well two solutions: 1/ markets goes down for a 420 correction and I win 2/ market breaks the 445 then I close short and open a long twice larger. Win win cause if it breaks the 445 it'll break the 450 for good! ^^ |
|
|
|
Pretty sure it was said already but nobody reacted to this it seems.
I know the only winner of a WW3 and it would be Europe. Europe is protected by France nuclear weapons, able to nuke any country in the world. And Europe isn't an interesting target because there is absolutely no natural ressources of interest here. It means it's fucking dangerous and you wouldn't earn anything important. So nobody will attack Europe =)
That's an interesting idea that you bring us here ! But what if France and the other europeans countries were not on the same side ? Also, let's remember that the evil Americans bombed Japan while they had no interest to do it. This was a pure terrorism, like they're the best at. Well the side with France inside would win :p Difference is that by bombing Japan USA ended the war without any possible counter attack. No country could do that because France own 7 nuclear submarines, each of it being able to launch around 80 H-bombs anywhere in the world. Even if the USA would bomb France, they would be totally nuked in return. So why doing it? |
|
|
|
I'm a bit afraid by your chart... I shouldn't have oppened a short no?
Well, anything can happen. I'm just the messenger of some arbitrary chart observations. If it was me, I would not be opening any shorts right now. We are in the middle of a 4-hour chart correction. Those usually take from a few days to a week to complete, but we're nearly a day into it and the price only dipped by $10 and has started turning around. Lets take a look at the On Balance Volume which is more of a leading indicator than the MACD:  Notice the OBV is in DISAGREEMENT with the correction profile. That is not exactly ideal for shorters. It often means that there is compressed bullishness in the market waiting for release like a coiled spring. To me that OBV simply looks very bullish and further endorses my observation above about the 4-hour correction indicated by the MACD histogram being only minimal. The 4-Hour RSI did indicate an overbought condition when we were up at $445 but it's since dropped back in range and is pushing upwards again. As I say - despite chart technicals, it's Bitcoin. Anything can happen and we would normally expect a pullback at this point as I pointed out in this commentary, say to 420 at least. Just going on these indications though I'd say we'd be lucky to see a dip to 430. Well, thanks for the observations. I'll keep my short. It won't cost me a lot if it goes up anyway cause I limited at 446, if 445 is broken then we go straight up and I'll open a long automatically. But I'm betting for a small dip until 425/430 anyway ^^ |
|
|
|
well the thing is that is true.
i gave examples of tree cutting machines that could replace 20 wood choppers and a trained female or even teenage could probaly use it. (the let me google it for you link)
and the next example is automation in the car industry.
but i also never said the process is finished, because it is obviously not - but we already see where the path is going.
We can today do stuff that needed hundred thousands of people before with just some hundred or thousand people; 3-4 orders of magnitude difference to just some hundred years ago.
Yeah of course but your example is the exception not the general way things are. If you want to build a house, you'll need strong men to do it, there aren't any machine to replace them i agree here for sure. to build a house you need a lot of physical strength and stamina! But we already have prefab houses that works like LEGO (the stuff that kids really like to build with) and that helps to save the needed strength and stamina by a lot! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefabricated_homeLol! Yeah but your LEGO house will never stay in place for 500 years like a good old stone house ^^ Moreover I find it truly cheap and disgraceful  But point taken, it's possible ^^ |
|
|
|
Don't you think there is a difference between making them pay something and getting rid of them?
How are you going to "make" them pay? What if they say no? That's where your elite leaders use their extra power and guns to control people and force them. If they can't control them, can't arrest them, and can't take their money, then they'll get rid of them. Dude, you're not only extreme, you're also stupid ^^ How are the current governments making companies pay taxes? With guns. I'm sorry to scare you, I didn't know you were a child. So in your opinion the current USA government is already a dictatorship? What kind of government would not be oppressing the people then? And no, not with guns, simply by saying "if you don't respect the laws of the country, hence don't pay the taxes you deserve, you won't be able to continue your activity anymore". Then of course if the company says fuck to the state, the company gets sued, seems rather logical no? It means being sued for breaking the law. |
|
|
|
Don't you think there is a difference between making them pay something and getting rid of them?
How are you going to "make" them pay? What if they say no? That's where your elite leaders use their extra power and guns to control people and force them. If they can't control them, can't arrest them, and can't take their money, then they'll get rid of them. Dude, you're not only extreme, you're also stupid ^^ How are the current governments making companies pay taxes? |
|
|
|
well the thing is that is true.
i gave examples of tree cutting machines that could replace 20 wood choppers and a trained female or even teenage could probaly use it. (the let me google it for you link)
and the next example is automation in the car industry.
but i also never said the process is finished, because it is obviously not - but we already see where the path is going.
We can today do stuff that needed hundred thousands of people before with just some hundred or thousand people; 3-4 orders of magnitude difference to just some hundred years ago.
Yeah of course but your example is the exception not the general way things are. If you want to build a house, you'll need strong men to do it, there aren't any machine to replace them |
|
|
|
The important part of socialism is that you would be abe to control companies and see that THEY ARE THE TRUE THREAT! They are the ones that ruin our world! They are the ones that get 99% of the wealth in the world and have NO OBLIGATION to give it back.
There have been countries that got rid of all the rich people and all the successful companies. Citizens of those countries die trying to escape and go somewhere that still has rich people and successful companies. McDonald's feeds millions of poor people every day. If you get rid of McDonald's, how are you going to feed those millions of poor people? Did I say "to get rid"? Why are you always trying to transform my words in extremism speech? Currently McDonald's pay exactly 0€ of taxes in France. Same goes for Apple and Google. Apple makes billions of € every years in France and pay NOTHING on it. Don't you think there is a difference between making them pay something and getting rid of them? Oh and btw, Mc'Donald's doesn't employ "millions of people" only a few thousands. It wouldn't be the end of the world if they all closed you know? Especially as even is they closed, people would just eat somewhere else so other small restaurants would open and employ people. It might even create jobs in then end! |
|
|
|
So this is my first analysis and positionning.  I've just opened a short (441). Shorting is always dangerous and especially here with a huge upper momentum, but a small correction to the 435/430 seems like the next logical move. It'll be the best moment to open a long next. |
|
|
|
Hi folks, this is a thread about... me  Well not me but my trading. I'm not exactly an incredible trader, but I try to follow the great market moves. I usually make profits by following my guts and my analysis and I decided to start a thread to exchange on the position I take. Of course I'm not responsible for anything, I'm not even giving out advices, just saying what I'm doing in the hope that it'll help some people and (to be honest it's more this) that discussions will help me making the right choices. Enjoy and trade at your own risks! =D |
|
|
|
|
Okay I just started to test Bitfinex.
I gotta say the site is cool, I like how things work and the margin trading is great.
But it's hard to understand everything! Why am I earning USD when I'm betting on BTC price with BTC equity? Why is the value of my equity decreasing while I do nothing? What are exactly the fees I pay? etc etc...
But interface is great so I'll keep working with it!
|
|
|
|
I don't really understand the debate.
Women and men are different and are made to do different things.
It doesn't mean men things have to be more important than women things. It's not because it's different than one is more important.
And it's of course only reliable from a statistical point of view. Because whatever the number of machine, men are more reliable to harvest trees than women.
Doesn't mean no woman can do it, but simply that on average it'll be mostly men.
End of the debate, why going further?
There is not only inter difference in genders there is also intra difference. No men is biological equal to another. That is obvious and not the question. What i am talking about is that technology is bridging this gap and the only thing important will be/is intelligence. If you dont understand it i cant help much. I'm sorry but you're wrong. Of course there are intra differences but that's why I talked only of STATISTICAL realities. It's a general point of view but there will be women cutting trees and men taking care of kindergardens. You think technology will bridge the gap completely? Well maybe. But to be honnest I don't think so. There are some things that will never changes. Women will still bear the babies, men will still be the ones fighting. That represents millions of years of evolution, it will be hard to erase it. And even, should we erase it? Gender differences allows a higher genetic differences, nor sure we should tend to destroy those differences. But again it's all statistical. It doesn't mean it's not possible, just that any job kid related will still be dominated by women and that any job strength related will be dominated by men. And is it a bad thing? I dont understand why we are going into the area of good and bad^^" It doesnt matter for me who does what job or has a statistical prevalence of doing something. For me it is about hard biological facts like you need high physical strength to do certain work like i.e. building houses or chopping trees. But that doesnt hold anymore because we have technology. Today a kid could be able to destroy a whole country with the right technology. (I hope you understand where i want to go.) Technology will also be able to give a homosexual pair a kid through genetic manipulations of stem cells. (stem research is incredible in size) If we want to go a bit more philosophical: The nature made men who he is. But now with technology men is changing nature itself. Well you seemed to engage yourself in the moral aspect of the debate, my bad if it wasn't the case Then let's be clear: you're wrong. You might be true one day (though I doubt it will be before thousands of years) but clearly you're not today. Building a house, cutting trees, loading crates... Those are jobs that still require a very high amount of strength and endurance! That's the most important point, even if lots of jobs require less strength, they still do for the most of them. And the jobs that no longer require a high amount of strength require lots of endurance, and men have more endurance But yeah technology is bridging the gap as you say. Maybe one day no job will require either strength nor endurance. |
|
|
|
|
I just thought about it, but does trading can be assimilated to gambling?
Cause to me it seems to be more and more the same things considering btc price fluctuations ><
|
|
|
|
Governments have killed and maimed many times more people than all "civilians" have ever, per capita, but governments should be the only ones with guns? Fuck you to death, you pro-democide freaks. What an argument... You're talking about governments like they were some independent entity! Government NEVER KILLED ANYONE! People did! When a government wants to kill part of the population or another country's population, they send the army, the people! And the people are more than willing to kill! What would gun control change to that? Distinction without a difference. If the government (the minority of the people) wants to kill people, it does, over all objections by the majority of the people, who have been disarmed by "gun control". Oh, you ignored the historical example given. And the government can't kill the majority because the army is also the majority. It never did. Give me one example. |
|
|
|
The only thing killing socialism is greed. Greed and corruption.
I think your have incorrectly identified the problem, the only thing killing socialism today is monetary inflation, the reason it's tolerated is greed. touché. But monetary inflation isn't exactly the problem. The root of all evils are banks Banks cause monetary inflation upon which they make a hell lot of money. But even if we suppressed monetary inflation I bet the would find something else. |
|
|
|
Why should we? Satan isn't going to punish us, why would he? He has no interest into crushing us! Better train us in order to take over the heavens!
Hahaha... touché What makes you think Satan is such a bad guy? He is only "the accuser"... accusing God of committing a moral crime... he's the good guy... Satan isn't the murderer of the bible... that's God... God murders everyone on the planet... and then keeps murdering, and commanding his followers to murder Satan only murders Job's family, and only because God told him to... It's just your opinion. Only people (influenced by Satan and evil spirits) kill other people, not God. Satan is bad because he destroyed God's ideal, heavenly kingdom, by pushing people to separate from God. After Human Fall, we had just misery, suffering and pain. God didn't want such world. So, yes, Satan is responsible for our misery, not God. You mean that God had no choice but to banish humanity from heaven because of Satan manipulation? God can do everything He wants but he decide to give people free will, so that they themselves realize who is Satan and get back to him. If God intervene in our lives he will break our free will and we will loose chance to qualify to become his children. It's complex theological matter. So he chose to give us pain, suffering, doubt, despair for...? He gives us everything bad in this world only to give us back what we had MAYBE? Doesn't sound like a good being to me... |
|
|
|
Bitcoin/USD 3-Day chart. Warming up main engines. I'm a bit afraid by your chart... I shouldn't have oppened a short no? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
