-snip- Maybe I have misspoke in some way due to my lack of technical understanding of RBF. I guess the conflicting transaction would also have RBF enabled, allowing it to be accepted by the nodes.
By enabling RBF you would essentially announce "this can be double spend", which would significantly reduce your chance to use this maliciously. I was responding to theymos's comment that was implying it would be necessary to have some level of technological knowledge to perform a malicious double spend with RBF I really doubt Core is ever going to provide an easy UI for fraudulently double-spending It might still allow an easy way to do RBF, e.g. by using the exact same inputs (or more if needed) and only allowing you to increase the fee, but not allowing you to change the non-change outputs. If the only long term change is a different relay policy it will not change much for the majority of users. CPFP is still possible. RBF does not change this. Right, however it appears to me that the core devs are pushing RBF much stronger then CPFP. I am questioning why it is not the opposite As I dont belong to that group I can only guess, but my guess is that - similar to what knightdk wrote - its not in the spirit of bitcoin and thus has less priority. AFAIK its mainly a miner side implementation anyway. From what I read about "SPV Mining" most miners run custom code, so developing code for CFPF in core might be seen as a waste of time.
|
|
|
Yup getting this error, But its Not frequent occuring like you, It usually occure here 1-2 times a Days some time it Show 502 error, and sometime its DNS problem which is I think from my Internet provider. This DNS type of problem I usually get when Im on gambling site and some other site.
Yeah 502 is back in town.
|
|
|
-snip- in short bitgo have sole control of your funds
Thats not how I understood it, but based on the little information the article provided we might both be wrong.
|
|
|
Ja dann, Herzlich wilkommen! möchtest du dir diesen Satz nicht noch einmal Überlegen? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Ich heise yanik. Bin 27 und komme aus Mainz.
Lass ihn doch, muss sich ja nicht jeder verstecken. Willkommen Yanik.
|
|
|
Sorry I should have been a bit clearer in my description. Core uses the blockchain stored on the hard disk. I backed it up by using a simple file copy, and that worked perfectly. I did think of trying to run a node on my chromebook using and SDcard for the storage, but I gave it up. One of the reasons was the point you made. I made the backup of the blockchain because it took me over two weeks to download it using public wifi.
I could do a direct backup of the unencrypted wallet, bu nowt get the error every time I try to backup since I have encrypted the wallet.
Its pretty obvious that sase007 never looked into a folder that stores the blockchain. Im too lazy right now to show how few files actually are below 1MB though. Anyway, back to topic: Can you show the debug.log at the times you tried to backup to the SDcard? It might give more clues to the source of the error.
|
|
|
This is bullshit man. Companies like AT&T received government subsidies to upgrade the nation's internet infrastructure. Instead, they kept it all and either went golfing or bought mortgage backed securities. US internet throughput is being gimped on purpose. It looks like someone put Blockstream in charge of the internet too.
I think I read similar numbers for germany/europe. The backbone network is at ~10% capacity. The last mile to the customer is whats badly developed, especially in rural areas.
|
|
|
Sadly no information on how it works, but a generic "multi sig works like this" picture. Does not look like a sidechain.
|
|
|
fuck off we can't look at the date on every post you fucking hypocrite go kill yourself and get cancer you Indian scum
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmemecrunch.com%2Fmeme%2FLU1N%2Fwell-that-escalated-quickly%2Fimage.png&t=663&c=GMrQzgI9rpwOSQ)
|
|
|
-snip- It starts with 139...
so if I get a router I can connect more devices?
Yes, you will probably need a router a switch is not enough. Set it on DHCP on the WAN port and let it create a local network on the other side. Whoever provides internet for you can detect what kind of device is at the end of the cable, but as long as you dont mess anything up I dont think they will block you. The best way to understand the setup is probably to ask them.
|
|
|
Correct, most services do not let you export the private keys. Dont get too attached to an address (which is not the same as a public key btw, you can play around with this site a bit to see the differences[1]). [1] https://www.bitaddress.orgYes, the key I mentioned (which allowed me to partially register in Electrum client) is actually an address. I'm not sure if the mentioned bitaddress can help me, though. Not with your actual problem, just to help you understand what a private key, a public key and an address is. The problem remains - I've contacted exmo support, will see what they can offer.
Thanks to everybody for help.
Good luck, let us know what they answered.
|
|
|
So all that work for no satisfaction? So why would someone create nodes if there is no earnings? Or i missed something.
I find it rather satisfying to run a full node. It helps the network and I know others that dont rely on those that do for their wallets. It also helps me gathering data I am interested in. If your only motvation is money, dont run a full node.
|
|
|
What exactly is your goal? Do you want to use electrum as your wallet?
If so, create a wallet with electrum, safely store the seed, set a password and used one of its "receiving addresses" to issue a "withdrawal" from exmo to your wallet.
My goal is to be able to operate my btc and my wallet, whatever the UI program be. The wallet remains "watching only", and I can't change anything with Electrum client. I can register a new wallet within Electrum, but can't get my desired address (from exmo) into it. That is correct, unless they allow you to export the private key. Or - I can open/restore a wallet with that address in Electrum, but it becomes a "watching only" wallet with no chance to send/receive funds << because I got only a public key from exmo starting with "1".
Again, I have an address with a public key with funds already in it, but can't do anything with is as a full-functioning wallet.
Correct, most services do not let you export the private keys. Dont get too attached to an address (which is not the same as a public key btw, you can play around with this site a bit to see the differences[1]). [1] https://www.bitaddress.org
|
|
|
Is it worth of it , electricity and work on maintenance?
I dont know if its worth it for you. The servers Im currently looking at cost ~100EUR per year to run a full node. You usually get nothing in return in terms of money. So if i dedicate my pc for node, can l use it for watching movies ,internet, mails?
Yes, bitcoin core sometimes hinders streaming, but you can just turn it off and back on later. How you ern your fee?
You dont. Thats what miners do.
|
|
|
Please if someone have instruction for creating nodes post it here ! But please let it be understandable and easy for newbies. Thanks!
Its difficult to help you if we dont know what you want. If you just want to run a full node, just install bitcoin core on your machine and let it run as often as you can. Done, thats it. You can use a dedicated machine for that as long as the hardware is not too old. I suggest at least 2 cores, 4GB RAM and >100 GB disk space to run a full node for the next year. Next year the disk will probably be full and the memory might not be enough, hard to say.
|
|
|
has any body seen any double spent being detected in there transactions? I haven't seen anywhere. How can someone double spend there bitcoins??
What happens to transaction that are detected as double spend??
A "double-spend" in bitcoin is typically understood as. #1 Alice creates one transaction (A1) with a low fee to pay Bob 1 BTC #2 Bob provides a service to Alice #3 Alice creates a different transaction (A2) that uses the same coins as A1, but pays a higher fee. #4 Alice heavily pushes A2 in the hopes that A1 will be forgotten by the network and not confirmed. If A2 gets confirmed A1 is invalid, if A1 gets confirmed A2 is invalid. There are variations of this, but there are no true double spends possible. No coins can be used twice and get confirmed. So no true double spend is possible. its a theory concept only. It happens because people like Bob accept unconfirmed transactions without defending against the possible attack by alice. Its not easy in most cases so its rare, but its more than a theory concept. See here -> http://bitcoinist.net/peter-todd-double-spends-on-coinbase/
|
|
|
Every address has a public key, which usually starts with 1 is the address we can share with others, and a private key which usually starts with 5 and should always kept secret. Whoever knows the secret key controls the bitcoins. Did you only get the public bitcoin address/key or also the private key? Thank you for your reply. Seems like I've got only a public one. What exactly is your goal? Do you want to use electrum as your wallet? If so, create a wallet with electrum, safely store the seed, set a password and used one of its "receiving addresses" to issue a "withdrawal" from exmo to your wallet.
|
|
|
I give up with blockchain service, it's need more developing and an expert developer to manage. Too much problem with their services, especially their wallet service. I suggested to stop using their wallet.
what other wallet you will suggest to newbies instead of blockchain?? Use a desktop wallet like Electrum. ...or MultibitHD which was made with beginners in mind.
|
|
|
has any body seen any double spent being detected in there transactions? I haven't seen anywhere. How can someone double spend there bitcoins??
What happens to transaction that are detected as double spend??
A "double-spend" in bitcoin is typically understood as. #1 Alice creates one transaction (A1) with a low fee to pay Bob 1 BTC #2 Bob provides a service to Alice #3 Alice creates a different transaction (A2) that uses the same coins as A1, but pays a higher fee. #4 Alice heavily pushes A2 in the hopes that A1 will be forgotten by the network and not confirmed. If A2 gets confirmed A1 is invalid, if A1 gets confirmed A2 is invalid. There are variations of this, but there are no true double spends possible. No coins can be used twice and get confirmed.
|
|
|
And you are just one of the lesser educated of the forum, and because of this I won't even bother explaining how the program works to you. have you heard of the blockchain? You are saying we FAKE hundreds of payouts daily? Sorry, but I can not be bothered sending hundreds of payments to myself, let alone depositing, every single day. Best of luck to you and your capacity of learning.
Even your retaliation doesn't make sense. Seeding money= BTC you yourself have invested in your 'service'/complicated-ponzi sceheme. Which you will recover with a profit after you scam the members, after the ponzi has saturated enough that no new investors will come The program has over 360 investors diversified over 26BTC (avg .072BTC per deposit) in investments and you are implying that I have done this? Again, this would mean that I would have to send hundreds of deposits (to myself) every day and at different times of the day/night just to boost site volume. While this may be what other sites do, there's no need for ours as growth is perfectly fine and sustainable. We have proven profit, and will continue to do so. This will be my last post in this thread, as I am sure I've explained all that I need to. Totally besides them point IMHO. For one, its a few lines of script that can handle that. It proves nothing. The only thing you have is proof of funds, nothing more. You have not shown where the funds come from and thus have not shown that you are not running a ponzi. The only difference between a ponzi and a legit business is the source of the funds. A legit business does "work" to increase the funds, while a ponzi attracts investors to increase the funds. You also show the same "I dont have to explain you shit" attitude that is common for ponzi operators, but thats not really a point, just an observation. Its not limited to ponzis.
|
|
|
|