Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 07:41:44 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 »
3341  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 12, 2014, 12:06:57 PM
The benefit of being a holder is i can now disappear off for a month and then get the surprise of finding out about the price when i return. The price could be back in the 6xx's or have plumbed new lows. A few low ball bids on stamp just in case.
3342  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 12, 2014, 11:30:15 AM

Bonus points:  Name the revolutionary money service in the pic Smiley
I am disqualified, I suppose...  Wink


I bought 0.2btc in the above enterprise before he ran off with the funds..
3343  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 12, 2014, 10:41:42 AM
Again a sizeable dump. No follow-through selling from panicked weak hands. If there is no one left to sell then perhaps the bottom is near.

Hopefully get to buy a few more coins at below 500 dollar prices..
3344  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 12, 2014, 08:35:45 AM
About 1.6K dumped on Stamp.

Again, where do the coins come from? Someone ask the exchange owner!

About 6000 coins in a coordinated dump on four exchanges. Who has that many coins to play with? Qui bono?

No manipulation here. It's a perfectly natural way to sell for best price with no slippage to perform synchronised large sells into thin order books.

Very unlikely to be a miner or sophisticated seller. Perhaps a hedge fund or malicious actor..
3345  Economy / Speculation / Re: Something is wrong with BTC on: September 11, 2014, 10:20:31 PM
It's just a temporary thing, people cut their loss and are afraid. It's the wrong thing to do. Soon they will all gain faith again and we can continue our fly to the moon!

Oh god. Not falllling clones on the way back up too! Smiley
3346  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 11, 2014, 10:10:54 PM
Ragnar- one of the few newbies not on my ignore list  Cheesy

Careful.  He (Ragnar/Fallling) is garnering your trust.  Once your defenses are down, he'll betray you in a dramatic true-believer-realizing-he's-been-duped about-face.

Treacherous, these trolls Angry

I'd much prefer that to bitcoin_is_a_mirages approach, which is just plain boring.


I don't know, i chuckled reading about Warren Buffer.

3347  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 11, 2014, 09:18:10 PM
NSA has back door installed on all iPhone, and maybe android and Windows computers. even paper wallet is dangerous, because NSA can place back door in network connected printer!

do not trust your bitcoins ANYWHERE. do not be tempted to buy into any false recovery, keep your money in cash or at a bank so that it is safe!

So don't print them! In the words of Shroomskit,"welcome to ignore"

I placed you on ignore already, I don't having time for bitcoin bulls. how does it feel to reach $460 again? give up your false hope for a recovery!

If you had him on ignore falllling it would say this user is currently ignored and not let you reply. Keep up old chap.
3348  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 11, 2014, 07:56:02 PM
Work with me, Dump3er!   We'll try to get there together...

You mean I should help you to establish your ShroomsKit scheme and see normal market behaviours as fanciful conspiracies of whale bear manipulators?




Goat was an annoying troll before establishing himself as a whale.

bitcointalk works like that.


I'm hoping that with the amount of bitcoin I own, I will become a whale in say 3+ years.  That will be fun, I'll start trading thousands of bits and trolling.   Cheesy

Whales trading bits..sounds good Smiley
3349  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: September 11, 2014, 07:53:58 PM
here's the BOE analysis that's already been put up earlier:

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarterlybulletin/2014/qb14q3digitalcurrenciesbitcoin1.pdf

the only reason i repeat it here is b/c of the last footnote in the Annex of Technical issues where the author mentions the Nash Equilibrium for mining.  he must have picked that up from me in this thread as i was the first to identify that concept afaik. 

he, and the BOE, are here.

Hi Mark!?
3350  Economy / Speculation / Re: Balls of steel on: September 11, 2014, 06:56:09 PM
...
I take your example to mean that the bitcoin price is a product of consumer/speculator demand. But that also consumer/speculator demand is also a product of the price? Unlike the baker scenario.. And that falling bitcoin prices may in fact reduce demand for bitcoins?

In the same sense as special relativity suggests that light is fast, yeah.

Alright Einstein!
3351  Economy / Speculation / Re: Balls of steel on: September 11, 2014, 06:29:38 PM
I try to be as clear as possible on the first pass.  What, specifically, would you like to have clarified?

I take your example to mean that the bitcoin price is a product of consumer/speculator demand. But that also consumer/speculator demand is also a product of the price? Unlike the baker scenario.. And that falling bitcoin prices may in fact reduce demand for bitcoins?
3352  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 11, 2014, 06:17:34 PM
panic sellers? where are they?

Those with coins to sell hoping to buy back in lower (the bears on here Derpinheimer, dump3r etc..) have already sold.

Who is going to panic dropping 8 dollars on bitstamp anymore? Dumping 1000 coins like that isn't a way to get the best price from a sale, it is a way manipulating the price suddenly downwards to induce further selling. Looks like it hasn't worked so far.
3353  Economy / Speculation / Re: Balls of steel on: September 11, 2014, 06:02:03 PM
... There is no consumer or speculator, they are one and the same. ...

Wait, did you miss this?  If you disagree with something, feel free to point it out.  Simply saying "there is no difference" is no better than saying NO U!1!

... I am curious. Are you saying you don't think consumer demand is sufficient to drive bitcoin (price) longterm? Why?

Yes, if we start with the following premises:
  A.  The current exchange rate is the product of consumer demand, and not speculation.  By "consumers" I mean the people using Bitcoin as money, not to speculate on its long-term worth.
  B.  The demand will continue to increase.

I'm saying neither (A) nor (B) are necessarily true, (A) partially due to supply/demand being kinda misused in the case of Bitcoin.
Think about it like this:

1.  A baker bakes cakes.
2.  You like delicious cakes, they're delicious.
3.  There are others who like delicious cakes.
4.  The baker keeps raising his cake price until, when he closes up for the night, he has no leftover cakes, but just barely.*

Classic supply/demand relationship, right?

Here's the good part:  (2) above could be seen as a constant.  The cake is just as delicious (and desirable) regardless of what the baker charges.  If the baker doubles his price, you are not going to want the cake twice as much, right?  

Not so with Bitcoin.
To a speculator, 1 BTC is twice as valuable when its exchange rate doubles.  That's why it's important that most Bitcoin holders are speculators and not typical consumers like cake_eaters.
See my point?

TL;DR:  Bitcoin is not goods.  It has neither intrinsic value nor is it subject to the classic supply/demand interpretations.

...
*assuming that selling out every day = max profit, not necessarily true if there are cake addicts, let's say, who'll pay anything for their pastry fix.  But that's a tangent.
edits...

Explain your point more clearly please Smiley
3354  Economy / Speculation / Re: Balls of steel on: September 11, 2014, 05:42:48 PM
...
It's not *that* simple, "Speculators" implies some fraction who are in it for short term fiat profits.

As the price of bitcoin rises there is a corresponding increase in the likelihood of a speculator deciding to sell.

It's not simple, but speculators don't need to be daytraders.  Many hodlers on this forum, the ones speculating on exchange rate going to the moon, are hoarding and holding.  They contribute to the "scarcity," but not in the same way a consumer would.

And even day traders, for the time they're in bitcoin, aren't essentially different from long-term holders.  The only difference is the timespan.
The speculators who are in it for Bitcoin, not fiat profit, simply buy BTC low and sell high, thus amassing more coin.  The unit of account is whatever you chose.

I disagree. Bitcoin is already becoming an extremely useful currency through utility. But the main strengths of bitcoin are its monetary properties and scarcity. People who buy and hold it do so knowing this. There is no consumer or speculator, they are one and the same. It is a happy side effect that the first 50 million people into the the bitcoin sphere will likely make significant gains on there initial investment. Whilst adoption continues the price must rise until like your baker there is an equilibrium where all the users of bitcoin are already using it, it has become distributed and the exchange price is stable. Bitcoin has no intrinsic value but is going to work exceptionally well as a future store of value with bouts of likely extreme volatility.
3355  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 11, 2014, 04:28:53 PM

It can and will change in a heartbeat. We have had all the positive news we could have begged for, so now we wait for the market to mature while adoption fills out. The good times are returning, you can feel it in the air mon.

True, we had very positive news and yet price didn't react which is very bearish and confirms we are still in a long downtrend. Good news only slowed the rate of falling, that's why I think we won't see any significant rally for quite a while. The most optimistic must sell and abandon their hopes before we can go to new highs.

So you can buy in? Smiley

Well, yes.

Timing the market always seems so easy looking at the past. Bit harder in realtime Smiley
3356  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: September 11, 2014, 04:16:06 PM

It can and will change in a heartbeat. We have had all the positive news we could have begged for, so now we wait for the market to mature while adoption fills out. The good times are returning, you can feel it in the air mon.

True, we had very positive news and yet price didn't react which is very bearish and confirms we are still in a long downtrend. Good news only slowed the rate of falling, that's why I think we won't see any significant rally for quite a while. The most optimistic must sell and abandon their hopes before we can go to new highs.

So you can buy in? Smiley
3357  Economy / Speculation / Re: Are we reaching a tipping point? on: September 11, 2014, 04:00:36 PM
Quote in the conclusion:

"If a subset of people transacted exclusively in a digital currency, then the Bank’s ability to influence demand for this group may potentially be impaired."

Ummmm.....

It is clear the central banks have been watching development of bitcoin very closely. At some point they will probably start to interfere with the price.


How would they do that?

They could buy off exchange and dump on exchange to depress the price. They could time large sells to floor the price when it starts to gain positive momentum. Whether they could exert long term damage to the market this way is unknown but they could increase volatility dramatically if they wanted which might potentially impact consumer adoption rates.

It is now well documented they have for a long time intervened in the gold market. Recently it has become publicised they have direct access to commodity and stock exchanges, too. So it isn't much of a stretch.

An alternative view is that see the bigger picture and actually buy up a % of bitcoin to add to their reserves.

Of course they may sit back and watch bitcoin instead. Perhaps moving to strangle it through legislation. Or nothing Smiley

yep, you just about covered all the bases.  Wink

seriously though, you'd think it'd be extremely risky given the strict AML/KYC measures exchanges have been forced to apply.  sure they could use a proxy but still.  having said that, the ask wall manipulators we're seeing right now could be them. Shocked

Thanks.

I try not to think about it too much. But to discount it entirely would be naive!
3358  Economy / Speculation / Re: Balls of steel on: September 11, 2014, 03:54:19 PM
...
There may be no direct causal relationship. But a hugely rising (or falling) number of users transacting in bitcoin will obviously exert pressure on the exchange price. Smiley
...

I'm bearish, but I'm also not shorting.  I honestly haven't been able to read BTC market like I once could.  So if forced to TL;DR, I'd say:

The bulk of BTC users are speculators. 
BTC exchange rate is ultimately determined by their sentiment and trading strategies.<==seems self-evident to me
Over the last year, bigger, tougher, smarter kids started playing in our sandbox.
I can't compete--trading I do now amounts to little more than gambling.

Something like that.

Do you mind me asking if you are holding bitcoin or sat on the sidelines in cash?

Not at all, but how would you interpret the answer considering that speculation is a competitive, not cooperative, game? Cheesy (But it's "both," as I'm sure is the case with most people here.)
I hold less BTC than I once did, take that for what it's worth (zilch).

Quote
Interesting that you feel the market movements have changed in some way due to new participants, especially as volatility has reduced?

You would expect the volatility to increase?  Why?  It takes a much smarter trader to make money in a market with low volatility.

Quote
I suppose the price is ultimately determined by supply and demand. That is supply from miners, genuine sellers and speculators, versus demand from new and veteran consumer buying. The shifts in balance determine the short term price trends. In such a thinly traded market my view is also that currently sentiment is hugely important as speculation probably has a major role in price discovery*.

The problem is the supply/demand relationship is biconditional, A <-> B.  Bitcoin has little intrinsic value.  The value of 1 BTC would be close to nothing if there was no user base, no Bitcoin network.  The network effect cuts both ways--a telephone set's value grows when more people get phones, but it drops when fewer people have them.
Agreed?

Quote
That said, overall mining supply and consumer demand should drive the price in the longer term which is evident in charts going back several years. Will it continue? I think so.

If I thought so too, and was reasonably sure of it, holding BTC long-term would be a no-brainer.  It's obviously not (for me).

Quote
I am not bothered particularly by short term volatility in the price otherwise I would have sold long ago (and been considerably better off from my bitcoin holdings). The very fact that silicon valley is rapidly integrating bitcoin into everything for what is really a tiny global userbase tells me big business wants bitcoin to succeed.

Big business sees potential profits in Bitcoin.  This doesn't translate into "big business wants Bitcoin to succeed" (for me).

Quote
* i am very busy with my day job but i have for a long time wanted to create a script to scrape the this forum and perform some sentiment analysis to generate some statistics to compare with the exchange rate and google trends etc.

Would be neat, any specific ideas on what sort of data you'll be looking for?  I wouldn't know where to start.

Thanks for the replies. I am curious. Are you saying you don't think consumer demand is sufficient to drive bitcoin (price) longterm? Why? For me this is still a no-brainer. If only 1 million people are actively using it then even if the project fails to go mainstream it likely will run further than this. It seems to me that infrastucture is only now beginning to blossom and develop. More on and off ramps are appearing all the time which will facilitate adoption potentially.

I am not sure of there being any real distinction between big business seeing potential profits by adopting bitcoin and big business supporting bitcoin and wanting it to succeed. Bitcoin is cheaper per transaction than a credit card, whilst delivering the actual payment within minutes. Isn't it obvious that a company will implement anything that will significantly reduce transaction costs and increase profits? What is amazing is that major companies such as dell, expedia, newegg etc have implemented bitcoin when the userbase is so incredibly tiny - really a speck on their balance sheets. That makes me think that big business actually wants bitcoin to succeed - i could be wrong.

Yes the construction of a sentiment index is a fun concept. Don't have much time to go into it further now but would probably have to be a scraping spider which analysed the threads on the front page and posts within the forum. I know someone who designed a similar tool for another market and sold it to a hedge fund so several probably exist for this forum already. Another poster speculated that could be the reason for the endless trolling accounts on here.
3359  Economy / Speculation / Re: Are we reaching a tipping point? on: September 11, 2014, 03:24:15 PM
Quote in the conclusion:

"If a subset of people transacted exclusively in a digital currency, then the Bank’s ability to influence demand for this group may potentially be impaired."

Ummmm.....

It is clear the central banks have been watching development of bitcoin very closely. At some point they will probably start to interfere with the price.


How would they do that?

They could buy off exchange and dump on exchange to depress the price. They could time large sells to floor the price when it starts to gain positive momentum. Whether they could exert long term damage to the market this way is unknown but they could increase volatility dramatically if they wanted which might potentially impact consumer adoption rates.

It is now well documented they have for a long time intervened in the gold market. Recently it has become publicised they have direct access to commodity and stock exchanges, too. So it isn't much of a stretch.

An alternative view is that see the bigger picture and actually buy up a % of bitcoin to add to their reserves.

Of course they may sit back and watch bitcoin instead. Perhaps moving to strangle it through legislation. Or nothing Smiley
3360  Economy / Speculation / Re: Are we reaching a tipping point? on: September 11, 2014, 02:47:50 PM
Quote in the conclusion:

"If a subset of people transacted exclusively in a digital currency, then the Bank’s ability to influence demand for this group may potentially be impaired."

Ummmm.....

It is clear the central banks have been watching development of bitcoin very closely. At some point they will probably start to interfere with the price.
Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!