To start, I suggest you stake your Bitcoin address on the thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0
If anything goes wrong with your account, signing the address will help you in case you have to prove ownership of the account.
If you ever see abuse like the one you mentioned, write here and expose what happened. For the red tag, you need to worry if it comes from DT members, and most reputed members try not to give an inappropriate red tag.

They ^BestChange monitoring around 238 different exchangers. I believe that each of them makes a lot of changes on a daily basis and monitoring dirty BTCs would be a very complicated job here. I'm not sure there's any automated possibility for that.

1) Real Madrid
2)  Over
3)  Over
4)  Over 
5)  Yes
6)  Equal

7)   No
8)  No

9)  No
10)  No

11)  Yes
12)  Yes

13)  No
14)  Yes

15)  12'

here is part of my review

not to repeat previous discussions, I have seen that most of the shortcomings have already been identified.

My first impression, of the visual part of the service, is quite satisfactory. I am a supporter of minimal design, and everything is clear and simple as it should be for such a service. it was clear to me at every moment what part of the process I was in, without superfluous site searches and potentially ambiguous options.

whether there has already been a discussion, why is a guarantee letter in json file?

I don't like the way the fee is charged, only, in the end, do we see only the percentage of how much will be deducted. it seems rather non-transparent. For example, I would like to send exactly 0.5BTC, not reduced by some percentage. so I want to have the option to send 0.5 + 1% up to 3% for the fee. Output address can receive a guaranteed amount.

I checked the IP address where the domain is located. By traceroute, it's 190.115.18.168. There I find potential problems something that should not be on a money receiving site. When I try to open this IP address in the browser (tested in Firefox, Chrome, Brave, and Opera) they warn me of a dangerous and unsecured page


when I ignore this message and still continue, the [banned mixer] page opens neatly (with a "dangerous" warning in the address bar)
I tested IP 190.115.18.168 in some DNS checker tools, and I didn't find her listed anywhere on the blacklists. I would say that the problem did not come with the hosting service.

---

I made a mistake when sending BTC to the mixer, my Trezor set the default fee rate of 2 sat/B, now I have to wait for my stuck transaction. I will finish this when everything is completed.

When you say "thread of other languages", you sound like you want to translate from many different languages, even the ones you don't understand well. I hope that's not your idea, if it is, gives it up right away. for such a thing you would probably have to use google translate or something like that and that's not a good idea. in the end, we all already know about that possibility, so such an effort would be almost in vain.

I agree with Pmalek, it's probably not too much of a problem to translate into your native language, and it doesn't matter if someone is a newbie here. just make sure you always leave feedback to the original post.

OP is updated, added new 35 scammers on the list. Unfortunately, this list has the potential to expand much further
Stay smart and keep your money safe.  Wink

here is the update log:

You said you had proof you weren't a scammer, there is no need to go into private discussion. Post it here, so everyone can be convinced of your words.
note: that you own a Binance account is no proof that you are not a scammer.


you say that now, while you are still looking for a buyer. what will happen in two or three months, and you become unavailable?
Of course, a big amount is no problem for you, it's not your money.

Nations League doesn’t seem particularly attractive to me. many will not play in the best lineup, the best players are pretty tired after the season it will be very difficult to predict. (My opinion)
The world cup is something different, I'm already interested in that +1


I am going to send you my address, if I understood correctly, the 10th place where I am still belongs to the circle of winners 

I agree with you here, even though you may have wanted to say this politically correct. I would say that the biggest blame here comes from bounty managers. They try to have as many participants as possible, but the quality is completely neglected. even ignoring the negative feedback on the profiles.
somewhere in the past (at the time of ICO), there were some mass campaigns that brought in good money and based on that, all managers took over the template. the same thing has been driving for five years, just different names for "projects".

so the question is if you are one of the top groups and start a business, would run a bounty program like these currently running?

Can you share your proof that you aren't a scammer? I think this is necessary if you want to end a trade like this.


But you can't change KYC verification documents, right? Plus it is very likely that Binance will require additional verification when withdrawing a larger amount of money.

I would say that users like the OP are the reason why casinos (Bitsler in this case) reduce bonuses. they are obviously right because with the reduction of bonuses or even without any rewards, such users leave the casino (sometimes with so much hate like in this topic)

their model of fraud is constantly based on the same approach. when presenting every new garbage from their kitchen, they use the most popular phrases to attract naive people. Fork, swap, stake, dollar etc...
I remember their airdrop where they promised a free 700 dollars, it was actually some worthless garbage they called a dollar.
I'm still surprised how they still survive, who pays them money after all and why they are still not sanctioned by the authorities.

initially, they started as a faucet site. then it might have made sense to say that they are miners and share free coins, it made it easier for beginners to accept this business model. earnings were supposed to come from web traffic and advertising.
overtime they implemented some casino games, in order for users to spend free coins earned with them. I would say they are more of a casino now than a faucet and it is certain that many users make a deposit there. I guess it's clear to everyone how the casino works.

"new kyc" mi zvuci kao da je potrebno ponovo da prodjes kroz verifikaciju. Moze da se desi ako ti je u medjuvremenu istekla vaznost dokumenta s kojim si ranije verifikovao nalog.
Moguce da su i oni poput nekih zabranili transakcije sa gambling sajtovima, pa je to razlog blokiranja. Bar se meni to cini jedinim logicnim.
Poslaji im druge adrese i povuci sredstva odatle. Bar danas postoji gomila slicnih servisa, ne moras da zavisis od njih.


Stranica koja poptuno identicno izgleda poput one koju ti zelis da posetis. A sluzi samo da se pokupe tvoji podaci za logovanje. Cesto domen vrlo slicno zvuci, zameni se samo jedan karakter (npr umesto l ubaci se veliko slovo I).

it could be concluded that you go to gambling sites only for bonuses and free prizes, I would say it is completely wrong. You attack them because they have reduced potential rewards and that is really just their goodwill, they can function without breaking any rules. it is not their obligation to give many rewards. You mess something there.
as much as I use gambling sites myself, Bitsler is one which offers the most opportunities to win free prizes and I have won enough myself.

OP will probably not read the further discussion here, it was not his primary goal to initiate a constructive discussion. just a simple promotion of his service on the .cc domain. Because of such meaningless and inflated texts, we have many naive people who want a part of juicy yields.
Because of many naive and greedy people, we have an expansion of duplicate idealess cryptocurrencies (if we may call them so) and a vicious circle is created.

Green trust is important but not the only measure of whether a manager is running a good campaign.


here are a lot of threads about scammers from 1xbit, you don't seem inexperienced but you still wear their signature. They steal money from their users and pay you to promote them here. You didn't do any research on that or what?

OP, what kind of BM power you are talking about here?
Any bounty manager was only hired by the owner of the project and campaign, while every hunter is not obliged to participate in a campaign managed by specified BM. Just ignore them.
I also don't see what is not legitimate here, if the campaign is closed due to the low response of quality participants. I would say that it is closely related to the quality of campaign management with the quality of participants (ignoring it may yield results).

I would say both teams (Liverpool and City) were nervous. the whole season came in those two games, under normal circumstances, they would get it without much trouble. I as neutral in this case, enjoyed it to the fullest.

About our Sportsbet pool, congratulations to the winners (it seems that I am among them as the 10th  ), especially congrats to the top winner casperBGD, I'm really glad you're the best this season.
I guess there will be no spectacular changes here after the final recalculation by Superbru.

Without competitive importance in terms of points, I am not sure whether Wimbledon in 2022 will be accepted as a regular GS, seems more like a revue tournament.
I don't see a reason why top players would bother about a tournament that has no weight, maybe it would really be best if all the players give up participating in it. In the end, politics and sport should never get mixed up together.