I am not near my bitcoin-qt client, but I see the refund amount for one of my machines hitting one of my addresses in the blockchain.
Was the amount the same quantity of btc that you paid with?
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggest Syke - we'll look into USPS for International. I was considering DHL Global
DHL Global is really good, but it'll cost ya.
|
|
|
Hi Dave, Are you using USPS for shipping?
Its not determined yet. I tend not to use USPS in favor of UPS/FedEx. We are working on getting a good price for standard shipping (which is free), but also an affordable option for people to upgrade to expedited. I expect about 90% of orders will want to get it in a day or two - every extra day mining will easily justify that cost. My suggestion: UPS for US deliveries. USPS for International deliveries.
|
|
|
K1's? You cannot "get then [sic]". You can only pre-order them to be delivered at a much later date. Tell me. What is your guaranteed delivery date?
3 weeks In those 3 weeks BE's will mine about .2 BTC which makes their effective cost .69 BTC. Way cheaper than yours.
|
|
|
You can get then for 0.8374 BTC ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) K1's? You cannot "get then [sic]". You can only pre-order them to be delivered at a much later date. Tell me. What is your guaranteed delivery date?
|
|
|
Nice try deleting my comment in your propoganda sales thread. Here it is again so everyone gets a chance to read it without your censorship. Price: BTC0.99 1-9 10 or more BTC0.89 50 or more BTC0.79
Also no it is not the highest price we could have chosen. We are trying to price these to compete with asicminer
What a shame. BE's are available today. K1's aren't. You aren't competitive. Drop your prices by at least 30% because by the time you actual have a product to ship that's what they'll be worth.
|
|
|
Josh didn't commit Seppuku when BFL failed to deliver before April 2013. BFL didn't donate to charity when they failed their 1GHash/Watt promise.
I also don't like what they are doing communication and delivery wise. However, they have founded the Bitcoin Development Fund and have filled the Fund with initial 1000 BTC. http://www.bitcoindf.org/This "Bitcoin Development Fund" isn't a charity.
|
|
|
Kslaughter grow some balls and quit deleting posts, answer for your business instead of censoring negative press because you can't produce an actual evidence of what you claim.
Mods, move this thread to Off-topic, or maybe Scam Accusations. A self-moderated thread from a questionable source does not belong here. It gives the false impression that there are no red flags when in reality the thread creator is deleting posts.
|
|
|
Hashrate of a single chip is largely irrelevant. A board with 1 large chip or a board with 10 small chips are not significantly different.
Delivery dates, cost, and power consumption are the key factors.
|
|
|
If it would make 20 btc a day and the btc value in $ would have dropped to $0.20, you would still have a party I guess? Fact is my jalapeno paid back the $ spent on it in 10 days.
Yes, that's right! When you get more btc than you spent, you've made a profitable investment. When you get less btc, you've lost.
|
|
|
A 60GH single delivered today makes $3,410 a month, Syke and facts, bleh
Mining hardware generates bitcoins. Not dollars. So it only makes sense to calculate ROI based on bitcoins. Bitcoins spent vs. bitcoins generated. Anything else is just to soothe your losses.
|
|
|
If for example you got your 60gh single upgrade right now... ROI in under a week.
Singles cost 200 btc back then and now generate 1 btc per day. ROI is already at 6 months assuming no difficulty increases. But as we all know, there's lots of increases on the way. A single delivered now will never break even.
|
|
|
Then there are KNC ane BitFury. Both of them claim to be cheaper than the others, as well as quite a bit more power efficient. Both have some pretty convincing evidence in their favor, but neither have shown any direct evidence of actual hardware (pics, videos, etc).
KNC does not have actual chips yet. Bitfury has confirmed working chips and boards: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYyrNhLwrn0. Shipments due next month.
|
|
|
It's not the pool connection. Something happens and all work ends up "discarded" until cgminer is restarted. What would cause that?
|
|
|
You guys try so hard and fail at every attempt. Does it suck to be such failure, or is it just "normal" for you and you don't know any other method of operation? Do you lurch from one failure to another, wondering why the world is out to get you? I've always wondered what it's like to be bad at everything you do, unable to succeed at anything. It's actually pretty funny, keep it up!
Speaking of failure, let's take a look at Jody's blog. Wednesday, July 10, 2013 Shipping Update No Little Singles Shipped
Thursday, July 11, 2013 Shipping Update We shipped no Little Singles today.
Friday, July 12, 2013 Shipping Update We shipped no Little Singles today.
|
|
|
I can watch MHS5s slowly drop to 0, and eventually cgminer-monitor will restart cgminer. Why is cgminer stopping hashing?
Common reasons: Wifi kernel problem Overdoing the overclocking Pool failure and the cgminer-monitor watchdog is trigger happy and kills cgminer when all it's doing is waiting for a pool to come back online. FPGA failure in the avalon. For maximum stability while I'm away, I limited my batch 2 overclock to 333 and it's been up for a week. At 350 it would restart cgminer every 12 hours and eventually after a few days would restart the entire router. * wifi is already disabled. * running at a moderate 300 mhz * other miners are connected to the pool just fine I don't see how restarting cgminer would fix a FPGA failure. So from that list of possibilities, pool issue seems most likely. I'll set a backup pool and see if it switches to that.
|
|
|
I can watch MHS5s slowly drop to 0, and eventually cgminer-monitor will restart cgminer. Why is cgminer stopping hashing?
|
|
|
how about the cgminer API log?
The API log in the web interface just shows the current state of the system. Is there an actual log file somewhere else?
|
|
|
|