Macau is the only place I have experience with, Vegas remains to be a dream. But of course, online gambling experience is what I'm focusing currently and I'm having fun exploring other platforms and check what they have in store for me. As for my Macau experience, it is somewhat a normal one since most of what they offer there, I get in the Philippines—at least what I experienced. Meals that they offer are good, the casino proper is not that crowded, and there is a semblance of elegance everywhere. Also, lots of gambling houses can be seen in just a single street, kind of what they have in Vegas IMO.

That is extremely rude, and the mother should be held legally liable on whatever happens on her son. Most probably the 4-year old son would be put to use in some kind of labor or whatever that the owner of the casino deem fit. The mother is so far into gambling that she consciously made the decision to leave and use her son as a collateral, and that is already a tell-tale sign that the mother has something going on with her mind. On the part of the gambling platform however, they should also be fined for accepting the kid for collateral because that can also be considered as human trafficking.

And now I want to try that game too As someone who grew up in the era of Atari, this is something that reminds me of Space Invaders with just some cool graphics in this day and age. If you happen to got the link then let me know. However though, how do you 'win' on these types of games? Do you have to clear the board like the mechanics of the game I mentioned, or is there any other mechanics that I need to know? Because frankly if clearing the board is the only mechanic to win, I assume that the prizes would be low because doing that is ridiculously easy.

Yes.

One can easily do a search and compare wordings on different whitepapers. Most of the time, whitepapers from new projects are just rehashed version of other whitepapers from other projects. They just change the words and technical terms but the style is mostly consistent all throughout the document. If the team can't create their own whitepaper outlining their project in every detail, I guess that should be an indicator for you to not invest your money on this project at all.

Question now is if Entity can carry that momentum forward once they step in on the TI stage. They are one hell of a team and they can surely carry their own against big teams out there, but there are still strong teams qualified and it's a herculean task for them to win against all odds. Could be another cinderella story but LGD is the heavy favorites, just because of how badly they want Ame to win his TI.

The thing is, it's not easy to invest in these entities unless you have millions to use as a capital for investment. They'd probably focus more on the big fishes to keep on funding their platform rather than small timers like us to give them a steady stream of funding. While on paper, with these numbers included, it is a no-brainer to invest on these platforms, in practice (especially crypto gambling platforms) your investment can only last for a few months before it gets used up by the casino as a payout for their winners.

I'd probably just follow the law and just find another hobby. It's way easier to give it up and do my normal thing and wait for other people more dedicated than me to make a move rather than throw myself in front of the deluge and get myself imprisoned. I only gamble to kill time and enjoy a bit but I can definitely live without it. I just haven't found the time to allocate on some other things other than gambling on Saturdays. The government can enforce this immediately, and I wouldn't care that much if all gambling websites will be blocked.

At the end of the day, parents are hugely responsible for what their kids have become since they should be the ones checking on them while they are growing up. In the case of what OP shared, I guess the parent should be at fault since they should have guided their son to not let those things happen. They are still legally responsible for their son too, so I think Jordan should take the responsibility for his son's actions, especially the underage drinking part. Michael's lifestyle reflects what his son did, and there is obviously something wrong with that. Just because you're rich doesn't mean you can do everything and anything especially if it breaches some laws, but oh well.

Pretty sure they are already crafting the actions that they're going to do against Binance. CZ could have made the obvious decision to pull out LUNA and other such related coins to Do Kwon but he never did even though they are aware of the current situation. Binance should have set an example for other exchanges but they perhaps they have other things in mind. Maybe they are with Do Kwon, or maybe they themselves are holders of LUNA. Whatever the case is, Binance should be cooperative to the law enforcement but that's not what's happening here.

Gacha is a category of game, and is not a game in itself. It means that you are playing on a game.of luck when you want to get the characters and items that you really want that will help you progress with the game faster and more efficiently. Usually these games are money sinks and aren't really worth playing in the long run if you care about your finances and your savings. Used to play a gacha game that made me spend over a few thousand dollars and I'm glad that I got over it.

Hopefully it's just as easy as you say it, but the judgment will linger longer than you can think of. I work in an environment closely to the academe and I have mentors and mentees who look up to me in a way. When they first found out about my gambling habits, they tend to distance themselves initially and limited their interaction with me when it comes to money matters. It's a long and tiring process to convince them that you're not who they think you are, but eventually they understood and slowly took that judgment off me but some of it still shows on their subtle jokes. I never had a problem with chasing losses nor using more money than I can afford on gambling but most of the time people are just too quick to jump on the gun.

I thought they remove this feature some time ago? Or is it just for us here in Asia?

But yeah, aside from Bybit, localcryptos like others mentioned is one thing that I remember that can help you trade P2P with no KYC. It's unfortunate that all these P2P exchange are slowly dying out in the era of CEX domination. KYC is also slowly creeping in on a lot of exchanges that were previously not affected by KYC. We know that this time will come but it's still quite saddening.

I picked Furia too because they've been killing it lately and they would surely be a huge contender against Outsiders. Also wanted to give KScerato a chance again since he let me down a number of times when I used to bet on Furia. Dude's a strong player but highly inconsistent, and oftentimes is being carried by teammates to a win but I still want him to step up and 'feel' like he makes up for the losses he had given me Also Outsider's last match might have gotten into them, but still they are quite the favorite in this match up for some reason.

The reason why a lot of people are against gambling because they only see the extreme negatives but not those who use it as an escape or as a means to enjoy without damaging their lives. If people can only learn how to check all sides and cover all bases before judging, this wouldn't happen. The gambling industry is responsible for creating tons of job opportunities all around the world, but people are only zooming in on the problematic gamblers and I think that has to change somewhat.

I wasn't surprised at all. Most of the GPU sales in the past few years were motivated by crypto mining, mostly for ETH. Finally it alleviated the pressure on GPU manufacturers and finally other sectors can already enjoy buying GPUs at lower prices. The ETH merge may have been extremely shaky, but it sure does benefit some other sectors even though there are still frsgments of PoW believers that are still clinging to their GPUs to mine their forked coins.

I expect a flood of used GPUs in the market in the next month. Those miners can try to use it on other coins but for sure they'd just use the proceeds to buy more coins for staking ETH.

Primedice and freebitco.in.

These two are still going strong after all these years, and have built a very active community and a huge playerbase with lots of loyal patrons. Even I remember the transition of freebitco.in from a dedicated btc faucet up until its transition to a casino. They just focused on their brand and just did what they do best, and people supported them for that. Community relations also go a long way. During Primedice and freebitco.in early days, a lot of their reps are active and can easily be approached.

I personally wouldn't care at all. It would even be better for me to let them know about the nature of my hobby and let them understand that if done properly, it won''t affect anything regarding my finances and life. Sometimes people need education in order to understand the things that they don't know about. It's a lot easier to do that rather than be judged based on what they do. It might even promote updstanding citizens if they checked all sides of the before before casting their judgment on someone.

BCH and other bitcoin forks used to be this way, and in the end the community decided that their money is better invested on the main network instead of a fork that has a lot of issues in the community and implementations as well. ETHW's principle is kinda noble, considering that a lot of people supported this fork and maintained it until the end. Just another community divide I guess, that a lot of people are cashing in.

What do you mean exactly with this? If Stake, as a separate entity, goes live on Twitch that is okay? Stake is a gambling entity, and it's not safe from Twitch's ban since they are a gambling platform.


For now there aren't any alternatives. Twitch is the best out of there as of now and there's no changing that any time soon. Dlive is a good platform but very few viewers at a time, although I think Drake can pull a lot of viewers since a lot of huge Twitch names in the past managed to pull viewers from Twitch to other live streaming platform (Mixer) in the past with enough hype and advertisement of the switch.

I'd bet on Jake just because he's the one who initiated this fight and for his previous bouts against MMA legends, he won those with questionable performances from his enemies. Might be the same outcome in here if Silva is motivated only by money, which somewhat shows on some interviews that were done to him. +100 isn't also a bad odd to bet on considering that Jake Paul is also a capable boxer in his own regard. If skills and grit I'd say Silva, but again this is a Paul initiated fight and that should suggest you something.