Also, OP still links to:

  CLAMs v. 1.4.10 TEST-Build

and

  CLAMs v. 1.4.7 STABLE

It's going to be impossible for people to guess which of 1.4.7 (stable), 1.4.10 (test), or 1.4.11 (unlabelled) to download.

Nice.

Which commit was this built from? We should move the release tag, since it's almost certainly currently in the wrong place.

If there really is a tendency for HLHLH, HHHHH, and LLLLL to come up more often than they should, you should be able to use that information to beat the house.

Simply bet small amounts until you see HLHL, HHHH, or LLLL, and then bet a larger amount on your next bet, since you "know" what is most likely to happen next.


Or, in other words "put your money where your mouth is".

I don't have sex for money and so the rest of your post doesn't follow. I've also never bought nor sold an account and never expect to do so. I've never even received any offers to buy this account, believe it or not.

Also, troll harder.

Is there really any need to change your password to secure your account? The chance of an attacker finding a password that hashes to the same 256 bit result as my password does is effectively zero. They're more likely to brute-force a private key that spends my Bitcoins (2^256 is much bigger than 2^160) than to brute force my forum password.

Edit: it was hard finding a post where I mentioned a Bitcoin address I own, but here's one:

That seems a little rude. How does advertising JD make me a whore?

The y-axis shows his profit. It started at zero, went up to 3k, then down to -2.5k. The final loss was a loss of 5.5k, 3k of which was pre-existing profit, and 2.5k of which wasn't.

This just in:



I looked at the bet log, and it's weird:


It looks like two bots running at the same time on the same account - one running martingale, and one flat-betting?

I have another exhibit:



I put it to you that no, martingale doesn't really works.

Something like that. I think he changed the threshold a little over time.

I think it happened shortly after Tiger busted:

http://blocktree.io/address/CLAM/xRnRi9Be3YDJBwaWNBL8YygiF9RNfT662m

Yes, he knew the risks. He said he was betting that he would reach 10k profit before finding a streak longer than 160. I guess he had set his starting bet such that he could afford to cover a losing streak that long.

TigerTatas finally hit a losing streak.

See the legendary Does martingale really works? thread for a chart etc.

His loss sent the site profit to a new all-time high, breaking us out of a 3 week lull:



Cyyy screenshotted the tail end of his losing streak:



The question now is whether he will write the loss off, or continue trying to find the end of the streak.

Over the last 2 or 3 weeks we had a guy at Just-Dice running 40 bots, all betting dust at 9% chance of winning, looking for long losing streaks. When a bit bot hit a streak of 100 or so losses in a row, it would stop and alert the guy, who would then take over and bet at 9% manually, increasing the stake by about 10% each roll.

It worked very well for 22.5 million rolls, and then this happened:



Yet another great example of how martingale works great until it doesn't!

Here's the losing streak - 163 losses in a row at 9%:

Maybe he's waiting for a suggestion he likes.

Like:

  gonein120hours.com

  flashiloveyoubutweonlyhave5daystosavemyinvestment.com

  ponziagainsttheclock.com

Pretty catchy, eh?

Doesn't that just add another choice for people? I don't get it.

I'm not overly familiar with how these things work. Do you put one of your private keys under the security sticker? Is that safe?

I guess buyers would have to trust you with their savings if they intend to fund the coins.

Deb contributed a bunch of trivia questions too. I know, because earlier when I was playing it asked me a question I had no idea about, and said "question written by Deb" at the bottom. lol. I got it wrong.

What more information do you want?

They tell you that you have a 49.5% chance of doubling your money. That should be enough for you to see that that's a 50.5% chance of you losing... Since 49.5% is smaller than 50.5%, you're more likely to lose than to win. Only a little more likely, but more likely.

That's why the dice sites usually win in the end, because of that small difference.

HYIP programs on the other hand almost always tell you that your profit is guaranteed, when in fact it isn't at all, and your expected profit is negative.

There are trivial questions that pop up when you win, and your win involved your house banner. Some of them ask about the sayings. I think one of the questions is "what is the (saying) for the house of Stark"... if you get it right, you win more than if you get it wrong, but if you get it wrong you still win something.

I just bet 1000, hit two triples in a row, including one set of my own house banners. I got the question right, and so won 4500, for a profit of 3500. My win didn't show up in the chat, although a couple of my smaller wins did.

You should link it:

  House of Chance

Some people won't be willing to click up to the first post to find the URL.